Humerus FracturesNCT02784522
Minimally Invasive of Proximal Humerus Fractures With Internal Fixation Improves Shoulder Function in Older Patients
A study testing locking compression plate group and conventional locking plate group in people with Humerus Fractures, run by Qinghai University.
Trial summary
This study protocol represents an attempt to objectively choose appropriate methods for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in older patients by comparing locking compression plate with conventional steel plate fixation to improve shoulder function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Humerus Fractures
- What is being tested?
- locking compression plate group and conventional locking plate group
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 82 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Neer II or III fractures as shown by X-ray examination
- Presentation with soft tissue swelling of the shoulder, limited mobility, tenderness, unusual activity, or a palpable sense of bone rubbing
- Unilateral traumatic fracture
- Over 60 years of age
- Admission to the hospital within 6 hours after injury
- Informed consent from patients or their relatives
Who cannot join
- Concomitant injuries involving pathological fracture, blood vessel injury, or nerve injury
- Head-split humerus fractures
- Severe comminuted proximal humerus fractures involving > 40% of the articular surface of the humeral head
- Disturbance of consciousness, cerebral infarction, cancer, severe medical complications (such as heart, lung, or kidney failure; severe hypertension; diabetes; or blood diseases)
- History of shoulder or elbow dysfunction
About this study
Official title: Minimally Invasive Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures With Locking Compression Plate Improves Shoulder Function in Older Patients: Study Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
This study protocol represents an attempt to objectively choose appropriate methods for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in older patients by comparing locking compression plate with conventional steel plate fixation to improve shoulder function.
Read the detailed description
Treatment for proximal humerus fractures emphasizes the restoration of shoulder function. Older patients, because of the loss of bodily functions, face enormous difficulties in fracture healing and shoulder functional recovery after sustaining proximal humerus fractures. As previously reported, open reduction with conventional locking plate fixation achieved fair outcomes in 48 cases of proximal humerus fractures in older patients, with an excellent rate of 85.4% according to the Neer classification system. The investigators' clinical experience, however, has shown that the stability of internal fixation is inadequate and must be enhanced. Consequently, the investigators design a microsurgical implantation using a locking compression plate (LCP) to treat proximal humerus fractures in older patients.
In a search of the Web of Science database, the investigators found a randomized controlled trial reported by Wang et al. in which LCP fixation using microsurgical techniques had better outcomes in 20 cases of proximal humerus fractures in older patients. However, the limitation created by the small sample size had profound effects on the reliability of their study.
No relevant articles were retrieved from the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, and only one similar article was found on ClinicalTrials.gov: "Proximal Humerus Fractures: Randomized Study Between Locking Nails and Locking Plates for Neer 2 and 3 Parts" (identifier: NCT01984112). In this clinical trial, Constant-Murley scores were considered the primary outcome, and the follow-up period was 12 months. Importantly, the inclusion criteria and study arms were distinctly different from those in the investigators' study protocol.
The main principle of minimally invasive techniques in orthopedics is to implant a specific bony plate, which is fixed across a transverse fracture, via small incisions of the periosteum, skin, and muscle. These implantation devices include less invasive stabilization systems, dynamic compression plate systems, and LCP systems. Internal fixation with the LCP system involves two completely different fixation techniques and two opposing osteosynthesis principles, namely conventional plate and bridging plate osteosyntheses characterized by direct anatomical reduction. Because of its special design, the LCP can be used as a dynamic compression plate, as a pure internal fixator using locking head screws, or as both combined, thus providing a variety of therapeutic options for surgeons. Moreover, the LCP has good stability and induces less damage to the periosteum; it is therefore beneficial for bone healing and functional recovery. Given these characteristics, the LCP is likely to have stronger stability than the conventional locking plate for internal fixation of fractures. Therefore, the investigators design a study protocol that compares the LCP and conventional locking plate using minimally invasive techniques for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in older patients. The investigators hypothesize that the LCP will be more effective than the conventional locking plate in promoting shoulder function recovery with a higher excellent rate according to the Neer classification system for proximal humerus fractures.
Data collection, management, analysis, and open access
- Data collection: All data, including demographic information, disease diagnosis, concomitant diseases, allergic history (drug allergy), and adverse reactions, will be collected on a case report form and summarized in one form. These data will be recorded electronically using a double-data entry strategy by EpiData software.
- Data management: Only the project manager will have the right to query the database, and changes will not be allowed. All data relevant to this clinical trial will be preserved by the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University.
- Data analysis: All data will be statistically analyzed by professional statisticians. The statistical report by the statisticians will be given to the project manager responsible for writing the research report. An independent data monitoring committee will be in charge of data monitoring and management throughout the entire trial to ensure scientific accuracy, authenticity, and integrity.
- Open data: Published data will be released at www.figshare.com.
Statistical analysis The statistical analysis will be completed by statisticians using the SPSS 19.0 statistical software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) in line with the intention-to-treat principle. Intergroup comparison for the excellent rate according to the Neer classification system will be performed using the chi-square test. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, fracture healing time, visual analogue scale scores, and SF-36 scores will be compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. A value of P < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Adverse events
- Predicted and unanticipated adverse events will be recorded during the trial.
- Adverse events including dizziness, fever, infection, subacromial impingement, humeral head necrosis, malunion, and severe pain will be detected.
- All serious adverse events will be recorded in detail, including the date of occurrence, type of event, and treatments, all of which will be reported to the project manager and institution review board within 24 hours.
- Conditions
- Humerus Fractures
- Being tested
- locking compression plate group, conventional locking plate group
- Medical subject headings
- Humeral Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
locking compression plate groupDevice
Closed reduction via shoulder lateral approach followed by locking compression plate fixation using minimally invasive technique
conventional locking plate groupDevice
Closed reduction via shoulder lateral approach followed by conventional locking plate fixation using minimally invasive technique
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| locking compression plate group | Experimental | In the experimental group, patients will undergo closed reduction via a lateral approach to the shoulder followed by locking compression plate fixation using a minimally invasive technique.The locking compression plate is purchased from Xiamen Dabo Yingjing Medical Devices Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China. Receives: Device: locking compression plate group |
| conventional locking plate group | Active comparator | Patients in the control group will be subjected to closed reduction via a lateral approach to the shoulder followed by conventional steel plate fixation using a minimally invasive technique. The conventional locking plate is purchased from Xiamen Dabo Yingjing Medical Devices Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China. Receives: Device: conventional locking plate group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neer classification system score
Clinical outcome scores according to the Neer classification system will be used to assess shoulder function recovery.
Measured: month 6 after surgery
Secondary outcomes (3)
change of visual analogue scale score
Visual analogue scale scores assess postoperative pain relief.
Measured: day 1, day 3 and week 1, week 2 after surgery
change of X-ray examinations
Disappearance of the fracture line shown on X-ray examination indicates fracture healing.
Measured: month 0.5, month 1, month 3, and month 6 after surgery
Change of Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score
Measured: month 0.5, month 1, month 3, and month 6 after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completionAug 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Humerus FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Qinghai University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tao Wu, Qinghai University
- Investigators
- Tao Wu, Master, Principal investigator, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02784522
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QinghaiUH_001
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 19 May 2016
- Last updated
- 27 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.
PubMed 35727196
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Minimally Invasive Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures With Locking Compression Plate Improves Shoulder Function in Older Patients: Study Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02784522
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QinghaiUH_001
- Conditions
- Humerus Fractures
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Qinghai UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2014
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study protocol represents an attempt to objectively choose appropriate methods for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in older patients by comparing locking compression plate with conventional steel plate fixation to improve shoulder function.
Detailed description
Treatment for proximal humerus fractures emphasizes the restoration of shoulder function. Older patients, because of the loss of bodily functions, face enormous difficulties in fracture healing and shoulder functional recovery after sustaining proximal humerus fractures. As previously reported, open reduction with conventional locking plate fixation achieved fair outcomes in 48 cases of proximal humerus fractures in older patients, with an excellent rate of 85.4% according to the Neer classification system. The investigators' clinical experience, however, has shown that the stability of internal fixation is inadequate and must be enhanced. Consequently, the investigators design a microsurgical implantation using a locking compression plate (LCP) to treat proximal humerus fractures in older patients.
In a search of the Web of Science database, the investigators found a randomized controlled trial reported by Wang et al. in which LCP fixation using microsurgical techniques had better outcomes in 20 cases of proximal humerus fractures in older patients. However, the limitation created by the small sample size had profound effects on the reliability of their study.
No relevant articles were retrieved from the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, and only one similar article was found on ClinicalTrials.gov: "Proximal Humerus Fractures: Randomized Study Between Locking Nails and Locking Plates for Neer 2 and 3 Parts" (identifier: NCT01984112). In this clinical trial, Constant-Murley scores were considered the primary outcome, and the follow-up period was 12 months. Importantly, the inclusion criteria and study arms were distinctly different from those in the investigators' study protocol.
The main principle of minimally invasive techniques in orthopedics is to implant a specific bony plate, which is fixed across a transverse fracture, via small incisions of the periosteum, skin, and muscle. These implantation devices include less invasive stabilization systems, dynamic compression plate systems, and LCP systems. Internal fixation with the LCP system involves two completely different fixation techniques and two opposing osteosynthesis principles, namely conventional plate and bridging plate osteosyntheses characterized by direct anatomical reduction. Because of its special design, the LCP can be used as a dynamic compression plate, as a pure internal fixator using locking head screws, or as both combined, thus providing a variety of therapeutic options for surgeons. Moreover, the LCP has good stability and induces less damage to the periosteum; it is therefore beneficial for bone healing and functional recovery. Given these characteristics, the LCP is likely to have stronger stability than the conventional locking plate for internal fixation of fractures. Therefore, the investigators design a study protocol that compares the LCP and conventional locking plate using minimally invasive techniques for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in older patients. The investigators hypothesize that the LCP will be more effective than the conventional locking plate in promoting shoulder function recovery with a higher excellent rate according to the Neer classification system for proximal humerus fractures.
Data collection, management, analysis, and open access
- Data collection: All data, including demographic information, disease diagnosis, concomitant diseases, allergic history (drug allergy), and adverse reactions, will be collected on a case report form and summarized in one form. These data will be recorded electronically using a double-data entry strategy by EpiData software.
- Data management: Only the project manager will have the right to query the database, and changes will not be allowed. All data relevant to this clinical trial will be preserved by the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University.
- Data analysis: All data will be statistically analyzed by professional statisticians. The statistical report by the statisticians will be given to the project manager responsible for writing the research report. An independent data monitoring committee will be in charge of data monitoring and management throughout the entire trial to ensure scientific accuracy, authenticity, and integrity.
- Open data: Published data will be released at www.figshare.com.
Statistical analysis The statistical analysis will be completed by statisticians using the SPSS 19.0 statistical software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) in line with the intention-to-treat principle. Intergroup comparison for the excellent rate according to the Neer classification system will be performed using the chi-square test. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, fracture healing time, visual analogue scale scores, and SF-36 scores will be compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. A value of P < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Adverse events
- Predicted and unanticipated adverse events will be recorded during the trial.
- Adverse events including dizziness, fever, infection, subacromial impingement, humeral head necrosis, malunion, and severe pain will be detected.
- All serious adverse events will be recorded in detail, including the date of occurrence, type of event, and treatments, all of which will be reported to the project manager and institution review board within 24 hours.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| locking compression plate group | Experimental | Device: locking compression plate groupIn the experimental group, patients will undergo closed reduction via a lateral approach to the shoulder followed by locking compression plate fixation using a minimally invasive technique.The locking compression plate is purchased from Xiamen Dabo Yingjing Medical Devices Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China. |
| conventional locking plate group | Active comparator | Device: conventional locking plate groupPatients in the control group will be subjected to closed reduction via a lateral approach to the shoulder followed by conventional steel plate fixation using a minimally invasive technique. The conventional locking plate is purchased from Xiamen Dabo Yingjing Medical Devices Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Neer II or III fractures as shown by X-ray examination
- Presentation with soft tissue swelling of the shoulder, limited mobility, tenderness, unusual activity, or a palpable sense of bone rubbing
- Unilateral traumatic fracture
- Over 60 years of age
- Admission to the hospital within 6 hours after injury
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Concomitant injuries involving pathological fracture, blood vessel injury, or nerve injury
- Head-split humerus fractures
- Severe comminuted proximal humerus fractures involving > 40% of the articular surface of the humeral head
- Disturbance of consciousness, cerebral infarction, cancer, severe medical complications (such as heart, lung, or kidney failure; severe hypertension; diabetes; or blood diseases)
- History of shoulder or elbow dysfunction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| locking compression plate groupClosed reduction via shoulder lateral approach followed by locking compression plate fixation using minimally invasive technique | Device | locking compression plate group |
| conventional locking plate groupClosed reduction via shoulder lateral approach followed by conventional locking plate fixation using minimally invasive technique | Device | conventional locking plate group |
Primary outcome
Neer classification system score
Time frame: month 6 after surgery
Clinical outcome scores according to the Neer classification system will be used to assess shoulder function recovery.
3 secondary outcomes
change of visual analogue scale score
Time frame: day 1, day 3 and week 1, week 2 after surgery
change of X-ray examinations
Time frame: month 0.5, month 1, month 3, and month 6 after surgery
Change of Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score
Time frame: month 0.5, month 1, month 3, and month 6 after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35727196Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Humerus Fractures
RecruitingObservational study
Duration of Immobilization After Reverse Total Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures
Proximal Humeral Fracture, Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Alloy Scaffold With Controlled Degradation for Periarticular Bone Defects
Periarticular Bone Defect, Proximal Humerus Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Study on Outcomes of Proximal Humerus Fractures
Proximal Humerus Fracture
Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of Functional Outcomes Between Triceps Tongue Elevation vs Olecranon Osteotomy in Intra Articular Distal Humerus Fracture (IA-DH) Management
Intra Articular Distal Humerus Fracture
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Surgical Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures. Randomized Controlled Trial
Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tao Wu, Master principal investigator
Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing locking compression plate group and conventional locking plate group in people with Humerus Fractures, run by Qinghai University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neer classification system score (time frame: month 6 after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02784522, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2016.