Cardiac SurgeryNCT02732574
Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) Therapy in High Risk Patients Following Cardiac Surgery
A study testing Oscilatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device in people with Cardiac Surgery and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Respiratory dysfunction following cardiac surgery is well documented and due in part to the location of the incision and nature of the surgery. Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain a significant problem following cardiac surgery, sometimes causing prolonged length of stay in hospital as well as… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Surgery, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
- What is being tested?
- Oscilatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 162 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- May 2016to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- CABG surgery or CABG-one valve (mitral or aortic) surgery (including conventional sternotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass, minimally-invasive and off-pump surgery)
- Age >= 60 years
- Documentation of at least one of the following: (pre-operative fraction of expired volume in one second (FEV1) of less than 70% predicted), (pre-operative FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) of less than 80%), or (on any daily usage of inhaled anti-cholinergic, beta2-agonist, or corticosteroid)
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ 2
Who cannot join
- Patients not meeting inclusion for high risk surgical candidate
- Unable/unwilling to provide written informed consent
- Patients undergoing emergent cardiac surgery
- Untreated postoperative pneumothorax
- Patients on home CPAP or BiPAP therapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
University Hospital - London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A5A5
Stephanie Fox, BA, RRT, 519-685-8500, stephanie.fox@lhsc.on.ca
About this study
Official title: The Effectiveness of Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) Therapy in High Risk Patients Following Cardiac Surgery Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Respiratory dysfunction following cardiac surgery is well documented and due in part to the location of the incision and nature of the surgery. Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain a significant problem following cardiac surgery, sometimes causing prolonged length of stay in hospital as well as increased morbidity and mortality; with the greater risk to older adults and individuals with obstructive lung disease. Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy is thought to increase lung volumes and facilitate secretion clearance. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the addition of oscillating PEP therapy to standard postoperative treatment is more effective in decreasing the incidence of PPCs and increasing functional capacity at time of discharge in 'high risk' patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
Read the detailed description
Respiratory dysfunction following cardiac surgery is well documented and due in part to the location of the incision and nature of the surgery (Weissman, 2000; Garcia-Delgado M, et al., 2014). Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications including hypoxemia, atelectasis, and pneumonia (Weissman, 2000; Garcia-Delgado M, et al., 2014; O'Donohue WJ, 1992); with an increased risk in older individuals and individuals with obstructive lung disease (Crowe \& Bradley, 1997; Weissman 2000; Jensen et al., 2007). Standard postoperative care includes early mobility and deep breathing and coughing (DB\&C) (Stiller K, et al., 1995; Johnson D., et al., 1996) usually initiated within the first 24 hours following surgery. Although standard care is sufficient in some instances, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain a significant problem following cardiac surgery and can cause prolonged length of stay in the hospital and an increase in morbidity and mortality (Weissman, 2000; Garcia-Delgado M, et al., 2014) in a significant number of patients. Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy is thought to increase lung volumes and facilitate secretion clearance in many populations (Orman J \& Wasterdahl E, 2009) and has been shown to be particularly effective in individuals with obstructive lung disease (Bott et al ., 2009). In consideration of the well documented respiratory dysfunction observed following cardiac surgery, PEP therapy may serve as a promising treatment in facilitating recovery in older, 'higher risk' individuals following elective cardiac surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate whether the addition of oscillating PEP therapy is more effective than standard treatment alone in improving functional status at time of discharge, as well as decreasing oxygen requirements and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (e.g., pneumonia, atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural effusions) in 'high risk' patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
Participants will be recruited from London Health Sciences Centre in London Ontario. Patients deciding to proceed with elective cardiac surgery will be screened in the surgeon's office, pre-admission clinic or the 6-inpatient ward for eligibility to participate in the study and provided with a letter of information. Each patient will be required to provide written consent in order to participate in this study. The study will be approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at Western University. Patients who have consented to participation in the study will be seen by the research coordinator at the patient's pre-operative clinic appointment where the research coordinator will explain the purpose and nature of the study and obtain written informed consent. Also, at that time, patient demographic information will be collected, as well as baseline data of chest x-ray (CXR) and a six minute walk test (6MWT). Pre-operative 6MWTs will be performed on a standardized 30 meter track in the basement of University Hospital and will comply with the American Thoracic Society Guidelines (2002). Patients enrolled in the study will be randomized to one of two groups on the day of their surgery; OPEP treatment or sham treatment group. On the day of surgery or post-operative day (POD) 1, the research coordinator will bring the device (OPEP or sham depending on randomization) to the patient's room. The sham devices have been manufactured to be externally identical to the OPEP devices allowing for patient blinding, however the sham devices do not contain the internal mechanisms provided expiratory pressure. All patients (sham or OPEP) will be seen by a physiotherapist on the day of extubation and receive instructions on how to properly use the device, in addition to receiving standard post-operative care. Patients will be instructed to set the resistance on the device to the highest setting and perform up to 15 breaths in the sitting position at least twice per waking hour. The resistance and number of repetitions may be decreased to adjust for patient tolerance as deemed appropriate by the treating physiotherapist. Compliance will be measured through a log book completed by the patient and/or their family. Patients will be reassessed by a physiotherapist on POD #2 and #3 to ensure proper technique and compliance with the device. All patients will continue to receive standard care each day as per the clinical pathway and may receive additional cardiorespiratory PT techniques as deemed necessary by the PT. Patients will be instructed to continue with OPEP treatments (sham or OPEP) as described until POD #5. Outcome assessment will be conducted by a blinded assessor. The outcomes and timing of outcome assessment is described in the outcome measures section and will terminate on POD #7 or discharge from hospital, whichever occurs first. If patients require continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), or reintubation during this period, they will be instructed to stop using their OPEP device and outcome assessment will occur only until POD#7.
- Conditions
- Cardiac Surgery, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Older Adults, Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
- Being tested
- Oscilatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device, SHAM Device Group
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Oscilatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) deviceDevice
Also called Aerobika
OPEP devices will be set to the highest pressure setting tolerated on POD #1. If the highest pressure setting is not achieved on POD#1, the PT will increase the pressure daily with the aim to achieve the highest pressure setting as soon as tolerated by the patient or POD#3, whichever comes first. Patients will be instructed to complete 15 breaths in a seated position with the OPEP device twice per waking hour. This will occur in addition to usual care.
SHAM Device GroupDevice
SHAM devices will be provided to patients on POD #1 and set to the highest pressure setting externally, however no positive expiratory pressure will be provided as the internal pressure regulating mechanism has been removed. Patients will be instructed to complete 15 breaths in a seated position with the sham device twice per waking hour. This will occur in addition to usual care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OPEP Device Treatment | Experimental | Patients randomized to OPEP will receive the device on postoperative day (POD) 1 or day of extubation, whichever comes first. Patients will be seen on POD #1 by a blinded physiotherapist (PT) for mobility and education on supported coughing. The OPEP device group will also be instructed to complete 15 breaths twice per waking hour in a seated position and receive education on proper use of the device. The OPEP device will be set to the highest pressure setting unless deemed inappropriate by the PT, at which time the most appropriate pressure setting will be selected and then increased daily until the OPEP device is set to the highest pressure setting by POD #3 if able. The PT will reassess the patients on POD 2 and 3 to assess for proper technique and continued use of the device, as well as usual care. Patients will use the OPEP device up to POD#5 pressure settings and compliance will be recorded and measure by use of a daily log. Receives: Device: Oscilatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device |
| SHAM Device | Sham comparator | Patients randomized to the sham treatment will receive the sham device on postoperative day (POD) 1 or day of extubation, whichever comes first. Patients will be seen on POD #1 by a blinded physiotherapist (PT) for mobility and education on supported coughing. The sham group will also be instructed to complete 15 breaths twice per waking hour in a seated position and receive education on proper use of the device. The sham device is identical in exterior appearance to the OPEP device but does not contain the internal mechanism providing expiratory pressure. As such, the device will be set to the highest setting and will not need to be adjusted at all for patient tolerance. The PT will reassess the patients on POD 2 and 3 to assess for proper technique and continued use of the device, as well as usual care. Patients will use the OPEP device up to POD#5 pressure settings and compliance will be recorded and measure by use of a daily log. Receives: Device: SHAM Device Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance (meters)
A 6MWT will be conducted as per American Thoracic Society guidelines in a designated hallway in the basement of university hospital or a corridor outside the cardiac surgery recovery unit. The tests will be conducted by a blinded assessor pre-operatively and on Postoperative day 5 or day of discharge, whichever comes first. Distance walked in meters will be recorded.
Measured: Postoperative day 5
Secondary outcomes (7)
Total duration of oxygen therapy
Cumulative duration of oxygen therapy will be tracked and recorded for all patients, tracked from time of extubation until Postoperative day 7 or discharge, whichever comes first.
Measured: Time of tracheal extubation to Postoperative day 7
Total exposure to oxygen therapy
The cumulative exposure to oxygen post-extubation will be tracked by calculating an area under the dose-time curve for oxygen usage, tracked from time of extubation until Postoperative day 7 or discharge, whichever comes first..
Measured: From tracheal extubation until Postoperative day 7
Number of cycles between room air and oxygen supplementation
Each time someone goes from room air to back on oxygen, this is a setback, and we will count this one 'cycle', tracked from time of extubation until Postoperative day 7 or discharge, whichever comes first..
Measured: From tracheal extubation until Postoperative day 7
Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) as determined by CXR interpretation
Incidence of PPCs will be assessed by a blinded assessor. PPCs will include:
- pneumonia/consolidation
- atelectasis
- pleural effusions
- pulmonary edema
- pneumothorax.
Presence of each PPC will be expressed as a 3 point score: 0= absent, 1=mild (not likely clinically relevant), 2 = moderate to severe (likely clinically relevant).
Measured: Postoperative days 1 and 4
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS)
time from admission to ICU (time 0) until actual discharge from ICU
Measured: Through study completion
Hospital LOS
Time from admission to ICU until actual discharge from hospital
Measured: Through study completion
All-cause 30-day mortality
This will be determined by hospital records, a phone call to family physician (if available) or by phone call to patient or substitute decision maker.
Measured: Up to and including the 30th post-operative day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2016
- Primary completionSep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiac SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Philip Jones, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- Philip M Jones, MD, MSc (Clinical Trials), Principal investigator, Western University, Canada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02732574
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OPEP-2016
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness of Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) Therapy in High Risk Patients Following Cardiac Surgery Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02732574
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPEP-2016
- Conditions
- Cardiac Surgery, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Older Adults, Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2016
- Primary completion
- Sep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Respiratory dysfunction following cardiac surgery is well documented and due in part to the location of the incision and nature of the surgery. Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain a significant problem following cardiac surgery, sometimes causing prolonged length of stay in hospital as well as increased morbidity and mortality; with the greater risk to older adults and individuals with obstructive lung disease. Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy is thought to increase lung volumes and facilitate secretion clearance. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the addition of oscillating PEP therapy to standard postoperative treatment is more effective in decreasing the incidence of PPCs and increasing functional capacity at time of discharge in 'high risk' patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
Detailed description
Respiratory dysfunction following cardiac surgery is well documented and due in part to the location of the incision and nature of the surgery (Weissman, 2000; Garcia-Delgado M, et al., 2014). Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications including hypoxemia, atelectasis, and pneumonia (Weissman, 2000; Garcia-Delgado M, et al., 2014; O'Donohue WJ, 1992); with an increased risk in older individuals and individuals with obstructive lung disease (Crowe \& Bradley, 1997; Weissman 2000; Jensen et al., 2007). Standard postoperative care includes early mobility and deep breathing and coughing (DB\&C) (Stiller K, et al., 1995; Johnson D., et al., 1996) usually initiated within the first 24 hours following surgery. Although standard care is sufficient in some instances, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain a significant problem following cardiac surgery and can cause prolonged length of stay in the hospital and an increase in morbidity and mortality (Weissman, 2000; Garcia-Delgado M, et al., 2014) in a significant number of patients. Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy is thought to increase lung volumes and facilitate secretion clearance in many populations (Orman J \& Wasterdahl E, 2009) and has been shown to be particularly effective in individuals with obstructive lung disease (Bott et al ., 2009). In consideration of the well documented respiratory dysfunction observed following cardiac surgery, PEP therapy may serve as a promising treatment in facilitating recovery in older, 'higher risk' individuals following elective cardiac surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate whether the addition of oscillating PEP therapy is more effective than standard treatment alone in improving functional status at time of discharge, as well as decreasing oxygen requirements and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (e.g., pneumonia, atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural effusions) in 'high risk' patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
Participants will be recruited from London Health Sciences Centre in London Ontario. Patients deciding to proceed with elective cardiac surgery will be screened in the surgeon's office, pre-admission clinic or the 6-inpatient ward for eligibility to participate in the study and provided with a letter of information. Each patient will be required to provide written consent in order to participate in this study. The study will be approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at Western University. Patients who have consented to participation in the study will be seen by the research coordinator at the patient's pre-operative clinic appointment where the research coordinator will explain the purpose and nature of the study and obtain written informed consent. Also, at that time, patient demographic information will be collected, as well as baseline data of chest x-ray (CXR) and a six minute walk test (6MWT). Pre-operative 6MWTs will be performed on a standardized 30 meter track in the basement of University Hospital and will comply with the American Thoracic Society Guidelines (2002). Patients enrolled in the study will be randomized to one of two groups on the day of their surgery; OPEP treatment or sham treatment group. On the day of surgery or post-operative day (POD) 1, the research coordinator will bring the device (OPEP or sham depending on randomization) to the patient's room. The sham devices have been manufactured to be externally identical to the OPEP devices allowing for patient blinding, however the sham devices do not contain the internal mechanisms provided expiratory pressure. All patients (sham or OPEP) will be seen by a physiotherapist on the day of extubation and receive instructions on how to properly use the device, in addition to receiving standard post-operative care. Patients will be instructed to set the resistance on the device to the highest setting and perform up to 15 breaths in the sitting position at least twice per waking hour. The resistance and number of repetitions may be decreased to adjust for patient tolerance as deemed appropriate by the treating physiotherapist. Compliance will be measured through a log book completed by the patient and/or their family. Patients will be reassessed by a physiotherapist on POD #2 and #3 to ensure proper technique and compliance with the device. All patients will continue to receive standard care each day as per the clinical pathway and may receive additional cardiorespiratory PT techniques as deemed necessary by the PT. Patients will be instructed to continue with OPEP treatments (sham or OPEP) as described until POD #5. Outcome assessment will be conducted by a blinded assessor. The outcomes and timing of outcome assessment is described in the outcome measures section and will terminate on POD #7 or discharge from hospital, whichever occurs first. If patients require continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), or reintubation during this period, they will be instructed to stop using their OPEP device and outcome assessment will occur only until POD#7.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OPEP Device Treatment | Experimental | Device: Oscilatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) devicePatients randomized to OPEP will receive the device on postoperative day (POD) 1 or day of extubation, whichever comes first. Patients will be seen on POD #1 by a blinded physiotherapist (PT) for mobility and education on supported coughing. The OPEP device group will also be instructed to complete 15 breaths twice per waking hour in a seated position and receive education on proper use of the device. The OPEP device will be set to the highest pressure setting unless deemed inappropriate by the PT, at which time the most appropriate pressure setting will be selected and then increased daily until the OPEP device is set to the highest pressure setting by POD #3 if able. The PT will reassess the patients on POD 2 and 3 to assess for proper technique and continued use of the device, as well as usual care. Patients will use the OPEP device up to POD#5 pressure settings and compliance will be recorded and measure by use of a daily log. |
| SHAM Device | Sham comparator | Device: SHAM Device GroupPatients randomized to the sham treatment will receive the sham device on postoperative day (POD) 1 or day of extubation, whichever comes first. Patients will be seen on POD #1 by a blinded physiotherapist (PT) for mobility and education on supported coughing. The sham group will also be instructed to complete 15 breaths twice per waking hour in a seated position and receive education on proper use of the device. The sham device is identical in exterior appearance to the OPEP device but does not contain the internal mechanism providing expiratory pressure. As such, the device will be set to the highest setting and will not need to be adjusted at all for patient tolerance. The PT will reassess the patients on POD 2 and 3 to assess for proper technique and continued use of the device, as well as usual care. Patients will use the OPEP device up to POD#5 pressure settings and compliance will be recorded and measure by use of a daily log. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- CABG surgery or CABG-one valve (mitral or aortic) surgery (including conventional sternotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass, minimally-invasive and off-pump surgery)
- Age >= 60 years
- Documentation of at least one of the following: (pre-operative fraction of expired volume in one second (FEV1) of less than 70% predicted), (pre-operative FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) of less than 80%), or (on any daily usage of inhaled anti-cholinergic, beta2-agonist, or corticosteroid)
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ 2
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients not meeting inclusion for high risk surgical candidate
- Unable/unwilling to provide written informed consent
- Patients undergoing emergent cardiac surgery
- Untreated postoperative pneumothorax
- Patients on home CPAP or BiPAP therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Oscilatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) deviceAlso: AerobikaOPEP devices will be set to the highest pressure setting tolerated on POD #1. If the highest pressure setting is not achieved on POD#1, the PT will increase the pressure daily with the aim to achieve the highest pressure setting as soon as tolerated by the patient or POD#3, whichever comes first. Patients will be instructed to complete 15 breaths in a seated position with the OPEP device twice per waking hour. This will occur in addition to usual care. | Device | OPEP Device Treatment |
| SHAM Device GroupSHAM devices will be provided to patients on POD #1 and set to the highest pressure setting externally, however no positive expiratory pressure will be provided as the internal pressure regulating mechanism has been removed. Patients will be instructed to complete 15 breaths in a seated position with the sham device twice per waking hour. This will occur in addition to usual care. | Device | SHAM Device |
Primary outcome
6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance (meters)
Time frame: Postoperative day 5
A 6MWT will be conducted as per American Thoracic Society guidelines in a designated hallway in the basement of university hospital or a corridor outside the cardiac surgery recovery unit. The tests will be conducted by a blinded assessor pre-operatively and on Postoperative day 5 or day of discharge, whichever comes first. Distance walked in meters will be recorded.
7 secondary outcomes
Total duration of oxygen therapy
Time frame: Time of tracheal extubation to Postoperative day 7
Total exposure to oxygen therapy
Time frame: From tracheal extubation until Postoperative day 7
Number of cycles between room air and oxygen supplementation
Time frame: From tracheal extubation until Postoperative day 7
Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) as determined by CXR interpretation
Time frame: Postoperative days 1 and 4
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS)
Time frame: Through study completion
Hospital LOS
Time frame: Through study completion
All-cause 30-day mortality
Time frame: Up to and including the 30th post-operative day
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2016.
Related trials for Cardiac Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
Recruiting
Change in Platelet Lipid Metabolism and Procoagulant Phenotype Induced by Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Impact on Postoperative Inflammatory Response and Bleeding Complications During Cardiac Surgery.
Cardiac Surgery, Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philip M Jones, MD, MSc (Clinical Trials) principal investigator
Western University, Canada
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Oscilatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device in people with Cardiac Surgery and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Stephanie Fox, BA, RRT (519-685-8500, stephanie.fox@lhsc.on.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance (meters) (time frame: Postoperative day 5). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2016.