Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)PREFERNCT02807857
A Prospective Evaluation of Natriuretic Peptide Based Referral of CHF Patients in Primary Care
A study of Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 191 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
This low interventional study, whose unique intervention was to measure the blood level of a biomarker called NT-proBNP in chronic heart failure patients daily followed-up by Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) in Europe, assessed if the cardiologist referral guided by NT-proBNP measurement in patients who were currently… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,415 participants
- Where
- 191 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- 7 Jul 2016to 23 Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent and accept study procedures and time schedule.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Patients suffering from chronic heart failure (the heart failure diagnosis must have been made or confirmed by a cardiologist and/or hospital physician at any time in the patient's medical history).
- Patients with reduced ejection fraction (≤ 40%) as confirmed at any time point in the patient's medical history.
Who cannot join
- Use of investigational drugs either within 5 half-lives of enrollment, or within 30 days, or until the expected pharmacodynamic effect has returned to baseline, whichever is longer.
- Major surgery in the last 3 months prior to baseline or planned major surgery or cardiac intervention during the study.
- Cancer or other significant co-morbidities implying that the patient's condition is unstable.
- Comorbidities that can be associated with elevated natriuretic peptide (NP) levels: renal insufficiency, (eGFR < 25 ml/min/1.73 m² calculated according to MDRD formula), recent (less than 3 months) cerebral trauma or recent (less than 3 months) cerebrovascular incident, novel diagnosis or acute exacerbation of COPD within the last 3 months.
- Patients who are primarily managed and regularly followed-up by a cardiologist for their HF
- Highly frail patients whose estimated lifespan due to comorbidities by the judgement of the investigator is less than 6 months.
Trial locations and contacts
191 sites in 18 countries.
191 sites in 18 countries
Belgium36 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aarschot, 3200
Novartis Investigative Site
Alveringem, 8691
Novartis Investigative Site
Binkom, BEL, 3211
Novartis Investigative Site
Boezinge, 8904
Novartis Investigative Site
Bruxe, 1080
Novartis Investigative Site
Buggenhout, Belgium, 9255
Novartis Investigative Site
Deinze, 9800
Novartis Investigative Site
Deurne, 2100
Novartis Investigative Site
Diksmuide, 8600
Novartis Investigative Site
Ezemaal-Neerwinden, 3400
Novartis Investigative Site
Gozée, BEL, 6534
Novartis Investigative Site
Hasselt, 3500
Novartis Investigative Site
Hasselt, Belgium, 3500
Novartis Investigative Site
Herzele, 9550
Novartis Investigative Site
Kluisbergen, Belgium, 9690
Novartis Investigative Site
Landen, 3400
Novartis Investigative Site
Leefdaal, 3060
Novartis Investigative Site
Linkebeek, BEL, 1630
Novartis Investigative Site
Linkebeek, 1630
Novartis Investigative Site
Lommel, 3920
Novartis Investigative Site
Maasmechelen, 3630
Novartis Investigative Site
Mont-sur-Marchienne, 6032
Novartis Investigative Site
Nazareth, 9810
Novartis Investigative Site
Oosteeklo, 9988
Novartis Investigative Site
Oostham, BEL, 3945
Novartis Investigative Site
Ostend
Novartis Investigative Site
Oudenaarde, 9700
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint-Médard, 6887
Novartis Investigative Site
Stoumont, 4987
Novartis Investigative Site
Tessenderlo, 3980
Novartis Investigative Site
Thuilles, 6536
Novartis Investigative Site
Tielt-Winge, 3390
Novartis Investigative Site
Tremelo, 3120
Novartis Investigative Site
Vilvoorde, 1800
Novartis Investigative Site
Waregem, 8790
Novartis Investigative Site
Zichem, BEL, 3271
Poland21 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bialystok, 15-746
Novartis Investigative Site
Bialystok, 15-867
Novartis Investigative Site
Bielawa, 58-260
Novartis Investigative Site
Bydgoszcz, 85-021
Novartis Investigative Site
Chełm, POL, 22-100
Novartis Investigative Site
Dzierżoniów, 58-200
Novartis Investigative Site
Kartuzy, POL, 83-300
Novartis Investigative Site
Katowice, 40-018
Novartis Investigative Site
Krakow, 30 415
Novartis Investigative Site
Krakow, 30-664
Novartis Investigative Site
Krakow, 31-061
Novartis Investigative Site
Lublin, 20-094
Novartis Investigative Site
Miasteczko Śląskie, 42-610
Novartis Investigative Site
Poznan, 61-388
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, POL, 00-874
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 01-493
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 01-887
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 03 185
Novartis Investigative Site
Wieleń, 64-730
Novartis Investigative Site
Wroclaw, 54-703
Novartis Investigative Site
Zgierz, 95-100
France20 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Arras, 62000
Novartis Investigative Site
Bersée, 59254
Novartis Investigative Site
Breteuil Sur Seine, France, 27160
Novartis Investigative Site
Cannes, 06400
Novartis Investigative Site
Chantepie, 35135
Novartis Investigative Site
Colombiers, 31770
Novartis Investigative Site
Coursan, 11110
Novartis Investigative Site
Erquy, 22430
Novartis Investigative Site
La Seyne-sur-Mer, 83500
Novartis Investigative Site
Laval, 53000
Novartis Investigative Site
Les Pennes-Mirabeau, 13170
Novartis Investigative Site
Nègrepelisse, 82800
Novartis Investigative Site
Orthez, 64300
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75010
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75020
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosiers d'Egleton, 19300
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint-Orens-de-Gameville, 31650
Novartis Investigative Site
Salles, 33770
Novartis Investigative Site
Six-Fours-les-Plages, 83140
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, 67200
Spain20 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
A Coruña, 15007
Novartis Investigative Site
A Estrada, Pontevedra, 36681
Novartis Investigative Site
Alcúdia, Balearic Islands, 07400
Novartis Investigative Site
Alicante, 03540
Novartis Investigative Site
Burriana, Castellon, 12530
Novartis Investigative Site
Cambre, A Coruna, 15660
Novartis Investigative Site
El Cañaveral, Caceres, 10820
Novartis Investigative Site
El Parador de Las Hortichiuela, Almeria, 04720
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28030
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28032
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28033
Novartis Investigative Site
Monteporeiro, Pontevedra, 36162
Novartis Investigative Site
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33009
Novartis Investigative Site
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33013
Novartis Investigative Site
Panxón, 36340
Novartis Investigative Site
Parla, Madrid, 28982
Novartis Investigative Site
Petrel, Alicante, 03610
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto do Son, A Coruña, 15970
Novartis Investigative Site
Puerto Real, Cadiz, 11510
Novartis Investigative Site
Telde, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35215
Croatia15 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bizovac, 31222
Novartis Investigative Site
HRV, Croatia, 10000
Novartis Investigative Site
HRV, Croatia, 31000
Novartis Investigative Site
HRV, Croatia, 44320
Novartis Investigative Site
HRV, 42000
Novartis Investigative Site
Krasica, 51224
Novartis Investigative Site
Osijek, 31000
Novartis Investigative Site
Rijeka, HRV, 51000
Novartis Investigative Site
Rijeka, 51000
Novartis Investigative Site
Slavonski Brod, 35000
Novartis Investigative Site
Velika Kopanica, 35221
Novartis Investigative Site
Viškovo, 51216
Novartis Investigative Site
Višnjevac, HRV, 31220
Novartis Investigative Site
Zagreb, HRV, 10000
Novartis Investigative Site
Zagreb, 10000
Hungary15 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Balatonkeresztúr, 8647
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1136
Novartis Investigative Site
Csongrád, 6640
Novartis Investigative Site
Érd, 2030
Novartis Investigative Site
Felsőrajk, 8767
Novartis Investigative Site
Hosszúhetény, 7694
Novartis Investigative Site
Kecskemét, 6000
Novartis Investigative Site
Korondi, 6726
Novartis Investigative Site
Nyíregyháza, 4400
Novartis Investigative Site
Pécs, 7632
Novartis Investigative Site
Szabadsag, 6756
Novartis Investigative Site
Szeged-Szoreg, H-6771
Novartis Investigative Site
Székesfehérvár, 8000
Novartis Investigative Site
Törökbálint, 2045
Novartis Investigative Site
Zákányszék, 6787
Russia11 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kazan', 420012
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 121374
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 121552
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 127015
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 127206
Novartis Investigative Site
Petrozavodsk, 185019
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197110
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 199106
Novartis Investigative Site
Ufa, 450000
Novartis Investigative Site
Vladivostok, 690002
Novartis Investigative Site
Yaroslavl, 150047
Norway10 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Flisa, 2270
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamar, 2317
Novartis Investigative Site
Hønefoss, 3515
Novartis Investigative Site
Kirkenær, 2260
Novartis Investigative Site
Lierskogen, N-3420
Novartis Investigative Site
Lørenskog, 1473
Novartis Investigative Site
Løten, 2340
Novartis Investigative Site
Noetteroey, 3163
Novartis Investigative Site
Ostereidet, Norway, 5993
Novartis Investigative Site
Skien, 3734
Slovenia9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ivančna Gorica, 1295
Novartis Investigative Site
Kranj, 4000
Novartis Investigative Site
Ljubljana, 1000
Novartis Investigative Site
Maribor, 2000
Novartis Investigative Site
Pesnica, 2211
Novartis Investigative Site
Slovenske Konjice, 3210
Novartis Investigative Site
Spodnji Duplek, 2241
Novartis Investigative Site
Vrhnika, 1360
Novartis Investigative Site
Žalec, 3310
Lithuania7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Alytus, LT-62386
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaunas, LTU, LT 45488
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaunas, LTU, LT 50161
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaunas, LT-49387
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaunas, LT-49449
Novartis Investigative Site
Klaipėda, LTU, 92304
Novartis Investigative Site
Vilnius, LT-08661
Portugal7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Cantanhede, 3060 123
Novartis Investigative Site
Leça da Palmeira, 4450 586
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1200 375
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1250 210
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1800 192
Novartis Investigative Site
Oeiras, 2780 163
Novartis Investigative Site
Seixal, Bairro Novo, 2840 481
Estonia5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Paide, 72713
Novartis Investigative Site
Sõmeru, EST, 44201
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallinn, 10138
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallinn, 11911
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallinn, 13415
Latvia5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Jelgava, LVA, LV-3001
Novartis Investigative Site
Riga, LVA, LV 1010
Novartis Investigative Site
Riga, 1012
Novartis Investigative Site
Riga, LV-1006
Novartis Investigative Site
Riga, LV-1021
Malta3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Rabat
Novartis Investigative Site
Xaghra, Gozo, XRA 2405
Novartis Investigative Site
Xewkija, Gozo, VCT 110
Cyprus2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Nicosia, 2048
Novartis Investigative Site
Nicosia, 2540
Denmark2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Præstø, 4720
Novartis Investigative Site
Skive, 7800
Italy2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Gatteo, FC, 47043
Novartis Investigative Site
Grumello del Monte, BG, 24064
About this study
This low interventional study, whose unique intervention was to measure the blood level of a biomarker called NT-proBNP in chronic heart failure patients daily followed-up by Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) in Europe, assessed if the cardiologist referral guided by NT-proBNP measurement in patients who were currently judged by PCPs as being stable, would lead to optimization of HF treatment, defined in adherence to treatment recommendations of the current European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the treatment of heart failure.
Read the detailed description
In the majority of European countries, the primary management of chronic heart failure patients was performed by General Practitioners in collaboration with cardiologists (specialists). Previous studies had shown that many patients suffering from CHF do not receive optimal pharmacological and/or device treatment for their disease. An increase in natriuretic peptides (BNP, NT-proBNP) was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events in heart failure patients. The purpose of the present study was to assess if a referral of clinical stable chronic heart failure patients with reduced ventricular ejection fraction (EF < or = 40%) and NT-proBNP level > or = 600 pg/mL to a specialist (cardiologist) led to treatment optimization, defined as adherence to the treatment recommendations according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. In addition, data obtained in this study was used to describe demographic, clinical (including NT-proBNP levels) and treatment characteristics of CHF patients who were managed in the primary care setting across Europe..
- Conditions
- Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)
- Being tested
- Standard care
- Keywords
- low-interventional observational study,, CHF,, heart failure,, primary care,, ESC guidelines,, Europe,, NT-proBNP,, reduced ventricular ejection fraction (EF),
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard careProcedure or surgery
Patients will receive the treatment that their primary care physician has decided to prescribe for their disease
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients' heart failure and non-heart failure | Other | No treatments are stipulated by this protocol - patients' HF and non-HF treatments will be observed throughout the study. The patients' treatment is entirely in the discretion of the primary care physicians Receives: Procedure: Standard care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Clinically Stable Patients Whose Therapy Regimen Adheres to ESC Guideline Recommendations for Drug Types (Level 1) and Drug Type and Dose (Level 2) at Visit 1 (Before Referral to a Cardiologist)
Assessment of treatment regimen with respect to ESC guideline adherence at Visit 1 before referral to cardiologist. ESC Criteria for adherence: Drug Types: Treatment with (1) ACEi or (1) ARB in combination with (1) beta-blocker and (1) MRA for patients w/an LVEF ≤ 35% at V1. Treatment w/(1) ACEi or (1) ARB, in combination with (1) beta-blocker+ without treatment with an MRA for patients with an LVEF > 35% at visit 1. Drug type \& dose: Guideline adherent with respect to drug types and dosage of all respective guideline drugs ≥ 50% of the recommended target dose.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Adherence to ESC Guideline at Visit 2 (After Referral to a Cardiologist, Month 6), for Follow-up Set: Drug Type and Drug Type and Dose
Assessment of patients' adherence at Visit 2, for patients who were already adherent at Visit 1, and those who were not adherent at Visit 1, for both drug type and drug type and dose. ESC Criteria for adherence: Drug Types: Treatment with (1) ACEi or (1) ARB in combination with (1) beta-blocker and (1) MRA for patients w/an LVEF ≤ 35% at V1. Treatment w/(1) ACEi or (1) ARB, in combination with (1) beta-blocker+ without treatment with an MRA for patients with an LVEF > 35% at visit 1. Drug type \& dose: Guideline adherent with respect to drug types and dosage of all respective guideline drugs ≥ 50% of the recommended target dose.
Measured: Month 6
Secondary outcomes (24)
Duration of Heart Failure
The duration of Heart Failure was collected at Baseline (Visit 1).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients With Current Use of Concomitant Compound
Use of concomitant compounds were collected at baseline (Visit 1)
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Follow-Up Patients With Current Use of Concomitant Compound at Visit 2
Use of concomitant compounds were collected at 6 months (Visit 2)
Measured: 6 months (Visit 2)
Percentages of Clinically Stable Patients for Whom the Cardiologist and/or Primary Care Physician Optimizes Treatment Post Referral, Stratified According to Key Baseline Characteristics
For patients who enter the prospective period of the study the post-referral treatment choice of cardiologists and/or primary care physicians was documented; for patients, for whom the cardiologist and/or primary care physician chose to prescribe a novel Heart Failure treatment, the treatment was assessed, if it fulfills the definition of adherence to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline recommendation. The proportion of patients for whom an ESC guideline adherent treatment was de novo prescribed was assessed stratified according to different parameters.
Measured: 6 months
Number of Patients With Different NT-proBNP Level Categories
NT-proBNP levels (pg/ml) was measured at baseline in all consecutive patients who satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Measurements were performed on-site by means of a handheld device provided for the purposes of the study. NT-proBNP level categories could be 600 -799 pg/ml, 800 - 999 pg/ml, 1000 - 1200 pg/ml, > 1200 pg/ml).
Measured: One measurement in all consecutive patients at baseline (Visit 1)
Percentages of Clinically Stable Patients
Clinically stable patients in this study were defined as those patients for whom the primary care physician did not see a necessity (based on signs and symptoms of HF) to change the current pharmacological and/or device treatment of HF and who were on stable pharmacological and/or device treatment for HF for at least 3 months prior to inclusion.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients by Cardiologist Prescription Practice Per Country/Region
The cardiologists' suggestions for pharmacological and/or device therapy for the treatment of clinically stable CHF patients was documented and assessed by means of descriptive statistical measures stratified by country/region 6 months after baseline.
Measured: 6 months
Change of NT-proBNP Levels in Clinically Stable Chronic Heart Failure Patients With and Without Treatment Optimization 10 Months After Baseline
At 10 months after baseline (end of study) NT-proBNP was assessed in clinically stable CHF patients with baseline NT-proBNP levels ≥ 600 pg/ml. Thus, for those patients two NT-proBNP measurements were available: at baseline and 10 months later. The individual change of NT-proBNP between both time points were assessed in accordance to the patients' treatment history during the study, i.e. baseline Heart Failure treatment and therapeutic decision taken 6 months after baseline.
Measured: 10 months
Change in EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Total and Individual Sub-scores at Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 2 (6 Months) and Visit 3 (10 Months)
Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by EQ-5D including the dimensions mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. A utility index based on UK value sets was built to summarize the information of these five dimensions into a single scale. The utility index can range between -0.281 and 1.0 where a higher number indicates a better health status. In addition, a visual analog scale (VAS) was applied with a possible range between 0 (=worst imaginable health state) and 100 (=best imaginable health state). Scores collected for all patients at baseline (Visit 1) and at Visit 2 and Visit 3 (only patients who entered the prospective period of the study, i.e. clinically stable patients with a NT-proBNP level ≥ 600 pg/ml) were asked to fill out the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) quality of life (QoL) questionnaire validated for heart failure (HF).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), 6 months (Visit 2), 10 months (Visit 3)
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Total and Individual Sub-scores at Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 2 (6 Months) and Visit 3 (10 Months)
The KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire. It contains 23 items, covering physical function, clinical symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life, each with different Likert scale wording, including limitations, frequency, bother, change in condition, understanding, levels of enjoyment and satisfaction. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Scores were collected for all patients at baseline and Visit 2 and Visit 3 (only patients who had entered the prospective period of the study (clinically stable patients with a NT-proBNP level ≥ 600 pg/ml) were asked to complete Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) validated for Heart Failure.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), 6 months (Visit 2), 10 months (Visit 3)
Number of Patients in Different Living Conditions
Living conditions were collected at Baseline (Visit 1).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients in Different Employment Status
Employment status was collected at Baseline (Visit 1).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients With Smoking Status
Smoking status was collected at baseline (visit 1).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients From Different Geographical Regions
Geographic regions were collected at Baseline (Visit 1).
Measured: Baseline (visit 1)
Number of Patients With Health Insurance Status
Health insurance status was collected at Baseline (Visit 1).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients at Different Educational Level
Educational level was collected at Baseline (Visit 1).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients Per Primary Etiology of Heart Failure
The primary etiology of Heart Failure was collected at Baseline (Visit 1).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients With Heart Failure (HF)-Related Hospitalizations in the Previous 12 Months Prior to Baseline, and During the Study
HF-related hospitalizations was collected in the previous 12 months prior to baseline at baseline visit, at 6 and 10 months post-baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), 6 months, 10 months
Percentage of Patients With Cardiovascular and Non-cardiovascular Co-morbidities
Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular co-morbidities were collected at baseline (Visit 1)
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Mean Dose of Previously Taken and Current Use of Concomitant Medications
Mean Dose of previously taken and current use of concomitant medications was to be collected at Visit 1, 6 months, 10 months post-baseline
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1), 6 months, 10 months
Number of Heart Failure (HF) Treatment Combinations
The types and number of participants with HF treatment combinations were collected at Baseline (Visit 1).
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Duration of Treatment With Device Type
The duration of treatment with device type was collected at baseline (Visit 1)
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Duration of Previously Taken and Currently Use of Most Common Non-Heart Failure Concomitant Compounds
Duration of most common previously taken and current use of most common Non-HF concomitant compounds were collected
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients by Primary Care Physicians' Prescription Practice Per Country/Region
For clinically stable CHF patients, the primary care physicians' prescription of pharmacological and device treatment for HF was to be documented prior to baseline and post cardiologist-referral. At the post-referral visit the degree of implementation of cardiologist-recommendations and the medical decision making (e.g. reasons for non-implementation) were to be documented.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 1)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study start7 Jul 2016
- Primary completion23 Mar 2018
- Study completion23 Mar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,415 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02807857
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLCZ696B3402
- Other IDs
- 2016-000473-20, 2016
- Acronym
- PREFER
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 17 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Evaluation of Natriuretic Peptide Based Referral of CHF Patients in Primary Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02807857
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREFER / CLCZ696B3402
- Conditions
- Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)
- Keywords
- low-interventional observational study,, CHF,, heart failure,, primary care,, ESC guidelines,, Europe,, NT-proBNP,, reduced ventricular ejection fraction (EF),
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,415 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Jul 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jan 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This low interventional study, whose unique intervention was to measure the blood level of a biomarker called NT-proBNP in chronic heart failure patients daily followed-up by Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) in Europe, assessed if the cardiologist referral guided by NT-proBNP measurement in patients who were currently judged by PCPs as being stable, would lead to optimization of HF treatment, defined in adherence to treatment recommendations of the current European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the treatment of heart failure.
Detailed description
In the majority of European countries, the primary management of chronic heart failure patients was performed by General Practitioners in collaboration with cardiologists (specialists). Previous studies had shown that many patients suffering from CHF do not receive optimal pharmacological and/or device treatment for their disease. An increase in natriuretic peptides (BNP, NT-proBNP) was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events in heart failure patients. The purpose of the present study was to assess if a referral of clinical stable chronic heart failure patients with reduced ventricular ejection fraction (EF < or = 40%) and NT-proBNP level > or = 600 pg/mL to a specialist (cardiologist) led to treatment optimization, defined as adherence to the treatment recommendations according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. In addition, data obtained in this study was used to describe demographic, clinical (including NT-proBNP levels) and treatment characteristics of CHF patients who were managed in the primary care setting across Europe..
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients' heart failure and non-heart failure | Other | Procedure: Standard careNo treatments are stipulated by this protocol - patients' HF and non-HF treatments will be observed throughout the study. The patients' treatment is entirely in the discretion of the primary care physicians |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent and accept study procedures and time schedule.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Patients suffering from chronic heart failure (the heart failure diagnosis must have been made or confirmed by a cardiologist and/or hospital physician at any time in the patient's medical history).
- Patients with reduced ejection fraction (≤ 40%) as confirmed at any time point in the patient's medical history.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Use of investigational drugs either within 5 half-lives of enrollment, or within 30 days, or until the expected pharmacodynamic effect has returned to baseline, whichever is longer.
- Major surgery in the last 3 months prior to baseline or planned major surgery or cardiac intervention during the study.
- Cancer or other significant co-morbidities implying that the patient's condition is unstable.
- Comorbidities that can be associated with elevated natriuretic peptide (NP) levels: renal insufficiency, (eGFR < 25 ml/min/1.73 m² calculated according to MDRD formula), recent (less than 3 months) cerebral trauma or recent (less than 3 months) cerebrovascular incident, novel diagnosis or acute exacerbation of COPD within the last 3 months.
- Patients who are primarily managed and regularly followed-up by a cardiologist for their HF
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard carePatients will receive the treatment that their primary care physician has decided to prescribe for their disease | Procedure or surgery | Patients' heart failure and non-heart failure |
Primary outcome
Number of Clinically Stable Patients Whose Therapy Regimen Adheres to ESC Guideline Recommendations for Drug Types (Level 1) and Drug Type and Dose (Level 2) at Visit 1 (Before Referral to a Cardiologist)
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Assessment of treatment regimen with respect to ESC guideline adherence at Visit 1 before referral to cardiologist. ESC Criteria for adherence: Drug Types: Treatment with (1) ACEi or (1) ARB in combination with (1) beta-blocker and (1) MRA for patients w/an LVEF ≤ 35% at V1. Treatment w/(1) ACEi or (1) ARB, in combination with (1) beta-blocker+ without treatment with an MRA for patients with an LVEF > 35% at visit 1. Drug type \& dose: Guideline adherent with respect to drug types and dosage of all respective guideline drugs ≥ 50% of the recommended target dose.
Adherence to ESC Guideline at Visit 2 (After Referral to a Cardiologist, Month 6), for Follow-up Set: Drug Type and Drug Type and Dose
Time frame: Month 6
Assessment of patients' adherence at Visit 2, for patients who were already adherent at Visit 1, and those who were not adherent at Visit 1, for both drug type and drug type and dose. ESC Criteria for adherence: Drug Types: Treatment with (1) ACEi or (1) ARB in combination with (1) beta-blocker and (1) MRA for patients w/an LVEF ≤ 35% at V1. Treatment w/(1) ACEi or (1) ARB, in combination with (1) beta-blocker+ without treatment with an MRA for patients with an LVEF > 35% at visit 1. Drug type \& dose: Guideline adherent with respect to drug types and dosage of all respective guideline drugs ≥ 50% of the recommended target dose.
24 secondary outcomes
Duration of Heart Failure
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients With Current Use of Concomitant Compound
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Follow-Up Patients With Current Use of Concomitant Compound at Visit 2
Time frame: 6 months (Visit 2)
Percentages of Clinically Stable Patients for Whom the Cardiologist and/or Primary Care Physician Optimizes Treatment Post Referral, Stratified According to Key Baseline Characteristics
Time frame: 6 months
Number of Patients With Different NT-proBNP Level Categories
Time frame: One measurement in all consecutive patients at baseline (Visit 1)
Percentages of Clinically Stable Patients
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients by Cardiologist Prescription Practice Per Country/Region
Time frame: 6 months
Change of NT-proBNP Levels in Clinically Stable Chronic Heart Failure Patients With and Without Treatment Optimization 10 Months After Baseline
Time frame: 10 months
Change in EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Total and Individual Sub-scores at Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 2 (6 Months) and Visit 3 (10 Months)
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1), 6 months (Visit 2), 10 months (Visit 3)
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Total and Individual Sub-scores at Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 2 (6 Months) and Visit 3 (10 Months)
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1), 6 months (Visit 2), 10 months (Visit 3)
Number of Patients in Different Living Conditions
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients in Different Employment Status
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients With Smoking Status
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients From Different Geographical Regions
Time frame: Baseline (visit 1)
Number of Patients With Health Insurance Status
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients at Different Educational Level
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients Per Primary Etiology of Heart Failure
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients With Heart Failure (HF)-Related Hospitalizations in the Previous 12 Months Prior to Baseline, and During the Study
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1), 6 months, 10 months
Percentage of Patients With Cardiovascular and Non-cardiovascular Co-morbidities
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Mean Dose of Previously Taken and Current Use of Concomitant Medications
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1), 6 months, 10 months
Number of Heart Failure (HF) Treatment Combinations
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Duration of Treatment With Device Type
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Duration of Previously Taken and Currently Use of Most Common Non-Heart Failure Concomitant Compounds
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Number of Patients by Primary Care Physicians' Prescription Practice Per Country/Region
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Community Health Worker Nutrition Self-Management Support for Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Health
Hypertension (HTN), CKD - Chronic Kidney Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Intravenous IRON Therapy With Ferric DerisomaltOSE in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency
Heart Failure, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
RecruitingObservational study
Norepinephrine in the Management of General Anesthesia-Induced Arterial Hypotension in Chronic Heart Failure Patients
Hypotension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
191 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study of Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 191 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 191 sites in Belgium, Poland, France, Spain, Croatia and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jan 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Clinically Stable Patients Whose Therapy Regimen Adheres to ESC Guideline Recommendations for Drug Types (Level 1) and Drug Type and Dose (Level 2) at Visit 1 (Before Referral to a Cardiologist) (time frame: Baseline (Visit 1)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2021.