AzTrials
AzTrials

Dentin SensitivityNCT02753075

A Study in Dentinal Hypersensitivity (DH) Participants to Assess the Efficacy of an Occluding Dentifrice.

A study testing Experimental Oral Rinse 1, Experimental Oral Rinse 2 and Fluoride toothpaste in people with Dentin Sensitivity, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will investigate the longitudinal efficacy of two experimental oral rinses, one containing 1.5% weight/weight (w/w) dipotassium oxalate monohydride (KOX) /0 Parts per Million (ppm fluoride) and the other 2.0% w/w KOX /45ppm fluoride, for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH), compared to a placebo… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dentin Sensitivity
What is being tested?
Experimental Oral Rinse 1, Experimental Oral Rinse 2 and Fluoride toothpaste
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
240 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
8 Sep 2015to 18 Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants in good general health with no clinically significant/ relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon oral examination
  • Pre-existing self reported and clinically diagnosed tooth sensitivity
  • At screening a minimum of 20 natural teeth and at least two accessible, non-adjacent teeth (incisors, canines or pre-molars) preferably in different quadrants with a signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion (EAR),tooth with modified gingival index (MGI) score =0 adjacent to the test area (exposed dentine) only and a clinical mobility of ≤1 and tooth with signs of sensitivity measured by qualifying evaporative air assessment (Y/N response).
  • At baseline, a minimum of 2 non-adjacent accessible teeth (incisors, canines or premolars) with DH (qualifying tactile threshold Yeaple ≤ 20g, Schiff Sensitivity Score ≥ 2)

Who cannot join

  • Participants with a known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to study products
  • Presence of chronic debilitating disease which could affect study outcomes
  • Any condition which is causing dry mouth
  • Use of an oral care product indicated for the relief of dentine hypersensitivity
  • Participation in a DH treatment study in the 8 weeks prior to screening
  • Taking daily doses of a medication/ treatment which could interfere with perception of pain or is causing dry mouth
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Require antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures
  • Dental prophylaxis within 4 weeks of screening
  • Treatment of periodontal disease within 12 months of screening
  • Scaling or root planning within 3 months of screening
  • Tooth bleaching within 8 weeks of screening
  • Active caries or periodontitis
  • Partial dentures, orthodontic appliances or dental implants which could affect study outcomes
  • Pregnant and breast-feeding females
  • Main Exclusions for Test Teeth: evidence of current or recent caries; treatment of decay within 12 months of screening; teeth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations; teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures; teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel; sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of Two Experimental Oral Rinses in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity

This study will investigate the longitudinal efficacy of two experimental oral rinses, one containing 1.5% weight/weight (w/w) dipotassium oxalate monohydride (KOX) /0 Parts per Million (ppm fluoride) and the other 2.0% w/w KOX /45ppm fluoride, for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH), compared to a placebo oral rinse, when used as an adjunct to twice daily brushing with a standard fluoride toothpaste.

Being tested
Experimental Oral Rinse 1, Experimental Oral Rinse 2, Placebo Oral Rinse, Fluoride toothpaste
Medical subject headings
Dentin Sensitivity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Experimental Oral Rinse 1Device

    Oral rinse containing 1.5% w/w KOX, 0ppm F, pH 4.5

  • Experimental Oral Rinse 2Device

    Oral rinse containing 2.0% w/w KOX, 45ppm F, pH 4.5

  • Placebo Oral RinseOther

    Oral rinse containing 0% w/w KOX 0ppm F, pH 4.5

  • Fluoride toothpasteDrug

    Oral rinse containing 1000ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate

Study groups in NCT02753075
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental Oral Rinse 1ExperimentalBrushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Experimental Oral Rinse 1 for 1 minute. This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
Receives: Device: Experimental Oral Rinse 1; Drug: Fluoride toothpaste
Experimental Oral Rinse 2ExperimentalBrushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Experimental Oral Rinse 2 for 1 minute. This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
Receives: Device: Experimental Oral Rinse 2; Drug: Fluoride toothpaste
Placebo Oral RinsePlacebo comparatorBrushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Placebo Oral Rinse 2 for 1 minute. This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
Receives: Other: Placebo Oral Rinse; Drug: Fluoride toothpaste

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 Against a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 8

    The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each selected two teeth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 at Week 8

    The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each selected two teeth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8

  2. Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 4

    The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each selected two teeth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

  3. Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold (Gram [g]) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1, 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 4

    The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g. However, in situations where participants did not give a 'yes' response at force of 80g, the tactile threshold was recorded as >80g. For analysis purposes values recorded as >80g were treated as 90g values.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

  4. Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold (g) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1, 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 8

    The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g. However, in situations where participants did not give a 'yes' response at force of 80g, the tactile threshold was recorded as >80g. For analysis purposes values recorded as >80g were treated as 90g values.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8

  5. Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale (VRS) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1, 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 4

    Participants rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 10 point VRS. The Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 1 (No Pain) to 10 (intense Pain). A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

  6. Change From Baseline in VRS of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse) at Week 8

    Participants rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 10 point VRS. The Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 1 ("No Pain") to 10 ("Intense Pain"). A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Sep 2015
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2015
  4. Study completion18 Dec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
240 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02753075
Sponsor's protocol ID
204773
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
25 Apr 2016
Last updated
27 Aug 2018

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Experimental Oral Rinse 1, Experimental Oral Rinse 2 and Fluoride toothpaste in people with Dentin Sensitivity, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 Against a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 8 (time frame: Baseline, Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in