Dental CariesPhase 2NCT02751970
Clinical Trial of the Effect of Different Categories of Adhesive System
A Phase 2 study testing Dental restoration, 3 step ER and 2 step ER in people with Dental Caries, run by Universidad de Valparaiso at 1 site in Chile.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of contemporary resin-based adhesive systems by retention rate of resin restorations placed in non carious cervical lesions with four different adhesive strategies: 3 and 2 steps etch-and-rinse adhesive system, 2 and 1 step self-etch adhesive systems. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Caries
- What is being tested?
- Dental restoration, 3 step ER and 2 step ER
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 185 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChile
- Study dates
- Apr 2014to Apr 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Good general health,
- Patients with acceptable oral hygiene level,
- Patients with at least 20 teeth under occlusion.
- Patients with at least four non-carious cervical lesions in four different teeth
- Patients with maximum of eight lesions that needed to be restored.
- These lesions had to be non-carious, non-retentive, deeper than 1 mm, and involve both the enamel and dentin of vital teeth without mobility.
Who cannot join
- Patients with extremely poor oral hygiene,
- Patients with severe or chronic periodontitis,
- Patients with heavy bruxism habits.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effect of Different Categories of Adhesive System
This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of contemporary resin-based adhesive systems by retention rate of resin restorations placed in non carious cervical lesions with four different adhesive strategies: 3 and 2 steps etch-and-rinse adhesive system, 2 and 1 step self-etch adhesive systems.
Read the detailed description
The etch-and-rinse (3 and 2 steps) and self-etch (1 and 2 steps) adhesive systems allow the bond between the resins restorations with the dental substrates, but they have mechanism of action different.
The success of resin composite restorations is reliant upon adhesion to the underlying tooth via adhesive systems. The mechanism of adhesion to enamel and dentine could be involved for one hand, the etching the substrates with 30-40% phosphoric acid, followed by the application of a primer and subsequently an adhesive resin 3 steps etch-and- rinse approach or 2 steps when to combine the primer and adhesive into one bottle. For another hand, the self- etch systems with acid monomers in their primer, allow conditioning the surface without phosphoric acid step. So, they consist of either a self-etching primer accompanied by an adhesive resin applied as a subsequent step (2 steps) or a self-etch adhesive, which does not require a separate primer (1 step).
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Being tested
- Dental restoration, 3 step ER, 2 step ER, 2 step SE, 1 step SE
- Keywords
- Dental adhesive, adhesive systems, Dental Restoration Failure
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Caries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dental restorationProcedure or surgery
Also called Dental resin restoration
Methacrylate resins will be used to complement the cavity restoration after of adhesive procedure
3 step ERProcedure or surgery
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with 35% phosphoric acid, then applied primer, and then applied adhesive resin.
2 step ERProcedure or surgery
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with 35% of phosphoric acid, then applied primer/adhesive resin.
2 step SEProcedure or surgery
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with acidic primer, then applied primer/adhesive resin.
1 step SEProcedure or surgery
Enamel and dentin will be conditioning with acidic primer/adhesive resin.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 3 step ER & Dental restoration | Active comparator | Dental restoration with etching the dental substrates 35% phosphoric acid, followed by the application of a primer and subsequently an adhesive resin. Receives: Procedure: Dental restoration; Procedure: 3 step ER |
| 2 step ER & Dental restoration | Experimental | Dental restoration with etching the dental substrates 35% phosphoric acid, followed by the application of an adhesive/primer step. Receives: Procedure: Dental restoration; Procedure: 2 step ER |
| 2 step SE & Dental restoration | Active comparator | Dental restoration with etching the dental substrates with acidic primer, followed by the application of adhesive resin. Receives: Procedure: Dental restoration; Procedure: 2 step SE |
| 1 step SE & Dental restoration | Experimental | Dental restoration with etching and infiltrate the dental substrates with acidic primer/adhesive system. Receives: Procedure: Dental restoration; Procedure: 1 step SE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Secondary caries
Secondary caries near and/or associated of the dental restorations
Measured: one year
Retention rate
retention rate of the dental restorations
Measured: one year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Marginal integrity
marginal integrity of the dental restorations
Measured: one year
Marginal discoloration
Marginal discoloration of the dental restorations
Measured: one year
post-operative sensitivity
dentin post-operative sensitivity
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2014
- Primary completionMay 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dental CariesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de Valparaiso
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Issis luque, Universidad de Valparaiso
- Investigators
- Issis Luque, professor, Principal investigator, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02751970
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CB027-2014
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 26 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chee B, Rickman LJ, Satterthwaite JD. Adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: a systematic review. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):443-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
PubMed 22353603Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic E, Omurlu H. Two-year clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Mar-Apr;20(2):192-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000200012.
PubMed 22666836Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Rikuta A, Tsubota K, Uekusa S. One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater J. 2007 Jan;26(1):14-20. doi: 10.4012/dmj.26.14.
PubMed 17410888Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Manzon E, Breschi L, Paolino D, Pasqualini D, Berutti E. Influence of operator experience on non-carious cervical lesion restorations: Clinical evaluation with different adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 2016 Feb;29(1):33-8.
PubMed 27093774Moosavi H, Kimyai S, Forghani M, Khodadadi R. The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):134-41. doi: 10.2341/12-110-CR. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
PubMed 22917442Heintze SD, Blunck U, Gohring TN, Rousson V. Marginal adaptation in vitro and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. Dent Mater. 2009 May;25(5):605-20. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.004. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
PubMed 19147216Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):864-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003.
PubMed 16009415Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2009 Jun;11(3):175-90.
PubMed 19603581van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater. 2000 Jul;16(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00019-1.
PubMed 10831784
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effect of Different Categories of Adhesive System
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02751970
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CB027-2014
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Keywords
- Dental adhesive, adhesive systems, Dental Restoration Failure
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de ValparaisoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
- Study start
- Apr 2014
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of contemporary resin-based adhesive systems by retention rate of resin restorations placed in non carious cervical lesions with four different adhesive strategies: 3 and 2 steps etch-and-rinse adhesive system, 2 and 1 step self-etch adhesive systems.
Detailed description
The etch-and-rinse (3 and 2 steps) and self-etch (1 and 2 steps) adhesive systems allow the bond between the resins restorations with the dental substrates, but they have mechanism of action different.
The success of resin composite restorations is reliant upon adhesion to the underlying tooth via adhesive systems. The mechanism of adhesion to enamel and dentine could be involved for one hand, the etching the substrates with 30-40% phosphoric acid, followed by the application of a primer and subsequently an adhesive resin 3 steps etch-and- rinse approach or 2 steps when to combine the primer and adhesive into one bottle. For another hand, the self- etch systems with acid monomers in their primer, allow conditioning the surface without phosphoric acid step. So, they consist of either a self-etching primer accompanied by an adhesive resin applied as a subsequent step (2 steps) or a self-etch adhesive, which does not require a separate primer (1 step).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 3 step ER & Dental restoration | Active comparator | Procedure: Dental restoration, Procedure: 3 step ERDental restoration with etching the dental substrates 35% phosphoric acid, followed by the application of a primer and subsequently an adhesive resin. |
| 2 step ER & Dental restoration | Experimental | Procedure: Dental restoration, Procedure: 2 step ERDental restoration with etching the dental substrates 35% phosphoric acid, followed by the application of an adhesive/primer step. |
| 2 step SE & Dental restoration | Active comparator | Procedure: Dental restoration, Procedure: 2 step SEDental restoration with etching the dental substrates with acidic primer, followed by the application of adhesive resin. |
| 1 step SE & Dental restoration | Experimental | Procedure: Dental restoration, Procedure: 1 step SEDental restoration with etching and infiltrate the dental substrates with acidic primer/adhesive system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Good general health,
- Patients with acceptable oral hygiene level,
- Patients with at least 20 teeth under occlusion.
- Patients with at least four non-carious cervical lesions in four different teeth
- Patients with maximum of eight lesions that needed to be restored.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with extremely poor oral hygiene,
- Patients with severe or chronic periodontitis,
- Patients with heavy bruxism habits.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dental restorationAlso: Dental resin restorationMethacrylate resins will be used to complement the cavity restoration after of adhesive procedure | Procedure or surgery | 1 step SE & Dental restoration, 2 step ER & Dental restoration, 2 step SE & Dental restoration, 3 step ER & Dental restoration |
| 3 step EREnamel and dentin will be conditioning with 35% phosphoric acid, then applied primer, and then applied adhesive resin. | Procedure or surgery | 3 step ER & Dental restoration |
| 2 step EREnamel and dentin will be conditioning with 35% of phosphoric acid, then applied primer/adhesive resin. | Procedure or surgery | 2 step ER & Dental restoration |
| 2 step SEEnamel and dentin will be conditioning with acidic primer, then applied primer/adhesive resin. | Procedure or surgery | 2 step SE & Dental restoration |
| 1 step SEEnamel and dentin will be conditioning with acidic primer/adhesive resin. | Procedure or surgery | 1 step SE & Dental restoration |
Primary outcome
Secondary caries
Time frame: one year
Secondary caries near and/or associated of the dental restorations
Retention rate
Time frame: one year
retention rate of the dental restorations
3 secondary outcomes
Marginal integrity
Time frame: one year
Marginal discoloration
Time frame: one year
post-operative sensitivity
Time frame: one year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Apr 2016.
- Background: PubMed 22353603Chee B, Rickman LJ, Satterthwaite JD. Adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: a systematic review. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):443-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 22666836Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic E, Omurlu H. Two-year clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Mar-Apr;20(2):192-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000200012.
- Background: PubMed 17410888Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Rikuta A, Tsubota K, Uekusa S. One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater J. 2007 Jan;26(1):14-20. doi: 10.4012/dmj.26.14.
- Background: PubMed 27093774Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Manzon E, Breschi L, Paolino D, Pasqualini D, Berutti E. Influence of operator experience on non-carious cervical lesion restorations: Clinical evaluation with different adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 2016 Feb;29(1):33-8.
- Background: PubMed 22917442Moosavi H, Kimyai S, Forghani M, Khodadadi R. The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):134-41. doi: 10.2341/12-110-CR. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
- Background: PubMed 19147216Heintze SD, Blunck U, Gohring TN, Rousson V. Marginal adaptation in vitro and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. Dent Mater. 2009 May;25(5):605-20. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.004. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
- Background: PubMed 16009415Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):864-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003.
- Background: PubMed 19603581Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2009 Jun;11(3):175-90.
- Background: PubMed 10831784van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater. 2000 Jul;16(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00019-1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dental Caries
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of a New Dual-cure Universal Adhesive
Class I Dental Restorations, Class II Dental Restorations
Not yet recruiting
Safety of Intraosseous Anaesthesia in Children With Haemophilia
Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Silver Diamine Fluoride Versus Light-Cured Silver Diamine Fluoride in Carious Primary Molars
Dental Caries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Inlays Versus Resin Composite Inlays in Vital Molars With Extensive Occluso-Proximal Cavities
Dental Caries, Cavity, Dental
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Xylitol- Versus Erythritol-Sweetened Mints on Plaque ATP-Bioluminescence Readings
Dental Caries, Dental Plaque
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Issis Luque, professor principal investigator
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Dental restoration, 3 step ER and 2 step ER in people with Dental Caries, run by Universidad de Valparaiso at 1 site in Chile.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Chile. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Secondary caries (time frame: one year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02751970, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.