Study Of PF-06817024 In Healthy Subjects, In Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps And in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis

Study at a glance

From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.

Official title

A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, THIRD-PARTY OPEN, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOSE ESCALATING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF SINGLE AND/OR MULTIPLE INTRAVENOUS AND/OR SUBCUTANEOUS DOSES OF PF-06817024 IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS WHO MAY BE MILDLY ATOPIC, SUBJECTS WITH CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS WITH NASAL POLYPS, AND SUBJECTS WITH MODERATE-SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS

ClinicalTrials.gov ID

NCT02743871

Acronym / sponsor ID

C0341001

Conditions

Healthy, Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

FIH, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, Tolerability, Atopic Dermatitis, Chronic Rhinosinusitis, Nasal Polyps

Phase

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Recruitment status

Completed

Enrolment

97 participants (actual)

Lead sponsor

PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)

Study start

27 Apr 2016 (actual)

Primary completion

9 Mar 2021 (actual)

Study completion

9 Mar 2021 (actual)

First posted

19 Apr 2016 (estimated)

Results

Posted 19 May 2022

Clinical summary

The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.

Study design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomised

Intervention model

Sequential

Masking

Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)

Number of arms

13

Who may qualify

Ages

18 to 75 years

Sex

All

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

Age groups

Adult, Older adult

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Interventions

Primary outcome

1. Number of Participants With All-causality Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Part 1

   Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).

   An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

2. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs and SAEs in Part 1

   Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).

   An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. The causality of TEAEs and SAEs was determined by the investigator.

3. Number of All-Causality TEAEs According to Severity in Part 1

   Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).

   An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. TEAE was assessed by the investigator according to severity; Mild: did not interfere with participant's usual function; moderate: interfered to some extent with participant's usual function; severe: interfered significantly with participant's usual function.

4. Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation Due to TEAEs in Part 1

   Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).

   An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

5. Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs and SAEs in Part 2

   Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.

   An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

6. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs and SAEs in Part 2

   Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.

   An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. The causality of TEAEs and SAEs was determined by the investigator.

7. Number of All-Causality TEAEs According to Severity in Part 2

   Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.

   An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. TEAE was assessed by the investigator according to severity; Mild: did not interfere with participant's usual function; moderate: interfered to some extent with participant's usual function; severe: interfered significantly with participant's usual function.

8. Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation Due to TEAEs in Part 2

   Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.

   An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

9. Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs and SAEs in Part 3

   Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.

   An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

10. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs and SAEs in Part 3

    Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. The causality of TEAEs and SAEs was determined by the investigator.

11. Number of All-Causality TEAEs According to Severity in Part 3

    Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. TEAE was assessed by the investigator according to severity; Mild: did not interfere with participant's usual function; moderate: interfered to some extent with participant's usual function; severe: interfered significantly with participant's usual function.

12. Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation Due to TEAEs in Part 3

    Time frame: From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

13. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis in Part 1

    Time frame: Part 1 single-dose cohorts: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 211. Part 1 multiple-dose cohorts: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 241.

    Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet and white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Chemistry parameters included blood urea nitrogen, glucose (fasting), calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein. Urine parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, microscopy. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator and those met the criteria of AE are listed here. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant in the whole study are presented here.

14. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis in Part 2

    Time frame: Part 2: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 211.

    Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet and white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Chemistry parameters included blood urea nitrogen, glucose (fasting), calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein. Urine parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, microscopy. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator and those met the criteria of AE are listed here. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant in the whole study are presented here.

15. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis in Part 3

    Time frame: Part 3: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 966.

    Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet and white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Chemistry parameters included blood urea nitrogen, glucose (fasting), calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein. Urine parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, microscopy. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator and those met the criteria of AE are listed here. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant in the whole study are presented here.

16. Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities in Part 1

    Time frame: Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211 for Part 1 SD cohorts, and Study Day 241 for Part 1 MD cohorts).

    Criteria for abnormality in vital signs: supine pulse rate <40 beats per minute (bpm) or >120 bpm; supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <50 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of >=20 mmHg; supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of >=30 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dosing. Vital sign abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

17. Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities in Part 2

    Time frame: Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211).

    Criteria for abnormality in vital signs: supine pulse rate <40 bpm or >120 bpm; supine DBP <50 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of >=20 mmHg; supine SBP <90 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of >=30 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dosing. Vital sign abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

18. Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities in Part 3

    Time frame: Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 337).

    Criteria for abnormality in vital signs: supine pulse rate <40 bpm or >120 bpm; supine DBP <50 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of >=20 mmHg; supine SBP <90 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of >=30 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dosing. Vital sign abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

19. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities in Part 1

    Time frame: Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211 for Part 1 SD cohorts, and Study Day 241 for Part 1 MD cohorts).

    ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) maximum QTc interval adjusted according Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): 450<= QTcF <480, 480<= QTcF <500, and QTcF >=500; QTcF maximum increase from baseline(msec): 30<= change <60, and change >=60; 2) maximum PR interval (msec): >=300; PR increase from baseline (msec): baseline >200 with 25% increase at maximum, baseline <=200 with 50% increase at maximum; 3) maximum QRS (msec): >=140; QRS increase from baseline (msec) >=50%. Baseline was defined as the average of the last triplicate measurement prior to the first dosing. ECG abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

20. Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities in Part 2

    Time frame: Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211).

    ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) maximum QTc interval adjusted according Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): 450<= QTcF <480, 480<= QTcF <500, and QTcF >=500; QTcF maximum increase from baseline(msec): 30<= change <60, and change >=60; 2) maximum PR interval (msec): >=300; PR increase from baseline (msec): baseline >200 with 25% increase at maximum, baseline <=200 with 50% increase at maximum; 3) maximum QRS (msec): >=140; QRS increase from baseline (msec) >=50%. Baseline was defined as the average of the last triplicate measurement prior to the first dosing. ECG abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

21. Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities in Part 3

    Time frame: Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 337).

    ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) maximum QTc interval adjusted according Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): 450<= QTcF <480, 480<= QTcF <500, and QTcF >=500; QTcF maximum increase from baseline(msec): 30<= change <60, and change >=60; 2) maximum PR interval (msec): >=300; PR increase from baseline (msec): baseline >200 with 25% increase at maximum, baseline <=200 with 50% increase at maximum; 3) maximum QRS (msec): >=140; QRS increase from baseline (msec) >=50%. Baseline was defined as the average of the last triplicate measurement prior to the first dosing. ECG abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

Results and safety

Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…

Research links

• Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2022.
• Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
• Derived from this study: PubMed 39215351Danto SI, Tsamandouras N, Reddy P, Gilbert SA, Mancuso JY, Page K, Beebe JS, Peeva E, Vincent MS. Exploratory pharmacodynamics and efficacy of PF-06817024 in a Phase 1 study of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and atopic dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Aug 30;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00894-8.
• Derived from this study: PubMed 37772436Danto SI, Tsamandouras N, Reddy P, Gilbert S, Mancuso J, Page K, Peeva E, Vincent MS, Beebe JS. Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of PF-06817024 in Healthy Participants, Participants with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps, and Participants with Atopic Dermatitis: A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 May;64(5):529-543. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2360. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
• To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
• Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Related trials for Healthy

• Recruiting

  THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS

  Physical Activity, Body Image

• Not yet recruitingPhase 1

  A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants

  Atopic Dermatitis

• Recruiting

  Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition

  Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health

• Not yet recruiting

  Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)

  Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female

• RecruitingPhase 1

  First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis

  Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis

Referral and contact

AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.

20 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.