RHINOPLASTYNCT02822781
Chronic Rhinosinusitis Classification Proposal
An observational study of RHINOPLASTY and NASAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES, run by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph at 3 sites in France.
Trial summary
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a debilitating disease that remains (smell, nasal patency, flow) because currently treatment protocols available to us are with a limited efficacy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- RHINOPLASTY, NASAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2015to 21 Jul 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis evolving for more than 3 months with diffuse sinus opacities scanner.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis evolving for more than 3 months with diffuse sinus opacities scanner.
Who cannot join
- Rhino Sinusitis unilateral
- Background total or functional ethmoidectomy (but not polypectomy)
- immunodeficiency or immunosuppression in patients
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
France3 sites
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014
L'Institut Arthur vernes
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75019
About this study
Official title: Chronic Rhinosinusitis Classification Proposal: Evaluation of the Severity and the Effectiveness of Medical and Surgical Treatments
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a debilitating disease that remains (smell, nasal patency, flow) because currently treatment protocols available to us are with a limited efficacy. The assessment of the response to surgical treatment protocols and monitoring the become of patients treated with only drugs should allow investigators to identify the predictive patient's profile for the response. With this prospective data, this study would allow investigators to make a classification of Chronic rhinosinusitis.
Read the detailed description
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a debilitating disease that remains (smell, nasal patency, flow) because currently treatment protocols available to us are with a limited efficacy.
For many years, practitioners have tried to identify a universal therapeutic protocol. It turns out that no treatment (functional endoscopic surgery, antifungal therapy, medical treatment with antibiotics / corticosteroids) does not resolve all of the symptoms and their effectiveness is variable from one patient to another.
The most plausible explanation is that the term "rhinosinusitis" includes various different pathophysiological mechanism entities, requiring different treatment. Like certain skin or lung diseases, chronic inflammation of the sinuses may have different origins, allergic or extrinsic (infectious). It is therefore important to determine the type of inflammation responsible for adapting the management.
First, it is important to determine from all forms of CRS (with or without polyps), those associated with allergic inflammation and infectious ones. The presence or absence of polyps does not appear to be a determining factor of the type of inflammation. However, the criteria - allergy and asthma - could provide guidance to an allergic mechanism.
The study aims to distinguish different phenotypes CRS according to clinical, anatomical criteria and biological criteria. Clinical classification obtained would assess and predict more finely treatment response and target according to the phenotype, the best supported. Surgery is one of the therapeutic options in the treatment of rhinosinusitis, but the term satisfaction of healing and patient comfort is variable, a finer and precise distribution of patients will allow us to better predict the success of the surgery and therefore the offer targeted patients.
Primary objective :
To assess the response to surgical treatment of rhinosinusitis and the outcome of these patients in order to highlight predictors of success of surgery.
Secondary objectives:
Assess chronic rhinosinusitis phenotype by score SNOT 22 (importance of symptoms) which assesses the average severity of different groups Assessing the future of non-operated patients
- Conditions
- RHINOPLASTY, NASAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES
- Being tested
- No intervention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No interventionOther
There is no intervention. The patients will receive common questionnaire usually used by doctors (SNOT 22). Some Data to describe the population are collected then.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessment of change of the SNOT 22 score with a significant improvement from a minimal decrease of 10 points
Assessment of change of the SNOT 22 score with a significant improvement from a minimal decrease of 10 points
Measured: Day1, Month 6
Secondary outcomes (1)
Assessment of change of endoscopic nasal in consultation
Measured: Day1, Month 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Nov 2015
- Primary completion30 Apr 2016
- Study completion21 Jul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for RHINOPLASTYStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- SAUVAGET Elisabeth, MD, Principal investigator, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02822781
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLASSIFICATION RSC
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis Classification Proposal: Evaluation of the Severity and the Effectiveness of Medical and Surgical Treatments
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02822781
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLASSIFICATION RSC
- Conditions
- RHINOPLASTY, NASAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondation Hôpital Saint-JosephUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a debilitating disease that remains (smell, nasal patency, flow) because currently treatment protocols available to us are with a limited efficacy. The assessment of the response to surgical treatment protocols and monitoring the become of patients treated with only drugs should allow investigators to identify the predictive patient's profile for the response. With this prospective data, this study would allow investigators to make a classification of Chronic rhinosinusitis.
Detailed description
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a debilitating disease that remains (smell, nasal patency, flow) because currently treatment protocols available to us are with a limited efficacy.
For many years, practitioners have tried to identify a universal therapeutic protocol. It turns out that no treatment (functional endoscopic surgery, antifungal therapy, medical treatment with antibiotics / corticosteroids) does not resolve all of the symptoms and their effectiveness is variable from one patient to another.
The most plausible explanation is that the term "rhinosinusitis" includes various different pathophysiological mechanism entities, requiring different treatment. Like certain skin or lung diseases, chronic inflammation of the sinuses may have different origins, allergic or extrinsic (infectious). It is therefore important to determine the type of inflammation responsible for adapting the management.
First, it is important to determine from all forms of CRS (with or without polyps), those associated with allergic inflammation and infectious ones. The presence or absence of polyps does not appear to be a determining factor of the type of inflammation. However, the criteria - allergy and asthma - could provide guidance to an allergic mechanism.
The study aims to distinguish different phenotypes CRS according to clinical, anatomical criteria and biological criteria. Clinical classification obtained would assess and predict more finely treatment response and target according to the phenotype, the best supported. Surgery is one of the therapeutic options in the treatment of rhinosinusitis, but the term satisfaction of healing and patient comfort is variable, a finer and precise distribution of patients will allow us to better predict the success of the surgery and therefore the offer targeted patients.
Primary objective :
To assess the response to surgical treatment of rhinosinusitis and the outcome of these patients in order to highlight predictors of success of surgery.
Secondary objectives:
Assess chronic rhinosinusitis phenotype by score SNOT 22 (importance of symptoms) which assesses the average severity of different groups Assessing the future of non-operated patients
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis evolving for more than 3 months with diffuse sinus opacities scanner.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis evolving for more than 3 months with diffuse sinus opacities scanner.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Rhino Sinusitis unilateral
- Background total or functional ethmoidectomy (but not polypectomy)
- immunodeficiency or immunosuppression in patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No interventionThere is no intervention. The patients will receive common questionnaire usually used by doctors (SNOT 22). Some Data to describe the population are collected then. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Assessment of change of the SNOT 22 score with a significant improvement from a minimal decrease of 10 points
Time frame: Day1, Month 6
Assessment of change of the SNOT 22 score with a significant improvement from a minimal decrease of 10 points
1 secondary outcome
Assessment of change of endoscopic nasal in consultation
Time frame: Day1, Month 6
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for RHINOPLASTY
Active, not recruiting
Hybrid Osteoplasty Versus Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty
Rhinoplasty Techniques
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Effect of Controlled Hypotension on GFAP and Cognition in Rhinoplasty
Nasal Septum Deviation, Rhinoplasty
RecruitingObservational study
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications After Structural Rhinoplasty Using Septal Extension Grafts
Nasal Deformity, Rhinoplasty
Not yet recruiting
AI in Assessing Aesthetic Outcomes in Rhinoplasty
Rhinoplasty, AI (Artificial Intelligence)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Post Septorhinoplasty
Rhinoplasty, Pain Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
SAUVAGET Elisabeth, MD principal investigator
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of RHINOPLASTY and NASAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES, run by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph at 3 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessment of change of the SNOT 22 score with a significant improvement from a minimal decrease of 10 points (time frame: Day1, Month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.