AzTrials
AzTrials

OverweightTHESFNCT02800616

The Healthy Elementary School of the Future

A study testing The Healthy Primary School of the Future and The Physical Activity School in people with Overweight and Physical Activity, run by Maastricht University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Unhealthy lifestyles in early childhood are a major global health challenge. These lifestyles often persist from generation to generation and contribute to a vicious cycle of health-related and social problems. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Overweight, Physical Activity, Malnutrition
What is being tested?
The Healthy Primary School of the Future and The Physical Activity School
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,349 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2015to Jul 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • All children and their caregivers enrolled at one of the participating schools

Who cannot join

  • None. Participants who switch schools during the four-year study period will not be followed-up.

About this study

Unhealthy lifestyles in early childhood are a major global health challenge. These lifestyles often persist from generation to generation and contribute to a vicious cycle of health-related and social problems. We present a study protocol that examines the effectiveness of two novel, integrated healthy school interventions. One is a full intervention called 'The Healthy Primary School of the Future', the other is a partial intervention called 'The Physical Activity School'. These intervention approaches will be compared with the regular school approach that is currently common practice in the Netherlands. The main outcome measure will be changes in children's body mass index (BMI). In addition, lifestyle behaviours, academic achievement, child well-being, socio-economic differences, and societal costs will be examined.

Read the detailed description

In close collaboration with various stakeholders, a quasi-experimental study was developed, for which children of four intervention schools (n = 1200) in the southern part of the Netherlands are compared with children of four control schools (n = 1200) in the same region. The interventions started in November 2015. In two of the four intervention schools, a whole-school approach named 'The Healthy Primary School of the Future', is implemented with the aim of improving physical activity and dietary behaviour. For this intervention, pupils are offered an extended curriculum, including a healthy lunch, more physical exercises, and social and educational activities, next to the regular school curriculum. In the two other intervention schools, a physical-activity school approach called 'The Physical Activity School', is implemented, which is essentially similar to the other intervention, except that no lunch is provided.

We hypothesize that these healthy school interventions will result in normalized BMI distributions that are more in line with national and international standards (smaller standard deviations) among primary school children, with a more pronounced effect in the full intervention schools (due to the expected synergy between exercise and diet) than in the partial intervention schools. Also, our multi-disciplinary research group will study a wide range of outcome measures, including lifestyle behaviours, academic achievement, child well-being, socio-economic differences, and societal costs. Moreover, an evaluation will be performed of the legal consequences of a healthy school approach in the Netherlands, as well as the conflicting interests of the stakeholders. Data collection is conducted within the school system. The interventions proceed during a period of four years. The baseline measurements started in September 2015 and yearly follow-up measurements are taking place until 2019.

Our primary research question is: What is the effect of the full intervention ('The Healthy Primary School of the Future') on the BMI of primary school children compared to no intervention (control schools)? Our secondary research question is: What is the effect of the full intervention on the BMI of primary school children compared to the partial intervention ('The Physical Activity School')? Our tertiary research questions are: (1) What is the effect of the full intervention in comparison with the partial intervention and the regular school approach (control schools) on: (a) children's levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, nutritional knowledge, healthy food preferences and behaviour, cognitive and non-cognitive performance, Health related-QoL, socio-emotional development, and sick leave? (b) parenting and teacher practices regarding physical activity and nutrition? (c) parental HR-QoL, well-being, labour participation and sick leave? (d) benefits across different socio-economic backgrounds? (e) long and short term cost-effectiveness? (f) satisfaction among the involved stakeholders (children, parents, teachers, and child care partners)? (2) Which determinants influence the quality of the implementation of the intervention? (3) What is the scope of children's human rights to health, what is the legal role of primary schools in realizing these rights (e.g., obligations and responsibilities of state and non-state actors, conflicts of interests and legal solutions to these conflicts), and is the intervention feasible within Dutch educational law?

A whole-school approach is a new concept in the Netherlands. Due to its innovative, multifaceted nature and sound scientific foundation, these integrated programmes have the potential to form a template for primary schools worldwide. The effects of this approach may extend further than the outcomes associated with well-being and academic achievement, potentially impacting legal and cultural aspects in our society.

Being tested
The Healthy Primary School of the Future, The Physical Activity School
Keywords
Academic Achievement, Accelerometry, Children, Primary school Intervention, Nutrition, Obesity, Physical Activity, Prevention, School Health
Medical subject headings
Overweight, Motor Activity, Malnutrition, Mental Disorders, Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The Healthy Primary School of the FutureOther

    In two out of four intervention schools, a whole-school approach named 'The Healthy Primary School of the Future', is implemented with the aim of improving physical activity and dietary behaviour. For this intervention, pupils are offered an extended curriculum, including a healthy lunch, more physical exercises, and social and educational activities, next to the regular school curriculum.

  • The Physical Activity SchoolBehavioural

    In the two other intervention schools, a physical-activity school approach called 'The Physical Activity School', is implemented, which is essentially similar to the other intervention, except that no lunch is provided.

Study groups in NCT02800616
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Full intervention groupExperimentalThe full intervention ('The Healthy Primary School of the Future') is implemented in two schools involving extended school hours in which healthy nutrition, physical exercise, environmental, social, and educational activities are incorporated, during a period of four years.
Receives: Other: The Healthy Primary School of the Future
Partial intervention groupExperimentalThe partial intervention ('The Physical Activity School') is implemented in two other schools: involving extended school hours in which healthy nutrition, physical exercise, environmental, social, and educational activities are incorporated, during a period of four years. Hence, this intervention only differs from the full intervention on the absence of nutritional intervention. Instead, children bring their own food from home, as they normally do.
Receives: Behavioral: The Physical Activity School
Control groupNo interventionFour primary schools will function as control schools. The control schools have a representative Dutch school environment in terms of lifestyle education, school hours and amount of Physical Education (PE) lessons.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Child absolute change in BMI Z-score, based on weight and height.

    Weight is measured using a weighing scale, to the nearest 0.1 kg; height is measured using a measuring rod, to the nearest 0.1 cm.

    Measured: Four years

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Child hip and waist circumferences

    Using a measuring tape, to the nearest 0.1 cm, following the World Health Organization's assessment protocol

    Measured: Four years

  2. Child handgrip strength

    Measured using a calibrated Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer to the nearest 0.5 kg

    Measured: Four years

  3. Child disease status

    Self-report measure (online parental questionnaire) since birth, hospital admissions (number and duration), healthcare visits (number), and medication use in the previous twelve months

    Measured: Four years

  4. Child pre-school blood pressure, birth weight, and information on disease history.

    Data previously obtained by the regional Public Health Services.

    Measured: Obtained once

  5. Parental BMI

    Self-report measure (online parental questionnaire).

    Measured: Four years

  6. Parental practices regarding nutrition

    Self-report measure (online parental questionnaire).Using the shortened version (nine items) of the Comprehensive Snack Parenting Questionnaire (CSPQ)

    Measured: Four years

  7. Parental practices regarding physical activity

    Self-report measure (online parental questionnaire).questionnaire developed in the same style as he Comprehensive Snack Parenting Questionnaire (CSPQ)

    Measured: Four Years

  8. Labour participation of parents

    Current employment status (self reported) is combined with parental education level and household income to determine socio economic status (SES).

    Measured: Four years

  9. Parents' ethnicity and level of (material) deprivation

    Self-report measure (online parental questionnaire).

    Measured: Four years

  10. Parental sick leave and absence from work or education because of illness of their child.

    Self-report measure (online parental questionnaire). Labour participation is combined with parental sick leave rates to determine productivity losses from work.

    Measured: Four years

  11. Child health-related quality of life

    Examined with the validated EuroQol 5-Dimensions Youth version questionnaire (EQ-5D-Y) and the proxy version for parents. Child-specific HR-QoL is measured by the validated Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and parents complete the proxy version of this questionnaire.

    Measured: Four years

  12. Child psychological attributes

    Assessed using the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire.

    Measured: Four years

  13. Child social, emotional, and academic self-efficacy.

    Tested using the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Children (SEQ-C).

    Measured: Four years

  14. Child self-confidence, social skills, self-efficacy, school well-being, and social support

    Assessed with OnderwijsMonitor Limburg programme

    Measured: Four years

  15. Child physical activity and sedentary behavior (Actigraph accelerometer)

    In the week in which the child is wearing the accelerometer, parents fill in a short activity diary on their child's physical activity and swimming behaviour and exceptional circumstances (e.g., illness of the child)

    Measured: Four years

  16. Sports club membership, active forms of transport to school, and leisure time physical activities assessed in both children and parents.

    Self-report measure

    Measured: Four years

  17. Child food intake

    Assessed using a food frequency questionnaire and a dietary recall tool to be completed by both children and parents.

    Measured: Four years

  18. Child food preferences and familiarity with healthy food products.

    Self-report measure: The questions mainly consist of pictures of food items, for which children can indicate whether they have ever eaten these items and whether they like them or not.

    Measured: Four years

  19. Parental practices regarding nutrition and physical activity

    Self-report measure

    Measured: Four years

  20. Parental wellbeing

    measured by the Satisfaction With Life Survey (SWLS)

    Measured: Four years

  21. Parental health-related quality of life

    Measured with the EuroQol - 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    Measured: Four years

  22. Socioeconomic status

    Self-report measure

    Measured: Four years

  23. School/ teacher practices regarding nutrition and physical activity

    E.g. modelling eating healthy food products and encouraging children's physical activity. Measured using adapted version of the Parental Practices Instrument

    Measured: Four years

  24. Teacher's self-reported height, weight and transport forms to work

    Written questionnaire

    Measured: Four years

  25. Child academic achievements

    Monitored using the Dutch national test called Centrale Eindtoets Basisonderwijs (CITO), and various other tests used by the schools. The CITO test measures language, maths and world orientation. In addition to the CITO test, many schools use a wide range of tests throughout the children's school careers. This also includes tests on maths (taken twice a year) and various aspects of language such as decoding skills, spelling, vocabulary, and reading comprehension.

    Measured: Four years

  26. School advice and the actual level of secondary school opted for (Dutch secondary education is hierarchically ordered).

    School registration system

    Measured: Four years

  27. School absenteeism and repeating classes

    School registration system

    Measured: Four years

  28. Process evaluation using a school satisfaction questionnaire

    Self-report measure: general parental satisfaction with their children's school (including safety, communication, quality of education, challenges to children, and professionalism of teachers). Implementation of the intervention is evaluated by qualitative outcome measures such as interviews with parents and children, and classroom observations.

    Measured: Four years

  29. Juridical evaluation through literature study and interviews

    Legal aspects will be addressed by a thorough scientific literature study and examination of policy and legislation instruments and case-law on the scope of children's right to health. Interviews with the parties involved in the healthy school setting will determine the juridical-related interests and possibilities.

    Measured: Four years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2015
  3. Primary completionNov 2019
  4. Study completionJul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,349 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02800616
Sponsor's protocol ID
UM MOVARE GGD
Acronym
THESF
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
2 Mar 2016
Last updated
22 Sep 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hahnraths MTH, Willeboordse M, van Assema P, Winkens B, van Schayck CP. The Effects of the Healthy Primary School of the Future on Children's Fruit and Vegetable Preferences, Familiarity and Intake. Nutrients. 2021 Sep 17;13(9):3241. doi: 10.3390/nu13093241.

    PubMed 34579117
  • Oosterhoff M, Jolani S, De Bruijn-Geraets D, van Giessen A, Bosma H, van Schayck OCP, Joore MA. BMI trajectories after primary school-based lifestyle intervention: Unravelling an uncertain future. A mixed methods study. Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jan 7;21:101314. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101314. eCollection 2021 Mar.

    PubMed 33537184
  • Oosterhoff M, Over EAB, van Giessen A, Hoogenveen RT, Bosma H, van Schayck OCP, Joore MA. Lifetime cost-effectiveness and equity impacts of the Healthy Primary School of the Future initiative. BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):1887. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09744-9.

    PubMed 33297992
  • Oosterhoff M, van Schayck OCP, Bartelink NHM, Bosma H, Willeboordse M, Winkens B, Joore MA. The Short-Term Value of the "Healthy Primary School of the Future" Initiative: A Social Return on Investment Analysis. Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;8:401. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00401. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32974255
  • Palacios Temprano J, Eichholtz P, Willeboordse M, Kok N. Indoor environmental quality and learning outcomes: protocol on large-scale sensor deployment in schools. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 16;10(3):e031233. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031233.

    PubMed 32184302
  • Bartelink NHM, van Assema P, Kremers SPJ, Savelberg HHCM, Oosterhoff M, Willeboordse M, van Schayck OCP, Winkens B, Jansen MWJ. Can the Healthy Primary School of the Future offer perspective in the ongoing obesity epidemic in young children? A Dutch quasi-experimental study. BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 31;9(10):e030676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030676.

    PubMed 31676651
  • Bartelink NHM, van Assema P, Jansen MWJ, Savelberg HHCM, Moore GF, Hawkins J, Kremers SPJ. Process evaluation of the healthy primary School of the Future: the key learning points. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 6;19(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6947-2.

    PubMed 31170941
  • Boudewijns EA, Pepels JJS, van Kann D, Konings K, van Schayck CP, Willeboordse M. Non-response and external validity in a school-based quasi-experimental study 'The Healthy Primary School of the Future': A cross-sectional assessment. Prev Med Rep. 2019 Apr 17;14:100874. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100874. eCollection 2019 Jun.

    PubMed 31061783
  • Oosterhoff M, Joore MA, Bartelink NHM, Winkens B, Schayck OCP, Bosma H. Longitudinal analysis of health disparities in childhood. Arch Dis Child. 2019 Aug;104(8):781-788. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316482. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

    PubMed 30948361
  • Willeboordse M, Jansen MW, van den Heijkant SN, Simons A, Winkens B, de Groot RH, Bartelink N, Kremers SP, van Assema P, Savelberg HH, de Neubourg E, Borghans L, Schils T, Coppens KM, Dietvorst R, Ten Hoopen R, Coomans F, Klosse S, Conjaerts MH, Oosterhoff M, Joore MA, Ferreira I, Muris P, Bosma H, Toppenberg HL, van Schayck CP. The Healthy Primary School of the Future: study protocol of a quasi-experimental study. BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 26;16:639. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3301-9.

    PubMed 27456845

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing The Healthy Primary School of the Future and The Physical Activity School in people with Overweight and Physical Activity, run by Maastricht University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Child absolute change in BMI Z-score, based on weight and height. (time frame: Four years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02800616, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in