Relapsing Multiple SclerosisPhase 3ASCLEPIOS INCT02792218
Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
A Phase 3 study testing Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule in people with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 166 sites in 29 countries.
Trial summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 930 participants
- Where
- 166 sitesin 29 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Sep 2016to 20 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 to 55 years of age
- Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
- Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS)
- At least 1 relapse during the previous 1 year or 2 relapses during the previous 2 years or a positive gadolinium-enhancing MRI scan in previous year
- Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5
Who cannot join
- Primary progressive MS
- Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less
- Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
- Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis
- Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML
Trial locations and contacts
166 sites in 29 countries.
166 sites in 29 countries
United States56 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Alexandria, Louisiana, 71301
Novartis Investigative Site
Atlantis, Florida, 33462-6608
Novartis Investigative Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70810
Novartis Investigative Site
Berkeley, California, 94705
Novartis Investigative Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Novartis Investigative Site
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017
Novartis Investigative Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Novartis Investigative Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Novartis Investigative Site
Clinton Township, Michigan, 48035
Novartis Investigative Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Novartis Investigative Site
Delray Beach, Florida, 33445
Novartis Investigative Site
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314-2611
Novartis Investigative Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Novartis Investigative Site
El Paso, Texas, 79935
Novartis Investigative Site
Fullerton, California, 92835
Novartis Investigative Site
Golden Valley, Minnesota, 55422
Novartis Investigative Site
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54311
Novartis Investigative Site
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Novartis Investigative Site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77074
Novartis Investigative Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Novartis Investigative Site
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604
Novartis Investigative Site
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Novartis Investigative Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920
Novartis Investigative Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Novartis Investigative Site
Latham, New York, 12110
Novartis Investigative Site
Loxahatchee Groves, Florida, 33470
Novartis Investigative Site
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33032
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Novartis Investigative Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, Florida, 34102
Novartis Investigative Site
Neenah, Wisconsin, 54956
Novartis Investigative Site
North Palm Beach, Florida, 33408
Novartis Investigative Site
Northbrook, Illinois, 60062
Novartis Investigative Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Novartis Investigative Site
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
Novartis Investigative Site
Ozark, Missouri, 65721
Novartis Investigative Site
Pensacola, Florida, 32514
Novartis Investigative Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
Novartis Investigative Site
Port Charlotte, Florida, 33952
Novartis Investigative Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Novartis Investigative Site
Round Rock, Texas, 78681
Novartis Investigative Site
Sacramento, California, 95817
Novartis Investigative Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Novartis Investigative Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Novartis Investigative Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
Novartis Investigative Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Novartis Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Novartis Investigative Site
Sunrise, Florida, 33351
Novartis Investigative Site
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960
Novartis Investigative Site
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23456
Novartis Investigative Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Novartis Investigative Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407
Novartis Investigative Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Novartis Investigative Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Germany11 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barsinghausen, 30890
Novartis Investigative Site
Bayreuth, 95445
Novartis Investigative Site
Bielefeld, D 33647
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 20249
Novartis Investigative Site
Marburg, 35043
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 80377
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 81377
Novartis Investigative Site
Neuburg an der Donau, 86633
Novartis Investigative Site
Potsdam, 14471
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, 89073
Novartis Investigative Site
Wiesbaden, 65191
Spain9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08026
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, 08003
Novartis Investigative Site
Cadiz, Andalusia, 11009
Novartis Investigative Site
El Palmar, Murcia, 30120
Novartis Investigative Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907
Novartis Investigative Site
Salt, Catalonia, 17190
Novartis Investigative Site
Valencia, 46026
Russia8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kemerovo, 650066
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 125367
Novartis Investigative Site
Nizhny Novgorod, 603155
Novartis Investigative Site
Novosibirsk, 630007
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 194044
Novartis Investigative Site
Saransk, 430032
Novartis Investigative Site
Sestroretsk, 197706
Novartis Investigative Site
Tyumen, 625000
Poland7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bydgoszcz, 85-796
Novartis Investigative Site
Gdansk, 80 952
Novartis Investigative Site
Gdansk, 80-462
Novartis Investigative Site
Gdansk, 80-803
Novartis Investigative Site
Katowice, 40 571
Novartis Investigative Site
Kielce, 25 726
Novartis Investigative Site
Lodz, 90 324
Czechia6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Hradec Králové, CZE, 500 05
Novartis Investigative Site
Jihlava, 586 01
Novartis Investigative Site
Olomouc, CZE, 775 20
Novartis Investigative Site
Pardubice, 532 03
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 150 06
Novartis Investigative Site
Praha 4 Krc, Czech Republic, 140 59
India6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560054
Novartis Investigative Site
Chandigarh, Punjab, 160012
Novartis Investigative Site
Kochi, Kerala, 682 026
Novartis Investigative Site
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700068
Novartis Investigative Site
Mangalore, 575018
Novartis Investigative Site
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110017
Slovakia5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Banská Bystrica, 97517
Novartis Investigative Site
Bratislava, 82606
Novartis Investigative Site
Bratislava, 83305
Novartis Investigative Site
Nitra, 94901
Novartis Investigative Site
Trnava, 917 75
Belgium4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brasschaat, 2930
Novartis Investigative Site
Bruges, 8000
Novartis Investigative Site
Liège, 4000
Novartis Investigative Site
Overpelt, 3900
Canada4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Gatineau, Quebec, J9J 0A5
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4
Novartis Investigative Site
Québec, Quebec, G1J 1Z4
Novartis Investigative Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3
France4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59037
Novartis Investigative Site
Nancy, Cedex, 54035
Novartis Investigative Site
Nantes, 44093
Novartis Investigative Site
Nîmes, 30029
Hungary4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, HUN, 1135
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1106
Novartis Investigative Site
Kistarcsa, 2143
Novartis Investigative Site
Szeged, 6725
Israel4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ashkelon, 78278
Novartis Investigative Site
Haifa, 310 9601
Novartis Investigative Site
Sefad, 13100
Novartis Investigative Site
Tel Aviv, 6423906
Italy4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Gallarate, VA, 21013
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20132
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, 80131
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00189
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Istanbul, 34147
Novartis Investigative Site
Izmir, 35040
Novartis Investigative Site
Kocaeli, 41380
Novartis Investigative Site
Samsun, 55139
Argentina3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Buenos Aires, 1061
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, X5004CDT
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000BZL
Bulgaria3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Plovdiv, 4002
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1309
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1431
Denmark3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aarhus, 8000
Novartis Investigative Site
Copenhagen, DK-2100
Novartis Investigative Site
Odense C, 5000
Greece3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, GR, 115 25
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, 115 28
Novartis Investigative Site
Thessaloniki, GR 54636
Netherlands3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Novartis Investigative Site
Rotterdam, 3015 CE
Novartis Investigative Site
Sittard-Geleen, BG, 6162 BG
United Kingdom3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Glasgow, G51 4TF
Novartis Investigative Site
Headington, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU
Novartis Investigative Site
London, E1 1BB
Australia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305
Novartis Investigative Site
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
Croatia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Rijeka, HRV, 51000
Novartis Investigative Site
Zagreb, 10000
Estonia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallinn, 10617
Novartis Investigative Site
Tartu, 51014
Sweden2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Gothenburg, 413 45
Novartis Investigative Site
Stockholm, 102 35
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Versus Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis
Read the detailed description
This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study with variable treatment duration in approximately 900 patients with relapsing multiple sclorosis (RMS). The maximal treatment duration in the study for an individual patient was 2.5 years.
Eligible patients were randomized to receive either experimental ofatumumab subcutaneous (s.c.) injections every 4 weeks or active comparator teriflunomide orally once daily. The dose regimen for ofatumumab for this study was a loading dose regimen of 20 mg at Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14, followed by a maintenance dose regimen of 20 mg administered every 4 weeks starting at Week 4. In order to blind for the different formulations, double-dummy masking was used i.e. all patients will take injections (containing either active ofatumumab or placebo) and oral capsules (containing either active teriflunomide or placebo).
- Conditions
- Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
- Being tested
- Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection, Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules, Teriflunomide capsule, Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections
- Keywords
- Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Ofatumumab, adult, OMB157, multiple sclerosis, T1 lesions, T2 lesions, relapse, GD-enhancing MRI, McDonald criteria, RRMS, SPMS
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionDrug
Ofatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injection on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsulesDrug
Placebo capsule, matching in appearance to teriflunomide, taken orally once daily
Teriflunomide capsuleDrug
Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily
Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionsDrug
Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OMB 20 mg | Experimental | Ofatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injectionon on days 1 ,7 ,14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter and a teriflunomide- matching placebo, taken orally once daily Receives: Drug: Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection; Drug: Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsules |
| TER 14 mg | Active comparator | Teriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily and matching placebo for subcutaneous injections to ofatumumab on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter Receives: Drug: Teriflunomide capsule; Drug: Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Secondary outcomes (29)
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Number of Gd-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan
Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across all scans per patient adjusted for different number of scans due to variable follow-up time in study.
Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year (Annualized Lesion Rate)
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on last available MRI scan compared to baseline adjusted for different time of scans versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Concentration in Serum
The NfL concentration (geometric mean concentration) was estimated by treatment and time point with using a repeated measures model on the basis of all evaluable log-transformed NfL values.
Measured: Month 3, 12 and 24
Annualized Rate of Brain Volume Loss Based on Assessments of Percent Brain Volume Change From Baseline
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study
Measured: Baseline, months 12 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Relapse
A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) >8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
A 3-month confirmed disability worsening (3mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 3 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline was defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 4 points in SDMT score sustained for at least 6 months. Processing speed was measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint
Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) or 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline (6mCCD) - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability worsening (6mCDW) was defined as an increase from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score sustained for at least 6 months. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1.5, for patients with a baseline EDSS of 1 to 5 or ≥5.5, the criterion for disability worsening was an increase in EDSS of ≥1 or ≥0.5, respectively. A 6-month confirmed cognitive decline (6mCCD) was defined as a 4-point worsening on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) sustained for at least 6 months. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Change in Cognitive Performance Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Processing speed is being measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening.
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) - Pooled Data
The patient is directed to walk 25 feet quickly and safely as possible from one marked end to the other. The time is calculated from the initiation of the patient instructed to begin, until the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) - Pooled Data
9 Hole Peg Test is a test of upper limb function. Participants place 9 pegs on pegboard and remove pegs and this is timed for each hand. Time recorded in seconds. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. 20% improvement is defined as 20% shorter time in seconds. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI) Sustained Until End of Study (EOS) as Measured by EDSS - Pooled Data
A 6-month confirmed disability improvement (6mCDI) sustained until EOS was defined as a decrease from baseline EDSS sustained until EOS. For patients with a baseline EDSS of 0 to 1.5, no disability improvement was possible based on the protocol definition of an improvement; for patients with a baseline EDSS of ≥2 to 6 or ≥6.5 to 9.5, the criterion for disability improvement was a decrease in EDSS of ≤1 or ≤0.5, respectively. This study was not powered for the analysis of this endpoint individually. It was pre-specified in the study protocol to combine the data from this study with study COMB157G2302 to address this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year From Month 12 Until End of Study (EOS)
Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan compared to Month 12 adjusted for different time of scans versus Month 12 due to variable follow up time in study.
Measured: Month 12 up to 2.5 years
Percent Change in T2 Lesion Volume Relative to Baseline
Percent change from baseline in total T2 lesion volume
Measured: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-4)
NEDA-4 was defined as no 3-month confirmed disability worsening, no confirmed MS relapse, no new or enlarging T2 lesions compared to baseline, and the annualized rate of brain atrophy >-0.04%.
Measured: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score Change From Baseline
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Psychological Impact Score Change From Baseline
MSIS-29 is a 29-item, self-administered questionnaire that includes 2 domains, physical and psychological. Responses are captured on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "extremely" (4), where higher scores reflect greater impact on day to day life.
Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Measured: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Year by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Number of new or enlarging T2 lesions on MRI per year (annualized lesion rate).
Measured: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Annual Rate of Percent Change in Brain Volume Loss by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Percent change from baseline in brain volume loss (BVL) on all MRI scans adjusted for different time of scan versus baseline due to variable follow up time in study.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab
Summary statistics of pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations from trough samples collected within a 7-day window prior or at day of dosing.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 96
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study start20 Sep 2016
- Primary completion5 Jul 2019
- Study completion20 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relapsing Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 930 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02792218
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- COMB157G2301
- Other IDs
- 2015-005418-31, 2015
- Acronym
- ASCLEPIOS I
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Williams MJ, Amezcua L, Cohan SL, Cohen JA, Delgado SR, Hua LH, Lucassen EB, Piccolo RS, Koulouris CR, Stankiewicz J. Efficacy of Ofatumumab and Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing MS From Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups: ASCLEPIOS I/II Subgroup Analyses. Neurology. 2024 Aug 13;103(3):e209610. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209610. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
PubMed 39018512Bhan V, Clift F, Baharnoori M, Thomas K, Patel BP, Blanchette F, Adlard N, Vudumula U, Gudala K, Dutta N, Grima D, Mouallif S, Farhane F. Cost-consequence analysis of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada. J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Sep;12(9):e220175. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0175. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
PubMed 37606897Gartner J, Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Montalban X, Cohen JA, Cross AH, Deiva K, Ganjgahi H, Haring DA, Li B, Pingili R, Ramanathan K, Su W, Willi R, Kieseier B, Kappos L. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II. Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1562-1575. doi: 10.1177/13524585221078825. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
PubMed 35266417Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, Cross AH, de Seze J, Leppert D, Montalban X, Selmaj K, Wiendl H, Kerloeguen C, Willi R, Li B, Kakarieka A, Tomic D, Goodyear A, Pingili R, Haring DA, Ramanathan K, Merschhemke M, Kappos L; ASCLEPIOS I and ASCLEPIOS II Trial Groups. Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):546-557. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.
PubMed 32757523
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Versus Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02792218
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASCLEPIOS I / COMB157G2301
- Conditions
- Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
- Keywords
- Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Ofatumumab, adult, OMB157, multiple sclerosis, T1 lesions, T2 lesions, relapse
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 930 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Oct 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every 4 weeks versus teriflunomide administered orally once daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis
Detailed description
This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study with variable treatment duration in approximately 900 patients with relapsing multiple sclorosis (RMS). The maximal treatment duration in the study for an individual patient was 2.5 years.
Eligible patients were randomized to receive either experimental ofatumumab subcutaneous (s.c.) injections every 4 weeks or active comparator teriflunomide orally once daily. The dose regimen for ofatumumab for this study was a loading dose regimen of 20 mg at Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14, followed by a maintenance dose regimen of 20 mg administered every 4 weeks starting at Week 4. In order to blind for the different formulations, double-dummy masking was used i.e. all patients will take injections (containing either active ofatumumab or placebo) and oral capsules (containing either active teriflunomide or placebo).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OMB 20 mg | Experimental | Drug: Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection, Drug: Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsulesOfatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injectionon on days 1 ,7 ,14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter and a teriflunomide- matching placebo, taken orally once daily |
| TER 14 mg | Active comparator | Drug: Teriflunomide capsule, Drug: Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionsTeriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily and matching placebo for subcutaneous injections to ofatumumab on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 18 to 55 years of age
- Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS)
- Relapsing MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS)
- At least 1 relapse during the previous 1 year or 2 relapses during the previous 2 years or a positive gadolinium-enhancing MRI scan in previous year
- Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Primary progressive MS
- Disease duration of more than 10 years in patients with an EDSS score of 2 or less
- Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS
- Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis
- Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionOfatumumab 20 mg pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injection on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter | Drug | OMB 20 mg |
| Teriflunomide-matching placebo capsulesPlacebo capsule, matching in appearance to teriflunomide, taken orally once daily | Drug | OMB 20 mg |
| Teriflunomide capsuleTeriflunomide 14 mg oral capsule taken once daily | Drug | TER 14 mg |
| Matching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injectionsMatching placebo of ofatumumab subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter | Drug | TER 14 mg |
Primary outcome
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
ARR was the number of confirmed relapses in a year, calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of time in study. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). Comparisons were made to the previous rating (the last EDSS rating that did not occur during a relapse).
29 secondary outcomes
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI ) Based on EDSS - Study COMB157G2301
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Number of Gd-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan
Time frame: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year (Annualized Lesion Rate)
Time frame: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Concentration in Serum
Time frame: Month 3, 12 and 24
Annualized Rate of Brain Volume Loss Based on Assessments of Percent Brain Volume Change From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, months 12 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Relapse
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) >8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
3-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (3mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) Based on EDSS > 8 Weeks After Onset of Treatment - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Worsening (6mCDW) or 6-month Confirmed Cognitive Decline (6mCCD) - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Change in Cognitive Performance Measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Worsening of at Least 20% in the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
6-month Confirmed Disability Improvement (6mCDI) Sustained Until End of Study (EOS) as Measured by EDSS - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Per Year From Month 12 Until End of Study (EOS)
Time frame: Month 12 up to 2.5 years
Percent Change in T2 Lesion Volume Relative to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-4)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Physical Impact Score Change From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) Psychological Impact Score Change From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to 2.5 years
Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Year by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, yearly up to 2.5 years
Annual Rate of Percent Change in Brain Volume Loss by NfL High-low Subgroups - Pooled Data
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 96
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39018512Williams MJ, Amezcua L, Cohan SL, Cohen JA, Delgado SR, Hua LH, Lucassen EB, Piccolo RS, Koulouris CR, Stankiewicz J. Efficacy of Ofatumumab and Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing MS From Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups: ASCLEPIOS I/II Subgroup Analyses. Neurology. 2024 Aug 13;103(3):e209610. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209610. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37606897Bhan V, Clift F, Baharnoori M, Thomas K, Patel BP, Blanchette F, Adlard N, Vudumula U, Gudala K, Dutta N, Grima D, Mouallif S, Farhane F. Cost-consequence analysis of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada. J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Sep;12(9):e220175. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0175. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35266417Gartner J, Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Montalban X, Cohen JA, Cross AH, Deiva K, Ganjgahi H, Haring DA, Li B, Pingili R, Ramanathan K, Su W, Willi R, Kieseier B, Kappos L. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II. Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1562-1575. doi: 10.1177/13524585221078825. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32757523Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Coyle PK, Cross AH, de Seze J, Leppert D, Montalban X, Selmaj K, Wiendl H, Kerloeguen C, Willi R, Li B, Kakarieka A, Tomic D, Goodyear A, Pingili R, Haring DA, Ramanathan K, Merschhemke M, Kappos L; ASCLEPIOS I and ASCLEPIOS II Trial Groups. Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):546-557. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruiting
Myrosinase Bioactivated Gglucoraphanin for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases (GRA-MYR-ND)
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Relapsing-remitting
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of Subcutaneously Administered RO7845860 in Participants With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Cladribine Tablets Level of Response Predictors in Clinical Practice (CLODINA)
Multiple Sclerosis
Recruiting
Wearable Focal Vibration Therapy on Upper Extremity Function of People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Relapsing-remitting, Upper Extremity Dysfunction
Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Memory Retrieval Impairments in MS With HDtDCS to the LIFG in a Placebo Controlled Trial
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
166 sites in 29 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ofatumumab subcutaneous injection and Teriflunomide capsule in people with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 166 sites in 29 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 166 sites in United States, Germany, Spain, Russia, Poland and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) (time frame: Baseline up to 2.5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02792218, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2021.