Relapsing Multiple ScelrosisPhase 3ASCLEPIOS IINCT02792231
Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
A Phase 3 study testing Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule in people with Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 178 sites in 30 countries.
Trial summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis
- What is being tested?
- Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 955 participants
- Where
- 178 sitesin 30 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Aug 2016to 22 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients aged 18 to 55 years at Screening
- Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
- Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with disease activity
- Documentation of at least: 1 relapse during the previous 1 year OR 2 relapses during the previous 2 years OR a positive gadolinium-enhancing MRI scan during the year prior to randomization
- Disability status at Screening with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5
- Neurologically stable within 1 month prior to randomization
Who cannot join
- Patients with primary progressive MS or SPMS without disease activity
- Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less
- Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
- Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis
- Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML
Trial locations and contacts
178 sites in 30 countries.
178 sites in 30 countries
United States59 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Akron, Ohio, 44320
Novartis Investigative Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131-0001
Novartis Investigative Site
Anderson, Indiana, 46011
Novartis Investigative Site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28806
Novartis Investigative Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Novartis Investigative Site
Basalt, Colorado, 81621
Novartis Investigative Site
Billings, Montana, 59101
Novartis Investigative Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233-0271
Novartis Investigative Site
Boulder, Colorado, 80301
Novartis Investigative Site
Bradenton, Florida, 34205
Novartis Investigative Site
Centennial, Colorado, 80112
Novartis Investigative Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28202
Novartis Investigative Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907
Novartis Investigative Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Novartis Investigative Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43221
Novartis Investigative Site
Cordova, Tennessee, 38018
Novartis Investigative Site
Cullman, Alabama, 35058
Novartis Investigative Site
Denver, Colorado, 80210
Novartis Investigative Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Novartis Investigative Site
Fairfield, Connecticut, 06824
Novartis Investigative Site
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80528
Novartis Investigative Site
Fort Collins, Colorado, 907-280528
Novartis Investigative Site
Gainesville, Florida, 32611
Novartis Investigative Site
Golden Valley, Minnesota, 55422
Novartis Investigative Site
Great Falls, Montana, 59405
Novartis Investigative Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27405
Novartis Investigative Site
Greenville, Texas, 75401
Novartis Investigative Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29650
Novartis Investigative Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256
Novartis Investigative Site
Kirkland, Washington, 98034
Novartis Investigative Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37922
Novartis Investigative Site
Lubbock, Texas, 79410
Novartis Investigative Site
Maitland, Florida, 32751
Novartis Investigative Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Novartis Investigative Site
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Novartis Investigative Site
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Novartis Investigative Site
Oldsmar, Florida, 34677
Novartis Investigative Site
Orem, Utah, 84058
Novartis Investigative Site
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Novartis Investigative Site
Palm Coast, Florida, 32164
Novartis Investigative Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Novartis Investigative Site
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Novartis Investigative Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84103
Novartis Investigative Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Novartis Investigative Site
Sarasota, Florida, 34243
Novartis Investigative Site
Seattle, Washington, 98122
Novartis Investigative Site
Sherman, Texas, 75092
Novartis Investigative Site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33713
Novartis Investigative Site
Suwanee, Georgia, 30024
Novartis Investigative Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallahassee, Florida, 32312
Novartis Investigative Site
Tampa, Florida, 33603
Novartis Investigative Site
Tampa, Florida, 33609
Novartis Investigative Site
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Novartis Investigative Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Novartis Investigative Site
Waukesha, Wisconsin, 53188
Novartis Investigative Site
Wellesley, Massachusetts, 02481
Novartis Investigative Site
Westerville, Ohio, 43081
Novartis Investigative Site
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090
Germany14 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bochum, 44791
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, 50935
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, 01307
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45147
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 22179
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, 30625
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, 69120
Novartis Investigative Site
Homburg, 66421
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04103
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04107
Novartis Investigative Site
Minden, 32429
Novartis Investigative Site
Siegen, 57076
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, 89081
Novartis Investigative Site
Unterhaching, 82008
Portugal10 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Amadora, 2720-276
Novartis Investigative Site
Braga, 4710243
Novartis Investigative Site
Coimbra, 3000-075
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1169-050
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1500 650
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1600190
Novartis Investigative Site
Loures, 2674514
Novartis Investigative Site
Matosinhos Municipality, Porto District, 4454509
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto, 4000001
Novartis Investigative Site
Santa Maria da Feira, 4520 211
Russia9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kazan', 420021
Novartis Investigative Site
Krasnoyarsk, 660049
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 127015
Novartis Investigative Site
Nizhny Novgorod, 603137
Novartis Investigative Site
Novosibirsk, 630087
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197110
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197376
Novartis Investigative Site
Yekaterinburg, 620109
Spain9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903
Novartis Investigative Site
Donostia / San Sebastian, 20014
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28006
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28034
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28040
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28222
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, Andalusia, 29010
Novartis Investigative Site
Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, Andalusia, 41017
France7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, 33076
Novartis Investigative Site
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Novartis Investigative Site
Montpellier, 34295
Novartis Investigative Site
Nice, Cedex1, 06001
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75651
Novartis Investigative Site
Rennes, 35033
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, 67098
India7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500018
Novartis Investigative Site
Ludhiana, Punjab, 141008
Novartis Investigative Site
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400008
Novartis Investigative Site
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012
Novartis Investigative Site
Mumbai, 400016
Novartis Investigative Site
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110 060
Novartis Investigative Site
Pune, Maharashtra, 411004
Italy6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Genova, 16132
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, 20133
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, 80138
Novartis Investigative Site
Padova, PD, 35128
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00133
Novartis Investigative Site
Rome, 00178
Czechia5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno, Czech Republic, 656 91
Novartis Investigative Site
Havířov, Czech Republic, 736 01
Novartis Investigative Site
Ostrava-Poruba, 708 52
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 100 34
Novartis Investigative Site
Teplice, Czech Republic, 415 01
Poland5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Głogów, 36-060
Novartis Investigative Site
Rzeszów, 35 055
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02 957
Novartis Investigative Site
Wroclaw, 51-685
Novartis Investigative Site
Zabrze, 41-800
Belgium4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aalst, 9300
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1200
Novartis Investigative Site
Edegem, Antwerpen, 2650
Novartis Investigative Site
Ghent, 9000
Canada4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2J2
Novartis Investigative Site
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
Novartis Investigative Site
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Haseki / Istanbul, 34096
Novartis Investigative Site
Izmir, 35340
Novartis Investigative Site
Mersin, 33079
Novartis Investigative Site
Trabzon, 61080
United Kingdom4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
London, SE5 9RS
Novartis Investigative Site
London, SW17 0QT
Novartis Investigative Site
Luton, Beds, LU4 0DZ
Novartis Investigative Site
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF
Argentina3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1428AQK
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000DSW
Novartis Investigative Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, 4000
Latvia3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Riga, LV, LV-1005
Novartis Investigative Site
Riga, LV 1002
Novartis Investigative Site
Riga, LV-1038
Peru3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Lima, LIMA 13
Novartis Investigative Site
Lima Cercado, Lima region, 01
Novartis Investigative Site
San Isidro, Lima region, 27
Slovakia3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bratislava, 813 69
Novartis Investigative Site
Martin, 036 59
Novartis Investigative Site
Ružomberok, 03426
Austria2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, 1010
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, 1090
Bulgaria2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1113
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1413
Croatia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Osijek, 31000
Novartis Investigative Site
Zagreb, 10000
Finland2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Tampere, 33100
Novartis Investigative Site
Turku, 20520
Hungary2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, HUN, 1204
Novartis Investigative Site
Esztergom, HUN, 2500
Lithuania2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaunas, LTU, LT 50161
Novartis Investigative Site
Vilnius, LT-08661
South Africa2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Pretoria, 0041
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosebank, 2196
Australia1 site
Novartis Investigative Site
Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Versus Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis
Read the detailed description
This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparatorcontrolled, parallel-group, multi-center study with variable treatment duration in approximately 900 patients with relapsing multiple sclorosis (RMS). The maximal treatment duration in the study for an individual patient was 2.5 years. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either experimental ofatumumab subcutaneous (s.c.) injections every 4 weeks or active comparator teriflunomide orally once daily. The dose regimen for ofatumumab for this study was a loading dose regimen of 20 mg at Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14, followed by a maintenance dose regimen of 20 mg administered every 4 weeks starting at Week 4. In order to blind for the different formulations, double-dummy masking was used, i.e., all patients will take injections (containing either active ofatumumab or placebo) and oral capsules (containing either active teriflunomide or placebo).
- Conditions
- Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis
- Being tested
- Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection, Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules, Teriflunomide capsule, Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections
- Keywords
- Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Ofatumumab, adult, OMB157, multiple sclerosis, T1 lesions, T2 lesions, relapse, GD-enhancing MRI, McDonald criteria, RRMS, SPMS
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionDrug
Ofatumumab 20 mg prefilled syringes for subcutaneous injection on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsulesDrug
Placebo capsule, matching in appearance to teriflunomide, taken orally once daily
Teriflunomide capsuleDrug
Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily
Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionsDrug
Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OMG 20 mg | Experimental | Ofatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injectionon on days 1
,7 ,14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter and a teriflunomide-matching placebo, taken orally once daily Receives: Drug: Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection; Drug: Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules |
| TER 14 mg | Active comparator | Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily and matching placebo for subcutaneous injections to ofatumumab on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter Receives: Drug: Teriflunomide capsule; Drug: Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Secondary outcomes (29)
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan
Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across all scans per patient adjusted for different number of scans due to variable follow-up time in study.
Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year (Annualized Lesion Rate)
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on last available MRI scan compared to baseline adjusted for different time of scans versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Concentration in Serum
The NfL concentration (geometric mean concentration) was estimated by treatment and time point with using a repeated measures model on the basis of all evaluable log-transformed NfL values.
Measured: Month 3, 12 and 24
Annualized Rate of Brain Volume Loss Based on Assessments of Percent Brain Volume Change From Baseline
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Participants With Confirmed Relapse
A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) >8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline was defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 4 points in SDMT score sustained for at least 6 months. Processing speed was measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint
Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) or 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline (6mCCD) - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline (6mCCD) was defined as a 4-point worsening on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) sustained for at least 6 months. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Change in Cognitive Performance Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Processing speed is being measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) - Pooled Data
The patient is directed to walk 25 feet quickly and safely as possible from one marked end to the other. The time is calculated from the initiation of the patient instructed to begin, until the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) - Pooled Data
9-Hole Peg Test is a test of upper limb function. Participants place 9 pegs on pegboard and remove pegs and this is timed for each hand. Time recorded in seconds. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. 20% improvement is defined as 20% shorter time in seconds. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI) Sustained Until End of Study (EOS) as Measured by EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) sustained until EOS was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained until EOS. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2301 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year From Month 12 Until End of Study (EOS)
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan compared to Month 12 adjusted for different time of scans versus Month 12 due to variable follow up time in study.
Measured: Month 12 up to 2.5 years
Percent Change in T2 Lesion Volume Relative to Baseline
Percent change from baseline in total T2 lesion volume
Measured: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-4)
NEDA-4 was defined as no 3-month confirmed disability worsening, no confirmed MS relapse, no new or enlarging T2 lesions compared to baseline, and the annualized rate of brain atrophy >-0.04%.
Measured: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score Change From Baseline
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Psychological Impact Score Change From Baseline
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Year by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI per year (annualized lesion rate).
Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Brain Volume Loss by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab
Summary statistics of pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations from trough samples collected within a 7-day window prior or at day of dosing.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 96
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study start26 Aug 2016
- Primary completion10 Jul 2019
- Study completion22 Oct 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relapsing Multiple ScelrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 955 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02792231
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- COMB157G2302
- Other IDs
- 2015-005419-33, 2015
- Acronym
- ASCLEPIOS II
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 22 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Williams MJ, Amezcua L, Cohan SL, Cohen JA, Delgado SR, Hua LH, Lucassen EB, Piccolo RS, Koulouris CR, Stankiewicz J. Efficacy of Ofatumumab and Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing MS From Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups: ASCLEPIOS I/II Subgroup Analyses. Neurology. 2024 Aug 13;103(3):e209610. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209610. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
PubMed 39018512Bhan V, Clift F, Baharnoori M, Thomas K, Patel BP, Blanchette F, Adlard N, Vudumula U, Gudala K, Dutta N, Grima D, Mouallif S, Farhane F. Cost-consequence analysis of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada. J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Sep;12(9):e220175. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0175. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
PubMed 37606897Gartner J, Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Montalban X, Cohen JA, Cross AH, Deiva K, Ganjgahi H, Haring DA, Li B, Pingili R, Ramanathan K, Su W, Willi R, Kieseier B, Kappos L. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II. Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1562-1575. doi: 10.1177/13524585221078825. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
PubMed 35266417Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, Cross AH, de Seze J, Leppert D, Montalban X, Selmaj K, Wiendl H, Kerloeguen C, Willi R, Li B, Kakarieka A, Tomic D, Goodyear A, Pingili R, Haring DA, Ramanathan K, Merschhemke M, Kappos L; ASCLEPIOS I and ASCLEPIOS II Trial Groups. Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):546-557. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.
PubMed 32757523
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Versus Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02792231
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASCLEPIOS II / COMB157G2302
- Conditions
- Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis
- Keywords
- Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Ofatumumab, adult, OMB157, multiple sclerosis, T1 lesions, T2 lesions, relapse
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 955 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Oct 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis
Detailed description
This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparatorcontrolled, parallel-group, multi-center study with variable treatment duration in approximately 900 patients with relapsing multiple sclorosis (RMS). The maximal treatment duration in the study for an individual patient was 2.5 years. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either experimental ofatumumab subcutaneous (s.c.) injections every 4 weeks or active comparator teriflunomide orally once daily. The dose regimen for ofatumumab for this study was a loading dose regimen of 20 mg at Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14, followed by a maintenance dose regimen of 20 mg administered every 4 weeks starting at Week 4. In order to blind for the different formulations, double-dummy masking was used, i.e., all patients will take injections (containing either active ofatumumab or placebo) and oral capsules (containing either active teriflunomide or placebo).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OMG 20 mg | Experimental | Drug: Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection, Drug: Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsulesOfatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injectionon on days 1 ,7 ,14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter and a teriflunomide-matching placebo, taken orally once daily |
| TER 14 mg | Active comparator | Drug: Teriflunomide capsule, Drug: Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionsTeriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily and matching placebo for subcutaneous injections to ofatumumab on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female patients aged 18 to 55 years at Screening
- Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
- Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with disease activity
- Documentation of at least: 1 relapse during the previous 1 year OR 2 relapses during the previous 2 years OR a positive gadolinium-enhancing MRI scan during the year prior to randomization
- Disability status at Screening with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with primary progressive MS or SPMS without disease activity
- Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less
- Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
- Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis
- Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionOfatumumab 20 mg prefilled syringes for subcutaneous injection on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter | Drug | OMG 20 mg |
| Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsulesPlacebo capsule, matching in appearance to teriflunomide, taken orally once daily | Drug | OMG 20 mg |
| Teriflunomide capsuleTeriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily | Drug | TER 14 mg |
| Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionsMatching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter | Drug | TER 14 mg |
Primary outcome
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
29 secondary outcomes
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2302
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan
Time frame: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year (Annualized Lesion Rate)
Time frame: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Concentration in Serum
Time frame: Month 3, 12 and 24
Annualized Rate of Brain Volume Loss Based on Assessments of Percent Brain Volume Change From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Participants With Confirmed Relapse
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) >8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) or 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline (6mCCD) - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Change in Cognitive Performance Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI) Sustained Until End of Study (EOS) as Measured by EDSS - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year From Month 12 Until End of Study (EOS)
Time frame: Month 12 up to 2.5 years
Percent Change in T2 Lesion Volume Relative to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-4)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score Change From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Psychological Impact Score Change From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Year by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Brain Volume Loss by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 96
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Nov 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39018512Williams MJ, Amezcua L, Cohan SL, Cohen JA, Delgado SR, Hua LH, Lucassen EB, Piccolo RS, Koulouris CR, Stankiewicz J. Efficacy of Ofatumumab and Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing MS From Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups: ASCLEPIOS I/II Subgroup Analyses. Neurology. 2024 Aug 13;103(3):e209610. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209610. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37606897Bhan V, Clift F, Baharnoori M, Thomas K, Patel BP, Blanchette F, Adlard N, Vudumula U, Gudala K, Dutta N, Grima D, Mouallif S, Farhane F. Cost-consequence analysis of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada. J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Sep;12(9):e220175. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0175. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35266417Gartner J, Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Montalban X, Cohen JA, Cross AH, Deiva K, Ganjgahi H, Haring DA, Li B, Pingili R, Ramanathan K, Su W, Willi R, Kieseier B, Kappos L. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II. Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1562-1575. doi: 10.1177/13524585221078825. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32757523Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, Cross AH, de Seze J, Leppert D, Montalban X, Selmaj K, Wiendl H, Kerloeguen C, Willi R, Li B, Kakarieka A, Tomic D, Goodyear A, Pingili R, Haring DA, Ramanathan K, Merschhemke M, Kappos L; ASCLEPIOS I and ASCLEPIOS II Trial Groups. Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):546-557. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis
178 sites in 30 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule in people with Relapsing Multiple Scelrosis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 178 sites in 30 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 178 sites in United States, Germany, Portugal, Russia, Spain and 25 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) (time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02792231, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2021.