AzTrials
AzTrials

Retinal DetachmentNCT02748538

The Posturing After Retinal Detachment (Post RD) Trial

An observational study of Retinal Detachment, run by Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of face-down posturing on retinal displacement and distortion following retinal detachment repair. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Retinal Detachment
How many people
262 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
17 May 2016to 1 May 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients presenting with macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Who may be able to join

  • Fovea-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
  • History of central visual loss within the past 14 days
  • Patients undergoing vitrectomy and gas surgery, under local anaesthetic
  • Able to give informed consent
  • 18 years old and over

Who cannot join

  • Previous vitrectomy or cryo-buckle surgery
  • Retinal detachment surgery requiring silicone oil tamponade
  • Existing ophthalmic condition which limits the patient's visual acuity (BCVA 6/36 or worse)
  • Inability to posture post-operatively or commit to follow-up visits

About this study

Official title: A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Face-down Posturing on Retinal Displacement and Distortion Following Retinal Detachment Repair

A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of face-down posturing on retinal displacement and distortion following retinal detachment repair.

Read the detailed description

During the surgical repair of a retina detachment, a gas bubble is inserted into the eye to keep the retina flat. Following this, it is common to ask patients to adopt a certain head position for a set period of time after their operation. This is known as posturing. It is thought that by adopting a certain head position/posturing, the bubble aids re-attachment of the retina. However, when the retinal detachment involves the macula (central portion of the retina) it has been shown that the retina can shift (or displace) post-operatively, leading to distortion in the patient's vision.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether adopting different head positions following surgery for macula involving retinal detachments, can reduce retinal displacement and visual distortion. The investigators plan to recruit 368 patients. Patients will be in follow up for a period of six months. The study will be operational at two different hospitals in the United Kingdom.

Medical subject headings
Retinal Detachment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02748538
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Face DownTo posture in the face down position for the first 24 hours following surgery.
Position to Support the BreakThe head is positioned so that the retinal breaks (which caused the retinal detachment) are positioned at the highest point of the eye and well supported by the intra-ocular gas bubble left within the eye at the completion of surgery.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To assess the proportion of patients in each treatment group with retinal displacement at 26 weeks after surgery

    The proportion of patients in each treatment group with retinal displacement at 26 weeks after surgery

    Measured: 26 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. To assess the degree of retinal displacement on autofluorescence imaging

    Degree of retinal displacement on autofluorescence imaging at 26 weeks

    Measured: 26 Weeks

  2. To assess proportion of patients in each group with retinal displacement at 8 weeks

    The proportion of patients in each group with retinal displacement at 8 weeks after surgery.

    Measured: Eight weeks

  3. To report the mean (SD)/median (IQR) ETDRS visual acuity score at two different time-points

    To report the mean (SD)/median (IQR) ETDRS visual acuity score at 8 and 26 weeks after surgery in each treatment group

    Measured: Eight and 26 weeks

  4. To report the mean(SD)/median(IQR) Objective distortion score at two different time-points

    To report the mean(SD)/median(IQR) Objective distortion score at 8 and 26 weeks after surgery in each treatment group - with Objective distortion measured with D Charts

    Measured: Eight and 26 weeks

  5. To report the mean (SD) / median (IQR) Visual function score as measured using the Visual Function Questionnaire

    To report the mean (SD) / median (IQR) Visual function score as measured using the Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI Visual Function Questionnaire 25) in each treatment group at 26 weeks after surgery.

    Measured: 26 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start17 May 2016
  3. Primary completion1 May 2018
  4. Study completion1 May 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
262 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02748538
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHAD1032
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
30 Mar 2016
Last updated
16 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Casswell EJ, Yorston D, Lee E, Heeren TFC, Harris N, Zvobgo TM, Tarafdar S, Xing W, Bourmpaki E, Bunce C, Keane P, Charteris DG. Effect of Face-Down Positioning vs Support-the-Break Positioning After Macula-Involving Retinal Detachment Repair: The PostRD Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 1;138(6):634-642. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0997.

    PubMed 32297923

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Retinal Detachment, run by Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To assess the proportion of patients in each treatment group with retinal displacement at 26 weeks after surgery (time frame: 26 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02748538, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in