AzTrials
AzTrials

Relapsing Multiple SclerosisPhase 3ASCLEPIOS INCT02792218

Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 3 study testing Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule in people with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 166 sites in 29 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
What is being tested?
Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
930 participants
Where
166 sitesin 29 countries
Study dates
20 Sep 2016to 20 Jul 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 to 55 years of age
  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
  • Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS)
  • At least 1 relapse during the previous 1 year or 2 relapses during the previous 2 years or a positive gadolinium-enhancing MRI scan in previous year
  • Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5

Who cannot join

  • Primary progressive MS
  • Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less
  • Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
  • Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis
  • Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML

Trial locations and contacts

166 sites in 29 countries.

166 sites in 29 countries

United States56 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Alexandria, Louisiana, 71301

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Atlantis, Florida, 33462-6608

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70810

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Berkeley, California, 94705

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Clinton Township, Michigan, 48035

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Delray Beach, Florida, 33445

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Des Moines, Iowa, 50314-2611

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    El Paso, Texas, 79935

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fullerton, California, 92835

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Golden Valley, Minnesota, 55422

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54311

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hollywood, Florida, 33021

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Houston, Texas, 77074

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Latham, New York, 12110

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Loxahatchee Groves, Florida, 33470

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33032

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Naples, Florida, 34102

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Neenah, Wisconsin, 54956

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    North Palm Beach, Florida, 33408

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Northbrook, Illinois, 60062

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66210

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ozark, Missouri, 65721

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pensacola, Florida, 32514

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85013

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Port Charlotte, Florida, 33952

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Round Rock, Texas, 78681

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78258

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Savannah, Georgia, 31406

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sunrise, Florida, 33351

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vero Beach, Florida, 32960

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23456

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

Germany11 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barsinghausen, 30890

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bayreuth, 95445

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bielefeld, D 33647

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hamburg, 20249

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Marburg, 35043

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    München, 80377

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    München, 81377

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Neuburg an der Donau, 86633

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Potsdam, 14471

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ulm, 89073

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Wiesbaden, 65191

Other trials in Germany

Spain9 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08026

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cadiz, Andalusia, 11009

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    El Palmar, Murcia, 30120

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Salt, Catalonia, 17190

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

Russia8 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kemerovo, 650066

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Moscow, 125367

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nizhny Novgorod, 603155

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Novosibirsk, 630007

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saint Petersburg, 194044

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saransk, 430032

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sestroretsk, 197706

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tyumen, 625000

Other trials in Russia

Poland7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bydgoszcz, 85-796

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gdansk, 80 952

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gdansk, 80-462

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gdansk, 80-803

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Katowice, 40 571

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kielce, 25 726

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lodz, 90 324

Other trials in Poland

Czechia6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hradec Králové, CZE, 500 05

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Jihlava, 586 01

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Olomouc, CZE, 775 20

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pardubice, 532 03

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Prague, 150 06

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Praha 4 Krc, Czech Republic, 140 59

Other trials in Czechia

India6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bangalore, Karnataka, 560054

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chandigarh, Punjab, 160012

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kochi, Kerala, 682 026

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kolkata, West Bengal, 700068

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mangalore, 575018

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110017

Other trials in India

Slovakia5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Banská Bystrica, 97517

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bratislava, 82606

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bratislava, 83305

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nitra, 94901

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Trnava, 917 75

Other trials in Slovakia

Belgium4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brasschaat, 2930

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bruges, 8000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Liège, 4000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Overpelt, 3900

Other trials in Belgium

Canada4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gatineau, Quebec, J9J 0A5

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1J 1Z4

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3

Other trials in Canada

France4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lille, 59037

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nancy, Cedex, 54035

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nantes, 44093

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nîmes, 30029

Other trials in France

Hungary4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Budapest, HUN, 1135

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Budapest, 1106

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kistarcsa, 2143

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Szeged, 6725

Other trials in Hungary

Israel4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ashkelon, 78278

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Haifa, 310 9601

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sefad, 13100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tel Aviv, 6423906

Other trials in Israel

Italy4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gallarate, VA, 21013

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Milan, MI, 20132

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Naples, 80131

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Roma, RM, 00189

Other trials in Italy

Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Istanbul, 34147

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Izmir, 35040

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kocaeli, 41380

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Samsun, 55139

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Argentina3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Buenos Aires, 1061

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Córdoba, X5004CDT

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000BZL

Other trials in Argentina

Bulgaria3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Plovdiv, 4002

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sofia, 1309

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sofia, 1431

Other trials in Bulgaria

Denmark3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Aarhus, 8000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Copenhagen, DK-2100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Odense C, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

Greece3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Athens, GR, 115 25

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Athens, 115 28

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Thessaloniki, GR 54636

Other trials in Greece

Netherlands3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Amsterdam, 1081 HV

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rotterdam, 3015 CE

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sittard-Geleen, BG, 6162 BG

Other trials in Netherlands

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Glasgow, G51 4TF

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Headington, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, E1 1BB

Other trials in United Kingdom

Australia2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

Other trials in Australia

Croatia2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rijeka, HRV, 51000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Estonia2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tallinn, 10617

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tartu, 51014

Other trials in Estonia

Sweden2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gothenburg, 413 45

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Stockholm, 102 35

Other trials in Sweden

Mexico1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mexico City, Mexico City, 03100

Other trials in Mexico

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guaynabo, 00968

Other trials in Puerto Rico

Switzerland1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Basel, 4031

Other trials in Switzerland

Thailand1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Khon Kaen, THA, 40002

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Versus Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study with variable treatment duration in approximately 900 patients with relapsing multiple sclorosis (RMS). The maximal treatment duration in the study for an individual patient was 2.5 years.

Eligible patients were randomized to receive either experimental ofatumumab subcutaneous (s.c.) injections every 4 weeks or active comparator teriflunomide orally once daily. The dose regimen for ofatumumab for this study was a loading dose regimen of 20 mg at Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14, followed by a maintenance dose regimen of 20 mg administered every 4 weeks starting at Week 4. In order to blind for the different formulations, double-dummy masking was used i.e. all patients will take injections (containing either active ofatumumab or placebo) and oral capsules (containing either active teriflunomide or placebo).

Being tested
Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection, Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules, Teriflunomide capsule, Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections
Keywords
Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Ofatumumab, adult, OMB157, multiple sclerosis, T1 lesions, T2 lesions, relapse, GD-enhancing MRI, McDonald criteria, RRMS, SPMS
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionDrug

    Ofatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injection on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter

  • Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsulesDrug

    Placebo capsule, matching in appearance to teriflunomide, taken orally once daily

  • Teriflunomide capsuleDrug

    Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily

  • Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionsDrug

    Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter

Study groups in NCT02792218
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OMB 20 mgExperimentalOfatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injectionon on days 1 ,7 ,14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter and a teriflunomide- matching placebo, taken orally once daily
Receives: Drug: Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection; Drug: Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules
TER 14 mgActive comparatorTeriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily and matching placebo for subcutaneous injections to ofatumumab on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Receives: Drug: Teriflunomide capsule; Drug: Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)

    ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. 3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data

    A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  2. 3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301

    A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  3. 6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  4. 6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301

    A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  5. 6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  6. 6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301

    A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  7. Number of Gd-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan

    Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across all scans per patient adjusted for different number of scans due to variable follow-up time in study.

    Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years

  8. Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year (Annualized Lesion Rate)

    Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on last available MRI scan compared to baseline adjusted for different time of scans versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study

    Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years

  9. Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Concentration in Serum

    The NfL concentration (geometric mean concentration) was estimated by treatment and time point with using a repeated measures model on the basis of all evaluable log-transformed NfL values.

    Measured: Month 3, 12 and 24

  10. Annualized Rate of Brain Volume Loss Based on Assessments of Percent Brain Volume Change From Baseline

    Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study

    Measured: Baseline, months 12 and 24

  11. Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Relapse

    A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  12. Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) >8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment

    ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  13. 3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data

    A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  14. 6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  15. 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline was defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 4 points in SDMT score sustained for at least 6 months. Processing speed was measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint

    Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years

  16. 6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) or 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline (6mCCD) - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline (6mCCD) was defined as a 4-point worsening on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) sustained for at least 6 months. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  17. Change in Cognitive Performance Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data

    Processing speed is being measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening.

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  18. 6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) - Pooled Data

    The patient is directed to walk 25 feet quickly and safely as possible from one marked end to the other. The time is calculated from the initiation of the patient instructed to begin, until the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  19. 6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) - Pooled Data

    9 Hole Peg Test is a test of upper limb function. Participants place 9 pegs on pegboard and remove pegs and this is timed for each hand. Time recorded in seconds. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. 20% improvement is defined as 20% shorter time in seconds. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years

  20. 6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI) Sustained Until End of Study (EOS) as Measured by EDSS - Pooled Data

    A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) sustained until EOS was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained until EOS. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years

  21. Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year From Month 12 Until End of Study (EOS)

    Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan compared to Month 12 adjusted for different time of scans versus Month 12 due to variable follow up time in study.

    Measured: Month 12 up to 2.5 years

  22. Percent Change in T2 Lesion Volume Relative to Baseline

    Percent change from baseline in total T2 lesion volume

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24

  23. No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-4)

    NEDA-4 was defined as no 3-month confirmed disability worsening, no confirmed MS relapse, no new or enlarging T2 lesions compared to baseline, and the annualized rate of brain atrophy >-0.04%.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24

  24. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score Change From Baseline

    MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.

    Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years

  25. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Psychological Impact Score Change From Baseline

    MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.

    Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years

  26. Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data

    ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).

    Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years

  27. Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Year by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data

    Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI per year (annualized lesion rate).

    Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years

  28. Annual Rate of Percent Change in Brain Volume Loss by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data

    Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

  29. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab

    Summary statistics of pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations from trough samples collected within a 7-day window prior or at day of dosing.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 96

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start20 Sep 2016
  3. Primary completion5 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion20 Jul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
930 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02792218
Sponsor's protocol ID
COMB157G2301
Other IDs
2015-005418-31, 2015
Acronym
ASCLEPIOS I
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
2 Jun 2016
Last updated
1 Oct 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Publications

  • Williams MJ, Amezcua L, Cohan SL, Cohen JA, Delgado SR, Hua LH, Lucassen EB, Piccolo RS, Koulouris CR, Stankiewicz J. Efficacy of Ofatumumab and Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing MS From Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups: ASCLEPIOS I/II Subgroup Analyses. Neurology. 2024 Aug 13;103(3):e209610. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209610. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

    PubMed 39018512
  • Bhan V, Clift F, Baharnoori M, Thomas K, Patel BP, Blanchette F, Adlard N, Vudumula U, Gudala K, Dutta N, Grima D, Mouallif S, Farhane F. Cost-consequence analysis of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada. J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Sep;12(9):e220175. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0175. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

    PubMed 37606897
  • Gartner J, Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Montalban X, Cohen JA, Cross AH, Deiva K, Ganjgahi H, Haring DA, Li B, Pingili R, Ramanathan K, Su W, Willi R, Kieseier B, Kappos L. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II. Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1562-1575. doi: 10.1177/13524585221078825. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

    PubMed 35266417
  • Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, Cross AH, de Seze J, Leppert D, Montalban X, Selmaj K, Wiendl H, Kerloeguen C, Willi R, Li B, Kakarieka A, Tomic D, Goodyear A, Pingili R, Haring DA, Ramanathan K, Merschhemke M, Kappos L; ASCLEPIOS I and ASCLEPIOS II Trial Groups. Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):546-557. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.

    PubMed 32757523

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule in people with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 166 sites in 29 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 166 sites in United States, Germany, Spain, Russia, Poland and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) (time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02792218, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in