AzTrials
AzTrials

Relapsing Multiple ScelrosisPhase 3ASCLEPIOS IINCT02792231

Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

A Phase 3 study testing Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule in people with Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 178 sites in 30 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis
What is being tested?
Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
955 participants
Where
178 sitesin 30 countries
Study dates
26 Aug 2016to 22 Oct 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female patients aged 18 to 55 years at Screening
  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
  • Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with disease activity
  • Documentation of at least: 1 relapse during the previous 1 year OR 2 relapses during the previous 2 years OR a positive gadolinium-enhancing MRI scan during the year prior to randomization
  • Disability status at Screening with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5
  • Neurologically stable within 1 month prior to randomization

Who cannot join

  • Patients with primary progressive MS or SPMS without disease activity
  • Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less
  • Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
  • Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis
  • Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML

Trial locations and contacts

178 sites in 30 countries.

178 sites in 30 countries

United States59 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Akron, Ohio, 44320

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131-0001

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Anderson, Indiana, 46011

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Asheville, North Carolina, 28806

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Basalt, Colorado, 81621

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Billings, Montana, 59101

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233-0271

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Boulder, Colorado, 80301

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bradenton, Florida, 34205

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Centennial, Colorado, 80112

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28202

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43214

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43221

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cordova, Tennessee, 38018

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cullman, Alabama, 35058

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Denver, Colorado, 80210

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fairfield, Connecticut, 06824

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fort Collins, Colorado, 80528

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fort Collins, Colorado, 907-280528

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gainesville, Florida, 32611

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Golden Valley, Minnesota, 55422

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Great Falls, Montana, 59405

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27405

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Greenville, Texas, 75401

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Greer, South Carolina, 29650

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kirkland, Washington, 98034

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37922

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lubbock, Texas, 79410

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Maitland, Florida, 32751

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37205

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Newark, Delaware, 19713

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ocala, Florida, 34471

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Oldsmar, Florida, 34677

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Orem, Utah, 84058

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Palm Coast, Florida, 32164

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Portland, Oregon, 97225

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84103

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sarasota, Florida, 34243

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seattle, Washington, 98122

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sherman, Texas, 75092

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33713

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Suwanee, Georgia, 30024

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tallahassee, Florida, 32312

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33603

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33609

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85704

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Waukesha, Wisconsin, 53188

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Wellesley, Massachusetts, 02481

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Westerville, Ohio, 43081

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090

Other trials in United States

Germany14 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bochum, 44791

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cologne, 50935

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dresden, 01307

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Essen, 45147

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hamburg, 22179

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hanover, 30625

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Homburg, 66421

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leipzig, 04107

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Minden, 32429

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Siegen, 57076

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ulm, 89081

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Unterhaching, 82008

Other trials in Germany

Portugal10 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Amadora, 2720-276

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Braga, 4710243

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Coimbra, 3000-075

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lisbon, 1169-050

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lisbon, 1500 650

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lisbon, 1600190

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Loures, 2674514

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Matosinhos Municipality, Porto District, 4454509

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Porto, 4000001

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Santa Maria da Feira, 4520 211

Other trials in Portugal

Russia9 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kazan', 420021

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Krasnoyarsk, 660049

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Moscow, 127015

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nizhny Novgorod, 603137

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Novosibirsk, 630087

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197110

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197376

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Yekaterinburg, 620109

Other trials in Russia

Spain9 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Donostia / San Sebastian, 20014

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28034

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28040

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28222

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Málaga, Andalusia, 29010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seville, Andalusia, 41017

Other trials in Spain

France7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nice, Cedex1, 06001

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Paris, 75651

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rennes, 35033

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Strasbourg, 67098

Other trials in France

India7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500018

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ludhiana, Punjab, 141008

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400008

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mumbai, 400016

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110 060

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pune, Maharashtra, 411004

Other trials in India

Italy6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Genova, 16132

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Milan, 20133

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Naples, 80138

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Padova, PD, 35128

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Roma, RM, 00133

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rome, 00178

Other trials in Italy

Czechia5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brno, Czech Republic, 656 91

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Havířov, Czech Republic, 736 01

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ostrava-Poruba, 708 52

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Prague, 100 34

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Teplice, Czech Republic, 415 01

Other trials in Czechia

Poland5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Głogów, 36-060

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rzeszów, 35 055

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Warsaw, 02 957

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Wroclaw, 51-685

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zabrze, 41-800

Other trials in Poland

Belgium4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Aalst, 9300

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brussels, 1200

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Edegem, Antwerpen, 2650

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

Canada4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2J2

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 5A5

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

Other trials in Canada

Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Haseki / Istanbul, 34096

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Izmir, 35340

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mersin, 33079

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Trabzon, 61080

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, SE5 9RS

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, SW17 0QT

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Luton, Beds, LU4 0DZ

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF

Other trials in United Kingdom

Argentina3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    CABA, Buenos Aires, C1428AQK

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000DSW

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Miguel de Tucumán, 4000

Other trials in Argentina

Latvia3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Riga, LV, LV-1005

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Riga, LV 1002

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Riga, LV-1038

Other trials in Latvia

Peru3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lima, LIMA 13

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lima Cercado, Lima region, 01

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Isidro, Lima region, 27

Other trials in Peru

Slovakia3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bratislava, 813 69

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Martin, 036 59

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ružomberok, 03426

Other trials in Slovakia

Austria2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vienna, 1010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Bulgaria2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sofia, 1113

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sofia, 1413

Other trials in Bulgaria

Croatia2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Osijek, 31000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Finland2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tampere, 33100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Turku, 20520

Other trials in Finland

Hungary2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Budapest, HUN, 1204

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Esztergom, HUN, 2500

Other trials in Hungary

Lithuania2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kaunas, LTU, LT 50161

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vilnius, LT-08661

Other trials in Lithuania

South Africa2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pretoria, 0041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rosebank, 2196

Other trials in South Africa

Australia1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170

Other trials in Australia

Mexico1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chihuahua City, 31238

Other trials in Mexico

Norway1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Drammen, 1086

Other trials in Norway

Switzerland1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lugano, 6900

Other trials in Switzerland

Taiwan1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tainan, 70403

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Versus Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparatorcontrolled, parallel-group, multi-center study with variable treatment duration in approximately 900 patients with relapsing multiple sclorosis (RMS). The maximal treatment duration in the study for an individual patient was 2.5 years. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either experimental ofatumumab subcutaneous (s.c.) injections every 4 weeks or active comparator teriflunomide orally once daily. The dose regimen for ofatumumab for this study was a loading dose regimen of 20 mg at Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14, followed by a maintenance dose regimen of 20 mg administered every 4 weeks starting at Week 4. In order to blind for the different formulations, double-dummy masking was used, i.e., all patients will take injections (containing either active ofatumumab or placebo) and oral capsules (containing either active teriflunomide or placebo).

Being tested
Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection, Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules, Teriflunomide capsule, Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections
Keywords
Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Ofatumumab, adult, OMB157, multiple sclerosis, T1 lesions, T2 lesions, relapse, GD-enhancing MRI, McDonald criteria, RRMS, SPMS
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionDrug

    Ofatumumab 20 mg prefilled syringes for subcutaneous injection on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter

  • Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsulesDrug

    Placebo capsule, matching in appearance to teriflunomide, taken orally once daily

  • Teriflunomide capsuleDrug

    Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily

  • Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionsDrug

    Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter

Study groups in NCT02792231
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OMG 20 mgExperimentalOfatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injectionon on days 1 ,7 ,14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter and a teriflunomide-matching placebo, taken orally once daily
Receives: Drug: Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection; Drug: Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules
TER 14 mgActive comparatorTeriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily and matching placebo for subcutaneous injections to ofatumumab on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Receives: Drug: Teriflunomide capsule; Drug: Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)

    ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. 3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data

    A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  2. 3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302

    A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  3. 6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  4. 6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302

    A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  5. 6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  6. 6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302

    A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  7. Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan

    Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across all scans per patient adjusted for different number of scans due to variable follow-up time in study.

    Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years

  8. Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year (Annualized Lesion Rate)

    Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on last available MRI scan compared to baseline adjusted for different time of scans versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study

    Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years

  9. Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Concentration in Serum

    The NfL concentration (geometric mean concentration) was estimated by treatment and time point with using a repeated measures model on the basis of all evaluable log-transformed NfL values.

    Measured: Month 3, 12 and 24

  10. Annualized Rate of Brain Volume Loss Based on Assessments of Percent Brain Volume Change From Baseline

    Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

  11. Participants With Confirmed Relapse

    A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  12. Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) >8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment

    ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  13. 3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data

    A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  14. 6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  15. 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline was defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 4 points in SDMT score sustained for at least 6 months. Processing speed was measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint

    Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years

  16. 6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) or 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline (6mCCD) - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline (6mCCD) was defined as a 4-point worsening on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) sustained for at least 6 months. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  17. Change in Cognitive Performance Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data

    Processing speed is being measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  18. 6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) - Pooled Data

    The patient is directed to walk 25 feet quickly and safely as possible from one marked end to the other. The time is calculated from the initiation of the patient instructed to begin, until the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  19. 6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) - Pooled Data

    9-Hole Peg Test is a test of upper limb function. Participants place 9 pegs on pegboard and remove pegs and this is timed for each hand. Time recorded in seconds. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. 20% improvement is defined as 20% shorter time in seconds. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years

  20. 6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI) Sustained Until End of Study (EOS) as Measured by EDSS - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) sustained until EOS was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained until EOS. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  21. Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year From Month 12 Until End of Study (EOS)

    Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan compared to Month 12 adjusted for different time of scans versus Month 12 due to variable follow up time in study.

    Measured: Month 12 up to 2.5 years

  22. Percent Change in T2 Lesion Volume Relative to Baseline

    Percent change from baseline in total T2 lesion volume

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24

  23. No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-4)

    NEDA-4 was defined as no 3-month confirmed disability worsening, no confirmed MS relapse, no new or enlarging T2 lesions compared to baseline, and the annualized rate of brain atrophy >-0.04%.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24

  24. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score Change From Baseline

    MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.

    Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years

  25. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Psychological Impact Score Change From Baseline

    MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.

    Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years

  26. Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data

    ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  27. Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Year by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data

    Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI per year (annualized lesion rate).

    Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years

  28. Brain Volume Loss by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data

    Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

  29. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab

    Summary statistics of pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations from trough samples collected within a 7-day window prior or at day of dosing.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 96

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completion10 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion22 Oct 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
955 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02792231
Sponsor's protocol ID
COMB157G2302
Other IDs
2015-005419-33, 2015
Acronym
ASCLEPIOS II
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
2 Jun 2016
Last updated
22 Nov 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Publications

  • Williams MJ, Amezcua L, Cohan SL, Cohen JA, Delgado SR, Hua LH, Lucassen EB, Piccolo RS, Koulouris CR, Stankiewicz J. Efficacy of Ofatumumab and Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing MS From Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups: ASCLEPIOS I/II Subgroup Analyses. Neurology. 2024 Aug 13;103(3):e209610. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209610. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

    PubMed 39018512
  • Bhan V, Clift F, Baharnoori M, Thomas K, Patel BP, Blanchette F, Adlard N, Vudumula U, Gudala K, Dutta N, Grima D, Mouallif S, Farhane F. Cost-consequence analysis of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada. J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Sep;12(9):e220175. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0175. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

    PubMed 37606897
  • Gartner J, Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Montalban X, Cohen JA, Cross AH, Deiva K, Ganjgahi H, Haring DA, Li B, Pingili R, Ramanathan K, Su W, Willi R, Kieseier B, Kappos L. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II. Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1562-1575. doi: 10.1177/13524585221078825. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

    PubMed 35266417
  • Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, Cross AH, de Seze J, Leppert D, Montalban X, Selmaj K, Wiendl H, Kerloeguen C, Willi R, Li B, Kakarieka A, Tomic D, Goodyear A, Pingili R, Haring DA, Ramanathan K, Merschhemke M, Kappos L; ASCLEPIOS I and ASCLEPIOS II Trial Groups. Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):546-557. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.

    PubMed 32757523

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule in people with Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 178 sites in 30 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 178 sites in United States, Germany, Portugal, Russia, Spain and 25 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) (time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02792231, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in