AzTrials
AzTrials

Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyPhase 4NCT02816710

Conbercept Injection in Treatment of Severe Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

A Phase 4 study testing Conbercept in people with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Tractional Retinal Detachment, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate efficacy of different intravitreal Conbercept injection therapy in the treatment of severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Conbercept
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
112 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jul 2016to Sep 2017
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects of either sex aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2);
  • Active proliferative diabetic retinopathy was clinically evident;
  • Study eyes required a vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade due to vitreous hemorrhage with significant fibrous proliferation, tractional retinal detachment in the posterior pole or complicated retinal detachment, which can be detected by B-scan ultrasonography.
  • Ability to give informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Coexistent ocular disease that may interfere with visual outcome;
  • Prior vitreoretinal surgery or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pharmacotherapy in either eye;
  • A macula-involving retinal detachment for >6 months in the study eye;
  • Iris or angle neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma;
  • known allergy to any components of conbercept formulation
  • severe external ocular infection;
Show all 11Show fewer
  • pregnancy or current oral contraceptive intake;
  • usage of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy;
  • preoperative or postoperative poor diabetes control [serum hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >11.0%];
  • uncontrolled systemic diseases, such as hypertension, cardiac diseases or presenting abnormal coagulation-associated blood diseases;
  • <6 months of follow-up post initial surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Ruijin Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 20025

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Different Conbercept Injection Methods in Treatment of Severe Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

To evaluate efficacy of different intravitreal Conbercept injection therapy in the treatment of severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Read the detailed description

To assess the clinical effects of preoperative, intraoperative or preoperative combined with intraoperative intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection in pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil tamponade for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods. These patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 received an IVC injection 3 to 5 days before surgery; Group 2 received an IVC injection at the end of surgery; and Group 3 received an IVC injection 3 to 5 days before PPV as well as an IVC injection at the end of PPV. Follow-up examinations were performed for at least six months after surgery.

Being tested
Conbercept
Keywords
Conbercept, Proliferative diabetic retinopathy, Silicone oil tamponade

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ConberceptDrug

    Conbercept is a humanized soluble fusion protein which has a high binding affinity to the Fc region of human immunoglobulin G1 simultaneously. Prior clinical studies have demonstrated that intravitreal conbercept (IVC) inhibits the process of angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro, and has been recognized as a novel effective treatment strategy for neovascularization, providing an alternative treatment option for ophthalmologists.

Study groups in NCT02816710
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IVC Preoperative groupExperimentalConbercept injection before vitrectomy
Receives: Drug: Conbercept
IVC Postoperative groupExperimentalConbercept injection at the end of vitrectomy
Receives: Drug: Conbercept
IVC Pre- and Post-operative groupExperimentalFirst conbercept injection before vitrectomy and second at the end of operation.
Receives: Drug: Conbercept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Best-corrected Visual Acuity

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Duration of Surgery

    To evaluate the influence of these three methods to the final duration of surgery. We carefully estimated the time of the vitrectomy from insertion to extraction of the 23-gauge three-port trocars.

    Measured: during the operation time

  3. Intraoperative Bleeding

    The grading criteria for intraoperative bleeding: Grade 1, spontaneous cessation of minor bleeding or bleeding that stopped by transient elevation of perfusion pressure; Grade 2, moderate bleeding requiring endodiathermy or broad blood clots formed far away from the bleeding site; Grade 3, thick blood clots exceeding half of the posterior pole or affecting the operation field.

    Measured: Time between the insertion and extraction of three 23-gauge vitrectomy ports

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Postoperative Preretinal Blood

    The grading criteria for postoperative preretinal blood: Grade 1, isolated blood clots within 10 disk area but without covering the posterior pole; Grade 2, broad blood clots exceeding 10 disk area regardless of involvement of the posterior pole; Grade 3, broad blood clots exceeding 10 disk area as well as involving the posterior pole. Maximal extent of preretinal blood within 1 week postoperatively was used for grading the extent of hemorrhage.

    Measured: postoperatively, up to 1 week

  2. Reabsorption Time of Blood

    To monitor the reabsorption time of preretinal blood.

    Measured: follow up period, up to an average of 6 months after the operation

  3. Recurrent Vitreous Hemorrhage

    Recurrent vitreous hemorrhage(VH) was referred to any new episode of VH occurring after one week postoperatively, dividing into early stage (≤ 4 weeks) and late stage (> 4 weeks).

    Measured: follow up period, up to an average of 6 months after the operation

  4. Frequency of Intraoperative Electrocoagulation

    The number of times electrocoagulation, which was used to stop bleeding, was carefully counted.

    Measured: during the operation time

  5. Number of Participants With Neovascular Glaucoma (NVG)

    Measured: follow up period, up to an average of 6 months after the operation

  6. Recurrent Retinal Detachment

    Measured: follow up period, up to an average of 6 months after the operation

  7. Need for Reoperation

    due to recurrent retinal detachment or unclear vitreous hemorrhage

    Measured: follow up period, up to an average of 6 months after the operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2017
  4. Study completionSep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
112 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02816710
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016062501
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
25 Jun 2016
Last updated
21 Nov 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Conbercept in people with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Tractional Retinal Detachment, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Best-corrected Visual Acuity (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in