Physical ActivityALLWheelNCT02826707
Evaluation of a Smartphone-delivered Peer-led Physical Activity Counselling Program for Manual Wheelchair Users
A study testing SPPAC intervention in people with Physical Activity, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Despite physical activity (PA) being a valuable modality for promoting health, the evidence for effective PA intervention strategies for manual wheelchair (MWC) users is underdeveloped. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Physical Activity
- What is being tested?
- SPPAC intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 7 Feb 2019to 31 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- live in the community
- have used a manual wheelchair for ≥ 1 year
- able to self-propel a manual wheelchair for at least 10m
- able to communicate in English or French
- have physical activity or mobility goals
- cognitively able to set goals (Mini-mental State Exam Score ≥ 25)
Who cannot join
- anticipate a health condition or procedure that contraindicates training (e.g., surgery scheduled which would impair physical activity)
- have a degenerative condition that is expected to progress quickly (e.g., Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- are concurrently or planning to receive manual wheelchair mobility training over the period of the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration
Québec, G1M 2S8
About this study
Official title: Feasibility Evaluation of a Smartphone-delivered Peer-led Physical Activity Counselling Program for Improving Physical Activity in Manual Wheelchair Users
Despite physical activity (PA) being a valuable modality for promoting health, the evidence for effective PA intervention strategies for manual wheelchair (MWC) users is underdeveloped. Community-based programs and telephone-counselling interventions to increase PA among MWC users have had some success, but the uptake and adherence to these interventions remains low within this population. Community-based programs may not reach MWC users who live in rural areas and have issues with transportation, while health professionals may not optimally relate with MWC when providing telephone counselling. Although the PA needs of MWCs are not fully understood, there is reason to believe that including peers into intervention delivery may have benefits.
A feasibility trial is critical and prudent prior to moving forwards with a large and expensive multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) to ensure that: the intervention meets the needs of the target population; the right outcomes are measured; and that the intervention is feasible to administer.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a Smartphone-delivered Peer-led Physical Activity Counselling (SPPAC) program for MWC users.
- Conditions
- Physical Activity
- Being tested
- SPPAC intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SPPAC interventionBehavioural
A peer coach will deliver a physical activity counselling intervention using a Smartphone. Individualized programs will be based on participants physical activity/wheelchair mobility goals.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SPPAC intervention | Experimental | Smartphone-delivered peer-led physical activity counselling Receives: Behavioral: SPPAC intervention |
| Control group | No intervention | Pragmatic no-contact control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective physical activity
Physical activity will be measured objectively using Actigraphy, a small, lightweight accelerometry-based tri-axial activity monitor (Actigraph 3GTX) that is worn on the wrist and MWC without impeding bodily movements or PA. Information about motion direction and speed are integrated to produce an electrical current with variable magnitude and duration. The electrical current data are stored in the monitor as 'activity counts.'
Measured: Change in physical activity from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (10)
Subjective physical activity (Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (LTPA))
Self-reported frequency (number of bouts) and duration (min per bout) of light, moderate and heavy intensity PA over the past 7 days.
Measured: Change in LTPA from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Wheelchair skills capacity and performance (Wheelchair Skills Test- Questionnaire (WST-Q))
Subjective evaluation of the skills capacity and performance of 32 manual wheelchair skills.
Measured: Change in WST from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Physical activity motivation (Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2))
Subjective evaluation of motivation for physical activity is measured using 5 subscales of regulation: external, introjected identified, intrinsic and amotivation.
Measured: Change in BREQ-2 from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Perceived autonomy support (Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ))
Subjective evaluation of perceived autonomy support
Measured: Change in HCCQ from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Satisfaction of psychological needs (Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale (PNSES))
Subjective evaluation of satisfaction of psychological needs (i.e. autonomy, competence, relatedness) for physical activity will be measured only in the intervention group.
Measured: Change in PNSES from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Self-efficacy to overcome barriers to leisure-time physical activity (Leisure-time Physical Activity Barrier Self-efficacy Scale)
Subjective evaluation of self-efficacy to overcome salient barriers to physical activity participation (e.g. when faced with transportation problems, bad weather, pain and fatigue).
Measured: Change in Self-efficacy to overcome barriers to leisure-time physical activity from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Wheelchair use self-efficacy (Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale Short Form (WheelCon-SF))
Subjective evaluation of situations that challenge self-efficacy while using a manual wheelchair.
Measured: Change in WheelCon-SF from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Satisfaction with participation in physical activity using a wheelchair (Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM))
A semi-structured interview that allows participants to select important physical activity/wheelchair mobility participation goals. The importance and current level of satisfaction is evaluated.
Measured: Change in WhOM from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Measure of self-efficacy in performing functional activities of daily living in individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (Moorong Self Efficacy Scale - MSES)
Subjective evaluation of self-efficacy in carrying out activities of daily living. Minimum value 1 and maximum value 7. A higher score indicates a higher perceived self efficacy.
Measured: Change in MSES from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Measure the degree to which individuals who have experienced traumatic or incapacitating illness achieve reintegration into normal social activities (Reintegration to Normal Living Index - RNLI)
Subjective evaluation of the reintegration to normal living activities
Measured: Change in RNLI from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study start7 Feb 2019
- Primary completion31 Mar 2023
- Study completion31 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Physical ActivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Laval UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Laval University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McGill University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Krista Best, Laval University
- Investigators
- François Routhier, PhD, Principal investigator, Laval University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02826707
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPPAC2016
- Acronym
- ALLWheel
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 31 May 2016
- Last updated
- 19 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Best KL, Routhier F, Sweet SN, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Borisoff JF, Noreau L, Martin Ginis KA. The Smartphone Peer Physical Activity Counseling (SPPAC) Program for Manual Wheelchair Users: Protocol of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Apr 26;6(4):e69. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7280.
PubMed 28446419
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility Evaluation of a Smartphone-delivered Peer-led Physical Activity Counselling Program for Improving Physical Activity in Manual Wheelchair Users
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02826707
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALLWheel / SPPAC2016
- Conditions
- Physical Activity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Laval UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McGill University
- Study start
- 7 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite physical activity (PA) being a valuable modality for promoting health, the evidence for effective PA intervention strategies for manual wheelchair (MWC) users is underdeveloped. Community-based programs and telephone-counselling interventions to increase PA among MWC users have had some success, but the uptake and adherence to these interventions remains low within this population. Community-based programs may not reach MWC users who live in rural areas and have issues with transportation, while health professionals may not optimally relate with MWC when providing telephone counselling. Although the PA needs of MWCs are not fully understood, there is reason to believe that including peers into intervention delivery may have benefits.
A feasibility trial is critical and prudent prior to moving forwards with a large and expensive multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) to ensure that: the intervention meets the needs of the target population; the right outcomes are measured; and that the intervention is feasible to administer.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a Smartphone-delivered Peer-led Physical Activity Counselling (SPPAC) program for MWC users.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SPPAC intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: SPPAC interventionSmartphone-delivered peer-led physical activity counselling |
| Control group | No intervention | –Pragmatic no-contact control group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- live in the community
- have used a manual wheelchair for ≥ 1 year
- able to self-propel a manual wheelchair for at least 10m
- able to communicate in English or French
- have physical activity or mobility goals
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- anticipate a health condition or procedure that contraindicates training (e.g., surgery scheduled which would impair physical activity)
- have a degenerative condition that is expected to progress quickly (e.g., Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- are concurrently or planning to receive manual wheelchair mobility training over the period of the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SPPAC interventionA peer coach will deliver a physical activity counselling intervention using a Smartphone. Individualized programs will be based on participants physical activity/wheelchair mobility goals. | Behavioural | SPPAC intervention |
Primary outcome
Objective physical activity
Time frame: Change in physical activity from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Physical activity will be measured objectively using Actigraphy, a small, lightweight accelerometry-based tri-axial activity monitor (Actigraph 3GTX) that is worn on the wrist and MWC without impeding bodily movements or PA. Information about motion direction and speed are integrated to produce an electrical current with variable magnitude and duration. The electrical current data are stored in the monitor as 'activity counts.'
10 secondary outcomes
Subjective physical activity (Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (LTPA))
Time frame: Change in LTPA from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Wheelchair skills capacity and performance (Wheelchair Skills Test- Questionnaire (WST-Q))
Time frame: Change in WST from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Physical activity motivation (Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2))
Time frame: Change in BREQ-2 from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Perceived autonomy support (Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ))
Time frame: Change in HCCQ from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Satisfaction of psychological needs (Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale (PNSES))
Time frame: Change in PNSES from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Self-efficacy to overcome barriers to leisure-time physical activity (Leisure-time Physical Activity Barrier Self-efficacy Scale)
Time frame: Change in Self-efficacy to overcome barriers to leisure-time physical activity from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Wheelchair use self-efficacy (Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale Short Form (WheelCon-SF))
Time frame: Change in WheelCon-SF from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Satisfaction with participation in physical activity using a wheelchair (Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM))
Time frame: Change in WhOM from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Measure of self-efficacy in performing functional activities of daily living in individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (Moorong Self Efficacy Scale - MSES)
Time frame: Change in MSES from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Measure the degree to which individuals who have experienced traumatic or incapacitating illness achieve reintegration into normal social activities (Reintegration to Normal Living Index - RNLI)
Time frame: Change in RNLI from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jul 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28446419Best KL, Routhier F, Sweet SN, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Borisoff JF, Noreau L, Martin Ginis KA. The Smartphone Peer Physical Activity Counseling (SPPAC) Program for Manual Wheelchair Users: Protocol of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Apr 26;6(4):e69. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7280.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Physical Activity
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
François Routhier, PhD principal investigator
Laval University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SPPAC intervention in people with Physical Activity, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective physical activity (time frame: Change in physical activity from baseline to post-intervention (10 weeks post-baseline) and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02826707, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2024.