Celiac DiseaseNCT02834429
Pre-endoscopy Serological Testing for Coeliac Disease; a Novel Approach Using Rapid Antibody Testing
An observational study of Celiac Disease, run by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to assess the clinical utility of the whole blood transglutaminase-based rapid test against current serological tests and the gold standard of duodenal biopsy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Celiac Disease
- How many people
- 1,596 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to Oct 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Endoscopy patients at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital Sheffield
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 18 years or more undergoing clinically indicated gastroscopy with biopsy and coeliac serology testing
Who cannot join
- Patients with coagulopathy (INR > 1.3 Platelets < 80)
- Active gastrointestinal bleeding identified at endoscopy
- suspected carcinoma identified at gastroscopy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Department of Gastroenterology
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF
About this study
Official title: Pre-endoscopy Serological Testing for Coeliac Disease - a Novel Approach Using Rapid Antibody Testing.
The aim of this study is to assess the clinical utility of the whole blood transglutaminase-based rapid test against current serological tests and the gold standard of duodenal biopsy. The investigators will recruit patients (n=1000) from the endoscopy department at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom (UK). The patients recruited for this study will already have been referred for a consultation and gastroscopy. In addition, these patients will already have been serologically tested for IgA TTG, EMA and a total IgA immunoglobulin level (as per normal clinical practice).
All duodenal biopsy specimens will be fixed in buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin wax. Standard, 3μm thick sections at three levels will be stained with haematoxylin and eosin and reported routinely. Additionally, biopsies demonstrating increased intraepithelial lymphocytes only (changes compatible with but not diagnostic of coeliac disease) will be stained with KiRAS or CD4/CD8 which are markers for coeliac disease.
Read the detailed description
Coeliac disease is the most common chronic inflammatory bowel condition encountered by physicians. Internationally the prevalence estimated by serological screening in healthy volunteers is between 0.5-1.0%. Historically, patients with adult coeliac disease complained of symptoms suggestive of mal-absorption, diarrhoea, weight loss or anaemia. This manner of presentation is now described as the classical (typical) form. Failure to recognise this disease may be due to the insidious nature of its presentation. Individuals with undiagnosed coeliac disease may have numerous hospital attendances, prior to diagnosis.
Although the presentation of patients with coeliac disease may be protean, serological markers have provided a cheap and non-invasive method by which clinicians in both primary and secondary care can initially recognise patients who may have coeliac disease. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical utility of the whole blood transglutaminase-based rapid test against current serological tests and the gold standard of duodenal biopsy.
Methods:
Study design and Participants Group 1 was a multicentre retrospective analysis of all patients with anaemia attending a gastroscopy with duodenal biopsy at four UK hospitals (Addenbrooke's, Bradford, Hull and Whipps Cross) over a 12 month period ranging from 2012 to 2014. The availability of coeliac serology prior to gastroscopy was reviewed.
Group 2 was a prospective study comparing the sensitivities of Simtomax to conventional serology in an iron deficient cohort. We prospectively recruited 133 consecutive patients (age range: 18-89 years, median 53) with iron deficiency with or without anaemia attending a single coeliac disease research endoscopy list at the tertiary referral centre Royal Hallamshire Hospital between 2013 and 2015. All recruited patients were consented for the study prior to the gastroscopy. The patients concurrently undertook the point-of-care test, Simtomax, conventional coeliac serology (IgA-TTG, IgA-EMA) and total IgA levels at the endoscopy unit. All patients then had a gastroscopy with quadrantic duodenal biopsy from the second part of the duodenum and at least one duodenal bulb biopsy. Patients were excluded from the study if they were known to have coeliac disease or were on a gluten free diet. Patients with coagulopathy, active gastrointestinal bleeding or a suspected carcinoma observed during the examination were also excluded. Clinical information of the patients was available to the endoscopist, however the endoscopist was blinded to the results of the Simtomax test.
Group 3 was a retrospective histological analysis of patients attending a separate non-coeliac specific iron deficiency anaemia clinic at the Northern General Hospital in 2013-2014. We reviewed their duodenal histology and hospital case notes to determine the yield of alternative causes other than coeliac disease in the context of iron deficiency anaemia.
Point-of-care test, Simtomax:
Simtomax is a point-of-care test for coeliac disease manufactured by Augurix Diagnostics, Switzerland. It detects both IgA and IgG antibodies to DGP, as well as the total IgA level. The assay is based on lateral flow immunochromatography using colloidal gold antihuman antibodies as a signal detector. A sample of 25 μl of capillary venous blood is required which can be obtained through a simple finger prick technique. The assay can also be performed using a plasma sample either in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or heparin as well as a separated serum sample, although a smaller sample volume of 20 μl is required. The blood sample is then applied to the test device, followed by the application of 5 drops of the provided buffer solution. The result can be read after 10 minutes. Positive results are indicated by the presence of a solid red test line for IgA and/or IgG-DGP positivity. A second single red line indicates the presence of IgA. An in-built red control line ensures a correctly functioning test.
Serology:
Total IgA was measured on a Behring BN2 nephelometer. IgA-TTG antibodies were evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Aesku Diagnostics, Wendelsheim, Germany). An IgA-TTG titre of > 15 U/ml before 20/5/2014, a new cut off level of >9 U/ml from 20/5-11/12/2014, and then >7 U/ml from 12/12/2014 onwards, were regarded as positive as per the manufacturer's guidance. IgA-EMA was detected by immunofluorescence on primate oesophagus sections (Binding Site, Birmingham, UK).
Biopsies and histology
In total, at least five biopsies were taken from the duodenum, including at least one from the duodenal bulb, with each biopsy fixed in formalin at the time of the gastroscopy. Specimens were then processed, orientated and embedded in paraffin wax by the pathology department. Standard 3 µm thick sections at three levels were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and reported routinely by gastrointestinal histopathologists without knowledge of the Simtomax results. Villous atrophy was graded according to the modified Marsh criteria.
Diagnosis of coeliac disease:
The presence of villous atrophy (Marsh 3a-3c) on histology with a positive IgA-EMA or IgA-TTG were required for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. In cases of seronegative villous atrophy, human leucocyte antigen (HLA) genotyping was performed, with a negative HLA DQ2 or DQ8 phenotype used to rule out coeliac disease. Supporting information such as family history and response to a gluten free diet were also taken into account.
- Conditions
- Celiac Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Celiac Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| endoscopy patients | We will recruit patients (n=1000) from the endoscopy department at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom (UK). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Positive and negative predictive values of the whole blood transglutaminase-based rapid test tissue for diagnosing coeliac disease
Measured: 8 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionAug 2017
- Study completionOct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Celiac DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,596 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David Sanders, Study director, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02834429
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STH15416
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pre-endoscopy Serological Testing for Coeliac Disease - a Novel Approach Using Rapid Antibody Testing.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02834429
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STH15416
- Conditions
- Celiac Disease
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,596 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to assess the clinical utility of the whole blood transglutaminase-based rapid test against current serological tests and the gold standard of duodenal biopsy. The investigators will recruit patients (n=1000) from the endoscopy department at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom (UK). The patients recruited for this study will already have been referred for a consultation and gastroscopy. In addition, these patients will already have been serologically tested for IgA TTG, EMA and a total IgA immunoglobulin level (as per normal clinical practice).
All duodenal biopsy specimens will be fixed in buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin wax. Standard, 3μm thick sections at three levels will be stained with haematoxylin and eosin and reported routinely. Additionally, biopsies demonstrating increased intraepithelial lymphocytes only (changes compatible with but not diagnostic of coeliac disease) will be stained with KiRAS or CD4/CD8 which are markers for coeliac disease.
Detailed description
Coeliac disease is the most common chronic inflammatory bowel condition encountered by physicians. Internationally the prevalence estimated by serological screening in healthy volunteers is between 0.5-1.0%. Historically, patients with adult coeliac disease complained of symptoms suggestive of mal-absorption, diarrhoea, weight loss or anaemia. This manner of presentation is now described as the classical (typical) form. Failure to recognise this disease may be due to the insidious nature of its presentation. Individuals with undiagnosed coeliac disease may have numerous hospital attendances, prior to diagnosis.
Although the presentation of patients with coeliac disease may be protean, serological markers have provided a cheap and non-invasive method by which clinicians in both primary and secondary care can initially recognise patients who may have coeliac disease. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical utility of the whole blood transglutaminase-based rapid test against current serological tests and the gold standard of duodenal biopsy.
Methods:
Study design and Participants Group 1 was a multicentre retrospective analysis of all patients with anaemia attending a gastroscopy with duodenal biopsy at four UK hospitals (Addenbrooke's, Bradford, Hull and Whipps Cross) over a 12 month period ranging from 2012 to 2014. The availability of coeliac serology prior to gastroscopy was reviewed.
Group 2 was a prospective study comparing the sensitivities of Simtomax to conventional serology in an iron deficient cohort. We prospectively recruited 133 consecutive patients (age range: 18-89 years, median 53) with iron deficiency with or without anaemia attending a single coeliac disease research endoscopy list at the tertiary referral centre Royal Hallamshire Hospital between 2013 and 2015. All recruited patients were consented for the study prior to the gastroscopy. The patients concurrently undertook the point-of-care test, Simtomax, conventional coeliac serology (IgA-TTG, IgA-EMA) and total IgA levels at the endoscopy unit. All patients then had a gastroscopy with quadrantic duodenal biopsy from the second part of the duodenum and at least one duodenal bulb biopsy. Patients were excluded from the study if they were known to have coeliac disease or were on a gluten free diet. Patients with coagulopathy, active gastrointestinal bleeding or a suspected carcinoma observed during the examination were also excluded. Clinical information of the patients was available to the endoscopist, however the endoscopist was blinded to the results of the Simtomax test.
Group 3 was a retrospective histological analysis of patients attending a separate non-coeliac specific iron deficiency anaemia clinic at the Northern General Hospital in 2013-2014. We reviewed their duodenal histology and hospital case notes to determine the yield of alternative causes other than coeliac disease in the context of iron deficiency anaemia.
Point-of-care test, Simtomax:
Simtomax is a point-of-care test for coeliac disease manufactured by Augurix Diagnostics, Switzerland. It detects both IgA and IgG antibodies to DGP, as well as the total IgA level. The assay is based on lateral flow immunochromatography using colloidal gold antihuman antibodies as a signal detector. A sample of 25 μl of capillary venous blood is required which can be obtained through a simple finger prick technique. The assay can also be performed using a plasma sample either in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or heparin as well as a separated serum sample, although a smaller sample volume of 20 μl is required. The blood sample is then applied to the test device, followed by the application of 5 drops of the provided buffer solution. The result can be read after 10 minutes. Positive results are indicated by the presence of a solid red test line for IgA and/or IgG-DGP positivity. A second single red line indicates the presence of IgA. An in-built red control line ensures a correctly functioning test.
Serology:
Total IgA was measured on a Behring BN2 nephelometer. IgA-TTG antibodies were evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Aesku Diagnostics, Wendelsheim, Germany). An IgA-TTG titre of > 15 U/ml before 20/5/2014, a new cut off level of >9 U/ml from 20/5-11/12/2014, and then >7 U/ml from 12/12/2014 onwards, were regarded as positive as per the manufacturer's guidance. IgA-EMA was detected by immunofluorescence on primate oesophagus sections (Binding Site, Birmingham, UK).
Biopsies and histology
In total, at least five biopsies were taken from the duodenum, including at least one from the duodenal bulb, with each biopsy fixed in formalin at the time of the gastroscopy. Specimens were then processed, orientated and embedded in paraffin wax by the pathology department. Standard 3 µm thick sections at three levels were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and reported routinely by gastrointestinal histopathologists without knowledge of the Simtomax results. Villous atrophy was graded according to the modified Marsh criteria.
Diagnosis of coeliac disease:
The presence of villous atrophy (Marsh 3a-3c) on histology with a positive IgA-EMA or IgA-TTG were required for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. In cases of seronegative villous atrophy, human leucocyte antigen (HLA) genotyping was performed, with a negative HLA DQ2 or DQ8 phenotype used to rule out coeliac disease. Supporting information such as family history and response to a gluten free diet were also taken into account.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| endoscopy patients | – | –We will recruit patients (n=1000) from the endoscopy department at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom (UK). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Endoscopy patients at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital Sheffield
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients aged 18 years or more undergoing clinically indicated gastroscopy with biopsy and coeliac serology testing
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with coagulopathy (INR > 1.3 Platelets < 80)
- Active gastrointestinal bleeding identified at endoscopy
- suspected carcinoma identified at gastroscopy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Positive and negative predictive values of the whole blood transglutaminase-based rapid test tissue for diagnosing coeliac disease
Time frame: 8 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Nov 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Celiac Disease
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
VTP-1000 in Adults With Celiac Disease
Celiac Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Mediterranean Diet and Processed Food Consumption on Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Coeliac Patients on a Gluten-Free Diet
Celiac Disease, Gluten-free Diet
Recruiting
GF-NOURISH (Gluten Free Nutrition Optimization Through Ultra-processed Food Reduction and Improved Strategies for Health)
Celiac Disease in Children, Nutrition Disorder, Child
RecruitingObservational study
Celiac Disease Genomic Environmental Microbiome and Metabolomic Study
Celiac Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Pathogenic Study of Adult Immune Enteropathies
Celiac Disease, Autoimmune Enteropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Sanders study director
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Celiac Disease, run by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Positive and negative predictive values of the whole blood transglutaminase-based rapid test tissue for diagnosing coeliac disease (time frame: 8 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2017.