Sedentary LifestylePAWSNCT02785640
Prompting Activity in a Workplace Setting
A study testing Hourly prompts to stand delivered by Microsoft Outlook in people with Sedentary Lifestyle, run by Glasgow Caledonian University at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This dual-arm randomised study aims to test a multi-component intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in a cohort of desk-based office workers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sedentary Lifestyle
- What is being tested?
- Hourly prompts to stand delivered by Microsoft Outlook
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Mar 2016to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Over 18 years of age
- Primarily engaged in sedentary, computer-based activities
- Access to Microsoft Outlook calendar
Who cannot join
- Workstation comprises of a standing desk
- Pre-existing health condition that prevents standing on a regular basis.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Study to Assess the Impact of a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Prolonged Sitting in the Workplace
This dual-arm randomised study aims to test a multi-component intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in a cohort of desk-based office workers.
Read the detailed description
There is increasing evidence to demonstrate that excessive and unhealthy patterns of sedentary behaviour can increase the risk of a range of health problems,independent to levels of physical activity. Increasingly, people are employed in low activity occupations with office workers being identified as one of the most sedentary roles. Small scale studies using prompts to remind office workers to stand have shown promising results, as well as representing a low-cost solution for employers. This study builds upon a recent pilot study investigating the impact of prompts delivered via Microsoft Outlook, on the sedentary behaviour of office workers.
Developed in accordance with the Medical Research Council framework for designing multi-component interventions this study utilises Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) as a theoretical basis. SCT describes the complex interaction between individuals and their environment. The influence of the office environment on sedentary behaviour is clearly illustrated by differences in people's sitting patterns inside and outside of working hours . Behavioural change techniques linked to the constructs of SCT have also been shown to have a positive impact on sedentary behaviour, namely education, goal setting and feedback. Participants in this study will therefore receive education on the benefits of breaking their sitting, tips on how to achieve this, and feedback on their baseline sitting behaviour. This study will test the impact of these techniques on sitting time and patterns, and also track their influence on the different constructs of SCT and individuals' readiness to change by measuring these at time points throughout the intervention. To address the fact that sitting at work may not be a conscious decision, but performed out of habit, half of participants will also receive prompts reminding them to stand. The same prompts will be used as in the pilot study, but the addition of an extra activity monitoring period will enable us to ascertain whether the impact of prompts diminishes during the intervention period.
This study will aim to recruit 60 desk-based office employees via email invitation. Volunteers will be screened using inclusion/exclusion criteria and asked to provide signed consent. Sitting will be de-emphasised in the participant information sheet, and other documentation used at recruitment, in order to minimise any impact on baseline activity measurements. Cluster randomisation will be used to split participants into two equal groups (Group 1 n=30, group 2 n=30) based on their physical location within the office(s) in order to minimise contamination between groups. Randomisation software will be used to allocate groups on www.randomisation.com. Baseline measurement for all participants will consist of completion of questionnaires and activity monitoring as follows:
- Questionnaires:
- Q1: Demographic data - to obtain basic information on participants
- Q2: Stage of change questionnaire - measuring readiness to change
- Q3: Social cognitive theory questionnaire - measuring key constructs of SCT
- Activity monitoring:
- Participants will be asked to wear a water-proofed activPAL activity monitor* on the front of their thigh for a period of 7 consecutive days (24 hours a day)
- A brief diary will be completed for the same 7 days
- The activPAL activity monitor has been validated for measuring and categorising sitting/lying, standing and walking using an acceleration signal from the thigh .
Following the collection of baseline data, all participants will attend a 1 hour education session during which they will receive a presentation outlining: the health problems associated with prolonged sedentary behaviour; how much sitting is recommended; feedback on their own baseline sitting behaviour; and tips on how to reduce and break up sedentary behaviour. They will be given a summary of their baseline activity data . Group 1 will then return to work as normal. Group 2 will receive an excel file to upload to Microsoft Outlook which will deliver prompts to break sitting at random times, once within an hour. The prompts will run for a period of 10 weeks and their content will be the same brief, positively framed messages that were evaluated favourably by participants in the pilot project. Measurements for all participants will be repeated as follows: Questionnaires Q2 and Q3 will be repeated after the education session and at 12 week follow-up; 1 week of activity monitoring will be repeated between weeks 2-4 of the intervention period, 8-10 of the intervention period, and at 12 week follow up.
Following final measurements, participants will be invited to one of a series of semi-structured focus groups to explore the feasibility, acceptability, meaningfulness and effectiveness of the intervention. Focus groups will be recorded using a digital voice recorder and transcribed.
Data will be treated as confidential, it will be anonymised, and stored securely in line with GCU's data protection policies. Electronic copies of the activity data will be kept for 10 years, alongside electronic and paper copies of the questionnaires and diaries and audio and transcribed accounts of the focus groups. Physical activity data and basic demographic data will also be kept on a password protected database on a secure server. The data held on the database will not be identifiable. The information collected may be used for further analysis by staff and students in the School of Health and Life Sciences at Glasgow Caledonian University at a later date. Access to data will be restricted and controlled by Dr Ben Stansfield, PGRT in the School of Health and Life Sciences, GCU. Individuals will not be identifiable from any reports published and the employer, JJML, will receive a report containing only amalgamated data.
: Each participant will receive a brief summary of their baseline activity data at the education session. In addition, at the end of the study they will be provided with an activity report, summarising their individual activity data for all 4 measurement periods. A report of amalgamated data, including the results of the focus groups, will be produced for JJML and this will also be made available to study participants. Furthermore, the results will be written up as a PhD thesis, published in appropriate academic journals and discussed in conference presentations.
- Conditions
- Sedentary Lifestyle
- Being tested
- Hourly prompts to stand delivered by Microsoft Outlook
- Medical subject headings
- Sedentary Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hourly prompts to stand delivered by Microsoft OutlookBehavioural
Prompt group
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt group | Experimental | Following feedback on their baseline sitting behaviour and an education session on the health benefits of breaking prolonged sitting, the prompt group will receive hourly prompts on their PC to stand. The prompts will be delivered via Microsoft Outlook and will run for a period of 10 weeks. The messages will be short in length, varied and centre around the key message of breaking prolonged sitting by standing Receives: Behavioral: Hourly prompts to stand delivered by Microsoft Outlook |
| Control group | No intervention | The control group will receive the same education session as the prompt group, as well as feedback on their baseline sitting behaviour. However, the will not receive prompts on their PC. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total time spent sitting at work
Total time spent sitting at work will be objectively measured using a tri-axial accelerometer
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Total time spent sitting at work in continuous bouts of at least 30 minutes.
This will be objectively measured using a tri-axial accelerometer
Measured: 12 weeks
Number of sitting events at work
These will be objectively measured using a tri-axial accelerometer
Measured: 12 weeks
Number of prolonged sitting events at work
Number of sitting events that last at least 30 minutes at work will be objectively measured using a tri-axial accelerometer
Measured: 12 weeks
Time after prompt to stand
The amount of time it takes those in the intervention group to stand following delivery of a prompt will be objectively measured using a tri-axial accelerometer
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2016
- Primary completionOct 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sedentary LifestyleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Glasgow Caledonian University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Philippa Dall, PhD, Principal investigator, Senior Research Fellow
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02785640
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GlasgowCU2
- Acronym
- PAWS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 25 May 2016
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Matthews CE, Bauman AE, van der Ploeg HP. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 24236168Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):661-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2046. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
PubMed 18252901Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010 Jul;38(3):105-13. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2.
PubMed 20577058Parry S, Straker L, Gilson ND, Smith AJ. Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time for office workers--a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e78957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078957. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 24265734Healy GN, Lawler S, Thorp A, Neuhaus M, Robson E, Owen N, et al. Reducing prolonged sitting in the workplace. An evidence review: full report. 2012;ISBN:978-1-921822-06-3.
Evans RE, Fawole HO, Sheriff SA, Dall PM, Grant PM, Ryan CG. Point-of-choice prompts to reduce sitting time at work: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.010.
PubMed 22898122Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
PubMed 18824488Bandura A, 1925. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control / Albert Bandura. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
Gardner B, Smith L, Lorencatto F, Hamer M, Biddle SJ. How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):89-112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1082146. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
PubMed 26315814Neuhaus M, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Eakin EG. Workplace sitting and height-adjustable workstations: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.009.
PubMed 24355669Healy GN, Eakin EG, Lamontagne AD, Owen N, Winkler EA, Wiesner G, Gunning L, Neuhaus M, Lawler S, Fjeldsoe BS, Dunstan DW. Reducing sitting time in office workers: short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention. Prev Med. 2013 Jul;57(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
PubMed 23597658Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. No abstract available.
PubMed 6863699Cooley D, Pedersen S. A pilot study of increasing nonpurposeful movement breaks at work as a means of reducing prolonged sitting. J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:128376. doi: 10.1155/2013/128376. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
PubMed 23690798Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;40(12):992-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.030262. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
PubMed 16980531
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study to Assess the Impact of a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Prolonged Sitting in the Workplace
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02785640
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAWS / GlasgowCU2
- Conditions
- Sedentary Lifestyle
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Glasgow Caledonian UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This dual-arm randomised study aims to test a multi-component intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in a cohort of desk-based office workers.
Detailed description
There is increasing evidence to demonstrate that excessive and unhealthy patterns of sedentary behaviour can increase the risk of a range of health problems,independent to levels of physical activity. Increasingly, people are employed in low activity occupations with office workers being identified as one of the most sedentary roles. Small scale studies using prompts to remind office workers to stand have shown promising results, as well as representing a low-cost solution for employers. This study builds upon a recent pilot study investigating the impact of prompts delivered via Microsoft Outlook, on the sedentary behaviour of office workers.
Developed in accordance with the Medical Research Council framework for designing multi-component interventions this study utilises Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) as a theoretical basis. SCT describes the complex interaction between individuals and their environment. The influence of the office environment on sedentary behaviour is clearly illustrated by differences in people's sitting patterns inside and outside of working hours . Behavioural change techniques linked to the constructs of SCT have also been shown to have a positive impact on sedentary behaviour, namely education, goal setting and feedback. Participants in this study will therefore receive education on the benefits of breaking their sitting, tips on how to achieve this, and feedback on their baseline sitting behaviour. This study will test the impact of these techniques on sitting time and patterns, and also track their influence on the different constructs of SCT and individuals' readiness to change by measuring these at time points throughout the intervention. To address the fact that sitting at work may not be a conscious decision, but performed out of habit, half of participants will also receive prompts reminding them to stand. The same prompts will be used as in the pilot study, but the addition of an extra activity monitoring period will enable us to ascertain whether the impact of prompts diminishes during the intervention period.
This study will aim to recruit 60 desk-based office employees via email invitation. Volunteers will be screened using inclusion/exclusion criteria and asked to provide signed consent. Sitting will be de-emphasised in the participant information sheet, and other documentation used at recruitment, in order to minimise any impact on baseline activity measurements. Cluster randomisation will be used to split participants into two equal groups (Group 1 n=30, group 2 n=30) based on their physical location within the office(s) in order to minimise contamination between groups. Randomisation software will be used to allocate groups on www.randomisation.com. Baseline measurement for all participants will consist of completion of questionnaires and activity monitoring as follows:
- Questionnaires:
- Q1: Demographic data - to obtain basic information on participants
- Q2: Stage of change questionnaire - measuring readiness to change
- Q3: Social cognitive theory questionnaire - measuring key constructs of SCT
- Activity monitoring:
- Participants will be asked to wear a water-proofed activPAL activity monitor* on the front of their thigh for a period of 7 consecutive days (24 hours a day)
- A brief diary will be completed for the same 7 days
- The activPAL activity monitor has been validated for measuring and categorising sitting/lying, standing and walking using an acceleration signal from the thigh .
Following the collection of baseline data, all participants will attend a 1 hour education session during which they will receive a presentation outlining: the health problems associated with prolonged sedentary behaviour; how much sitting is recommended; feedback on their own baseline sitting behaviour; and tips on how to reduce and break up sedentary behaviour. They will be given a summary of their baseline activity data . Group 1 will then return to work as normal. Group 2 will receive an excel file to upload to Microsoft Outlook which will deliver prompts to break sitting at random times, once within an hour. The prompts will run for a period of 10 weeks and their content will be the same brief, positively framed messages that were evaluated favourably by participants in the pilot project. Measurements for all participants will be repeated as follows: Questionnaires Q2 and Q3 will be repeated after the education session and at 12 week follow-up; 1 week of activity monitoring will be repeated between weeks 2-4 of the intervention period, 8-10 of the intervention period, and at 12 week follow up.
Following final measurements, participants will be invited to one of a series of semi-structured focus groups to explore the feasibility, acceptability, meaningfulness and effectiveness of the intervention. Focus groups will be recorded using a digital voice recorder and transcribed.
Data will be treated as confidential, it will be anonymised, and stored securely in line with GCU's data protection policies. Electronic copies of the activity data will be kept for 10 years, alongside electronic and paper copies of the questionnaires and diaries and audio and transcribed accounts of the focus groups. Physical activity data and basic demographic data will also be kept on a password protected database on a secure server. The data held on the database will not be identifiable. The information collected may be used for further analysis by staff and students in the School of Health and Life Sciences at Glasgow Caledonian University at a later date. Access to data will be restricted and controlled by Dr Ben Stansfield, PGRT in the School of Health and Life Sciences, GCU. Individuals will not be identifiable from any reports published and the employer, JJML, will receive a report containing only amalgamated data.
: Each participant will receive a brief summary of their baseline activity data at the education session. In addition, at the end of the study they will be provided with an activity report, summarising their individual activity data for all 4 measurement periods. A report of amalgamated data, including the results of the focus groups, will be produced for JJML and this will also be made available to study participants. Furthermore, the results will be written up as a PhD thesis, published in appropriate academic journals and discussed in conference presentations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt group | Experimental | Behavioral: Hourly prompts to stand delivered by Microsoft OutlookFollowing feedback on their baseline sitting behaviour and an education session on the health benefits of breaking prolonged sitting, the prompt group will receive hourly prompts on their PC to stand. The prompts will be delivered via Microsoft Outlook and will run for a period of 10 weeks. The messages will be short in length, varied and centre around the key message of breaking prolonged sitting by standing |
| Control group | No intervention | –The control group will receive the same education session as the prompt group, as well as feedback on their baseline sitting behaviour. However, the will not receive prompts on their PC. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Over 18 years of age
- Primarily engaged in sedentary, computer-based activities
- Access to Microsoft Outlook calendar
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Workstation comprises of a standing desk
- Pre-existing health condition that prevents standing on a regular basis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hourly prompts to stand delivered by Microsoft OutlookPrompt group | Behavioural | Prompt group |
Primary outcome
Total time spent sitting at work
Time frame: 12 weeks
Total time spent sitting at work will be objectively measured using a tri-axial accelerometer
4 secondary outcomes
Total time spent sitting at work in continuous bouts of at least 30 minutes.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of sitting events at work
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of prolonged sitting events at work
Time frame: 12 weeks
Time after prompt to stand
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2017.
- Background: PubMed 24236168Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Matthews CE, Bauman AE, van der Ploeg HP. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000. eCollection 2013.
- Background: PubMed 18252901Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):661-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2046. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
- Background: PubMed 20577058Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010 Jul;38(3):105-13. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2.
- Background: PubMed 24265734Parry S, Straker L, Gilson ND, Smith AJ. Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time for office workers--a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e78957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078957. eCollection 2013.
- BackgroundHealy GN, Lawler S, Thorp A, Neuhaus M, Robson E, Owen N, et al. Reducing prolonged sitting in the workplace. An evidence review: full report. 2012;ISBN:978-1-921822-06-3.
- Background: PubMed 22898122Evans RE, Fawole HO, Sheriff SA, Dall PM, Grant PM, Ryan CG. Point-of-choice prompts to reduce sitting time at work: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.010.
- Background: PubMed 18824488Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
- BackgroundBandura A, 1925. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control / Albert Bandura. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
- Background: PubMed 26315814Gardner B, Smith L, Lorencatto F, Hamer M, Biddle SJ. How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):89-112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1082146. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
- Background: PubMed 24355669Neuhaus M, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Eakin EG. Workplace sitting and height-adjustable workstations: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.009.
- Background: PubMed 23597658Healy GN, Eakin EG, Lamontagne AD, Owen N, Winkler EA, Wiesner G, Gunning L, Neuhaus M, Lawler S, Fjeldsoe BS, Dunstan DW. Reducing sitting time in office workers: short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention. Prev Med. 2013 Jul;57(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
- Background: PubMed 6863699Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sedentary Lifestyle
Recruiting
Real-time Engagement for Learning to Effectively Control Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Lifestyle
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Kava Aging and Mobility Study
Old Adults, Sleep Quality
Recruiting
Polarized Aerobic Training and Vascular Adaptations in Apparently Healthy Individuals
Sedentary Lifestyle
Recruiting
Families Implementing Good Health Traditions for Life
Diabetes, Chronic Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Effects of Sustainable Exercise Habits in University Students
Sedentary Lifestyle, Physical Activity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philippa Dall, PhD principal investigator
Senior Research Fellow
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hourly prompts to stand delivered by Microsoft Outlook in people with Sedentary Lifestyle, run by Glasgow Caledonian University at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total time spent sitting at work (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02785640, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.