AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2NCT02833350

Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

A Phase 2 study testing GDC-0853, Adalimumab and Folic Acid in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Genentech, Inc. at 150 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a multicenter, Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator (Cohort 1 only), parallel-group, dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GDC-0853 in participants with moderate to severe active RA and an inadequate response to previous methotrexate (MTX) therapy… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
GDC-0853, Adalimumab and Folic Acid
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
578 participants
Where
150 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
9 Sep 2016to 2 Jul 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have a diagnosis of adult-onset RA as defined by the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for RA
  • RA disease activity by joint counts and laboratory markers of inflammation: greater than or equal to (>=) 6 tender/painful joints on motion (68 joint count) and >= 6 swollen joints (66 joint count) at both screening and Day 1 (randomization)
  • For MTX-inadequate response (IR) participants: must have had an inadequate response to MTX
  • For TNF-IR participants: must have had an inadequate response or intolerance to previous treatment with at least 1 and no more than 2 biologic TNF-alpha inhibitors and may have also been exposed to no more than one biologic non-TNF-alpha inhibitor
  • High sensitivity C-reactive protein of >= 0.400 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) for Cohort 1 and >= 0.650 mg/dL for Cohort 2 at screening

Who cannot join

  • History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA or other systemic autoimmune disorder
  • For MTX-IR participants: History of treatment with any TNF inhibitor, including biosimilar equivalents and history of treatment with biologic non-TNF-alpha inhibitor for RA
  • For all participants: Previous treatment with cell-depleting therapy including B cell-depleting therapy (e.g., anti-cluster of differentiation 20-directed therapy such as rituximab), tofacitinib, or other Janus kinase inhibitor(s), or alkylating agents
  • Current treatment with medications that are well known to prolong the QT interval at doses that have a clinically meaningful effect on QT
  • History of non-gallstone-related pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis
  • Evidence of serious uncontrolled concomitant cardiac, neurologic, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrine, metabolic, or gastrointestinal disease
  • Evidence of chronic and/or active hepatitis B or C
  • Women who are pregnant, nursing (breast feeding), or intending to become pregnant during the study or within 60 days after completion of the study

Trial locations and contacts

150 sites in 11 countries.

150 sites in 11 countries

Ukraine24 sites
  • Railway Transp DCH of HealthCenter Branch of PJSC Ukr Railway Dept of Rheumatology

    Dnipro, Tavria Okruha, 49008

  • Regional CH Dep of Rheumatology SHEI Ivano-Frankivsk NMU

    Ivano-Frankivsk, KIEV Governorate, 76008

  • GI L.T.Malaya Therapy National Institute of the NAMS of Ukraine

    Kharkiv, 61039

  • Kharkiv MA of PGE of MOHU Ch of Cardiology and Functional Diagnostics

    Kharkiv, 61176

  • Medical Center Medical Clinic Blagomed LLC.

    Kyiv, KIEV Governorate, 01601

  • Medical Center OK!Clinic+

    Kyiv, KIEV Governorate, 02091

  • SI NSС M.D. Strazhesko Institute of Cardiology of NAMSU

    Kyiv, KIEV Governorate, 03680

  • Clinic of Modern Rheumatology Revmotsentr LLC

    Kyiv, KIEV Governorate, 04071

  • CNI Consultative and Diagnostic Center of Desnianskyi District of Kyiv

    Kyiv, 02232

  • MI of Helathcare Kyiv RCH P.L. Shupy NMA of PGE

    Kyiv, 04107

  • Gerontology Institute of the Ukrainian AMS

    Kyiv, 04114

  • Oleksandrivska Clinical Hospital

    Kyiv, 1023

  • Volyn Regional Center of Cardiovascular Pathology and Thrombolysis

    Lutsk, 43024

  • Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital Dept of Rehmuaatology D. Halytskyi Lviv NMU

    Lviv, KIEV Governorate, 79010

  • CH of State Border Service of Ukraine (Military Base 2522); Dept of Therapy, D.Halytskyi Lviv NMU

    Lviv, KIEV Governorate, 79014

  • City Hospital #1

    Mykolaiv, 54003

  • M.V. Sklifosovsky Poltava RCH Dept of Rheumatology HSEIU UMSA

    Poltava, 36011

  • CI of TRC

    Ternopil, Kherson Governorate, 46002

  • A.Novak Transcarpathian Regional Clinical Hospital

    Uzhhorod, KIEV Governorate, 88018

  • Private Small Enterprise Medical Center Pulse

    Vinnytsia, 21001

  • M.I. Pyrogov VRCH Dept of Gastroenterology M.I. Pyrogov VNMU

    Vinnytsia, 21018

  • City Clinical Hospital #9 Dept of Gastrosurgery SI Zaporizhzhia MA of PGE of MoHU

    Zaporizhzhya, 69096

  • CI City Hospital #7

    Zaporizhzhya, 69118

  • CI Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital of ZRC

    Zaporizhzhya, 69600

Other trials in Ukraine

United States23 sites
  • Pinnacle Research Group; Llc, Central

    Anniston, Alabama, 36207

  • RASF-Clinical Research Center

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • ZASA Clinical Research

    Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472

  • Clinical Research of West Florida

    Clearwater, Florida, 33765

  • Medvin Clinical Research

    Covina, California, 91723

  • Metroplex Clinical Research

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Baylor Research Inst.

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Danville Orthopedic Clinic, Inc.; Research Department

    Danville, Virginia, 24541

  • TriWest Research Associates, LLC

    El Cajon, California, 92020

  • Saint Jude Heritage Medical Grp

    Fullerton, California, 92835

  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.

    Glendale, Arizona, 85306

  • Medication Management

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408

  • Accurate Clinical Management - VO

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Accurate Clinical Research

    Houston, Texas, 77089

  • Institute of Arthritis Research

    Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404

  • Advanced Clinical Research

    Meridian, Idaho, 83642

  • InVentiv Health

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Omega Research Consultants

    Orlando, Florida, 32810

  • Oregon Health and Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Stanford University School of Medicine

    Stanford, California, 94305-5151

  • McIlwain Medical Group

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Crossroads Clinical Research, LLC

    Victoria, Texas, 77901

  • Clinical Research Center of Reading

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610

Other trials in United States

Russia23 sites
  • SMMIH "Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital"

    Chelyabinsk, Voronez, 454076

  • SAHI of Kem. "Regional Clinical Hospital for War Veterans"

    Kemerovo, 650000

  • OOO Family Polyclinic

    Korolev, Moscow Region, 141060

  • TSBIH "Krasnoyarsk Interdistrict Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care n.a. N.S. Karpovich

    Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, 660062

  • Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Research Institute of Rheumatology V.A. Nasonova

    Moscow, Moscow Oblast, 115522

  • SBIH of Moscow "City Clinical Hospital # 1 n. a. N. I. Pirogov"

    Moscow, Moscow Oblast, 119049

  • SBEI HPE " First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov" of the MoH of the RF

    Moscow, Moscow Oblast, 119992

  • Practical Medicine

    Moscow, 115404

  • Limited Liability Company "Centre of Medical Common Practice"

    Novosibirsk, 630091

  • Ultramed

    Omsk, 644024

  • Technologii zdorovia LLC

    Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, 191144

  • Sanavita LLC

    Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, 195257

  • LLC Medical Sanitary Unit

    Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, 196066

  • City Hospital 25; Rheumatology

    Saint Petersburg, 190068

  • Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

  • SBEI HPE "Saratov State Medical University n.a. V. I. Razumovskiy" of the MoH of the RF

    Saratov, 410026

  • SBEI HPE "Smolensk State Medical University" of the MoH of the RF

    Smolensk, 214019

  • Siberian State Medical University

    Tomsk, 634050

  • SHI Ulyanovsk Reg Clinical Hospital

    Ulyanovsk, 432063

  • Territorial Clinical Hospital #2

    Vladivostok, 690035

  • SBHI of Yaroslavl Region Clinical Hospital #3

    Yaroslavl, Volgograd Oblast, 150051

  • SHI Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital

    Yaroslavl, 150062

  • Center of Family Medicine LC

    Yekaterinburg, Sankt-Peterburg, 620043

Other trials in Russia

Argentina14 sites
  • Instituto de Investigaciones Clinicas-Mar del Plata

    Buenos Aires, B7600FZN

  • Organizacion Medica de Investigacion

    Buenos Aires, C1015ABO

  • Hospital Italiano

    Buenos Aires, C1181ACH

  • APRILLUS

    Buenos Aires, C1194AAO

  • Instituto centenario

    Buenos Aires, C1204AAD

  • Centro de Investigacion en Enfermedades Reumaticas CIER

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1055AAF

  • Expertia S.A- Mautalen Salud e Investigación

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1128AAE

  • CCBR - Buenos Aires - AR; AxisMed SRL

    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1430CKE

  • ILAIM-CEOM Inst. Latinoamericano de Inv. Medicas

    Córdoba, X5000BNB

  • Hospital Italiano de La Plata

    La Plata, 1900

  • Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Mar Del Plata

    Mar del Plata, B7600DHK

  • Instituto de Investigaciones Clínicas Quilmes

    Quilmes, 1878

  • CER San Juan Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Investigacion Clinica

    San Juan, 5400

  • Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia; Reumathology

    San Miguel, T4000AXL

Other trials in Argentina

Bulgaria14 sites
  • MHAT - Dobrich, AD

    Dobrich, 9300

  • MHAT "Eurohospital" - Plovdiv, OOD

    Plovdiv, 4002

  • MHAT Kaspela; EOOD

    Plovdiv, 4002

  • MHAT - Ruse, AD

    Rousse, 7002

  • Medizinski Zentrar-1-Sevlievo EOOD

    Sevlievo, 5400

  • MHAT "Hadzhi Dimitar", OOD

    Sliven, 8800

  • Medical Center Excelsior OOD

    Sofia, 1000

  • NMTH "Tsar Boris III"

    Sofia, 1233

  • MHAT "Lyulin", EAD

    Sofia, 1336

  • DCC "Alexandrovska", EOOD; Clinic of Neurology

    Sofia, 1431

  • UMHAT "SofiaMed", OOD

    Sofia, 1750

  • MC "Synexus - Sofia", EOOD

    Sofia, 1784

  • MHAT Dr. St. Kirkovich, AD

    Stara Zagora, 6003

  • 'New Medical Center' , EOOD

    Vratsa, 3000

Other trials in Bulgaria

Brazil12 sites
  • CAEP - Centro Avancado de Estudos e Pesquisas Ltda.

    Campinas, São Paulo, 13087-567

  • Edumed - Educação e Saúde SA

    Curitiba, Paraná, 80440-080

  • Centro de Estudos em Terapias Inovadoras - CETI

    Curtiba, Paraná, 80030-110

  • CIP - Centro Internacional de Pesquisa; Pesquisa Clinica

    Goiânia, Goiás, 74110-120

  • Centro Mineiro de Pesquisa - CMIP

    Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, 36036-330

  • Hospital Sao Vicente de Paulo

    Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, 99010-090

  • LMK Serviços Médicos S/S

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90480-000

  • CCBR - Synarc Centro de Pesquisa Clinica - RJ

    Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22271-100

  • Faculdade de Medicina do ABC - FMABC

    Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-650

  • Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto

    São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090-000

  • CPCLIN - Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas Ltda.; Pesquisa Clinica

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01244-030

  • Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica e Medicina Avançada Ltda

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05437-010

Other trials in Brazil

Poland12 sites
  • NZOZ OSTEO-MEDIC S.C. Artur Racewicz, Jerzy Supronik

    Bialystok, 15-351

  • Szpital Uniwersytecki; nr 2 im. Dr J. Biziela

    Bydgoszcz, 85-168

  • Medica Pro Familia Spolka Akcyjna Oddzial w Katowicach

    Katowice, 40-081

  • Centrum Medyczne Plejady

    Krakow, 30-349

  • CCBR - Lodz - PL

    Lodz, 90-368

  • ETYKA Osrodek Badan Kliniczynch

    Olsztyn, 10-117

  • Ai Centrum Medyczne Sp. Z O.O Sp.K.

    Poznan, 61-113

  • KO-MED Centra Kliniczne Staszow

    Staszów, 28-200

  • Medycyna Kliniczna

    Warsaw, 00-660

  • Centrum Medyczne AMED

    Warsaw, 03-291

  • Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny we Wrocławiu

    Wroclaw, 51-124

  • KO-MED Centra Kliniczne Zamosc

    Zamość, 22400

Other trials in Poland

Mexico9 sites
  • Consultorio Medico en Fundacion el Hospitalito de morelos A.C.

    Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62170

  • Consultorio Particular del Dr. Miguel Cortes Hernandez

    Cuernavaca, 62290

  • Centro de Investigación de Tratamientos Innovadores de Sinaloa (CITI)

    Culiacán, Sinaloa, 80000

  • Centro de Investigacion en Reumatologia

    Mérida, Yucatán, 97070

  • Centro de Investigacion en Enfermedades Reumaticas y Osteoporosis

    Mexicali, 21100

  • Centro de Investigacion Clínica GRAMEL S.C

    México, 03720

  • Policilinica Medica de Queretaro; Rheumatology

    Querétaro, 76000

  • Clinical Research Institute

    Tlalnepantla, 54055

  • Unidad de Enfermedades Reumaticas y Cronicodegenerativas

    Torreón, 27000

Other trials in Mexico

South Korea7 sites
  • Chungnam National University Hospital; Department of Internal Medicine (Rheumatology)

    Daejeon, 35015

  • Chonnam National University Hospital

    Gwangju, 61469

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Gyeonggi-do, 13620

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 03080

  • Konkuk University Medical Center

    Seoul, 05030

  • Asan Medical Center - Oncology

    Seoul, 05505

  • Ajou University Hospital

    Suwon, 443-721

Other trials in South Korea

Colombia6 sites
  • Centro de Reumatologia y Ortopedia

    Barranquilla, 80020

  • Centro de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Especialdades Medicas SAS. CIREEM

    Bogotá, 110221

  • Riesgo de Fractura S.A.

    Bogotá, 110221

  • Fundación Instituto de Reumatología Fernando Chalem

    Bogotá, 111211

  • Clinica de Artritis Temprana S.A.

    Cali, 00000

  • Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe

    Medellín, 050034

Other trials in Colombia

Serbia6 sites
  • Institute of Rheumatology

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Military Medical Academy

    Belgrade, 11040

  • Clinical Center Kragujevac

    Kragujevac, 34000

  • Institute of Treatment and Rehabilitation "Niska Banja"

    Niška Banja, 18205

  • Special hospital for rheumatic diseases Novi Sad

    Novi Sad, 21000

  • General Hospital Sabac; Department of Urology and Hemodialysis

    Šabac, 15000

Other trials in Serbia

About this study

Official title: A Two-Cohort Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Previous Methotrexate Therapy (Cohort 1) and Compared With Placebo in Patients With an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Previous TNF Therapy (Cohort 2)

This is a multicenter, Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator (Cohort 1 only), parallel-group, dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GDC-0853 in participants with moderate to severe active RA and an inadequate response to previous methotrexate (MTX) therapy (Cohort 1) or MTX and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy who may have also had exposure to no more than one non-TNF inhibitor biologic (Cohort 2).

Being tested
GDC-0853, Adalimumab, Folic Acid, MTX, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GDC-0853Drug

    Also called RO7010939

    Participants will receive GDC-0853 at low, mid, or high doses, orally once or twice daily for 12 weeks in Cohort 1 or 2.

  • AdalimumabDrug

    Participants will receive adalimumab, subcutaneously Q2W starting on Day 1 for 12 weeks.

  • Folic AcidDrug

    Participants will receive stable background therapy of folic acid of at least 5 mg total dose weekly (or equivalent) as per investigator's discretion.

  • MTXDrug

    Participants will receive stable background therapy of MTX 15-25 mg/week (oral or parenteral; for participants entering the trial on MTX doses 15 mg/week, doses as low as 7.5 mg/week are allowed only if there is clear documentation in the medical record that higher doses were not tolerated or that the dose of MTX is the highest acceptable dose based on local clinical practice guidelines).

  • PlaceboDrug

    Participants will receive placebo matched to adalimumab, subcutaneously Q2W and/or placebo matched to GDC-0853, orally once or twice daily for 12 weeks in Cohort 1 or 2.

Study groups in NCT02833350
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort 1: GDC-0853 High Dose + Adalimumab PlaceboExperimentalParticipants of Cohort 1 will receive GDC-0853 high dose, orally once daily along with placebo matched to adalimumab, subcutaneously every 2 weeks (Q2W) starting on Day 1 for 12 weeks. Participants will remain on a stable background therapy of MTX 15-25 milligrams per week (mg/week) (oral or parenteral; for participants entering the trial on MTX doses 15 mg/week, doses as low as 7.5 mg/week are allowed only if there is clear documentation in the medical record that higher doses were not tolerated or that the dose of MTX is the highest acceptable dose based on local clinical practice guidelines) and folic acid of at least 5 mg total dose weekly (or equivalent) as per investigator's discretion.
Receives: Drug: GDC-0853; Drug: Folic Acid; Drug: MTX; Drug: Placebo
Cohort 1: GDC-0853 Low Dose + Adalimumab PlaceboExperimentalParticipants of Cohort 1 will receive GDC-0853 low dose, orally once daily along with placebo matched to adalimumab, subcutaneously Q2W starting on Day 1 for 12 weeks. Participants will remain on a stable background therapy of MTX 15-25 mg/week (oral or parenteral; for participants entering the trial on MTX doses 15 mg/week, doses as low as 7.5 mg/week are allowed only if there is clear documentation in the medical record that higher doses were not tolerated or that the dose of MTX is the highest acceptable dose based on local clinical practice guidelines) and folic acid of at least 5 mg total dose weekly (or equivalent) as per investigator's discretion.
Receives: Drug: GDC-0853; Drug: Folic Acid; Drug: MTX; Drug: Placebo
Cohort 1: GDC-0853 Mid Dose + Adalimumab PlaceboExperimentalParticipants of Cohort 1 will receive GDC-0853 mid dose, orally twice daily along with placebo matched to adalimumab, subcutaneously Q2W starting on Day 1 for 12 weeks. Participants will remain on a stable background therapy of MTX 15-25 mg/week (oral or parenteral; for participants entering the trial on MTX doses 15 mg/week, doses as low as 7.5 mg/week are allowed only if there is clear documentation in the medical record that higher doses were not tolerated or that the dose of MTX is the highest acceptable dose based on local clinical practice guidelines) and folic acid of at least 5 mg total dose weekly (or equivalent) as per investigator's discretion.
Receives: Drug: GDC-0853; Drug: Folic Acid; Drug: MTX; Drug: Placebo
Cohort 1: GDC-0853 Placebo + AdalimumabActive comparatorParticipants of Cohort 1 will receive placebo matched to GDC-0853, orally once daily along with adalimumab, subcutaneously Q2W starting on Day 1 for 12 weeks. Participants will remain on a stable background therapy of MTX 15-25 mg/week (oral or parenteral; for participants entering the trial on MTX doses 15 mg/week, doses as low as 7.5 mg/week are allowed only if there is clear documentation in the medical record that higher doses were not tolerated or that the dose of MTX is the highest acceptable dose based on local clinical practice guidelines) and folic acid of at least 5 mg total dose weekly (or equivalent) as per investigator's discretion.
Receives: Drug: Adalimumab; Drug: Folic Acid; Drug: MTX; Drug: Placebo
Cohort 1: GDC-0853 Placebo + Adalimumab PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants of Cohort 1 will receive placebo matched to GDC-0853, orally once daily along with placebo matched to adalimumab, subcutaneously Q2W starting on Day 1 for 12 weeks. Participants will remain on a stable background therapy of MTX 15-25 mg/week (oral or parenteral; for participants entering the trial on MTX doses 15 mg/week, doses as low as 7.5 mg/week are allowed only if there is clear documentation in the medical record that higher doses were not tolerated or that the dose of MTX is the highest acceptable dose based on local clinical practice guidelines) and folic acid of at least 5 mg total dose weekly (or equivalent) as per investigator's discretion.
Receives: Drug: Folic Acid; Drug: MTX; Drug: Placebo
Cohort 2: GDC-0853 High DoseExperimentalParticipants of Cohort 2 will receive GDC-0853 high dose, orally twice daily for 12 weeks. Participants will remain on a stable background therapy of MTX 15-25 mg/week (oral or parenteral; for participants entering the trial on MTX doses 15 mg/week, doses as low as 7.5 mg/week are allowed only if there is clear documentation in the medical record that higher doses were not tolerated or that the dose of MTX is the highest acceptable dose based on local clinical practice guidelines) and folic acid of at least 5 mg total dose weekly (or equivalent) as per investigator's discretion.
Receives: Drug: GDC-0853; Drug: Folic Acid; Drug: MTX
Cohort 2: GDC-0853 PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants of Cohort 2 will receive placebo matched to GDC-0853, orally twice daily for 12 weeks. Participants will remain on a stable background therapy of MTX 15-25 mg/week (oral or parenteral; for participants entering the trial on MTX doses 15 mg/week, doses as low as 7.5 mg/week are allowed only if there is clear documentation in the medical record that higher doses were not tolerated or that the dose of MTX is the highest acceptable dose based on local clinical practice guidelines) and folic acid of at least 5 mg total dose weekly (or equivalent) as per investigator's discretion.
Receives: Drug: Folic Acid; Drug: MTX; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Day 84, Comparison Between GDC-0853 and Placebo (Cohort 1)

    ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].

    Measured: Day 84

  2. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

    An Adverse event was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events. A SAE was any experience that suggested a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was medically significant.

    Measured: Day 1 up to 8 weeks after last dose (up to Week 20)

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 Response at Day 84, Comparison Between GDC-0853 and Adalimumab (Cohort 1)

    ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].

    Measured: Day 84

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 Response at Day 84, Comparison Between GDC-0853 and Placebo (Cohort 2)

    ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].

    Measured: Day 84

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response

    ACR20 response is defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate]

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response

    ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response

    ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  6. Change in Disease Activity Score From Baseline Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  7. Change in Disease Activity Score From Baseline Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP])

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  8. Change in Disease Activity Score From Baseline Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [ESR])

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  9. Change in Disease Activity Score From Baseline Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  10. Percentage of Participants With DAS Low Disease Activity

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. LDAS is defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  11. Percentage of Participants With DAS Remission

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  12. Percentage of Participants Meeting the Boolean-based Remission Criteria

    Boolean Remission is defined as Tender joint count less than 1, Swollen joint count less than 1, CRP less than 1 mg/dL, patient global assessment less than 1 (on 0 to 10 VAS scale).

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  13. Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)

    CDAI was derived as the sum of the following: tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), participant global assessment (PGA) of disease activity, and physician assessment of disease activity. TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, respectively, out of 28 assessed joints. PGA and physician assessment of disease activity were scored 0-100 millimeters (mm) and rounded to the nearest centimeter (cm) on a visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity. The total CDAI score range was 0-76, where higher scores indicate increased disease activity. Change from baseline at a particular time point was calculated among patients with data available at both baseline and the time point of interest. Negative values indicate improvement/reduction in RA disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Days 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84

  14. Percentage of Participants Meeting the CDAI-based Remission Criteria

    Clinical Disease Activity Index is defined as CDAI= : SJC(28) + TJC(28) + PGA + MDG where TJC and SJC are the tender and swollen joint counts from 28 joints, PGA is the patient's global assessment of disease activity (on a 0-10 scale) and MDG is physician global assessment of disease activity (on a 0-10 scale). The cutoff value for CDAI remission is <=2.8.

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  15. Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)

    Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC (based on a 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PhGA (based on 0-10 cm VAS, where 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity), and CRP. SDAI total score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 86 (maximal disease activity), where higher scores represents higher disease activity. The SDAI =< 3.3 indicates disease remission, > 3.4 to 11 indicates low disease activity, > 11 to 26 indicates moderate disease activity, and > 26 indicates high disease activity

    Measured: Baseline, Days 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84

  16. Percentage of Participants Meeting the SDAI-based Remission Criteria

    The SDAI was the numerical sum of five outcome parameter: SJC and TJC (based on a 28-joint assessment), PGA and MDG (based on 0-10 cm VAS, where 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity), and CRP. The SDAI =< 3.3 indicates disease remission

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  17. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2.0 (V2) Scores for Physical and Mental Components

    The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) is a questionnaire used to assess functional health and well-being and consists of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health.

    The SF-36v2 is summarized into Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores. The PCS and MCS scores range from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Day 84

  18. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score

    The FACIT-Fatigue Scale consists of 13 items designed to measure the degree of fatigue experienced by the patient in the previous 7 days. For each question, there are five possible responses: 0 (not at all), 1 (a little bit), 2 (somewhat), 3 (quite a bit), 4 (very much).

    A total fatigue score is calculated by summing all items, and possible total scores range from 0 (maximum fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient's fatigue (less fatigue).

    Measured: Day 84

  19. Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Count (68 Joint Count)

    Tender Joint Count: a total of 68 joints will be assessed for tenderness. Each joint is assessed for the presence/absence of tenderness. 68 joints are assessed for tenderness and joints are classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  20. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (66 Joint Count)

    Swollen Joint Count: a total of 66 joints will be assessed for swelling. Each joint is assessed for the presence/absence of swelling. 66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  21. Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment Score of Arthritis Pain

    Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  22. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment Score of Arthritis Pain

    Participant-assessed arthritis pain was scored on a 100-mm VAS, where the distance from 0 mm represented the participant's self evaluation of arthritis pain (0 mm=none; 100 mm=very severe). Change from baseline at a particular time point was calculated among patients with data available at both baseline and the time point of interest, where negative change indicated a decrease in participant-assessed arthritis pain.

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  23. Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment Score of Arthritis

    Physician's assessment of participant's disease activity was scored on a 100-mm VAS, where the distance from 0 mm represented the physician's assessment of the participant's disease activity (0 mm=very good; 100 mm=very poor). Change from baseline at a particular time point was calculated among patients with data available at both baseline and the time point of interest, where negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in physician-assessed disease activity.

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  24. Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels

    C-reactive protein is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  25. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

    The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index is a patient-reported outcome used to assess difficulty in performing activities of daily living. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.

    To respond to each question, a four-level response with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring is as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1= with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. The composite HAQ-DI score is the mean of the eight domain scores and the score ranges from 0 (no functional impairment) to 3 (maximum functional impairment). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84

  26. Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Time 24 of GDC-0853 at Steady State (AUC0-24,ss)

    The Pharmacokinetics (PK) evaluation may include, but will not be limited to, plasma GDC-0853 concentrations and population PK model estimated PK exposures (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]. AUC was measured in Nanograms(ng) per millilitre(mL)*hour (hr)

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hours) up to 10 hours post-dose on Day 28

  27. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of GDC-0853 at Steady State (Cmax,ss)

    Cmax is the maximum (peak) plasma concentration over the dosing interval at steady state (ss)

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hours) up to 10 hours post-dose on Day 28

  28. Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration of GDC-0853 at Steady State (Cmin,ss)

    Cmin is the minimum concentration over the dosing interval at steady state (ss)

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hours) up to 10 hours post-dose on Day 28

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start9 Sep 2016
  3. Primary completion2 Jul 2018
  4. Study completion2 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
578 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02833350
Sponsor's protocol ID
GA29350
Other IDs
2016-000335-40, 2016
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
12 Jul 2016
Last updated
12 Jun 2020

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing GDC-0853, Adalimumab and Folic Acid in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Genentech, Inc. at 150 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 150 sites in Ukraine, United States, Russia, Argentina, Bulgaria and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Day 84, Comparison Between GDC-0853 and Placebo (Cohort 1) (time frame: Day 84). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in