AzTrials
AzTrials

Cosmetics, Suture, CicatrixNCT02776618

Polyglactin 910 vs Poligelecaprone 25 Running Subcuticular Closure of Elliptical Excision Wounds

A study testing running subcuticular closure of excisional defect in people with Cosmetics, Suture, Cicatrix, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We will be recruiting patients requiring excisions of skin cancer and comparing aesthetic and functional differences of suture repair of excisional defects using polyglactin 910 vs poliglecaprone 25 with a split-scar model. Excision sites will be on either the trunk or extremities. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cosmetics, Suture, Cicatrix
What is being tested?
running subcuticular closure of excisional defect
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 May 2016to 15 May 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years or older requiring excision of either cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma with postoperative defects of at least 4 cm on the trunk and extremities resulting from simple excisional defects. Participants will be patients of the dermatology departments of either the University of California, Los Angeles

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy, incarceration, mental impairment, inability to understand English, nonlinear closures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Department of Dermatology, University of California, Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90035

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Aesthetic and Functional Efficacy of Poliglecaprone 25 vs Polyglactin 910 in Running Subcuticular Closures: a Split-scar, Rater-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

We will be recruiting patients requiring excisions of skin cancer and comparing aesthetic and functional differences of suture repair of excisional defects using polyglactin 910 vs poliglecaprone 25 with a split-scar model. Excision sites will be on either the trunk or extremities. Standard dermatological excision and repair methods will be used for removal of lesions and repair of the wound by surgeons; training courses will be used to limit inter-surgeon variation in technique. Excisional defects will be repaired with deep polyglactin 910 sutures, followed by randomly assigned subcuticular closure of one half of the defect with polyglactin 910 sutures and the other half with poliglecaprone 25 sutures. The patient will follow-up at 6 months and fill out a patient self-assessment evaluation survey of the scar. Photographs will also be taken of the scars at the follow-up at 6 months, which will be then be assigned to a set of blinded observers to evaluate the wound using a modified Patient Observer Self-Assessment Scale (mPOSAS). These observers will rate each scar on the mPOSAS scale and values will be averaged between observers. Total duration of participation will be 6 months, with 2 total visits (excision visit and follow-up visit).

Read the detailed description

Screening: Patients will be recruited for the study after the need for excision of cutaneous malignancy has been been determined by biopsy. Patients who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria (please refer to section 11.1) will be offered to have an elliptical excision with repair by standard of care (surgeon's choice of closure of entire surgical wound) or be enrolled in the study. Patients will be recruited directly by the PI and/or co-investigators, typically on the telephone when biopsy results of cutaneous malignancy and the need for treatment by excision are being conveyed. Occasionally the patient's may be recruited directly in-person if a subsequent office-visit occurs between the patient and the physician. Patient's who enroll in the study will then undergo intervention with excision and repair at a time convenient to them, ideally within one month.

Intervention:

Patients will undergo a medically-necessary elliptical excision of their cutaneous malignancy using standard excision protocol. This will occur in a similar time frame to a standard excision of cutaneous malignancy in our clinics ranging from 1-4 weeks from diagnosis, based on the patient's preference and schedule. The wound will be divided into halves designated as side A (either left or superior aspect) and side B (either right or inferior). Side A of the wound will be randomly assigned subcuticular closure with either poliglecaprone 25 or polyglactin 910. Side B will receive the opposite of side A. Randomization will be performed with online randomization software (https://www.randomizer.org). Prior to placement of the superficial subcuticular sutures, both sides of the wound will receive vertical deep sub-epidermal sutures using polyglactin 910. Patients will be blinded as to which material is used on which side. After the wound is closed, a de-identified photograph will be taken by the PI or co-investigators of the wound with demarcation of sites A and B (using a surgical pen) to serve as a marker for side A and side B for future identification of the intervention sites. The type of randomized intervention to site A and site B will be recorded without identifying patient information on a secure, encrypted database. Closed wounds will be treated with standard protocol with a pressure bandage left in place for 24 hours followed by daily treatment with petrolatum ointment and a bandage for 2 weeks until the epidermis has healed together completely. Patients will be counseled on standard wound care as well as common complications of standard excisions by the surgeon. No visit for suture removal will be necessary as all sutures are dissolvable.

*note - interventional methods for patients included in the study are considered standard therapy. Patient's would still receive similar excision and closure of their wound if they were not participating in the research.

Follow-up:

Patients will be called via telephone by either the PI or co-investigators after 2 weeks to inquire about the healing process and assess for any complications.

Patients will then follow up at 6 months for their scheduled routine skin cancer surveillance exam with the surgeon who performed the excision. At that time, the surgeon will re-identify sites A and B with a surgical marking pen. A de-photograph will be taken of the excision site scar. At the end of the patient visit, the patient will personally given a POSAS patient survey and asked to rate their scar for both sites A and B; no identifying information will be included in this survey. In the case that the scar is in a location that the patient can not easily visualize, the de-identified photograph of the patient's scar will be printed for the patient to assess the scar. Photographs will then later be assigned to two blinded observers to assign a modified observer POSAS score to subjects' scars. These scores will be averaged and then analyzed for differences.

Being tested
running subcuticular closure of excisional defect
Medical subject headings
Cicatrix

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • running subcuticular closure of excisional defectProcedure or surgery

    Excisional defects will be repaired with deep polyglactin 910 sutures, followed by each half of the wound given randomly assigned subcuticular superficial closure as described in the treatment arms.

Study groups in NCT02776618
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Polyglactin 910ExperimentalOne half of excision site will be randomly assigned superficial closure with polyglactin 910 suture
Receives: Procedure: running subcuticular closure of excisional defect
poliglecaprone 25ExperimentalOne half of excision site will be randomly assigned superficial closure with poliglecaprone 25
Receives: Procedure: running subcuticular closure of excisional defect

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale

    The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale includes subjective symptoms of pain and pruritus and consists of 2 numerical numeric scales: The Patient Scar Assessment Scale and the Observer Scar Assessment Scale. It assesses vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area, and it incorporates patient assessments of pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, and relief.

    Measured: 6 month after surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Visual analog scale

    The multidimensional visual analog scale is a photograph-based scale derived from evaluating standardized digital photographs in 4 dimensions (pigmentation, vascularity, acceptability, and observer comfort) plus contour.

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 May 2016
  3. Primary completion15 May 2017
  4. Study completion15 May 2017

Why it stopped: could not and did not recruit any participants

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02776618
Sponsor's protocol ID
#15-001216
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
15 May 2016
Last updated
17 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing running subcuticular closure of excisional defect in people with Cosmetics, Suture, Cicatrix, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (time frame: 6 month after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in