Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section and/or Perineal WoundPhase 4NCT02780245
Role of Tranexamic Acid Versus Uterine Cooling at Caesarean Section
A Phase 4 study testing Tranexamic Acid and Intraoperative Uterine Cooling in people with Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section and/or Perineal Wound and Postpartum Hemorrhage, run by Talkha Central Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study aims to compare role of a prophylactic predefined intravenous Tranexamic Acid dose versus intraoperative Uterine Cooling in reducing blood loss and incidence of postpartum hemorrhage at secondary CS. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section and/or Perineal Wound, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
- What is being tested?
- Tranexamic Acid and Intraoperative Uterine Cooling
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- Jun 2016to Sep 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women who attended Talkha Central Hospital for planned or emergency secondary CS.
- Singleton pregnancy at term with gestational age (G.A) between 38±5 and 40 weeks.
Who cannot join
- Preoperative exclusion criteria were women who had any disorders of heart, liver, kidney, brain or blood, Abruptio placenta, placental abnormalities or accrete syndromes, Polyhydramnios, macrosomia, preeclampsia, allergy to TXA, history of thromboembolic disorders, or severe anemia.
- Intraoperative exclusion criteria was inability to exteriorize the uterus during CS for group (Y).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Tranexamic Acid Versus Novel Uterine Cooling Technique in Reducing Blood Loss and Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage at Caesarean Section
This study aims to compare role of a prophylactic predefined intravenous Tranexamic Acid dose versus intraoperative Uterine Cooling in reducing blood loss and incidence of postpartum hemorrhage at secondary CS.
Read the detailed description
Bleeding during vaginal or operative delivery is always of prime concern. Despite significant progress in obstetric care 125,000 women die from obstetric hemorrhage annually in the world.
The incidence of CS is increasing, and the average blood loss during CS (1000 mL) is double the amount lost during vaginal delivery (500 mL). CS rate as high as 25-30% in many areas of the world. In Egypt the CS rate is 27.6 %, in United States of America, from 1970-2009 the CS rate rose from 4.5-32.9%, and declined to 32.8% of all deliveries at 2010. In spite of the various measures to prevent blood loss during and after CS, post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) continues to be the most common complication seen in almost 20% of the cases, and causes approximately 25% of maternal deaths worldwide, leading to increased maternal morbidity and mortality. Women who undergo a CS are much more likely to be delivered by a repeat operation in subsequent pregnancies. For women undergoing subsequent CS, the maternal risks are even greater like massive obstetric hemorrhage, hysterectomy, admission to an intensive care unit, or maternal death. Medications, such as oxytocin, misoprostol and prostaglandin F2α, have been used to control bleeding postoperatively.
TXA is a synthetic analog of the amino acid lysine, as an antifibrinolytic agent. Its intravenous administration has been routinely used for many years to reduce or prevent excessive hemorrhage in various medical conditions or disorders (helping hemostasis), also during and after surgical procedures like benign hysterectomy, open heart surgeries, scoliosis surgery, oral surgery, liver surgeries, total hip or knee arthroplasty, and urology. It has been shown to be very useful and efficient in reducing blood loss and incidence of blood transfusion in these surgeries, and decreases the risk of death in bleeding trauma patients. It was also included in the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines.
About its role in CS, some recent studies showed that TXA has advantage and useful effect safely in reducing blood loss and requirement of additional ecbolics. Its doses used intravenously to reduce blood loss at CS were a bolus of 1gm, 10 mg/kg , or 15 mg/kg which had an advantage over 10 mg/kg in anemic parturients.
A recent study by Mitchell et al. concluded that Uterine cooling during cesarean delivery was efficient enough to decrease blood loss and the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage.
This study aims to compare role of a prophylactic predefined intravenous Tranexamic Acid dose versus intraoperative Uterine Cooling in reducing blood loss and incidence of postpartum hemorrhage at secondary CS.
- Conditions
- Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section and/or Perineal Wound, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
- Being tested
- Tranexamic Acid, Intraoperative Uterine Cooling
- Keywords
- Caesarean Section, Tranexamic Acid, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Ecbolics
- Medical subject headings
- Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Inertia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tranexamic AcidDrug
Also called TXA
At 20 minutes preoperatively, TXA of 20 mg/kg was administered in Z Solution (500•0 ml normal saline containing a prophylactic antibiotic 1•0 g).
Intraoperative Uterine CoolingProcedure or surgery
Intraoperatively immediately following delivery of the fetus the uterus was been externalized in the usual fashion, and the body of the uterus cephalad to the hysterotomy incision was been wrapped in sterile surgical towels saturated in sterile and iced normal saline. These towels came from a sterile cooling pot set to 30 degrees Fahrenheit. Iced saline-soaked towels was been kept in place for a minimum of 5 minutes and replaced at the discretion of the attending obstetrician until the hysterotomy is closed and the uterus is replaced into the patient's abdomen.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group (X) Prophylactic Tranexamic Acid | Experimental | Intravenously at 20 minutes preoperatively had an intervention of a single bolus TXA dose of 20•0 mg/kg, which was administered in Z solution (500•0 ml normal saline containing a prophylactic antibiotic 1•0 g) (NCT02739815). Receives: Drug: Tranexamic Acid |
| Group (Y) Intraoperative Uterine Cooling | Experimental | Firstly intravenously at 20 minutes preoperatively had only the Z solution, and secondly [Intraoperatively immediately following delivery of the fetus the uterus was been externalized in the usual fashion, and the body of the uterus cephalad to the hysterotomy incision was been wrapped in sterile surgical towels saturated in sterile and iced normal saline. These towels came from a sterile cooling pot set to 30 degrees Fahrenheit. Iced saline-soaked towels was been kept in place for a minimum of 5 minutes and replaced at the discretion of the attending obstetrician until the hysterotomy is closed and the uterus is replaced into the patient's abdomen]. Receives: Procedure: Intraoperative Uterine Cooling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total blood loss volume
Estimation of Total Blood Loss Volume (ml) during CS and in the PACU.
Measured: Up to 3 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
Hematocrit value (Hct)
Estimating change in Pre- versus Post-operative hematocrit values (%) at 6 hours postoperatively.
Measured: 6 hours postoperative period
Overall blood loss volume greater than 1000 cc
Estimation of overall blood loss volume during CS and up to 6 hours postoperatively
Measured: Up to 9 hours
Need for Additional Ecbolics
Need for additional ecbolics to arrest and manage bleeding if there is a uterine atony
Measured: Intraoperative
Need for other surgical measures to stop bleeding
Need for other surgical measures to stop bleeding (B-lynch denoting uterine atony, uterine artery ligation, hysterectomy)
Measured: Intraoperative
Transfusion of Blood or Blood Products
Need for transfusion of blood or blood products during CS and in the PACU
Measured: Up to 3 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2016
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionSep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section and/or Perineal WoundStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Talkha Central Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amro Mohamed Ibrahim Ibrahim Hetta, Talkha Central Hospital
- Investigators
- Amro M Hetta, M.B., Ch.B., Principal investigator, Talkha Central Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02780245
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OG2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 19 May 2016
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tarabrin O, Kaminskiy V, Galich S, Tkachenko R, Gulyaev A, Shcherbakov S, et al. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss during cesarean section. Critical Care 2012, 16(1): 1-189.
Ahmed MR, Sayed Ahmed WA, Madny EH, Arafa AM, Said MM. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss in elective caesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Jun;28(9):1014-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.941283. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
PubMed 25068947Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World health report 2010, 30: 1-31.
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Wilson EC, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012 Aug 28;61(1):1-72.
PubMed 24974589Mayur G, Purvi P, Ashoo G, Pankaj D. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss during and after cesarean section: a randomized case controlled prospective study. J Obstet Gynecol India 2007, 57(3): 4.
WHO Recommendations for the Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Haemorrhage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK131942/
PubMed 23586122Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Ratcliffe SJ, Stevens EJ, Sammel MD, Macones GA. Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;195(4):1143-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.045. Epub 2006 Jul 17.
PubMed 16846571Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;205(3):262.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
PubMed 22071057Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1226-32. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84.
PubMed 16738145Shahid A, Khan A. Tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss during and after caesarean section. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Jul;23(7):459-62.
PubMed 23823946Sentilhes L, Lasocki S, Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Deruelle P, Dreyfus M, Perrotin F, Goffinet F, Deneux-Tharaux C. Tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):576-87. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu448. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
PubMed 25571934Gaines-Dillard N, Bartley MK, Rosini JM. Tranexamic acid in the trauma patient. Nursing. 2016 Feb;46(2):60-2. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000476234.78599.e2. No abstract available.
PubMed 26760392Yehia AH, Koleib MH, Abdelazim IA, Atik A. Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss during and after cesarean section: A double blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction 2014, 3(1): 53-56.
Topsoee MF, Bergholt T, Ravn P, Schouenborg L, Moeller C, Ottesen B, Settnes A. Anti-hemorrhagic effect of prophylactic tranexamic acid in benign hysterectomy-a double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):72.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.184. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
PubMed 26829509CRASH-2 trial collaborators; Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, Caballero J, Coats T, Dewan Y, El-Sayed H, Gogichaishvili T, Gupta S, Herrera J, Hunt B, Iribhogbe P, Izurieta M, Khamis H, Komolafe E, Marrero MA, Mejia-Mantilla J, Miranda J, Morales C, Olaomi O, Olldashi F, Perel P, Peto R, Ramana PV, Ravi RR, Yutthakasemsunt S. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Jul 3;376(9734):23-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60835-5. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
PubMed 20554319
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Tranexamic Acid Versus Novel Uterine Cooling Technique in Reducing Blood Loss and Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage at Caesarean Section
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02780245
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OG2
- Conditions
- Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section and/or Perineal Wound, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
- Keywords
- Caesarean Section, Tranexamic Acid, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Ecbolics
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Talkha Central HospitalOther government
- Study start
- Jun 2016
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to compare role of a prophylactic predefined intravenous Tranexamic Acid dose versus intraoperative Uterine Cooling in reducing blood loss and incidence of postpartum hemorrhage at secondary CS.
Detailed description
Bleeding during vaginal or operative delivery is always of prime concern. Despite significant progress in obstetric care 125,000 women die from obstetric hemorrhage annually in the world.
The incidence of CS is increasing, and the average blood loss during CS (1000 mL) is double the amount lost during vaginal delivery (500 mL). CS rate as high as 25-30% in many areas of the world. In Egypt the CS rate is 27.6 %, in United States of America, from 1970-2009 the CS rate rose from 4.5-32.9%, and declined to 32.8% of all deliveries at 2010. In spite of the various measures to prevent blood loss during and after CS, post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) continues to be the most common complication seen in almost 20% of the cases, and causes approximately 25% of maternal deaths worldwide, leading to increased maternal morbidity and mortality. Women who undergo a CS are much more likely to be delivered by a repeat operation in subsequent pregnancies. For women undergoing subsequent CS, the maternal risks are even greater like massive obstetric hemorrhage, hysterectomy, admission to an intensive care unit, or maternal death. Medications, such as oxytocin, misoprostol and prostaglandin F2α, have been used to control bleeding postoperatively.
TXA is a synthetic analog of the amino acid lysine, as an antifibrinolytic agent. Its intravenous administration has been routinely used for many years to reduce or prevent excessive hemorrhage in various medical conditions or disorders (helping hemostasis), also during and after surgical procedures like benign hysterectomy, open heart surgeries, scoliosis surgery, oral surgery, liver surgeries, total hip or knee arthroplasty, and urology. It has been shown to be very useful and efficient in reducing blood loss and incidence of blood transfusion in these surgeries, and decreases the risk of death in bleeding trauma patients. It was also included in the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines.
About its role in CS, some recent studies showed that TXA has advantage and useful effect safely in reducing blood loss and requirement of additional ecbolics. Its doses used intravenously to reduce blood loss at CS were a bolus of 1gm, 10 mg/kg , or 15 mg/kg which had an advantage over 10 mg/kg in anemic parturients.
A recent study by Mitchell et al. concluded that Uterine cooling during cesarean delivery was efficient enough to decrease blood loss and the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage.
This study aims to compare role of a prophylactic predefined intravenous Tranexamic Acid dose versus intraoperative Uterine Cooling in reducing blood loss and incidence of postpartum hemorrhage at secondary CS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group (X) Prophylactic Tranexamic Acid | Experimental | Drug: Tranexamic AcidIntravenously at 20 minutes preoperatively had an intervention of a single bolus TXA dose of 20•0 mg/kg, which was administered in Z solution (500•0 ml normal saline containing a prophylactic antibiotic 1•0 g) (NCT02739815). |
| Group (Y) Intraoperative Uterine Cooling | Experimental | Procedure: Intraoperative Uterine CoolingFirstly intravenously at 20 minutes preoperatively had only the Z solution, and secondly [Intraoperatively immediately following delivery of the fetus the uterus was been externalized in the usual fashion, and the body of the uterus cephalad to the hysterotomy incision was been wrapped in sterile surgical towels saturated in sterile and iced normal saline. These towels came from a sterile cooling pot set to 30 degrees Fahrenheit. Iced saline-soaked towels was been kept in place for a minimum of 5 minutes and replaced at the discretion of the attending obstetrician until the hysterotomy is closed and the uterus is replaced into the patient's abdomen]. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Women who attended Talkha Central Hospital for planned or emergency secondary CS.
- Singleton pregnancy at term with gestational age (G.A) between 38±5 and 40 weeks.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Preoperative exclusion criteria were women who had any disorders of heart, liver, kidney, brain or blood, Abruptio placenta, placental abnormalities or accrete syndromes, Polyhydramnios, macrosomia, preeclampsia, allergy to TXA, history of thromboembolic disorders, or severe anemia.
- Intraoperative exclusion criteria was inability to exteriorize the uterus during CS for group (Y).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tranexamic AcidAlso: TXAAt 20 minutes preoperatively, TXA of 20 mg/kg was administered in Z Solution (500•0 ml normal saline containing a prophylactic antibiotic 1•0 g). | Drug | Group (X) Prophylactic Tranexamic Acid |
| Intraoperative Uterine CoolingIntraoperatively immediately following delivery of the fetus the uterus was been externalized in the usual fashion, and the body of the uterus cephalad to the hysterotomy incision was been wrapped in sterile surgical towels saturated in sterile and iced normal saline. These towels came from a sterile cooling pot set to 30 degrees Fahrenheit. Iced saline-soaked towels was been kept in place for a minimum of 5 minutes and replaced at the discretion of the attending obstetrician until the hysterotomy is closed and the uterus is replaced into the patient's abdomen. | Procedure or surgery | Group (Y) Intraoperative Uterine Cooling |
Primary outcome
Total blood loss volume
Time frame: Up to 3 hours
Estimation of Total Blood Loss Volume (ml) during CS and in the PACU.
5 secondary outcomes
Hematocrit value (Hct)
Time frame: 6 hours postoperative period
Overall blood loss volume greater than 1000 cc
Time frame: Up to 9 hours
Need for Additional Ecbolics
Time frame: Intraoperative
Need for other surgical measures to stop bleeding
Time frame: Intraoperative
Transfusion of Blood or Blood Products
Time frame: Up to 3 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2016.
- BackgroundTarabrin O, Kaminskiy V, Galich S, Tkachenko R, Gulyaev A, Shcherbakov S, et al. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss during cesarean section. Critical Care 2012, 16(1): 1-189.
- Background: PubMed 25068947Ahmed MR, Sayed Ahmed WA, Madny EH, Arafa AM, Said MM. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss in elective caesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Jun;28(9):1014-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.941283. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
- BackgroundGibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World health report 2010, 30: 1-31.
- Background: PubMed 24974589Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Wilson EC, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012 Aug 28;61(1):1-72.
- BackgroundMayur G, Purvi P, Ashoo G, Pankaj D. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss during and after cesarean section: a randomized case controlled prospective study. J Obstet Gynecol India 2007, 57(3): 4.
- Background: PubMed 23586122WHO Recommendations for the Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Haemorrhage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK131942/
- Background: PubMed 16846571Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Ratcliffe SJ, Stevens EJ, Sammel MD, Macones GA. Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;195(4):1143-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.045. Epub 2006 Jul 17.
- Background: PubMed 22071057Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;205(3):262.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
- Background: PubMed 16738145Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1226-32. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84.
- Background: PubMed 23823946Shahid A, Khan A. Tranexamic acid in decreasing blood loss during and after caesarean section. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Jul;23(7):459-62.
- Background: PubMed 25571934Sentilhes L, Lasocki S, Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Deruelle P, Dreyfus M, Perrotin F, Goffinet F, Deneux-Tharaux C. Tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):576-87. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu448. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
- Background: PubMed 26760392Gaines-Dillard N, Bartley MK, Rosini JM. Tranexamic acid in the trauma patient. Nursing. 2016 Feb;46(2):60-2. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000476234.78599.e2. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amro M Hetta, M.B., Ch.B. principal investigator
Talkha Central Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Tranexamic Acid and Intraoperative Uterine Cooling in people with Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section and/or Perineal Wound and Postpartum Hemorrhage, run by Talkha Central Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total blood loss volume (time frame: Up to 3 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02780245, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2016.