Infant ColicsNCT02813772
Efficacy of a Partially Hydrolyzed Formula, Containing Lactobacillus Reuteri, for Infant Colic
A study testing Milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle and Milk formula Optipro, Nestle in people with Infant Colics, run by Federico II University at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Infant colic (IC) is responsible of 25% of pediatric consultation in the first 3-4 months of life affecting from 5% to 30% of infants between 2 weeks and 3 months of life (3, 4). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 day to 4 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Infant Colics
- What is being tested?
- Milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle and Milk formula Optipro, Nestle
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Nov 2015to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 day to 4 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Full-term infants (≥37 weeks gestation at birth); Exclusively formula fed infants at time of enrolment; Infants suffering from IC according to Rome III criteria (Appendix 1); Age < 4 months of life; 5-minute Apgar score ≥7; Birth weight ≥2500 g.
Who cannot join
- Consumption of formula containing probiotics, pHF or with reduced lactose content at time of enrolment; Major medical problem or acute illness, including gastroesophageal reflux, cow's milk protein allergy History of antibiotic treatment before or during the study; History of probiotic or L reuteri supplementation; History of any allergies to any of the ingredients in the probiotic L reuteri Concurrent participation in another clinical trial. Birth weight < 2500 g; Failed to thrive; Breastfed infants; NAN (to avoid the formula switch effect).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Annamaria Staiano contact
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Annamaria Staiano
Naples, Italy, 80131
Annamaria Staiano, staiano@unina.it
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of a Partially Hydrolyzed Formula, Containing Lactobacillus Reuteri, for Infant Colic: a Double Blind, Randomized-controlled Trial
Infant colic (IC) is responsible of 25% of pediatric consultation in the first 3-4 months of life affecting from 5% to 30% of infants between 2 weeks and 3 months of life (3, 4). The variability in the prevalence of IC reported by the several studies depends on different criteria used to define IC.The etiology of IC remains still unclear. Recently, the composition of intestinal microbiome has been addressed as an independent risk factor for IC. There are no uniform criteria for a specific therapeutic approach of IC. Based on these conclusions the objectives of our study are: to determine whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in reducing the infant crying duration and in prolonging the duration of sleeping period
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND Definition Infantile Colic (IC) is one of the Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) of infants/toddlers, which are defined as a variable combination of chronic or recurrent gastrointestinal symptoms not explained by structural or biochemical abnormalities. In 2006, the Rome III committee established a new criteria defining it as "episodes of irritability, fussing, or crying that begin and end for no apparent reason and last at least three hours a day, at least three days a week, for at least one week".
Epidemiology IC is responsible of 25% of pediatric consultation in the first 3-4 months of life affecting from 5% to 30% of infants between 2 weeks and 3 months of life. The variability in the prevalence of IC reported by the several studies depends on different criteria used to define IC.
In a systematic review of 15 community-based surveys on IC prevalence, carried out in 2001, the occurrence rates in the first 3 months of life were from 3% to 28% in prospective studies and from 8% and 40% in retrospective studies. In a prospective study found that 20.5% of 2879 Italian infants, aged 2 weeks-6 months, had IC.
Recently a French study reported a prevalence of IC in infants aged 0-4 months, of 19%. In two english studies, IC was reported in 18.3% and 26 % respectively, of infants aged 0-12 months. Other European studies were conducted with a different reported prevalence.
Outside Europe, a prevalence of 9.2% and of 20% respectively were reported by two studies carried out in US. More recently in an Israeli study of 94 mothers of 2-4 moths of life infants, 56% of those whose babies were breastfed and 73% of those using formula reported "paroxysmal irritability".
In addition, several studies found occurrence rates of crying/fussing problems in young infants ranging from 7% to 19%, without defining the problems as IC.
Pathogenesis The etiology of IC remains still unclear. Gender, type of milk (breast-milk or formula), delivery modality (vaginally or caesarean), mother age, number of siblings and gestational history do not seem to be correlated to IC onset. Gastrointestinal function, psychosocial, and neurodevelopmental disorders, food intolerance, transient low lactase activity, cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA), gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) and intestinal microbiota imbalance have been suggested as the cause of colic.
Gastrointestinal theories include increased intra-abdominal gas, hyperperistalsis and visceral pain. Gastrointestinal disorders have been implicated in colic because of the infant's leg position and grimacing during the crying episodes. Excessive crying or increased gas production from colon function can result in intraluminal gas formation and aerophagia, even if radiographic images taken during a crying episode have shown a normal gastric outline. One study has suggested that infants with colic may have increased fecal calprotectin levels, suggesting a possible role for gut inflammation; however, another study suggested no differences in fecal calprotectin levels between infants with and infants without colic. Gut hormones, such as motilin, also may play a causative role in colic. Motilin is thought to cause hyperperistalsis, leading to abdominal pain and colic. Regarding psychosocial hypotheses, maternal anxiety and depression, and difficult infant temperament have been correlated to IC. Also behavioral issues such as family tension or inadequate interaction between parents and infant have been considered, but these issues are really controversial. Concomitant risk factors remain partially unknown; however, maternal smoking, increased maternal age and firstborn status may be associated to the development of IC.
The role of intestinal microbiome in Infantile Colic Recently, the composition of intestinal microbiome has been addressed as an independent risk factor for IC. Several studies indicate that inadequate lactobacilli in the first few months of life may affect intestinal fatty acid profile favoring the development of IC. Coliform bacteria have also been found more abundantly in colicky infants and it is speculated that altering the intestinal microbiota composition may positively influence the management of affected infants. As a matter of fact, recently, research into the use of probiotics for colic has been rapidly increasing but results are conflicting. Infants with colic are reported to have increased concentration of gas forming organisms and proteobacteria such as Escherichia coli in their gut. Colonization with certain intestinal microorganisms, such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species, along with increased intestinal microbial diversity, may protect against infant distress. Probiotics enhance the mucosal barrier and promote microbial diversity in the gut. They may reduce concentrations of proteobacteria and gas forming coliform and reduce intestinal inflammation.
One clinical trial showed safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri in prevention of IC. A recent meta-analysis of three small, randomized controlled trials, of breast-fed infants with IC reported that Lactobacillus reuteri noticeably reduced crying time at 21 days post supplementation. Recently Chau et al showed that administration of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 significantly improved colic symptoms by reducing crying and fussing times in breastfed Canadian infants with colic. In contrast, a double blind, placebo controlled randomized trial on the same probiotic strain Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 showed that it did not benefit a community sample of breast-fed infants and formula-fed infants with IC.
The role of diet in Infant colic There are no uniform criteria for a specific therapeutic approach of IC. Regarding dietary modifications on management of IC, current evidence suggests that they may reduce IC in only a very small minority of infants. Unfortunately, the evidence is often contrasting. For the breast-fed infants with IC, where there is the relatively rare concern of a cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA), one can consider eliminating cow's milk from the maternal diet for a minimum of two weeks. For the formula-fed infants with colic, the use of a time-limited (two weeks) empiric trial of an extensively hydrolyzed formula may be considered. However this information derived from studies in highly selected patients from tertiary care level centers. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, a partial hydrolyzed, with high β-palmitate, and a specific prebiotics mixture with galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides resulted in a significant decrease of colic within one week of intervention. In some cases, these formulas are lactose-reduced or lactose-free and contain prebiotics or probiotics causing a reduction in the number of crying episodes per week and total crying time. Infante et al showed an association between clinical improvement and evidence of decreased levels of hydrogen in IC when the infants were fed with a specially designed, low-lactose formula. Moreover, in two double-blinded crossover trials, lactase treatment reduced crying time compared with placebo. The use of soy formulas, instead, in the treatment of IC should be avoided since it can induce sensitization to soy and it's high in isoflavones with estradiol-like effects.
OBJECTIVES
Primary objective:
-To determine whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in reducing the infant crying duration.
Secondary objectives:
- To evaluate the effect of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri in prolonging the duration of sleeping period.
- To evaluate the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on fecal microbiome of colicky infants
- To evaluate the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on parents' quality of life
- To evaluate the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on infants' quality of life
METHODS
Study design
- This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized-controlled, clinical trial.
- The study aims to compare the infant colic's trend and intestinal microbiome between infants fed with partially hydrolyzed formulas (pHF; 100% whey protein; 1.9g/100 kcal) with reduced lactose content (40%), addition of maltodextrins (60%) and Lactobacillus reuteri (NAN Sensitive, Nestlè) (group 1) and infants fed with an intact protein body formula (70% of whey protein, 30% of casein; 1.85g/100 kcal) with 100% of lactose content and not containing Lactobacillus reuteri (NAN Optipro 1, Nestlè) (group 2).
- Subjects will be enrolled consecutively and randomized to one of the 2 study groups.
- Conditions
- Infant Colics
- Being tested
- Milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle, Milk formula Optipro, Nestle
- Keywords
- infants, colic
- Medical subject headings
- Colic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Milk formula NAN Sensitive, NestleDietary supplement
Infants randomized to group 1 will receive the milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle for a period of 4 weeks.
Milk formula Optipro, NestleDietary supplement
Infants randomized to group 1 will receive the milk formula NAN Optipro, Nestle for a period of 4 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| group 1 | Experimental | Patients with infantile colics who will receive the milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestlè Receives: Dietary Supplement: Milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle |
| group 2 | Active comparator | Patients with infantile colics who will receive the milk formula NAN Optipro, Nestlè Receives: Dietary Supplement: Milk formula Optipro, Nestle |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in reducing the infant crying duration.
Infant crying duration (minutes per day) at 7, 14, 21, 28 days, 2 and 3 months post-intervention.
Measured: 7, 14, 21, 28 days, 2 and 3 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in reducing the infant crying duration.
Percentage of responders at 28 days post-intervention. A response to the treatment will be defined as 50% of reduction of infant crying.
Measured: 28 days
whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in increasing infant sleep.
Longer infant sleep duration at 7, 14, 21, 28 days, 2 and 3 months post-intervention
Measured: 7, 14, 21, 28 days, 2 and 3 months
the effect of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) on quality of life of the enrolled patients
Reduction of mean scores of a standardized measure for childrens' quality of life
Measured: 3 months
the effect of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) on quality of life of parents
Reduction of mean scores of a standardized measure for parents' quality of life
Measured: 3 months
the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on fecal microbiome of colicky infants
Changes in gut microbiome
Measured: 2 months
Changes in stool frequency and consistency
Changes in stool frequency and consistency
Measured: 28 days
Parental perception of colic severity (VAS 0-10)
Parental perception of colic severity (VAS 0-10)
Measured: 28 days
Parental perception of sleep quality (VAS 0-10)
Parental perception of sleep quality (VAS 0-10)
Measured: 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2015
- Primary completionOct 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Infant ColicsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Federico II UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federico II University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Annamaria Staiano, Federico II University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02813772
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 30/05/2016
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: December 2016
Publications
Turco R, Russo M, Bruzzese D, Staiano A. Efficacy of a partially hydrolysed formula, with reduced lactose content and with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in infant colic: A double blind, randomised clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2021 Feb;40(2):412-419. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.048. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
PubMed 32600858
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of a Partially Hydrolyzed Formula, Containing Lactobacillus Reuteri, for Infant Colic: a Double Blind, Randomized-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02813772
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 30/05/2016
- Conditions
- Infant Colics
- Keywords
- infants, colic
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Federico II UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2015
- Primary completion
- Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Infant colic (IC) is responsible of 25% of pediatric consultation in the first 3-4 months of life affecting from 5% to 30% of infants between 2 weeks and 3 months of life (3, 4). The variability in the prevalence of IC reported by the several studies depends on different criteria used to define IC.The etiology of IC remains still unclear. Recently, the composition of intestinal microbiome has been addressed as an independent risk factor for IC. There are no uniform criteria for a specific therapeutic approach of IC. Based on these conclusions the objectives of our study are: to determine whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in reducing the infant crying duration and in prolonging the duration of sleeping period
Detailed description
BACKGROUND Definition Infantile Colic (IC) is one of the Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) of infants/toddlers, which are defined as a variable combination of chronic or recurrent gastrointestinal symptoms not explained by structural or biochemical abnormalities. In 2006, the Rome III committee established a new criteria defining it as "episodes of irritability, fussing, or crying that begin and end for no apparent reason and last at least three hours a day, at least three days a week, for at least one week".
Epidemiology IC is responsible of 25% of pediatric consultation in the first 3-4 months of life affecting from 5% to 30% of infants between 2 weeks and 3 months of life. The variability in the prevalence of IC reported by the several studies depends on different criteria used to define IC.
In a systematic review of 15 community-based surveys on IC prevalence, carried out in 2001, the occurrence rates in the first 3 months of life were from 3% to 28% in prospective studies and from 8% and 40% in retrospective studies. In a prospective study found that 20.5% of 2879 Italian infants, aged 2 weeks-6 months, had IC.
Recently a French study reported a prevalence of IC in infants aged 0-4 months, of 19%. In two english studies, IC was reported in 18.3% and 26 % respectively, of infants aged 0-12 months. Other European studies were conducted with a different reported prevalence.
Outside Europe, a prevalence of 9.2% and of 20% respectively were reported by two studies carried out in US. More recently in an Israeli study of 94 mothers of 2-4 moths of life infants, 56% of those whose babies were breastfed and 73% of those using formula reported "paroxysmal irritability".
In addition, several studies found occurrence rates of crying/fussing problems in young infants ranging from 7% to 19%, without defining the problems as IC.
Pathogenesis The etiology of IC remains still unclear. Gender, type of milk (breast-milk or formula), delivery modality (vaginally or caesarean), mother age, number of siblings and gestational history do not seem to be correlated to IC onset. Gastrointestinal function, psychosocial, and neurodevelopmental disorders, food intolerance, transient low lactase activity, cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA), gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) and intestinal microbiota imbalance have been suggested as the cause of colic.
Gastrointestinal theories include increased intra-abdominal gas, hyperperistalsis and visceral pain. Gastrointestinal disorders have been implicated in colic because of the infant's leg position and grimacing during the crying episodes. Excessive crying or increased gas production from colon function can result in intraluminal gas formation and aerophagia, even if radiographic images taken during a crying episode have shown a normal gastric outline. One study has suggested that infants with colic may have increased fecal calprotectin levels, suggesting a possible role for gut inflammation; however, another study suggested no differences in fecal calprotectin levels between infants with and infants without colic. Gut hormones, such as motilin, also may play a causative role in colic. Motilin is thought to cause hyperperistalsis, leading to abdominal pain and colic. Regarding psychosocial hypotheses, maternal anxiety and depression, and difficult infant temperament have been correlated to IC. Also behavioral issues such as family tension or inadequate interaction between parents and infant have been considered, but these issues are really controversial. Concomitant risk factors remain partially unknown; however, maternal smoking, increased maternal age and firstborn status may be associated to the development of IC.
The role of intestinal microbiome in Infantile Colic Recently, the composition of intestinal microbiome has been addressed as an independent risk factor for IC. Several studies indicate that inadequate lactobacilli in the first few months of life may affect intestinal fatty acid profile favoring the development of IC. Coliform bacteria have also been found more abundantly in colicky infants and it is speculated that altering the intestinal microbiota composition may positively influence the management of affected infants. As a matter of fact, recently, research into the use of probiotics for colic has been rapidly increasing but results are conflicting. Infants with colic are reported to have increased concentration of gas forming organisms and proteobacteria such as Escherichia coli in their gut. Colonization with certain intestinal microorganisms, such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species, along with increased intestinal microbial diversity, may protect against infant distress. Probiotics enhance the mucosal barrier and promote microbial diversity in the gut. They may reduce concentrations of proteobacteria and gas forming coliform and reduce intestinal inflammation.
One clinical trial showed safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri in prevention of IC. A recent meta-analysis of three small, randomized controlled trials, of breast-fed infants with IC reported that Lactobacillus reuteri noticeably reduced crying time at 21 days post supplementation. Recently Chau et al showed that administration of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 significantly improved colic symptoms by reducing crying and fussing times in breastfed Canadian infants with colic. In contrast, a double blind, placebo controlled randomized trial on the same probiotic strain Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 showed that it did not benefit a community sample of breast-fed infants and formula-fed infants with IC.
The role of diet in Infant colic There are no uniform criteria for a specific therapeutic approach of IC. Regarding dietary modifications on management of IC, current evidence suggests that they may reduce IC in only a very small minority of infants. Unfortunately, the evidence is often contrasting. For the breast-fed infants with IC, where there is the relatively rare concern of a cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA), one can consider eliminating cow's milk from the maternal diet for a minimum of two weeks. For the formula-fed infants with colic, the use of a time-limited (two weeks) empiric trial of an extensively hydrolyzed formula may be considered. However this information derived from studies in highly selected patients from tertiary care level centers. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, a partial hydrolyzed, with high β-palmitate, and a specific prebiotics mixture with galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides resulted in a significant decrease of colic within one week of intervention. In some cases, these formulas are lactose-reduced or lactose-free and contain prebiotics or probiotics causing a reduction in the number of crying episodes per week and total crying time. Infante et al showed an association between clinical improvement and evidence of decreased levels of hydrogen in IC when the infants were fed with a specially designed, low-lactose formula. Moreover, in two double-blinded crossover trials, lactase treatment reduced crying time compared with placebo. The use of soy formulas, instead, in the treatment of IC should be avoided since it can induce sensitization to soy and it's high in isoflavones with estradiol-like effects.
OBJECTIVES
Primary objective:
-To determine whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in reducing the infant crying duration.
Secondary objectives:
- To evaluate the effect of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri in prolonging the duration of sleeping period.
- To evaluate the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on fecal microbiome of colicky infants
- To evaluate the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on parents' quality of life
- To evaluate the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on infants' quality of life
METHODS
Study design
- This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized-controlled, clinical trial.
- The study aims to compare the infant colic's trend and intestinal microbiome between infants fed with partially hydrolyzed formulas (pHF; 100% whey protein; 1.9g/100 kcal) with reduced lactose content (40%), addition of maltodextrins (60%) and Lactobacillus reuteri (NAN Sensitive, Nestlè) (group 1) and infants fed with an intact protein body formula (70% of whey protein, 30% of casein; 1.85g/100 kcal) with 100% of lactose content and not containing Lactobacillus reuteri (NAN Optipro 1, Nestlè) (group 2).
- Subjects will be enrolled consecutively and randomized to one of the 2 study groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| group 1 | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Milk formula NAN Sensitive, NestlePatients with infantile colics who will receive the milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestlè |
| group 2 | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Milk formula Optipro, NestlePatients with infantile colics who will receive the milk formula NAN Optipro, Nestlè |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 day to 4 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Full-term infants (≥37 weeks gestation at birth); Exclusively formula fed infants at time of enrolment; Infants suffering from IC according to Rome III criteria (Appendix 1); Age < 4 months of life; 5-minute Apgar score ≥7; Birth weight ≥2500 g.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Consumption of formula containing probiotics, pHF or with reduced lactose content at time of enrolment; Major medical problem or acute illness, including gastroesophageal reflux, cow's milk protein allergy History of antibiotic treatment before or during the study; History of probiotic or L reuteri supplementation; History of any allergies to any of the ingredients in the probiotic L reuteri Concurrent participation in another clinical trial. Birth weight < 2500 g; Failed to thrive; Breastfed infants; NAN (to avoid the formula switch effect).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Milk formula NAN Sensitive, NestleInfants randomized to group 1 will receive the milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle for a period of 4 weeks. | Dietary supplement | group 1 |
| Milk formula Optipro, NestleInfants randomized to group 1 will receive the milk formula NAN Optipro, Nestle for a period of 4 weeks. | Dietary supplement | group 2 |
Primary outcome
whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in reducing the infant crying duration.
Time frame: 7, 14, 21, 28 days, 2 and 3 months
Infant crying duration (minutes per day) at 7, 14, 21, 28 days, 2 and 3 months post-intervention.
8 secondary outcomes
whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in reducing the infant crying duration.
Time frame: 28 days
whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in increasing infant sleep.
Time frame: 7, 14, 21, 28 days, 2 and 3 months
the effect of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) on quality of life of the enrolled patients
Time frame: 3 months
the effect of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) on quality of life of parents
Time frame: 3 months
the effect of this infant formula enriched with Lactobacillus reuteri on fecal microbiome of colicky infants
Time frame: 2 months
Changes in stool frequency and consistency
Time frame: 28 days
Parental perception of colic severity (VAS 0-10)
Time frame: 28 days
Parental perception of sleep quality (VAS 0-10)
Time frame: 28 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32600858Turco R, Russo M, Bruzzese D, Staiano A. Efficacy of a partially hydrolysed formula, with reduced lactose content and with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in infant colic: A double blind, randomised clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2021 Feb;40(2):412-419. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.048. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. December 2016
Related trials for Infant Colics
Recruiting
The Effect of Probiotics in Infantile Colic
Infantile Colic
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of Probiotic Limosilactobacillus Reuteri (L. Reuteri) on Crying and Fussing Time in Infants With Colic
Infantile Colic
Active, not recruiting
RELIEF-pathway in Patients With Upper Abdominal Pain
Abdominal Pain, Gallstone; Colic
Recruiting
Use of Bifidobacterium Bifidum in Formula-Fed Infants With Colic, With or Without Atopic Dermatitis
Infant Colic, Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of BioAmicus Complete
Infantile Colics, Constipation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Annamaria Staiano contact
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Milk formula NAN Sensitive, Nestle and Milk formula Optipro, Nestle in people with Infant Colics, run by Federico II University at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Annamaria Staiano (staiano@unina.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
whether the administration of a partially hydrolyzed formula (pHF) with reduced lactose content and Lactobacillus reuteri, is beneficial in IC in reducing the infant crying duration. (time frame: 7, 14, 21, 28 days, 2 and 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02813772, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2016.