NauseaPhase 4NCT02760069
Isopropyl Alcohol vs Ondansetron for Nausea in the Emergency Department
A Phase 4 study testing Inhaled isopropyl alcohol, Oral ondansetron and Inhaled normal saline in people with Nausea, run by Brooke Army Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare the efficacy of isopropyl alcohol and conventional anti-emetics with three study arms: (1) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral ondansetron; (2) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral placebo; (3) inhaled placebo plus oral ondansetron. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nausea
- What is being tested?
- Inhaled isopropyl alcohol, Oral ondansetron and Inhaled normal saline
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 122 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Nov 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ages 18 and older
- complaint of nausea and/or vomiting reported at 3 or above on verbal numerical rating scale at the time of triage
Who cannot join
- allergy to isopropyl alcohol or ondansetron
- inability to breathe through nose (e.g., recent upper respiratory infection)
- intake of cefoperazone, disulfiram, or metronidazole within the last 24 hours
- mental status precluding informed consent including intoxication
- known QT-prolongation
- clinical suspicion for serotonin syndrome
- intravenous catheter in place prior to study start
- medications administered since patient arrival (e.g., in triage)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
San Antonio Military Medical Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78234
About this study
Official title: Nasally Inhaled Isopropyl Alcohol Versus Oral Ondansetron for the Treatment of Nausea in the Emergency Department: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
This study will compare the efficacy of isopropyl alcohol and conventional anti-emetics with three study arms: (1) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral ondansetron; (2) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral placebo; (3) inhaled placebo plus oral ondansetron.
Read the detailed description
This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that nasally-inhaled isopropyl alcohol (ISO) plus oral placebo has greater anti-emetic efficacy compared to oral ondansetron oral solution. By design, the study will be double-blinded insofar as neither investigators nor subjects will be notified of the identity of the substances they are inhaling or swallowing. The study will include a post-study survey to ascertain the extent to which blinding was achieved. Potential subjects are those presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with nausea and/or vomiting. Investigators will recruit a convenience sample by approaching subjects at the time of initial triage and solicit nausea on a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) scored from 0-10 with those patients reporting scores of 3 or greater eligible for study. Informed consent will be obtained from each subject.
Subjects will be allocated to one of three arms: (1) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral ondansetron; (2) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral placebo; (3) inhaled placebo plus oral ondansetron. No subject will receive both inhaled and oral placebo; all subjects will be allocated to at least one therapeutic intervention for nausea. Both investigators and study subjects will be blinded to subject allocation.
Regarding the interventions, upon recruitment, patients will be administered an oral solution (placebo or ondansetron) by their treating nurse. A study team member will then instruct the subject to inhale one of the blinded prep pads, to hold the pad approximately 1 centimeter from their nares, and to take deep nasal inhalations as needed for nausea relief. The investigator will remain at arm's length from the patient at all times to avoid detecting prep pad scent. Additionally, investigators will also instruct subjects to avoid any behavior or actions during the study that would indicate which preparation pad is being used.
The investigators will record their findings on data collection forms. The primary outcome will be nausea as measured on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) at 30 minutes. Nausea measurements will also be collected at 10, 20, 40, 50, and 60 minutes, and then every hour up to 5 hours, then at disposition at which time the patient will provide one final nausea VAS score. The study team member will not be present in the patient's room during the intervals between these evaluations. At the time of each nausea measurement, patients will be offered another preparation pad (up to ten pads). Investigators will notify the patient's treating provider to prompt consideration for treatment with a rescue anti-emetic (such as metoclopramide or promethazine) if the patient vomits or if the patient requests an anti-emetic at any time. At the time of each nausea measurement, a pain score will also be measured on a 10 cm VAS. At the time of final disposition, the patient will provide a satisfaction score on a 10-cm VAS and be asked to indicate his/her belief as to whether the pad was a treatment or placebo and whether the oral solution was a treatment or placebo. Similarly, at study conclusion the patient's provider will be asked to indicate his/her belief as to whether the pad was a treatment or placebo and whether the oral solution was a treatment or placebo. Other data collected will include times and doses for all medications (including preparation pads) and fluids administered, episodes of vomiting (defined as forceful expulsion of gastric contents separated by at least 2 minutes), disposition (admission versus discharge), final clinical impression at the time of disposition, and time to disposition. Subjects will be followed and data collected for the entirety of their ED stay.
- Conditions
- Nausea
- Being tested
- Inhaled isopropyl alcohol, Oral ondansetron, Inhaled normal saline, Oral placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Nausea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Inhaled isopropyl alcoholDrug
Also called ISO
Patients will inhale from isopropyl alcohol pads as needed for nausea up to q30 minutes.
Oral ondansetronDrug
Also called Ondansetron
Patients will drink elixir containing 4 mg ondansetron in 5 ml of solution. National Drug Code (NDC) 0054-0064-47.
Inhaled normal salineDrug
Also called Inhaled placebo
Patients will inhale from normal saline pads as needed for nausea up to q30 minutes.
Oral placeboDrug
Also called Oral sugar water
Subjects will drink solution comprised of 0.25 ml of Oral Sweet Sugar Free NDC 0574-0302-16 with 4.75 ml of sterile water for dilution NDC 0264-2101-00
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Inhaled ISO + oral ondansetron | Active comparator | Inhaled isopropyl alcohol pads as needed for nausea (up to q30 minutes) and drink oral elixir comprising ondansetron (4 mg). Receives: Drug: Inhaled isopropyl alcohol; Drug: Oral ondansetron |
| Inhaled ISO + oral placebo | Experimental | Inhaled isopropyl alcohol pads as needed for nausea (up to q30 minutes) and drink oral placebo elixir. Receives: Drug: Inhaled isopropyl alcohol; Drug: Oral placebo |
| Inhaled placebo + oral ondansetron | Active comparator | Inhaled normal saline pads as needed for nausea (up to q30 minutes) and drink oral placebo elixir. Receives: Drug: Oral ondansetron; Drug: Inhaled normal saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nausea 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Full Scale Name: Nausea 100-mm visual analogue scale. Scale Construct: Measures nausea as reported by the patient Scale Range: Minimum is 0 (no nausea) to 100 (worst nausea imaginable). These values quantify, on an interval scale anchored at 0, the patient's subjective sensation of nausea. Higher values represent worse outcomes (e.g., more nausea). Patient makes a single vertical mark on a 100 mm horizontal line with 0 at the left and 100 on the right to depict their nausea.
Measured: 30 minutes post intervention
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue Anti-emetics
Whether patient required rescue anti-emetics (binary variable). Measured using nurse drug administration record.
Measured: Study duration (up to 5 hours post intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionNov 2017
- Study completionNov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NauseaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brooke Army Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael D. April, Brooke Army Medical Center
- Investigators
- Michael D April, MD, PhD, MSc, Principal investigator, Brooke Army Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02760069
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C.2016.091
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Beadle KL, Helbling AR, Love SL, April MD, Hunter CJ. Isopropyl Alcohol Nasal Inhalation for Nausea in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;68(1):1-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.031. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
PubMed 26679977Hines S, Steels E, Chang A, Gibbons K. Aromatherapy for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD007598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007598.pub2.
PubMed 22513952Egerton-Warburton D, Meek R, Mee MJ, Braitberg G. Antiemetic use for nausea and vomiting in adult emergency department patients: randomized controlled trial comparing ondansetron, metoclopramide, and placebo. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;64(5):526-532.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 May 10.
PubMed 24818542April MD, Oliver JJ, Davis WT, Ong D, Simon EM, Ng PC, Hunter CJ. Aromatherapy Versus Oral Ondansetron for Antiemetic Therapy Among Adult Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;72(2):184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
PubMed 29463461
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nasally Inhaled Isopropyl Alcohol Versus Oral Ondansetron for the Treatment of Nausea in the Emergency Department: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02760069
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C.2016.091
- Conditions
- Nausea
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brooke Army Medical CenterUS federal agency
- Study start
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jul 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare the efficacy of isopropyl alcohol and conventional anti-emetics with three study arms: (1) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral ondansetron; (2) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral placebo; (3) inhaled placebo plus oral ondansetron.
Detailed description
This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that nasally-inhaled isopropyl alcohol (ISO) plus oral placebo has greater anti-emetic efficacy compared to oral ondansetron oral solution. By design, the study will be double-blinded insofar as neither investigators nor subjects will be notified of the identity of the substances they are inhaling or swallowing. The study will include a post-study survey to ascertain the extent to which blinding was achieved. Potential subjects are those presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with nausea and/or vomiting. Investigators will recruit a convenience sample by approaching subjects at the time of initial triage and solicit nausea on a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) scored from 0-10 with those patients reporting scores of 3 or greater eligible for study. Informed consent will be obtained from each subject.
Subjects will be allocated to one of three arms: (1) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral ondansetron; (2) inhaled isopropyl alcohol plus oral placebo; (3) inhaled placebo plus oral ondansetron. No subject will receive both inhaled and oral placebo; all subjects will be allocated to at least one therapeutic intervention for nausea. Both investigators and study subjects will be blinded to subject allocation.
Regarding the interventions, upon recruitment, patients will be administered an oral solution (placebo or ondansetron) by their treating nurse. A study team member will then instruct the subject to inhale one of the blinded prep pads, to hold the pad approximately 1 centimeter from their nares, and to take deep nasal inhalations as needed for nausea relief. The investigator will remain at arm's length from the patient at all times to avoid detecting prep pad scent. Additionally, investigators will also instruct subjects to avoid any behavior or actions during the study that would indicate which preparation pad is being used.
The investigators will record their findings on data collection forms. The primary outcome will be nausea as measured on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) at 30 minutes. Nausea measurements will also be collected at 10, 20, 40, 50, and 60 minutes, and then every hour up to 5 hours, then at disposition at which time the patient will provide one final nausea VAS score. The study team member will not be present in the patient's room during the intervals between these evaluations. At the time of each nausea measurement, patients will be offered another preparation pad (up to ten pads). Investigators will notify the patient's treating provider to prompt consideration for treatment with a rescue anti-emetic (such as metoclopramide or promethazine) if the patient vomits or if the patient requests an anti-emetic at any time. At the time of each nausea measurement, a pain score will also be measured on a 10 cm VAS. At the time of final disposition, the patient will provide a satisfaction score on a 10-cm VAS and be asked to indicate his/her belief as to whether the pad was a treatment or placebo and whether the oral solution was a treatment or placebo. Similarly, at study conclusion the patient's provider will be asked to indicate his/her belief as to whether the pad was a treatment or placebo and whether the oral solution was a treatment or placebo. Other data collected will include times and doses for all medications (including preparation pads) and fluids administered, episodes of vomiting (defined as forceful expulsion of gastric contents separated by at least 2 minutes), disposition (admission versus discharge), final clinical impression at the time of disposition, and time to disposition. Subjects will be followed and data collected for the entirety of their ED stay.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Inhaled ISO + oral ondansetron | Active comparator | Drug: Inhaled isopropyl alcohol, Drug: Oral ondansetronInhaled isopropyl alcohol pads as needed for nausea (up to q30 minutes) and drink oral elixir comprising ondansetron (4 mg). |
| Inhaled ISO + oral placebo | Experimental | Drug: Inhaled isopropyl alcohol, Drug: Oral placeboInhaled isopropyl alcohol pads as needed for nausea (up to q30 minutes) and drink oral placebo elixir. |
| Inhaled placebo + oral ondansetron | Active comparator | Drug: Oral ondansetron, Drug: Inhaled normal salineInhaled normal saline pads as needed for nausea (up to q30 minutes) and drink oral placebo elixir. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- ages 18 and older
- complaint of nausea and/or vomiting reported at 3 or above on verbal numerical rating scale at the time of triage
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- allergy to isopropyl alcohol or ondansetron
- inability to breathe through nose (e.g., recent upper respiratory infection)
- intake of cefoperazone, disulfiram, or metronidazole within the last 24 hours
- mental status precluding informed consent including intoxication
- known QT-prolongation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Inhaled isopropyl alcoholAlso: ISOPatients will inhale from isopropyl alcohol pads as needed for nausea up to q30 minutes. | Drug | Inhaled ISO + oral ondansetron, Inhaled ISO + oral placebo |
| Oral ondansetronAlso: OndansetronPatients will drink elixir containing 4 mg ondansetron in 5 ml of solution. National Drug Code (NDC) 0054-0064-47. | Drug | Inhaled ISO + oral ondansetron, Inhaled placebo + oral ondansetron |
| Inhaled normal salineAlso: Inhaled placeboPatients will inhale from normal saline pads as needed for nausea up to q30 minutes. | Drug | Inhaled placebo + oral ondansetron |
| Oral placeboAlso: Oral sugar waterSubjects will drink solution comprised of 0.25 ml of Oral Sweet Sugar Free NDC 0574-0302-16 with 4.75 ml of sterile water for dilution NDC 0264-2101-00 | Drug | Inhaled ISO + oral placebo |
Primary outcome
Nausea 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: 30 minutes post intervention
Full Scale Name: Nausea 100-mm visual analogue scale. Scale Construct: Measures nausea as reported by the patient Scale Range: Minimum is 0 (no nausea) to 100 (worst nausea imaginable). These values quantify, on an interval scale anchored at 0, the patient's subjective sensation of nausea. Higher values represent worse outcomes (e.g., more nausea). Patient makes a single vertical mark on a 100 mm horizontal line with 0 at the left and 100 on the right to depict their nausea.
1 secondary outcome
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue Anti-emetics
Time frame: Study duration (up to 5 hours post intervention)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 26679977Beadle KL, Helbling AR, Love SL, April MD, Hunter CJ. Isopropyl Alcohol Nasal Inhalation for Nausea in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;68(1):1-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.031. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
- Background: PubMed 22513952Hines S, Steels E, Chang A, Gibbons K. Aromatherapy for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD007598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007598.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 24818542Egerton-Warburton D, Meek R, Mee MJ, Braitberg G. Antiemetic use for nausea and vomiting in adult emergency department patients: randomized controlled trial comparing ondansetron, metoclopramide, and placebo. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;64(5):526-532.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 May 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29463461April MD, Oliver JJ, Davis WT, Ong D, Simon EM, Ng PC, Hunter CJ. Aromatherapy Versus Oral Ondansetron for Antiemetic Therapy Among Adult Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;72(2):184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nausea
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Netupitant/Palonosetron for Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer ADC Therapy
Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 4
BMT-08: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Transdermal Granisetron to Ondansetron
Nausea With Vomiting Chemotherapy-Induced
Not yet recruiting
Manual Acupuncture for Intradialytic Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
Intradialytic Nausea and Vomiting, Chronic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Volume and PONV in Pediatric Appendectomy Cases
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate LY3537021 for the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting Caused by Chemotherapy in Adults With Cancer
Nausea, Vomiting
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael D April, MD, PhD, MSc principal investigator
Brooke Army Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Inhaled isopropyl alcohol, Oral ondansetron and Inhaled normal saline in people with Nausea, run by Brooke Army Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nausea 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (time frame: 30 minutes post intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02760069, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2020.