Colon CancerFAMCAPNCT02738359
Efficacy of Colonoscopy, Colon Capsule and Fecal Immunological Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening
An observational study of Colon Cancer and Rectum Cancer, run by Hôpital Edouard Herriot at 17 sites in France.
Trial summary
Efficacy of colonoscopy, colon capsule and fecal immunological test for colorectal cancer screening, in first degree relatives of patients with colorectal neoplasia: a prospective randomized study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colon Cancer, Rectum Cancer
- What is being tested?
- optical colonoscopy, colon capsule endoscopy and fecal immunological test (FIT)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 3 Nov 2017to 2 Jan 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients at high risk of colorectal cancer (first-degree relatives of patient with colorectal cancer) will be included prospectively in one of the 3 comparative arms.
Who may be able to join
- History of colorectal cancers (any age) in first-degree relatives (parents, children, siblings including half-brothers and sisters)
- Age > or = 45 years
- No previous colorectal cancer screening
- Informed patient
- Patient having signed the consent form
- Patient affiliated to a social security system or recipient of such system
Who cannot join
- Any previous colorectal cancer screening:
- History of blood tests in the stool (hemoccult, fecal immunological test, ...)
- History of colonic capsule screening
- History of colonoscopy
- Any known advanced neoplasia or colorectal cancer
- Known genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer (very high risk group)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Adults protected by law (under guardianship or trusteeship)
- Other metastatic cancers
- Life-threatening diseases
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country.
17 sites in 1 country
France17 sites
CH d'Avignon
Avignon, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, 84000
CHU de Besançon - Hôpital Minjoz
Besançon, Franche-Comté, 25030
Hôpital Avicenne - AP-HP
Bobigny, Île-de-France Region, 93000
CHU de Brest - Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche
Brest, Brittany Region, 29200
CHI de Créteil
Créteil, Île-de-France Region, 94000
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, 21000
CHU de Limoges - Hôpital Dupuytren
Limoges, Limousin, 87000
Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices civils de Lyon
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69000
Hôpital de la Timone - AP-HM
Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, 13385
CHU de Nantes - Hôpital de l'Hôtel-Dieu
Nantes, Pays de la Loire Region, 44000
CHU de Nice - Hôpital Archet II
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azure, 06200
Hôpital Saint-Antoine - Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75012
Hôpital Cochin - AP-HP
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014
CHU de Bordeaux - Hôpital Haut-Lévêque
Pessac, Aquitaine, 33604
CHU de Rouen - Hôpital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, Normandy, 16000
CHU de Saint-Etienne - Hôpital nord
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 42270
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, 31059
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Colonoscopy, Colon Capsule and Fecal Immunological Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening, in First Degree Relatives of Patients With Colorectal Neoplasia: a Prospective Randomized Study.
Efficacy of colonoscopy, colon capsule and fecal immunological test for colorectal cancer screening, in first degree relatives of patients with colorectal neoplasia: a prospective randomized study.
Read the detailed description
Fecal immunological test (FIT) is the reference screening method in average risk patient. FIT is proposed every 2 years to all asymptomatic subjects with average risk aged from 50 to 74 years in France. Optical colonoscopy (OC) is the gold standard examination for patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer, like those with a first degree relative with colorectal cancer (relative risk between 2 and 4 times that of the general population). Colonoscopy should be performed in this high risk group before 50 years or 5 to 10 years before the earliest case of colorectal cancer. Optical colonoscopy has important limitations: complications (perforation, bleeding), need to use general anesthesia (in France 95% of colonoscopy are performed under general anesthesia), and low acceptability for screening even in high risk persons (40% in the best cases). In this high risk population, there is a potentially important place for alternative methods. FIT could be one of them, with already a significant amount of data suggesting its interest. No data are available in high risk French patients. Colon capsule endoscopy (CC) is a more recent technique with sparse data in this high risk group, and no prospective comparison with optical colonoscopy in this indication. Capsule endoscopy has the advantage of high feasibility, very low risk, probably (but to be demonstrated) increased acceptability, and represents the closest examination as compared to colonoscopy. This justifies a prospective study comparing in a randomized methodology these 3 modalities for the identification of advanced neoplastic lesions of the colon in well characterized group of subjects at high risk of colorectal cancer. The investigators propose a prospective, randomized protocol of non-inferiority in order to compare the two new strategies to the reference strategy for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (colon or rectal cancers, large adenoma > 1 cm or high grade dysplasia ; 1st arm: OC first; 2nd arm: CC first, OC at 3 years for those patients with negative initial CC; 3rd arm: annual FIT for 2 years (t0, t = 1 year, t = 2 years), colonoscopy at 3 years for those patients with negative FIT during the study). The new strategies will be considered non-inferior to the reference strategy if the study allows to conclude that the absolute reduction of the proportion of detected patients is not greater than 3% in comparison to the reference strategy.
- Conditions
- Colon Cancer, Rectum Cancer
- Being tested
- optical colonoscopy, colon capsule endoscopy, fecal immunological test (FIT)
- Keywords
- colon cancer, rectum cancer, colonoscopy, fecal immunological test, colon capsule
- Medical subject headings
- Colonic Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
optical colonoscopyProcedure or surgery
optical colonoscopy
colon capsule endoscopyProcedure or surgery
colon capsule endoscopy
fecal immunological test (FIT)Diagnostic test
fecal immunological test (FIT)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1rst arm: optical colonoscopy (OC) | t0: optical colonoscopy; Follow-up: yearly by phone call for three years Receives: Procedure: optical colonoscopy | |
| 2nd arm: colon capsule endoscopy (CC) | t0: colon capsule endoscopy -> if positive: OC; At three years: OC for those patients with negative initial CC; Follow-up: yearly by phone call for 3 years Receives: Procedure: optical colonoscopy; Procedure: colon capsule endoscopy | |
| 3rd arm: fecal immunological test (FIT) | FIT yearly for two years:
t0: FIT -> if positive : OC; t = 1 year: FIT -> if positive : OC; t = 2 years: FIT -> if positive : OC; At three years: OC for those patients with negative FIT during the study Follow-up: yearly by phone call for 3 years Receives: Procedure: optical colonoscopy; Diagnostic Test: fecal immunological test (FIT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia or cancer identified by each screening strategy (OC, CC and FIT)
The main objective of the study is to compare two alternative methods (CC anf FIT) to OC in term of non-inferiority for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (adenoma > 1 cm, adenoma with high grade dysplasia) or cancer. The method of the unilateral confidence interval of the difference will be used to test the non-inferiority. The strategies will be considered to be equivalent if the 95% confidence interval of the difference or the detection of advanced neoplasia won't exceed ±3%.
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Rate of colorectal cancer identified by each screening strategy
The rate of colorectal cancer identified by each strategy (= number of cancer identified by the strategy/number of patients for the strategy) will be calculated at the different steps of the study (t = first exam, t = yearly follow-up and/or interval colonoscopy, t = 3 years upon control colonoscopy) and over the full duration of the study. The rate of initial colorectal cancer, interval colorectal cancer, colorectal cancer at t=3 years and colorectal cancer identified over the duration of the study, respectively, have the same unit, i.e. the number of cancer identified by the strategy/number of patients for the strategy.
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start3 Nov 2017
- Primary completion1 Nov 2021
- Study completion2 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Colon CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 3 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hôpital Edouard Herriot
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute, France, Medtronic
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jean Christophe Saurin, Hôpital Edouard Herriot
- Investigators
- Jean-Christophe Saurin, Pr, Principal investigator, Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices civils de LyonRobert Benamouzig, Pr, Study chair, Hôpital Avicenne - Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02738359
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FAMCAP
- Acronym
- FAMCAP
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Colonoscopy, Colon Capsule and Fecal Immunological Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening, in First Degree Relatives of Patients With Colorectal Neoplasia: a Prospective Randomized Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02738359
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FAMCAP / FAMCAP
- Conditions
- Colon Cancer, Rectum Cancer
- Keywords
- colon cancer, rectum cancer, colonoscopy, fecal immunological test, colon capsule
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hôpital Edouard HerriotUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute, France, Medtronic
- Study start
- 3 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Efficacy of colonoscopy, colon capsule and fecal immunological test for colorectal cancer screening, in first degree relatives of patients with colorectal neoplasia: a prospective randomized study.
Detailed description
Fecal immunological test (FIT) is the reference screening method in average risk patient. FIT is proposed every 2 years to all asymptomatic subjects with average risk aged from 50 to 74 years in France. Optical colonoscopy (OC) is the gold standard examination for patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer, like those with a first degree relative with colorectal cancer (relative risk between 2 and 4 times that of the general population). Colonoscopy should be performed in this high risk group before 50 years or 5 to 10 years before the earliest case of colorectal cancer. Optical colonoscopy has important limitations: complications (perforation, bleeding), need to use general anesthesia (in France 95% of colonoscopy are performed under general anesthesia), and low acceptability for screening even in high risk persons (40% in the best cases). In this high risk population, there is a potentially important place for alternative methods. FIT could be one of them, with already a significant amount of data suggesting its interest. No data are available in high risk French patients. Colon capsule endoscopy (CC) is a more recent technique with sparse data in this high risk group, and no prospective comparison with optical colonoscopy in this indication. Capsule endoscopy has the advantage of high feasibility, very low risk, probably (but to be demonstrated) increased acceptability, and represents the closest examination as compared to colonoscopy. This justifies a prospective study comparing in a randomized methodology these 3 modalities for the identification of advanced neoplastic lesions of the colon in well characterized group of subjects at high risk of colorectal cancer. The investigators propose a prospective, randomized protocol of non-inferiority in order to compare the two new strategies to the reference strategy for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (colon or rectal cancers, large adenoma > 1 cm or high grade dysplasia ; 1st arm: OC first; 2nd arm: CC first, OC at 3 years for those patients with negative initial CC; 3rd arm: annual FIT for 2 years (t0, t = 1 year, t = 2 years), colonoscopy at 3 years for those patients with negative FIT during the study). The new strategies will be considered non-inferior to the reference strategy if the study allows to conclude that the absolute reduction of the proportion of detected patients is not greater than 3% in comparison to the reference strategy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Years
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1rst arm: optical colonoscopy (OC) | – | Procedure: optical colonoscopyt0: optical colonoscopy; Follow-up: yearly by phone call for three years |
| 2nd arm: colon capsule endoscopy (CC) | – | Procedure: optical colonoscopy, Procedure: colon capsule endoscopyt0: colon capsule endoscopy -> if positive: OC; At three years: OC for those patients with negative initial CC; Follow-up: yearly by phone call for 3 years |
| 3rd arm: fecal immunological test (FIT) | – | Procedure: optical colonoscopy, Diagnostic Test: fecal immunological test (FIT)FIT yearly for two years: t0: FIT -> if positive : OC; t = 1 year: FIT -> if positive : OC; t = 2 years: FIT -> if positive : OC; At three years: OC for those patients with negative FIT during the study Follow-up: yearly by phone call for 3 years |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients at high risk of colorectal cancer (first-degree relatives of patient with colorectal cancer) will be included prospectively in one of the 3 comparative arms.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- History of colorectal cancers (any age) in first-degree relatives (parents, children, siblings including half-brothers and sisters)
- Age > or = 45 years
- No previous colorectal cancer screening
- Informed patient
- Patient having signed the consent form
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Any previous colorectal cancer screening:
- Any known advanced neoplasia or colorectal cancer
- Known genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer (very high risk group)
- Adults protected by law (under guardianship or trusteeship)
- Other metastatic cancers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| optical colonoscopyoptical colonoscopy | Procedure or surgery | 1rst arm: optical colonoscopy (OC), 2nd arm: colon capsule endoscopy (CC), 3rd arm: fecal immunological test (FIT) |
| colon capsule endoscopycolon capsule endoscopy | Procedure or surgery | 2nd arm: colon capsule endoscopy (CC) |
| fecal immunological test (FIT)fecal immunological test (FIT) | Diagnostic test | 3rd arm: fecal immunological test (FIT) |
Primary outcome
Prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia or cancer identified by each screening strategy (OC, CC and FIT)
Time frame: 3 years
The main objective of the study is to compare two alternative methods (CC anf FIT) to OC in term of non-inferiority for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (adenoma > 1 cm, adenoma with high grade dysplasia) or cancer. The method of the unilateral confidence interval of the difference will be used to test the non-inferiority. The strategies will be considered to be equivalent if the 95% confidence interval of the difference or the detection of advanced neoplasia won't exceed ±3%.
1 secondary outcome
Rate of colorectal cancer identified by each screening strategy
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Colon Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Alberta Cancer Exercise Dose in Colorectal Cancer
Cancer, Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Christophe Saurin, Pr principal investigator
Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices civils de Lyon
Robert Benamouzig, Pr study chair
Hôpital Avicenne - Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Colon Cancer and Rectum Cancer, run by Hôpital Edouard Herriot at 17 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia or cancer identified by each screening strategy (OC, CC and FIT) (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2026.