Lung CancerNCT02803281
Assessment of Patient Frailty Prior to Thoracic Surgery
An observational study of Lung Cancer and Esophageal Cancer, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 3 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Determine the feasibility of assessment of measures of frailty and determine if these measures provide a clinically important contribution of risk assessment in a population of patients undergoing major thoracic surgery for lung or esophageal cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer, Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Frailty Assessment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 29 Jul 2015to 21 Nov 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Cancer Patients - Lung or Esophageal
Who may be able to join
- Patients with Esophageal or Lung Cancer who will undergo resectional surgery.
Who cannot join
- Patients undergoing diagnostic or staging procedures or pulmonary wedge excisions will be excluded.
- Patients unable to give informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Canada3 sites
University Health Network (Toronto General Hospital)
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
University Health Network: Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Patient Frailty Prior to Thoracic Surgery: A Feasibility Study
Determine the feasibility of assessment of measures of frailty and determine if these measures provide a clinically important contribution of risk assessment in a population of patients undergoing major thoracic surgery for lung or esophageal cancer.
Read the detailed description
Both gastro-esophageal and lung cancers are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In Canada the incidence for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma has doubled in the last two decades, while lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. Surgery is a treatment option for these patients; however, esophagectomy in particular, is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and adverse effect on quality of life. Despite satisfactory standard preoperative testing to evaluate risk for surgery, some patients experience morbidity and never recover fully from surgery. Frailty assessment may offer a more sensitive measure of a patient's physiologic reserve, which may allow identification of patients who are poor candidates for surgery. There is a lack of consensus of how best to assess frailty prior to surgery. This study aims to analyze frailty assessment as a tool for patient selection for surgery.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Esophageal Cancer
- Being tested
- Frailty Assessment
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Frailty AssessmentOther
Various physiologic and frailty assessment tests
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lung Cancer - Frialty Assessment | Patients who will undergo surgery for lung cancer Receives: Other: Frailty Assessment | |
| Esophageal Cancer - Frailty Assessment | Patients who will undergo esophagectomy for esophageal cancer Receives: Other: Frailty Assessment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility Assessment
Determine the feasibility of assessment of measures of frailty and determine if these measures provide a clinically important contribution of risk assessment in a population of patients undergoing major thoracic surgery for lung or esophageal cancer.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study start29 Jul 2015
- Primary completion29 Jul 2018
- Study completion21 Nov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Health Network, TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gail E Darling, MD, Principal investigator, University Health Network, Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02803281
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15-9170
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 7 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Hodari A, Hammoud ZT, Borgi JF, Tsiouris A, Rubinfeld IS. Assessment of morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy using a modified frailty index. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Oct;96(4):1240-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.051. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
PubMed 23915593Talsma AK, Damhuis RA, Steyerberg EW, Rosman C, van Lanschot JJ, Wijnhoven BP. Determinants of improved survival after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2015 May;102(6):668-75. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9792. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
PubMed 25787705Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, Syin D, Bandeen-Roche K, Patel P, Takenaga R, Devgan L, Holzmueller CG, Tian J, Fried LP. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jun;210(6):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PubMed 20510798Robinson TN, Eiseman B, Wallace JI, Church SD, McFann KK, Pfister SM, Sharp TJ, Moss M. Redefining geriatric preoperative assessment using frailty, disability and co-morbidity. Ann Surg. 2009 Sep;250(3):449-55. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b45598.
PubMed 19730176Chen CH, Ho-Chang, Huang YZ, Hung TT. Hand-grip strength is a simple and effective outcome predictor in esophageal cancer following esophagectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug 15;6:98. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-98.
PubMed 21843340Yano Y, Inokuchi T, Kario K. Walking speed is a useful marker of frailty in older persons. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Feb 25;173(4):325-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1629. No abstract available.
PubMed 23440240Fritz S, Lusardi M. White paper: "walking speed: the sixth vital sign". J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(2):46-9. No abstract available.
PubMed 20039582Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, Sayer AA. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr051. Epub 2011 May 30.
PubMed 21624928Sheetz KH, Zhao L, Holcombe SA, Wang SC, Reddy RM, Lin J, Orringer MB, Chang AC. Decreased core muscle size is associated with worse patient survival following esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(7):716-22. doi: 10.1111/dote.12020. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
PubMed 23350746Rogalla P, Meiri N, Hoksch B, Boeing H, Hamm B. Low-dose spiral computed tomography for measuring abdominal fat volume and distribution in a clinical setting. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998 Aug;52(8):597-602. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600612.
PubMed 9725661
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Patient Frailty Prior to Thoracic Surgery: A Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02803281
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15-9170
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Esophageal Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Jul 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Determine the feasibility of assessment of measures of frailty and determine if these measures provide a clinically important contribution of risk assessment in a population of patients undergoing major thoracic surgery for lung or esophageal cancer.
Detailed description
Both gastro-esophageal and lung cancers are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In Canada the incidence for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma has doubled in the last two decades, while lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. Surgery is a treatment option for these patients; however, esophagectomy in particular, is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and adverse effect on quality of life. Despite satisfactory standard preoperative testing to evaluate risk for surgery, some patients experience morbidity and never recover fully from surgery. Frailty assessment may offer a more sensitive measure of a patient's physiologic reserve, which may allow identification of patients who are poor candidates for surgery. There is a lack of consensus of how best to assess frailty prior to surgery. This study aims to analyze frailty assessment as a tool for patient selection for surgery.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lung Cancer - Frialty Assessment | – | Other: Frailty AssessmentPatients who will undergo surgery for lung cancer |
| Esophageal Cancer - Frailty Assessment | – | Other: Frailty AssessmentPatients who will undergo esophagectomy for esophageal cancer |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Cancer Patients - Lung or Esophageal
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with Esophageal or Lung Cancer who will undergo resectional surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients undergoing diagnostic or staging procedures or pulmonary wedge excisions will be excluded.
- Patients unable to give informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Frailty AssessmentVarious physiologic and frailty assessment tests | Other | Esophageal Cancer - Frailty Assessment, Lung Cancer - Frialty Assessment |
Primary outcome
Feasibility Assessment
Time frame: 2 years
Determine the feasibility of assessment of measures of frailty and determine if these measures provide a clinically important contribution of risk assessment in a population of patients undergoing major thoracic surgery for lung or esophageal cancer.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2019.
- Background: PubMed 23915593Hodari A, Hammoud ZT, Borgi JF, Tsiouris A, Rubinfeld IS. Assessment of morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy using a modified frailty index. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Oct;96(4):1240-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.051. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
- Background: PubMed 25787705Talsma AK, Damhuis RA, Steyerberg EW, Rosman C, van Lanschot JJ, Wijnhoven BP. Determinants of improved survival after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2015 May;102(6):668-75. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9792. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 20510798Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, Syin D, Bandeen-Roche K, Patel P, Takenaga R, Devgan L, Holzmueller CG, Tian J, Fried LP. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jun;210(6):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 19730176Robinson TN, Eiseman B, Wallace JI, Church SD, McFann KK, Pfister SM, Sharp TJ, Moss M. Redefining geriatric preoperative assessment using frailty, disability and co-morbidity. Ann Surg. 2009 Sep;250(3):449-55. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b45598.
- Background: PubMed 21843340Chen CH, Ho-Chang, Huang YZ, Hung TT. Hand-grip strength is a simple and effective outcome predictor in esophageal cancer following esophagectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug 15;6:98. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-98.
- Background: PubMed 23440240Yano Y, Inokuchi T, Kario K. Walking speed is a useful marker of frailty in older persons. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Feb 25;173(4):325-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1629. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 20039582Fritz S, Lusardi M. White paper: "walking speed: the sixth vital sign". J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(2):46-9. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21624928Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, Sayer AA. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr051. Epub 2011 May 30.
- Background: PubMed 23350746Sheetz KH, Zhao L, Holcombe SA, Wang SC, Reddy RM, Lin J, Orringer MB, Chang AC. Decreased core muscle size is associated with worse patient survival following esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(7):716-22. doi: 10.1111/dote.12020. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 9725661Rogalla P, Meiri N, Hoksch B, Boeing H, Hamm B. Low-dose spiral computed tomography for measuring abdominal fat volume and distribution in a clinical setting. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998 Aug;52(8):597-602. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600612.
- Canadian Cancer Statistics 2010Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gail E Darling, MD principal investigator
University Health Network, Toronto
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Cancer and Esophageal Cancer, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 3 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility Assessment (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02803281, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.