AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)NCT02728674

Management of Patients With Respiratory Symptoms in Sweden

A study testing Person in the case is a male., Person in the case is a female. and Symptom in the case is breathlessness. in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), run by Skane University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a web-based randomized survey to evaluate management of respiratory symptoms among physicians in Sweden. The aim of this study is to determine if there is a gender bias in the diagnosis of COPD and how often physicians identify that chronic refractory breathlessness requires treatment as compared to refractory… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Person in the case is a male., Person in the case is a female. and Symptom in the case is breathlessness.
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
134 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Sep 2016to May 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Certified physician
  • Treats patients with respiratory symptoms and reduced physical activity
  • Able to read and understand a hypothetical case in Swedish

Who cannot join

  • Knowledge about the aim and/or design of the study, or
  • Previous participation in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology

    Lund, Skåne County, 21100

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

This is a web-based randomized survey to evaluate management of respiratory symptoms among physicians in Sweden. The aim of this study is to determine if there is a gender bias in the diagnosis of COPD and how often physicians identify that chronic refractory breathlessness requires treatment as compared to refractory pain.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. An American randomized web-based study showed important differences in the diagnosis of COPD among female and male patients.Women were more likely to be misdiagnosed as chronic cough or asthma instead of COPD and physicians were more reluctant to refer further women for spirometry.This is of importance as treatment and follow-up differ between the conditions.

Breathlessness, a subjective experience of breathing discomfort, is the cardinal symptom of cardiac and pulmonary disease. In advanced COPD, 98% of patients experience breathlessness which persists at rest or on minimal exertion, despite optimal treatment of the underlying disease (chronic refractory breathlessness). Dyspnea is linked to reduced physical activity, worsening deconditioning, increased anxiety and depression, impaired quality of life, loss of the will to live near death, increased risk of hospitalization, and earlier death.

The preferred treatment for the relief of chronic refractory breathlessness is a systemic (oral or parenteral) low dose opioid (Level I evidence). In a recent meta-analysis of 16 studies (271 patients in total), low dose opioids reduced chronic refractory breathlessness in advanced COPD, without any reported serious adverse effects. Lower dose opioids were not associated with increased risk of admission to hospital or death in a large register-based Swedish study of 2,249 patients with oxygen-dependent COPD patients treated with lower dose opioids (≤ 30mg of oral morphine/day).

Despite the growing evidence that support the use of opioids, physicians are reluctant to prescribe low dose opioids for breathlessness in COPD. In a review of 2000 random dispensed opioid prescriptions among patients with advanced COPD, most of whom suffered from severe chronic breathlessness, the most common stated indication was pain (97%), with only 2% for breathlessness. In a survey, Dutch chest physicians were reluctant to prescribe opioids for refractory breathlessness in advanced COPD due to perceived resistance from the patient and fear of adverse effects, including respiratory depression. Qualitative studies from Canada has shown that physicians in pulmonary medicine and primary care, families and patients feel that low dose opioids can be helpful for the relief of breathlessness, but that treatment was delayed or avoided due to lack of guidelines, lack of related knowledge and experience about opioids, and fears related to the potential adverse effects and legal censure.

No randomized trial has compared how physicians assess and treat refractory breathlessness versus refractory pain, how often opioids are considered for treatment of breathlessness and what factors affect the choice of treatment in chronic breathlessness as compared to pain in advanced COPD. Furthermore, it remains unknown if there is a gender bias in the diagnosis of COPD among physicians treating COPD patients.

METHOD:

This is a randomized, triple-blind, parallel group-, web-based study based on a survey instrument which is answered by certified physicians who treat patients with respiratory problems in Sweden. The survey is based upon a hypothetical patient case which regards situations and considerations that are part of physicians' daily clinical management and treatment of COPD patients. Two randomizations take place regarding the hypothetical case 1) Sex 2) Symptom. The participant is shown a hypothetical patient case which is randomized (1:1:1:1) regarding sex and symptom to one of four potential case scenarios: man+breathlessness; man+pain; woman+breathlessness; or woman+pain.

AIM:

The aim of the study is to determine if there is a gender bias in the diagnosis of COPD; how often physicians identify that chronic refractory breathlessness requires treatment as compared to refractory pain, which symptomatic treatments are considered with focus on morphine; explore physicians perception regarding the grade of evidence for different treatments for the relief of chronic breathlessness; and examine which factors affect physicians decision to treat refractory breathlessness with opioids.

Being tested
Person in the case is a male., Person in the case is a female., Symptom in the case is breathlessness., Symptom in the case is pain.
Keywords
COPD, Breathlessness, Symptom, Opioids, Gender bias
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Dyspnea, Sexism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Person in the case is a male.Other

    Person in the case is a male.

  • Person in the case is a female.Other

    Person in the case is a female.

  • Symptom in the case is breathlessness.Other

    Symptom in the case is breathlessness.

  • Symptom in the case is pain.Other

    Symptom in the case is pain.

Study groups in NCT02728674
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Man+BreathlessnessOtherPerson in the case is a male. Symptom in the case is breathlessness.
Receives: Other: Person in the case is a male.; Other: Symptom in the case is breathlessness.
Man+PainOtherPerson in the case is a male. Symptom in the case is pain.
Receives: Other: Person in the case is a male.; Other: Symptom in the case is pain.
Woman+BreathlessnessOtherPerson in the case is a female. Symptom in the case is breathlessness.
Receives: Other: Person in the case is a female.; Other: Symptom in the case is breathlessness.
Woman+PainOtherPerson in the case is a female.Symptom in the case is pain.
Receives: Other: Person in the case is a female.; Other: Symptom in the case is pain.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. COPD treatment in the Questionnaire

    Would there be a difference between the hypothetical case with breathlessness compared to the otherwise identical case with pain instead of breathlessness regarding:

    1. Proportion of study participants that consider that the patient in the case is not optimally treated;
    2. Proportion of study participants that consider morphine as either primary or secondary treatment option

    Measured: through study completion, up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Gender bias in COPD diagnosis in the Questionnaire

    Would there be a difference between the cases with a male respective female patient regarding:

    • Proportion of study participants that consider COPD diagnosis;
    • Proportion of study participants that consider spirometry for further diagnostics

    Measured: through study completion, up to 6 months

  2. Symptomatic treatment in the Questionnaire

    Would there be a difference between the case with breathlessness compared with the case with pain regarding:

    • Chosen treatment options;
    • Reasons not to choose treatment with opioids Chosen treatment options Reasons not to choose treatment with opioids

    Measured: through study completion, up to 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2016
  3. Primary completionMay 2017
  4. Study completionMay 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
134 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02728674
Sponsor's protocol ID
CASE2016
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
24 Mar 2016
Last updated
24 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ahmadi Z, Sandberg J, Shannon-Honson A, Vandersman Z, Currow DC, Ekstrom M. Is chronic breathlessness less recognised and treated compared with chronic pain? A case-based randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2018 Sep 15;52(3):1800887. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00887-2018. Print 2018 Sep.

    PubMed 30002106

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Person in the case is a male., Person in the case is a female. and Symptom in the case is breathlessness. in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), run by Skane University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

COPD treatment in the Questionnaire (time frame: through study completion, up to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02728674, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in