Renal Cell CarcinomaPhase 3CLEARNCT02811861
Lenvatinib/Everolimus or Lenvatinib/Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib Alone as Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
A Phase 3 study testing Lenvatinib, Everolimus and Pembrolizumab in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Eisai Inc. at 183 sites in 20 countries.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate that lenvatinib in combination with everolimus (Arm A) or pembrolizumab (Arm B) is superior compared to sunitinib alone (Arm C) in improving progression-free survival (PFS) (by independent imaging review [IIR] using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Lenvatinib, Everolimus and Pembrolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,069 participants
- Where
- 183 sitesin 20 countries
- Study dates
- 13 Oct 2016to 31 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histological or cytological confirmation of RCC with a clear-cell component (original tissue diagnosis of RCC is acceptable).
- Documented evidence of advanced RCC.
- At least 1 measurable target lesion according to RECIST 1.1 meeting the following criteria:
- Lymph node (LN) lesion that measures at least 1 dimension as greater than or equal to (>=) 1.5 cm in the short axis
- Lymph node (LN) lesion that measures at least 1 dimension as greater than or equal to (>=) 1.5 centimeter (cm) in the short axis
- Non-nodal lesion that measures greater than or equal to (>=) 1.0 cm in the longest diameter
Show all 17Show fewer
- The lesion is suitable for repeat measurement using computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Lesions that have had external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or locoregional therapy must show radiographic evidence of disease progression based on RECIST 1.1 to be deemed a target lesion.
- 3.Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of >=70 4.Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with or without antihypertensive medications, defined as BP less than or equal (<=) 150/90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) at Screening and no change in antihypertensive medications within 1 week prior to Cycle 1/Day 1 (C1/D1) 5.Adequate renal function defined as creatinine <=1.5upper limit of normal (ULN); or for participants with creatinine greater than (>) 1.5ULN, the calculated creatinine clearance >=30 milliliters per minute (mL/min) (per the Cockcroft-Gault formula) is acceptable.
- 6.Adequate bone marrow function defined by:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >=1500/cubic millimeter (mm^3)
- Platelets >=100,000/mm^3
- Hemoglobin >=9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) NOTE: Criteria must be met without erythropoietin dependency and without packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion within the previous 2 weeks.
- 7.Adequate blood coagulation function defined by International Normalized ratio (INR) <=1.5 unless participant is receiving anticoagulant therapy, as long as INR is within therapeutic range of intended use of anticoagulants.
- 8.Adequate liver function defined by:
- Total bilirubin <=1.5*ULN except for unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia of Gilbert's syndrome.
- Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) <=3*ULN (in the case of liver metastases <=5*ULN), unless there are bone metastases. Participants with ALP values >3*ULN and known to have bone metastases can be included.
- 9.Provide written informed consent. 10.Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol.
Who cannot join
- Participants who have received any systemic anticancer therapy for RCC, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, or any systemic investigational anticancer agent. Prior adjuvant treatment with an investigational anticancer agent is not allowed unless the investigator can provide evidence of participant's randomization to placebo arm.
- Participants with central nervous system (CNS) metastases are not eligible, unless they have completed local therapy (example, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgery or radiosurgery) and have discontinued the use of corticosteroids for this indication for at least 4 weeks before starting treatment in this study. Any signs (example, radiologic) or symptoms of CNS metastases must be stable for at least 4 weeks before starting study treatment
- Active malignancy (except for RCC, definitively treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, and carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or bladder) within the past 24 months. Participants with history of localized \& low risk prostate cancer are allowed in the study if they were treated with curative intent and there is no prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence within the past 5 years
- Prior radiation therapy within 21 days prior to start of study treatment with the exception of palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions, which is allowed if completed 2 weeks prior to study treatment start
- Participants who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs <=4 weeks prior to study treatment start.
- Received a live vaccine within 30 days of planned start of study treatment (Cycle 1/Day 1). Examples of live vaccines include, but are not limited to, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella/zoster (chicken pox), yellow fever, rabies, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and typhoid vaccine. Seasonal influenza vaccines for injection are generally killed virus vaccines and are allowed; however, intranasal influenza vaccines (example, FluMist®) are live attenuated vaccines and are not allowed.
Show all 33Show fewer
- Participants with proteinuria >1+ on urine dipstick testing will undergo 24-h urine collection for quantitative assessment of proteinuria. Participants with urine protein >=1 g/24 h will be ineligible
- Fasting total cholesterol >300 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (or ˃7.75 millimole per liter (mmol/L)) and/or fasting triglycerides level ˃2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN). Note: these participants can be included after initiation or adjustment of lipid-lowering medication
- Uncontrolled diabetes as defined by fasting glucose >1.5 times the ULN. Note: these participants can be included after initiation or adjustment of glucose-lowering medication
- Prolongation of corrected QT (QTc) interval to >480 milliseconds (ms)
- Participants who have not recovered adequately from any toxicity and/or complications from major surgery prior to starting therapy.
- Gastrointestinal malabsorption, gastrointestinal anastomosis, or any other condition that might affect the absorption of lenvatinib, everolimus, and/or sunitinib.
- Bleeding or thrombotic disorders or participants at risk for severe hemorrhage. The degree of tumor invasion/infiltration of major blood vessels should be considered because of the potential risk of severe hemorrhage associated with tumor shrinkage/necrosis following lenvatinib therapy
- Clinically significant hemoptysis or tumor bleeding within 2 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug
- Significant cardiovascular impairment within 12 months of the first dose of study drug: history of congestive heart failure greater than New York Heart Association Class II, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or cardiac arrhythmia associated with hemodynamic instability. The following is also excluded: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below the institutional normal range as determined by multiple-gated acquisition MUGA scan or echocardiogram
- Active infection (any infection requiring systemic treatment)
- Participants known to be positive for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
- Known active Hepatitis B (example, Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) reactive) or Hepatitis C (example, hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) [qualitative] is detected)
- Known history of, or any evidence of, interstitial lung disease
- Has a history of (non-infectious) pneumonitis that required steroids, or current pneumonitis
- Participants with a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or who are receiving chronic systemic steroid therapy (doses exceeding 10 mg/day of prednisone equivalent) or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of study treatment. Physiologic doses of corticosteroids (up to 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) may be used during the study
- Active autoimmune disease (with the exception of psoriasis) that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years (that is, with use of disease modifying agents, corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs). Replacement therapy (example, thyroxine, insulin, or physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency) is not considered a form of systemic treatment.
- Females who are breastfeeding or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [ß-hCG] (or human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG]) test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 IU/L or equivalent units of ß-hCG [or hCG]). A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug.
- Females of childbearing potential who:
- Do not agree to use a highly effective method of contraception for the entire study period and for 120 days after study discontinuation, that is:
- total abstinence (if it is their preferred and usual lifestyle)
- an intrauterine device (IUD) or hormone-releasing system (IUS)
- a contraceptive implant
- an oral contraceptive (with additional barrier method) OR
- Do not have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia. For sites outside of the EU, it is permissible that if a highly effective method of contraception is not appropriate or acceptable to the participant, then the participant must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception, that is, double barrier methods of contraception such as condom plus diaphragm or cervical/vault cap with spermicide.
- Males who have not had a successful vasectomy (confirmed azoospermia) and do not agree to use condom + spermicide OR have a female partner who does not meet the criteria above (that is, is of childbearing potential and not practicing highly effective contraception throughout the study period), starting with the first dose of study therapy through 120 days after the last dose of study therapy, unless sexually abstinent. Note: Abstinence is acceptable if this is the usual lifestyle and preferred contraception for the participant.
- Known intolerance to any of the study drugs (or any of the excipients)
- Participant has had an allogenic tissue/solid organ transplant.
Trial locations and contacts
183 sites in 20 countries.
183 sites in 20 countries
United States35 sites
Mission Hospital_ Cancer Care of Western North Carolina
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
Associates in Oncology & Hematology, PC
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817
Boca Raton Community Hospital
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Massachusetts General Hospital- MGH
Boston, Massachusetts, 02214
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Rosewell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29412
Oncology Hematology Care
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Texas Oncology, P.A.
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Karmanos Cancer Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Florida Cancer Specialists
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901
Texas Oncology PA
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Hackensack Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Broome Oncology
Johnson City, New York, 13790
Joliet Oncology - Hematology Associates
Joliet, Illinois, 60435
Texas Oncology PA - McAllen
McAllen, Texas, 78503
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33136
SCRI - Tennessee Oncology
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10021
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
GU Research Network
Omaha, Nebraska, 68130
Nebraska Cancer Specialists
Omaha, Nebraska, 68130
Florida Hospital Cancer Institute
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Health Midwest Ventures Group, Inc d/b/a HCA MidAmerica Division, LLC
Overland Park, Kansas, 66209
Texas Oncology PA - Paris
Paris, Texas, 75460
Florida Cancer Specialists ( North Region)
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705
Stanford School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305-5826
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461
USOR Texas Oncology
The Woodlands, Texas, 77380
Healthcare Research Network III, LLC
Tinley Park, Illinois, 60487
Cotton-Oneil Clinical Research Center
Topeka, Kansas, 66604
Texas Oncology PA - Tyler
Tyler, Texas, 75702
Florida Cancer Specialists
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Japan26 sites
Facility #1
Aichi
Facility #1
Akita
Facility #1
Aomori
Facility #2
Chiba
Facility #1
Fukuoka
Facility #1
Hiroshima
Facility #1
Hokkaido
Facility #2
Hokkaido
Facility #1
Hyōgo
Facility #1
Kagawa
Facility #2
Kanagawa
Facility #3
Kanagawa
Facility #1
Nagasaki
Facility #1
Nara
Facility #1
Niigata
Facility #1
Okayama
Facility #1
Osaka
Facility #2
Osaka
Facility #1
Saitama
Facility #1
Tokushima
Facility #1
Tokyo
Facility #2
Tokyo
Facility #3
Tokyo
Facility #4
Tokyo
Facility #5
Tokyo
Facility #6
Tokyo
Italy15 sites
Ospedale San Donato
Arezzo
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico SantOrsola Malpighi
Bologna
Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale- Ravenna
Faenza, Ravenna, 48018
Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro di Genova
Genova, 16132
Presidio Ospedaliero Vito Fazzi
Lecce, 73100
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori - IRST
Meldola
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan, 20133
A.O.U. Policlinico di Modena
Modena, 41124
Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale A. Cardarelli
Naples, 80131
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale
Naples
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia
I.R.C.S.S Fondazione Maugeri
Pavia
Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Degli Angeli
Pordenone, 33170
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
Roma
Universita Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
Rome
Spain15 sites
Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
ICO l'Hospitalet - Hospital Duran I Reynals
Barcelona, 08908
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona
Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara
Cáceres, 10003
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Córdoba
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Clinico San Carlos
Madrid
Hospital Universitario HM Madrid Sanchinarro
Madrid
MD Anderson Cancer Centre
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, 33011
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville
Oncologia
Valencia, 46009
France9 sites
ICO - Site Paul Papin
Angers, Maine Et Loire, 49055
Centre Georges François Leclerc
Dijon, 21079
Clinique Victor Hugo - Centre Jean Bernard
Le Mans
Centre Leon Berard - Centre regional de lutte contre le cancer Rhone-Alpes
Lyon
Institut Regional du Cancer de Montpellier
Montpellier
Hopital la Petie Salpetriere
Paris, cedex 13 75651
Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
Paris
Boulevard du Professeur Jacques Monod
Saint-Herblain, 4805
CHU Strasbourg - Nouvel Hopital Civil
Strasbourg
Germany9 sites
EISAI Trial site 5
Berlin, 12200
EISAI Trial site 6
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590
EISAI Trial site 14
Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
EISAI Trial site 8
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625
EISAI Trial site 2
Homburg/Saar, Saarland, 66421
EISAI Trial site 7
München, Bavaria, 81377
EISAI Trial site 13
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149
EISAI Trial site 4
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70174
EISAI Trial site 1
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076
South Korea9 sites
Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital
Daegu, 41404
National Cancer Center
Goyang-si
Asan Medical Center: Medical Oncology Department
Seoul
Asan Medical Center: Urology Department
Seoul
Department of Internal Medicine Division of Hematology/Oncology Cancer center 11F
Seoul
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul
The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul
United Kingdom8 sites
Royal Bournemouth General Hospital
Bournemouth
Velindre Cancer Centre
Cardiff
Western General Hospital
Edinburgh
Beatson West Of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow, G12 0YN
St. James's University Hospital
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Guy's Hospital
London
Royal Free Hospital
London
Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, M20 4BX
Belgium7 sites
O.L.V Ziekenhuis
Aalst
ZNA Middelheim
Antwerp, 2260
Imeldaziekenhuis
Bonheiden
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, 1000
Jessa Ziekenhuis - Campus Virga Jesse
Hasselt, 3500
Domaine Universitaire
Liège, 4000
GZA Ziekenhuizen - Campus Sint-Augustinus
Wilrijk, 2610
Canada7 sites
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Centre de santé et de services sociaux Champlain-Charles-Le Moyne
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6
London Institute of Health Sciences
London, Ontario, N6A4L6
Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8
Sunnybrook Research Institute - University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
BC Cancer Agency Vancouver Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1H7
Russia7 sites
FSBSI Russian Oncological Scientific Center n.a. N.N. Blokhin - Department of Oncology
Moscow, 115478
FSBI "Moscow scientific research oncology institute n.a. P.A. Gertsen" of MoH of RF
Moscow, 125284
FSBSI Russian Oncological Scientific Center n.a. N.N. Blokhin - Department of Urology
Moscow
FBHI Privolzhskiy District Medical Centre FMBA of Russia
Nizhny Novgorod
SBHI of Novosibirsk region "Novosibirsk Regional Oncological Dispensary"
Novosibirsk, 630108
FSBI "National Medical Research Radiological Center" of the MoH of the RF
Obninsk, 249036
BHI of Omsk region "Clinical Oncology Dispensary"
Omsk, 644013
Australia6 sites
Box Hill Hospital
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Austin Health
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Royal Hobart Hospital
Hobart
Macquarie University Hospital
Macquarie Park
ICON Cancer Foundation
South Brisbane
Sunshine Hospital
St Albans
Czechia6 sites
Fakultni nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brne
Brno
Masarykuv onkologicky ustav
Brno
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc, Neurologicka klinika
Olomouc
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
Prague
Nemocnice Na Bulovce
Prague
Thomayerova nemocnice
Prague
Israel6 sites
Assaf Harofeh Medical Center
Be’er Ya‘aqov
Rambam MC
Haifa
Sapir Medical Center, Meir Hospital
Kfar Saba
Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus
Petah Tikva, 49100
Chaim Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv
Greece4 sites
General Hospital of Athens "Alexandra"
Athens, 11528
University of Patras Medical School
Pátrai, 26504
General Hospital Papageorgiou
Thessaloniki, 56429
Interbalkan Hospital of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki, 57001
Ireland4 sites
Cork University Hospital,Wilton
Cork
Adelaide and Meath Hospital Incorp The National Children's Hospital
Dublin
Beaumont Hospital
Dublin
University Hospital Galway
Galway
Austria3 sites
Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck
Innsbruck
Krankenhaus der barmherzigen Schwestern Linz
Linz
AKH - Medizinische Universität Wien
Vienna, 1090
Netherlands3 sites
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
Amsterdam, 1066 CX
VU Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, 3584 CX
Poland3 sites
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
Gdansk
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 4 w Lublinie
Lublin
SPWSZ w Szczecinie im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie
Szczecin
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Everolimus or Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib Alone in First-Line Treatment of Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (CLEAR)
The primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate that lenvatinib in combination with everolimus (Arm A) or pembrolizumab (Arm B) is superior compared to sunitinib alone (Arm C) in improving progression-free survival (PFS) (by independent imaging review [IIR] using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST 1.1]) as first-line treatment in participants with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Lenvatinib, Everolimus, Pembrolizumab, Sunitinib
- Keywords
- Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), Lenvatinib, First-line RCC, Treatment-naive RCC, Everolimus, Pembrolizumab, Sunitinib, Phase 3 RCC, Phase 3 first-line RCC, Phase 3 treatment-naive RCC
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LenvatinibDrug
EverolimusDrug
PembrolizumabDrug
SunitinibDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lenvatinib 18 mg plus Everolimus 5 mg | Experimental | Lenvatinib 18 milligrams (mg) administered orally, once daily, plus everolimus 5 mg administered orally, once daily in each 21-day cycle. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib; Drug: Everolimus |
| Lenvatinib 20 mg plus Pembrolizumab 200 mg | Experimental | Lenvatinib 20 mg administered orally, once daily, in each 21-day cycle plus pembrolizumab 200 mg administered intravenously (IV), every 3 weeks on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib; Drug: Pembrolizumab |
| Sunitinib 50 mg | Active comparator | Sunitinib 50 mg administered orally, once daily, on a schedule of 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment in each 21-day cycle. Receives: Drug: Sunitinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Imaging Review (IIR)
PFS assessed by IIR was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death (whichever occurred first) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase or 5 millimeter (mm) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first or up to data cutoff date 28 Aug 2020 (up to approximately 46 months)
Secondary outcomes (12)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as the proportion of participants who had best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by IIR using RECIST 1.1. CR is defined as disappearance of all (targeted and non-target [NT]) lesions. All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (<) 10mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. To be considered a BOR, all responses had to be confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the initial assessment of response. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
Measured: Up to approximately 69 months
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants who were lost to follow-up and those who were alive at the data cutoff date were censored, either at the last date the participant was last known alive or at the data cutoff date, whichever occurred first. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
Measured: Up to approximately 69 months
Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
TEAEs were defined as those adverse events (AEs) that occurred (or worsened, if present at Baseline) after the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug.An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered an investigational product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with medicinal product. A SAE was defined as any AE if it resulted in death or life-threatening AE or required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or resulted in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
Measured: Up to approximately 69 months
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Toxicity
Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026.
Measured: Up to approximately 69 months
Time to Treatment Failure Due to Toxicity
Time to treatment failure due to toxicity is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date that a participant discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
Measured: Up to approximately 69 months
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Syndrome Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Scores
The FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 items that experts and participants had indicated are important targets for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer, and that clinical experts had indicated are primarily disease-related, as opposed to treatment-related. Symptoms assessed on the FKSI-DRS included lack of energy, fatigue, weight loss, pain, bone pain, shortness of breath, cough, fever, or hematuria. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much) where total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 36 (best), where higher scores correspond to better outcomes. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
Measured: Up to approximately 69 months
HRQoL Assessed by European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire including 30 questions that rate the overall quality of life in cancer participants. The first 28 questions use a 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) for evaluating function (physical, role, social, cognitive, emotional), symptoms (diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, nausea/vomiting, constipation, and pain) and financial difficulties. The last 2 questions use a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent) to evaluate overall health and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using a standard EORTC algorithm. For the overall HRQoL and functioning scales, a higher score is correlated with better HRQoL, whereas a higher score represents worse HRQoL for symptom scales. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026)
Measured: Up to approximately 69 months
HRQoL Assessed by European Quality of Life (EuroQol) Five-Dimensional, 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Score
EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire consisting of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). For the EQ-5D, participants rate 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) at 1 of 3 levels (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The EQ-5D Health Utilities Index (HUI) is derived from the five dimensions of the EQ-5D, using country-specific preference weights (tariffs) to summarize how good or bad each health state is on a scale from 1 (full health) to <0 (worse health/dead). The EQ-VAS measures self-rated global health status using a vertically oriented VAS, where 100 represents the "best imaginable health state" and 0 represents the "worst imaginable health state." Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026)
Measured: Up to approximately 69 months
PFS on Next-line of Therapy (PFS2)
PFS2 is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression as assessed by investigator on next-line treatment or death from any cause (whichever occurred first). Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026)
Measured: Up to approximately 69 months
PFS by Investigator Assessment
PFS by investigator assessment is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression based on the investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1 or death (whichever occurred first). Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
Measured: Up to approximately 69 months
Model-predicted Clearance for Lenvatinib and Everolimus
Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026)
Measured: Cycles 1 and 2 Day 1; 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours postdose; Cycle 1 Day 15: predose and 2-12 hours postdose; Cycles 3, 4, 5 and 6 Day 1: predose (Cycle length=21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lenvatinib and Everolimus
Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026)
Measured: Cycles 1 and 2 Day 1; 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours postdose; Cycle 1 Day 15: predose and 2-12 hours postdose; Cycles 3, 4, 5 and 6 Day 1: predose (Cycle length = 21 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study start13 Oct 2016
- Primary completion28 Aug 2020
- Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Renal Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Eisai Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,069 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02811861
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E7080-G000-307
- Other IDs
- KEYNOTE-581, 2016-000916-14, 2016
- Acronym
- CLEAR
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Fawsitt CG, Pan J, Orishaba P, Jackson CH, Thom H. Unanchored simulated treatment comparison on survival outcomes using parametric and Royston-Parmar models with application to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in renal cell carcinoma. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02480-x.
PubMed 39885377Grunwald V, McKay RR, Buchler T, Eto M, Park SH, Takagi T, Zanetta S, Keizman D, Suarez C, Negrier S, Lee JL, Santini D, Bedke J, Staehler M, Kollmannsberger C, Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ, Burgents JE, Xie R, Okpara CE, Powles T. Clinical outcomes by baseline metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib: Post hoc analysis of the CLEAR trial. Int J Cancer. 2025 Apr 1;156(7):1326-1335. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35288. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
PubMed 39739622Zheng H, Zhou J, Tong Y, Zhang J. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Feb;23(1):102264. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102264. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
PubMed 39642774Motzer RJ, Choueiri TK, Hutson T, Young Rha S, Puente J, Lalani AA, Winquist E, Eto M, Basappa NS, Tannir NM, Vaishampayan U, Bjarnason GA, Oudard S, Grunwald V, Burgents J, Xie R, McKenzie J, Powles T. Characterization of Responses to Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma at the Final Prespecified Survival Analysis of the Phase 3 CLEAR Study. Eur Urol. 2024 Jul;86(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.015. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
PubMed 38582713Motzer RJ, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, Grunwald V, Hutson TE, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Merchan J, Goh JC, Lalani AA, De Giorgi U, Melichar B, Hong SH, Gurney H, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Kopyltsov E, Tjulandin S, Gordoa TA, Kozlov V, Alyasova A, Winquist E, Maroto P, Kim M, Peer A, Procopio G, Takagi T, Wong S, Bedke J, Schmidinger M, Rodriguez-Lopez K, Burgents J, He C, Okpara CE, McKenzie J, Choueiri TK; CLEAR Trial Investigators. Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Prespecified Overall Survival Analysis of CLEAR, a Phase III Study. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Apr 10;42(11):1222-1228. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01569. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
PubMed 38227898Grunwald V, Powles T, Eto M, Kopyltsov E, Rha SY, Porta C, Motzer R, Hutson TE, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Hong SH, Winquist E, Goh JC, Maroto P, Buchler T, Takagi T, Burgents JE, Perini R, He C, Okpara CE, McKenzie J, Choueiri TK. Phase 3 CLEAR study in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: outcomes in subgroups for the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and sunitinib arms. Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 16;13:1223282. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1223282. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37664025Rha SY, Choueiri TK, Matveev VB, Alyasova A, Hong SH, Gordoa TA, Gurney H, Bjarnason GA, Buchler T, Pedrazzoli P, Takagi T, Park SH, Lee JL, Perini RF, He CS, McKenzie JA, Eto M. Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in the East Asian subset of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma from the CLEAR trial. Int J Cancer. 2023 Sep 15;153(6):1241-1250. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34608. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
PubMed 37294085Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
PubMed 37146227Motzer R, George S, Merchan JR, Hutson TE, Song X, Perini RF, Xie R, Bapat U, Puente J. Characterization and Management of Adverse Reactions From the CLEAR Study in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab. Oncologist. 2023 Jun 2;28(6):501-509. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac269.
PubMed 36866412Choueiri TK, Eto M, Motzer R, De Giorgi U, Buchler T, Basappa NS, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Tjulandin S, Hoon Park S, Melichar B, Hutson T, Alemany C, McGregor B, Powles T, Grunwald V, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Kopyltsov E, Kapoor A, Alonso Gordoa T, Goh JC, Staehler M, Merchan JR, Xie R, Perini RF, Mody K, McKenzie J, Porta CG. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (CLEAR): extended follow-up from the phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):228-238. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00049-9.
PubMed 36858721Motzer R, Porta C, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Choueiri TK, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Hong SH, Kapoor A, Goh JC, Eto M, Bennett L, Wang J, Pan JJ, Saretsky TL, Perini RF, He CS, Mody K, Cella D. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus versus sunitinib (CLEAR): a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jun;23(6):768-780. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00212-1. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
PubMed 35489363Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, Grunwald V, Hutson TE, Kopyltsov E, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Kozlov V, Alyasova A, Hong SH, Kapoor A, Alonso Gordoa T, Merchan JR, Winquist E, Maroto P, Goh JC, Kim M, Gurney H, Patel V, Peer A, Procopio G, Takagi T, Melichar B, Rolland F, De Giorgi U, Wong S, Bedke J, Schmidinger M, Dutcus CE, Smith AD, Dutta L, Mody K, Perini RF, Xing D, Choueiri TK; CLEAR Trial Investigators. Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1289-1300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035716. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
PubMed 33616314Hofmann F, Hwang EC, Lam TB, Bex A, Yuan Y, Marconi LS, Ljungberg B. Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 14;10(10):CD012796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012796.pub2.
PubMed 33058158
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Everolimus or Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib Alone in First-Line Treatment of Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (CLEAR)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02811861
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLEAR / E7080-G000-307
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), Lenvatinib, First-line RCC, Treatment-naive RCC, Everolimus, Pembrolizumab, Sunitinib, Phase 3 RCC
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,069 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- 13 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Sep 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate that lenvatinib in combination with everolimus (Arm A) or pembrolizumab (Arm B) is superior compared to sunitinib alone (Arm C) in improving progression-free survival (PFS) (by independent imaging review [IIR] using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST 1.1]) as first-line treatment in participants with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lenvatinib 18 mg plus Everolimus 5 mg | Experimental | Drug: Lenvatinib, Drug: EverolimusLenvatinib 18 milligrams (mg) administered orally, once daily, plus everolimus 5 mg administered orally, once daily in each 21-day cycle. |
| Lenvatinib 20 mg plus Pembrolizumab 200 mg | Experimental | Drug: Lenvatinib, Drug: PembrolizumabLenvatinib 20 mg administered orally, once daily, in each 21-day cycle plus pembrolizumab 200 mg administered intravenously (IV), every 3 weeks on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. |
| Sunitinib 50 mg | Active comparator | Drug: SunitinibSunitinib 50 mg administered orally, once daily, on a schedule of 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment in each 21-day cycle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Histological or cytological confirmation of RCC with a clear-cell component (original tissue diagnosis of RCC is acceptable).
- Documented evidence of advanced RCC.
- At least 1 measurable target lesion according to RECIST 1.1 meeting the following criteria:
- 3.Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of >=70 4.Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with or without antihypertensive medications, defined as BP less than or equal (<=) 150/90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) at Screening and no change in antihypertensive medications within 1 week prior to Cycle 1/Day 1 (C1/D1) 5.Adequate renal function defined as creatinine <=1.5upper limit of normal (ULN); or for participants with creatinine greater than (>) 1.5ULN, the calculated creatinine clearance >=30 milliliters per minute (mL/min) (per the Cockcroft-Gault formula) is acceptable.
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >=1500/cubic millimeter (mm^3)
Key exclusion criteria (33 listed)
- Participants who have received any systemic anticancer therapy for RCC, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, or any systemic investigational anticancer agent. Prior adjuvant treatment with an investigational anticancer agent is not allowed unless the investigator can provide evidence of participant's randomization to placebo arm.
- Participants with central nervous system (CNS) metastases are not eligible, unless they have completed local therapy (example, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgery or radiosurgery) and have discontinued the use of corticosteroids for this indication for at least 4 weeks before starting treatment in this study. Any signs (example, radiologic) or symptoms of CNS metastases must be stable for at least 4 weeks before starting study treatment
- Active malignancy (except for RCC, definitively treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, and carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or bladder) within the past 24 months. Participants with history of localized \& low risk prostate cancer are allowed in the study if they were treated with curative intent and there is no prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence within the past 5 years
- Prior radiation therapy within 21 days prior to start of study treatment with the exception of palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions, which is allowed if completed 2 weeks prior to study treatment start
- Participants who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs <=4 weeks prior to study treatment start.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lenvatinib | Drug | Lenvatinib 18 mg plus Everolimus 5 mg, Lenvatinib 20 mg plus Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
| Everolimus | Drug | Lenvatinib 18 mg plus Everolimus 5 mg |
| Pembrolizumab | Drug | Lenvatinib 20 mg plus Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
| Sunitinib | Drug | Sunitinib 50 mg |
Primary outcome
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Imaging Review (IIR)
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first or up to data cutoff date 28 Aug 2020 (up to approximately 46 months)
PFS assessed by IIR was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death (whichever occurred first) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase or 5 millimeter (mm) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.
12 secondary outcomes
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Toxicity
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
Time to Treatment Failure Due to Toxicity
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Syndrome Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Scores
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
HRQoL Assessed by European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) Score
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
HRQoL Assessed by European Quality of Life (EuroQol) Five-Dimensional, 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Score
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
PFS on Next-line of Therapy (PFS2)
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
PFS by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
Model-predicted Clearance for Lenvatinib and Everolimus
Time frame: Cycles 1 and 2 Day 1; 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours postdose; Cycle 1 Day 15: predose and 2-12 hours postdose; Cycles 3, 4, 5 and 6 Day 1: predose (Cycle length=21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lenvatinib and Everolimus
Time frame: Cycles 1 and 2 Day 1; 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours postdose; Cycle 1 Day 15: predose and 2-12 hours postdose; Cycles 3, 4, 5 and 6 Day 1: predose (Cycle length = 21 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39885377Fawsitt CG, Pan J, Orishaba P, Jackson CH, Thom H. Unanchored simulated treatment comparison on survival outcomes using parametric and Royston-Parmar models with application to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in renal cell carcinoma. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02480-x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39739622Grunwald V, McKay RR, Buchler T, Eto M, Park SH, Takagi T, Zanetta S, Keizman D, Suarez C, Negrier S, Lee JL, Santini D, Bedke J, Staehler M, Kollmannsberger C, Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ, Burgents JE, Xie R, Okpara CE, Powles T. Clinical outcomes by baseline metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib: Post hoc analysis of the CLEAR trial. Int J Cancer. 2025 Apr 1;156(7):1326-1335. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35288. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39642774Zheng H, Zhou J, Tong Y, Zhang J. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Feb;23(1):102264. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102264. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38582713Motzer RJ, Choueiri TK, Hutson T, Young Rha S, Puente J, Lalani AA, Winquist E, Eto M, Basappa NS, Tannir NM, Vaishampayan U, Bjarnason GA, Oudard S, Grunwald V, Burgents J, Xie R, McKenzie J, Powles T. Characterization of Responses to Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma at the Final Prespecified Survival Analysis of the Phase 3 CLEAR Study. Eur Urol. 2024 Jul;86(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.015. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38227898Motzer RJ, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, Grunwald V, Hutson TE, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Merchan J, Goh JC, Lalani AA, De Giorgi U, Melichar B, Hong SH, Gurney H, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Kopyltsov E, Tjulandin S, Gordoa TA, Kozlov V, Alyasova A, Winquist E, Maroto P, Kim M, Peer A, Procopio G, Takagi T, Wong S, Bedke J, Schmidinger M, Rodriguez-Lopez K, Burgents J, He C, Okpara CE, McKenzie J, Choueiri TK; CLEAR Trial Investigators. Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Prespecified Overall Survival Analysis of CLEAR, a Phase III Study. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Apr 10;42(11):1222-1228. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01569. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37664025Grunwald V, Powles T, Eto M, Kopyltsov E, Rha SY, Porta C, Motzer R, Hutson TE, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Hong SH, Winquist E, Goh JC, Maroto P, Buchler T, Takagi T, Burgents JE, Perini R, He C, Okpara CE, McKenzie J, Choueiri TK. Phase 3 CLEAR study in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: outcomes in subgroups for the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and sunitinib arms. Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 16;13:1223282. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1223282. eCollection 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37294085Rha SY, Choueiri TK, Matveev VB, Alyasova A, Hong SH, Gordoa TA, Gurney H, Bjarnason GA, Buchler T, Pedrazzoli P, Takagi T, Park SH, Lee JL, Perini RF, He CS, McKenzie JA, Eto M. Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in the East Asian subset of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma from the CLEAR trial. Int J Cancer. 2023 Sep 15;153(6):1241-1250. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34608. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37146227Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36866412Motzer R, George S, Merchan JR, Hutson TE, Song X, Perini RF, Xie R, Bapat U, Puente J. Characterization and Management of Adverse Reactions From the CLEAR Study in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab. Oncologist. 2023 Jun 2;28(6):501-509. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac269.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36858721Choueiri TK, Eto M, Motzer R, De Giorgi U, Buchler T, Basappa NS, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Tjulandin S, Hoon Park S, Melichar B, Hutson T, Alemany C, McGregor B, Powles T, Grunwald V, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Kopyltsov E, Kapoor A, Alonso Gordoa T, Goh JC, Staehler M, Merchan JR, Xie R, Perini RF, Mody K, McKenzie J, Porta CG. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (CLEAR): extended follow-up from the phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):228-238. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00049-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35489363Motzer R, Porta C, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Choueiri TK, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Hong SH, Kapoor A, Goh JC, Eto M, Bennett L, Wang J, Pan JJ, Saretsky TL, Perini RF, He CS, Mody K, Cella D. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus versus sunitinib (CLEAR): a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jun;23(6):768-780. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00212-1. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33616314Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, Grunwald V, Hutson TE, Kopyltsov E, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Kozlov V, Alyasova A, Hong SH, Kapoor A, Alonso Gordoa T, Merchan JR, Winquist E, Maroto P, Goh JC, Kim M, Gurney H, Patel V, Peer A, Procopio G, Takagi T, Melichar B, Rolland F, De Giorgi U, Wong S, Bedke J, Schmidinger M, Dutcus CE, Smith AD, Dutta L, Mody K, Perini RF, Xing D, Choueiri TK; CLEAR Trial Investigators. Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1289-1300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035716. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
Related trials for Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab and Lenvatinib With or Without SBRT Before Surgery for Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer
Nonmetastatic Locally Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Pucotenlimab, Lenvatinib, and SBRT Before Surgery for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
183 sites in 20 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lenvatinib, Everolimus and Pembrolizumab in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Eisai Inc. at 183 sites in 20 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 33 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 183 sites in United States, Japan, Italy, Spain, France and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Imaging Review (IIR) (time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first or up to data cutoff date 28 Aug 2020 (up to approximately 46 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02811861, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2026.