GERDNCT02759094
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the RefluxStop Device in the Management of GERD
A study testing Treatment with RefluxStop in people with GERD, run by Implantica CE Reflux Ltd. at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Prospective, open-label, multi-centre, single arm treatment only trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of RefluxStop for the treatment of GERD. The used medical device "RefluxStop" is an implantable single use sterile device to ensure maintenance of gastro oesophageal junction (GEJ) in an intra-abdominal… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- GERD
- What is being tested?
- Treatment with RefluxStop
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2016to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject's age >= 18 years and <= 75 years
- Subject is able to undergo general anaesthesia and is a suitable laparoscopic surgical candidate
- Subject is willing and able to participate
- Subject has provided written informed consent after being informed of the study procedure and risks prior to any study-related events
- Subject has documented typical GERD symptoms present for > 6 months which respond to PPIs as anti-GERD medication. Typical symptom of GERD is defined as heartburn, which is a burning epigastric or substernal pain
- Subject requires daily PPI anti GERD medication
- Subject has a 24-hour pH monitoring proven GERD performed taken off any anti reflux medication or after discontinuation for at least 7 days prior to testing. Total distal esophageal pH must be <= 4 for >= 4.5% if time during a 24-hour monitoring
Who cannot join
- Subject is currently participating in another study involving investigational drugs or devices
- Subject has a history of gastro esophageal surgery, anti-reflux or bariatric procedure
- Subject has a history of endoscopic anti-reflux intervention
- Subject has a history or a suspicion of esophageal or gastric cancer
- Subject has a history of major psychiatric disorder
- Presence of a para-esophageal hernia or sliding hernia of > 3cm determined on endoscopy
Show all 17Show fewer
- Presence of an esophagitis grade C or D according to the Los Angeles classification
- Presence of esophageal dysmotility disorder such as but not limited to scleroderma, achalasia, Nutcracker oesophagus
- Presence of esophageal stricture or stenosis
- Presence of delayed gastric emptying
- Presence of esophageal or gastric varies
- Subject has a body mass index (BMI) > 35kg/m2
- Female subjects who are pregnant or nursing
- Known sensitivity or allergies to silicone materials
- Subjects who are unable to comply with the protocol requirements
- Subjects with limited life expectancy (< 3 years)
- Intra-operative findings that may preclude conduct of the study procedures
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
Hungary3 sites
Semmelweis University
Budapest, 1082
University of Debrecen, Kenezy Gyula Teaching Hospital, General Surgery Department
Debrecen, 4031
Fejer County Szent Gyorgy University Teaching Hospital, Surgical Department
Székesfehérvár, H-8000
Serbia1 site
Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Digestive Surgery
Belgrade, 11000
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the RefluxStop Device in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Prospective, open-label, multi-centre, single arm treatment only trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of RefluxStop for the treatment of GERD.
The used medical device "RefluxStop" is an implantable single use sterile device to ensure maintenance of gastro oesophageal junction (GEJ) in an intra-abdominal position to reduce or eliminate GERD.
Read the detailed description
The study plan will include a screening/baseline visit, a surgical procedure phase with hospital stay until discharge, and study visits at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after device implantation.
A follow-up will be performed annually from years 1-5 to evaluate long-term safety and performance with the intention to collect post-market long-term data using the GERD-HRQL score as a screening tool. Data of subjects who agreed to participate in the long-term safety and performance will be analysed after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years.
At the screening/baseline visit, after signing the informed consent, the eligibility of subjects to receive treatment with the study device will be determined. Eligible subjects will then undergo the device implant procedure.
A standard laparoscopic approach will be used to reposition the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to its intra-abdominal position. The RefluxStop™ device will then be positioned and fixed in the gastric fundus to ensure intra-abdominal positioning of the GEJ at all time. After confirming proper placement, the laparoscopic implant procedure will be completed and access points will be closed. The procedure will be recorded and saved only with study identification number and without subject ID information. The same applies for images on contrast swallow controlling the device.
Evaluations will be performed daily during hospitalisation and in an additional 3 study visits in the outpatient setting at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Subjects who have given their consent to participate in the long-term safety and performance follow-up part of the study will be followed annually from year 1-5.
A pathologically low pH in the lower esophagus is correlated to the development of precancerous changes/ Barrett's esophagus and fulminant cancer, as shown in the literature. Barrett's esophagus occurs in 1-2% of the total population while daily acid reflux patients have an incidence of 10-20% depending on the severity of the acid reflux [Modiano, Gerson 2007; Cossentino, Wong 2003]. As many as 48,000 people p.a. die in Europe and the US alone of esophageal adenocarcinoma, the primary cause of which is acid reflux. Therefore, in order to determine whether treatment is maintained in the longer-term, an additional 24-hour pH monitoring and simplified contrast swallow x-ray to verify the position of the device will be performed at 5 years for the benefit of the patients.
These long-term results have also been requested by the U.S. FDA. A quality control of the placement of the device will be categorized for subjects at after surgery, 6 months and 5 year follow-up and at therapy failure.
The position of the device is of utmost importance and will be categorized in the case of therapy failure.
To ensure a proper quality control, the contrast swallow x-ray determining eventual hiatal hernia performed before surgery is repeated at hospital stay after surgery and during the 6-month surgical outcome control and at 5-year follow-up. This x-ray is also used for categorizing the position of the device in a four-graded scale if therapy failure occurs and should be performed by the radiologist using the standard of care post-op contrast swallow.
- Conditions
- GERD
- Being tested
- Treatment with RefluxStop
- Keywords
- GERD, Implantable medical device, RefluxStop, Reflux, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Laparoscopy, pH-Monitoring, PPI proton pump inhibitors
- Medical subject headings
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Treatment with RefluxStopDevice
A standard laparoscopic approach will be used to reposition the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) to its intra-abdominal position. The RefluxStop device will be then positioned and fixed in the gastric funds to ensure intra-abdominal positioning of the GEJ (Gastro-oesophageal Junction) at all time. After confirming proper placement, the laparoscopic implant procedure will be completed and access points will be closed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with RefluxStop device | Experimental | All enrolled subjects will receive treatment for their GERD using the RefluxStop device intervention Receives: Device: Treatment with RefluxStop |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary safety endpoint
Assessment of incidence of serious adverse device effects (SADEs) and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs)
Measured: at 6 months
Primary efficacy endpoint
Percent reduction from baseline of GERD symptoms based on the GERD-HRQL score (questions 1-10). The data will also be presented as the number of subjects obtaining a 50% improvement of the baseline figures, with success defined as 60% of the subjects to reach such score improvement. Thus, the aim of this analysis is to show that the lower limit of the confidence interval exceeds 60%.
Measured: at 6 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Secondary safety endpoint
Assessment of incidence of serious adverse device effects (SADEs) and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Incidence of adverse device effects (ADEs) and procedure-related adverse events (AEs)
Measured: at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months (ADEs and AEs only) and annually years 1-5
Secondary efficacy endpoint: HRQL all other timepoints
Percent reduction from baseline of GERD symptoms based on the GERD-HRQL score (questions 1-10)
Measured: measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and follow-up years 1-5
Secondary efficacy endpoint: additional questions
Reduction from baseline of GERD symptoms based on the total GERD-HRQL score (questions 1-10) and individual symptom questions
Measured: measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and follow up years 1-5
Secondary efficacy endpoint: 24-hr pH monitoring
Reduction or normalisation from baseline of the total acid (pH<4) exposure time on 24-hour pH monitoring
Measured: measured at baseline, 6 months, 5 years and if therapy failure
Secondary efficacy endpoint: PPI usage
Reduction from baseline of the percentage of subjects with regular daily PPI usage
Measured: measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and follow up years 1-5
Secondary efficacy endpoint: Foregut
Reduction from baseline of individual foregut questionnaire scores focusing on regurgitation and additional information on dysphagia and odynophagia reported as AEs, or alternatively GERD-HRQL questions >2 and/or >3
Measured: measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and follow up years 1-5
Secondary efficacy endpoint: Endoscopy
Improvement in esophagitis on upper endoscopy
Measured: measured at baseline, 6 months and if therapy failure
Secondary efficacy endpoint: device location
Location and function of the device evaluated by a simplified contrast swallow x-ray with overview pictures of device and LES position during swallowing
Measured: measured at hospital stay, 6 weeks, 6 months, 5 years and if therapy failure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2016
- Primary completionMar 2018
- Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GERDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Implantica CE Reflux Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- László Harsányi, Prof., Principal investigator, Semmelweis University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02759094
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RXI 001
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bjelovic M, Harsanyi L, Altorjay A, Kincses Z, Forsell P; Investigators of the RefluxStop Clinical Investigation Study Group. Non-active implantable device treating acid reflux with a new dynamic treatment approach: 1-year results : RefluxStop device; a new method in acid reflux surgery obtaining CE mark. BMC Surg. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00794-9.
PubMed 32689979
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the RefluxStop Device in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02759094
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RXI 001
- Conditions
- GERD
- Keywords
- GERD, Implantable medical device, RefluxStop, Reflux, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Laparoscopy, pH-Monitoring, PPI proton pump inhibitors
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Implantica CE Reflux Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, open-label, multi-centre, single arm treatment only trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of RefluxStop for the treatment of GERD.
The used medical device "RefluxStop" is an implantable single use sterile device to ensure maintenance of gastro oesophageal junction (GEJ) in an intra-abdominal position to reduce or eliminate GERD.
Detailed description
The study plan will include a screening/baseline visit, a surgical procedure phase with hospital stay until discharge, and study visits at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after device implantation.
A follow-up will be performed annually from years 1-5 to evaluate long-term safety and performance with the intention to collect post-market long-term data using the GERD-HRQL score as a screening tool. Data of subjects who agreed to participate in the long-term safety and performance will be analysed after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years.
At the screening/baseline visit, after signing the informed consent, the eligibility of subjects to receive treatment with the study device will be determined. Eligible subjects will then undergo the device implant procedure.
A standard laparoscopic approach will be used to reposition the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to its intra-abdominal position. The RefluxStop™ device will then be positioned and fixed in the gastric fundus to ensure intra-abdominal positioning of the GEJ at all time. After confirming proper placement, the laparoscopic implant procedure will be completed and access points will be closed. The procedure will be recorded and saved only with study identification number and without subject ID information. The same applies for images on contrast swallow controlling the device.
Evaluations will be performed daily during hospitalisation and in an additional 3 study visits in the outpatient setting at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Subjects who have given their consent to participate in the long-term safety and performance follow-up part of the study will be followed annually from year 1-5.
A pathologically low pH in the lower esophagus is correlated to the development of precancerous changes/ Barrett's esophagus and fulminant cancer, as shown in the literature. Barrett's esophagus occurs in 1-2% of the total population while daily acid reflux patients have an incidence of 10-20% depending on the severity of the acid reflux [Modiano, Gerson 2007; Cossentino, Wong 2003]. As many as 48,000 people p.a. die in Europe and the US alone of esophageal adenocarcinoma, the primary cause of which is acid reflux. Therefore, in order to determine whether treatment is maintained in the longer-term, an additional 24-hour pH monitoring and simplified contrast swallow x-ray to verify the position of the device will be performed at 5 years for the benefit of the patients.
These long-term results have also been requested by the U.S. FDA. A quality control of the placement of the device will be categorized for subjects at after surgery, 6 months and 5 year follow-up and at therapy failure.
The position of the device is of utmost importance and will be categorized in the case of therapy failure.
To ensure a proper quality control, the contrast swallow x-ray determining eventual hiatal hernia performed before surgery is repeated at hospital stay after surgery and during the 6-month surgical outcome control and at 5-year follow-up. This x-ray is also used for categorizing the position of the device in a four-graded scale if therapy failure occurs and should be performed by the radiologist using the standard of care post-op contrast swallow.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with RefluxStop device | Experimental | Device: Treatment with RefluxStopAll enrolled subjects will receive treatment for their GERD using the RefluxStop device intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subject's age >= 18 years and <= 75 years
- Subject is able to undergo general anaesthesia and is a suitable laparoscopic surgical candidate
- Subject is willing and able to participate
- Subject has provided written informed consent after being informed of the study procedure and risks prior to any study-related events
- Subject has documented typical GERD symptoms present for > 6 months which respond to PPIs as anti-GERD medication. Typical symptom of GERD is defined as heartburn, which is a burning epigastric or substernal pain
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Subject is currently participating in another study involving investigational drugs or devices
- Subject has a history of gastro esophageal surgery, anti-reflux or bariatric procedure
- Subject has a history of endoscopic anti-reflux intervention
- Subject has a history or a suspicion of esophageal or gastric cancer
- Subject has a history of major psychiatric disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with RefluxStopA standard laparoscopic approach will be used to reposition the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) to its intra-abdominal position. The RefluxStop device will be then positioned and fixed in the gastric funds to ensure intra-abdominal positioning of the GEJ (Gastro-oesophageal Junction) at all time. After confirming proper placement, the laparoscopic implant procedure will be completed and access points will be closed. | Device | Treatment with RefluxStop device |
Primary outcome
Primary safety endpoint
Time frame: at 6 months
Assessment of incidence of serious adverse device effects (SADEs) and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs)
Primary efficacy endpoint
Time frame: at 6 months
Percent reduction from baseline of GERD symptoms based on the GERD-HRQL score (questions 1-10). The data will also be presented as the number of subjects obtaining a 50% improvement of the baseline figures, with success defined as 60% of the subjects to reach such score improvement. Thus, the aim of this analysis is to show that the lower limit of the confidence interval exceeds 60%.
8 secondary outcomes
Secondary safety endpoint
Time frame: at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months (ADEs and AEs only) and annually years 1-5
Secondary efficacy endpoint: HRQL all other timepoints
Time frame: measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and follow-up years 1-5
Secondary efficacy endpoint: additional questions
Time frame: measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and follow up years 1-5
Secondary efficacy endpoint: 24-hr pH monitoring
Time frame: measured at baseline, 6 months, 5 years and if therapy failure
Secondary efficacy endpoint: PPI usage
Time frame: measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and follow up years 1-5
Secondary efficacy endpoint: Foregut
Time frame: measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and follow up years 1-5
Secondary efficacy endpoint: Endoscopy
Time frame: measured at baseline, 6 months and if therapy failure
Secondary efficacy endpoint: device location
Time frame: measured at hospital stay, 6 weeks, 6 months, 5 years and if therapy failure
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32689979Bjelovic M, Harsanyi L, Altorjay A, Kincses Z, Forsell P; Investigators of the RefluxStop Clinical Investigation Study Group. Non-active implantable device treating acid reflux with a new dynamic treatment approach: 1-year results : RefluxStop device; a new method in acid reflux surgery obtaining CE mark. BMC Surg. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00794-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for GERD
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of K-CAB Tab./K-CAB ODT(Tegoprazan) 25 mg as Maintenance Therapy Following the Treatment of GERD
Maintenance Therapy Following Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
RETHINK REFLUX Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Recruiting
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Mitral Regurgitation - APOLLO-EU Trial
Mitral Regurgitation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Tirzepatide on Esophagogastric Junction Mechanics, Reflux Burden, and Gastric Physiology in Adults With Obesity
Obese Adults
Recruiting
Mesh Vs Pledgets for Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia
Paraesophageal Hernia, GERD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
László Harsányi, Prof. principal investigator
Semmelweis University
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Treatment with RefluxStop in people with GERD, run by Implantica CE Reflux Ltd. at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Hungary, Serbia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary safety endpoint (time frame: at 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02759094, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2023.