Glioblastoma MultiformePhase 1NCT02722512
Trial of Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96) Vaccine
A Phase 1 study testing Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96), Tumor Resection and Radiation in people with Glioblastoma Multiforme and Astrocytoma, Grade III, run by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96) Vaccine is an feasible and safe treatment for pediatric patients with newly-diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas or recurrent, resectable High-Grade Gliomas and Ependymomas. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Glioblastoma Multiforme, Astrocytoma, Grade III, Anaplastic Ependymoma
- What is being tested?
- Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96), Tumor Resection and Radiation
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2016to 13 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Arm A: Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma Tumor
- Arm B: Recurrent, resectable High Grade Glioma or Ependymoma
- Stable Neurologic Status
- Lanksy/Karnofsky score greater than or equal to 50.
- Adequate Bone Marrow Function (ANC≥ 1000/μL, platelets≥ 100,000/μL transfusion independent, Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 gm/dL with or without transfusion support)
- Adequate Liver Function (Bilirubin ≤ 2x institutional normal for age, Alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ 5x institutional normal for age, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 5x institutional normal for age)
- Adequate Renal Function (Normal creatinine for age and/or glomerular filtration rate ≥ 70 mls/min/1.73 m2)
- Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test
Who cannot join
- Patients with unresectable disease are not eligible.
- Patients with primary spinal cord tumors are not eligible.
- Patients with metastatic disease are not eligible for Arm A (this does NOT apply to Arm B).
- Patients with a known allergy to any component of the vaccine or any compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition of the vaccine are not eligible.
- Patients with known auto-immune disease are excluded.
- Patients with known immunodeficiency are excluded.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients with a concurrent malignancy are excluded.
- Clinically Significant Concurrent Illness
- Patients receiving any other anticancer or investigational drug
- Patients with uncontrolled seizure disorders
- Patients whose central nervous system (CNS) tumor is considered a secondary malignancy from prior therapies
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
About this study
Official title: A Phase I and Feasibility Trial of Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96) Vaccine for Pediatric Patients With Newly Diagnosed Intracranial High Grade Glioma and Recurrent Resectable Intracranial High Grade Glioma and Ependymoma
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96) Vaccine is an feasible and safe treatment for pediatric patients with newly-diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas or recurrent, resectable High-Grade Gliomas and Ependymomas.
Read the detailed description
Immunotherapy for Brain Tumors:
Although it is usually ineffective alone, it has long been recognized that the immune system of tumor bearing hosts (human and animal models) does, indeed, mount an endogenous immune-mediated response to tumor. Unfortunately, this immune response alone is not sufficient in combating tumor. The balance of immune response and immune regulation often mitigates this anti-tumor response. Several mechanisms within tumor-bearing hosts compromise the efficacy of this anti-tumor immune response, including low levels of expression of co-stimulatory molecules such as the B7 family of immune-regulatory ligands, the tumor's local production of immunosuppressive factors and the tumor's ability to over-express pro-survival factors thus escaping destruction by the host immune system. However, many have hypothesized that if this immune response can be better harnessed and/or magnified, there is potential for heightened tumor responses.
A number of specific observations support the use of immunotherapy to treat brain tumors. Data published supports a possible correlation between HIV mediated immunosuppression and the development of intracranial glial tumors. Immunosuppression in transplant recipients has also been implicated in the development of intracranial glioma. Further supporting this hypothesis are documented rare cases of long-term remission of malignant brain tumors following significant post-operative infection. These observations have fueled the idea that a heightened immune system may confer some protection against intracranial tumors. With this in mind, one hypothesis is that successful active immunotherapy for patients with brain tumors will require development of a specific peptide or polyvalent vaccines in an effort to further stimulate the host's immune system against specific tumor-associated antigens.
It has been well established that mice can be immunized against syngeneic tumors. Heat shock protein-peptide complexes isolated from a specific tumor can been utilized to elicit both prophylactic and therapeutic immunity against the specific cancer from which the preparations have been isolated. Overexpression of heat shock protein-chaperone complexes (HSPPC) in brain tumor cells suggests that HSPPC are a meaningful target antigen for a brain tumor vaccine. Moreover, in addition to generating tumor-specific immunity, vaccination with heat shock protein peptide complexes in animal models generates therapeutic responses. Since an immune response has not been widely evaluated for pediatric brain tumors, this study will test the safety and feasibility of producing and administering a vaccine capable of generating an autologous, anti-tumor immune response.
HSPPC-96:
Heat shock proteins are up-regulated along with tissue-specific chaperone peptides in the setting of cellular stress to prevent damage and aggregation of the proteome. Therefore, heat shock protein peptide complexes (HSPPC) provide a cytoprotective effect. Overexpression of heat shock proteins has been described in malignant glioma and medulloblastoma cells. HSPPC-96 is an autologous tumor-derived vaccine that has been under clinical investigation for the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including adult high-grade glioma (HGG). It is composed of the 96-kilodalton (KDa) heat shock protein, glycoprotein 96 (gp96), attached to autologous tumor-derived peptides. The gp96 glycoprotein in HSPPC-96 is a highly conserved, abundant, non-polymorphic stress protein found in every cell type of the body. Gp96 isolated from normal or tumor tissues is found in complex with peptides that are specific to the original tissue. Mouse models have shown that HSPPC-96 confers protective immunity only to the tumor from which it is derived and not to genetically distinct tumors or normal tissue.
When injected into the host, HSPPC-96 interacts with antigen presenting cells (APCs) via specific receptors. Once internalized by the APCs, the peptides chaperoned by the HSP are transferred to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II molecules in intracellular compartments and eventually expressed at the cell surface. T-cells then recognize the MHC-peptide complexes and are stimulated. HSP-peptide complexes are unique in their ability to elicit an antigen-specific cytotoxic T-cell response. Additionally, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+) T cells and natural killer (NK) cells are also recruited adding to the tumor-associated immunity.
Some advantages of heat shock protein-peptide vaccines for immunotherapy are that it elicits a cluster of differentiation (CD8+) T cell response in spite of exogenous administration, it circumvents the need for identification of T-cell epitopes of individual cancers, and it minimizes the possibility of generating epitope variants. Furthermore, heat shock protein-peptide complexes have elicited tumor rejection and CD8+ T cell response without adjuvant therapies. Heat shock protein-peptide complexes, such as HSPPC-96, can be isolated from human tumors, and when injected back into the patient from whom they were isolated, may present a unique opportunity to deliver a vaccine specific to that patient.
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma Multiforme, Astrocytoma, Grade III, Anaplastic Ependymoma, Clear Cell Ependymoma, Ependymoma
- Being tested
- Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96), Tumor Resection, Radiation
- Medical subject headings
- Glioblastoma, Astrocytoma, Ependymoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96)Biological
The vaccine is patient specific, created from the patient's own brain tumor resected at a clinically necessary surgery. The vaccine is administered intradermally on a weekly basis.
Tumor ResectionProcedure or surgery
Clinically-indicated removal of the tumor
RadiationRadiation
Focal Radiation Therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma (HGG) | Experimental | Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96) therapy will be given between 0-28 days after the completion of radiation therapy (XRT) AND no more than 60 days from completion of XRT. Vaccine will be given once weekly for 4 weeks. The 4 weeks (28 days) of vaccine administration will be followed by an observation visit. In patients with sufficient vaccine (on both Arms A and B), a maintenance therapy will be instituted. It will be administered at the same dose the patient was enrolled at and given every 2 weeks until vaccine is exhausted or there is evidence of tumor progression. The first dose of maintenance vaccine should be administered 7 days after completion of the observation visit. Receives: Biological: Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96); Procedure: Tumor Resection; Radiation: Radiation |
| Recurrent HGG and Ependymoma | Experimental | On Arm B, Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96) will be given as soon as possible after tumor resection post-operative recovery and sufficient time for vaccine preparation (typically 0-28 days post-operatively) AND no more than 60 days post-operatively. Vaccine will be given once weekly for 4 weeks. These 4 weeks (28 days) of vaccines will be followed by an observation visit. In patients with sufficient vaccine, a maintenance therapy will be given. It will be given at the same dose the patient was enrolled at and given every 2 weeks until vaccine is exhausted or there is evidence of tumor progression. The first dose of maintenance vaccine should be given 7 days after completion of the observation visit. Receives: Biological: Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96); Procedure: Tumor Resection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The rolling 6 statistical design will be utilized to establish the MTD and RP2D of HSPCC autologous vaccine in children with newly diagnosed high grade glioma (HGG) following focal radiation therapy and in recurrent HGG and ependymoma given alone.
Measured: 36 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
To estimate the progression-free survival distribution in children with recurrent and resectable HGG treated with HSPPC-96 vaccine therapy alone (Arm B).
Measured: 60 months
To estimate the progression-free survival distribution in children with recurrent and resectable ependymoma treated with HSPPC-96 vaccine therapy alone (Arm B).
Measured: 60 months
To evaluate patient immune responses as measured by immune correlates in the above patient groups.
Measured: 60 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2016
- Primary completion13 Nov 2019
- Study completion13 Nov 2019
Why it stopped: Lack of substantial evidence for immune responses in response to vaccination.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Glioblastoma MultiformeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Northwestern University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Angela Waanders, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
- Investigators
- Stewart Goldman, MD, Principal investigator, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02722512
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016-362
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase I and Feasibility Trial of Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96) Vaccine for Pediatric Patients With Newly Diagnosed Intracranial High Grade Glioma and Recurrent Resectable Intracranial High Grade Glioma and Ependymoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02722512
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016-362
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma Multiforme, Astrocytoma, Grade III, Anaplastic Ependymoma, Clear Cell Ependymoma, Ependymoma
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Lack of substantial evidence for immune responses in response to vaccination.
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Northwestern University
- Study start
- Jul 2016
- Primary completion
- 13 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96) Vaccine is an feasible and safe treatment for pediatric patients with newly-diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas or recurrent, resectable High-Grade Gliomas and Ependymomas.
Detailed description
Immunotherapy for Brain Tumors:
Although it is usually ineffective alone, it has long been recognized that the immune system of tumor bearing hosts (human and animal models) does, indeed, mount an endogenous immune-mediated response to tumor. Unfortunately, this immune response alone is not sufficient in combating tumor. The balance of immune response and immune regulation often mitigates this anti-tumor response. Several mechanisms within tumor-bearing hosts compromise the efficacy of this anti-tumor immune response, including low levels of expression of co-stimulatory molecules such as the B7 family of immune-regulatory ligands, the tumor's local production of immunosuppressive factors and the tumor's ability to over-express pro-survival factors thus escaping destruction by the host immune system. However, many have hypothesized that if this immune response can be better harnessed and/or magnified, there is potential for heightened tumor responses.
A number of specific observations support the use of immunotherapy to treat brain tumors. Data published supports a possible correlation between HIV mediated immunosuppression and the development of intracranial glial tumors. Immunosuppression in transplant recipients has also been implicated in the development of intracranial glioma. Further supporting this hypothesis are documented rare cases of long-term remission of malignant brain tumors following significant post-operative infection. These observations have fueled the idea that a heightened immune system may confer some protection against intracranial tumors. With this in mind, one hypothesis is that successful active immunotherapy for patients with brain tumors will require development of a specific peptide or polyvalent vaccines in an effort to further stimulate the host's immune system against specific tumor-associated antigens.
It has been well established that mice can be immunized against syngeneic tumors. Heat shock protein-peptide complexes isolated from a specific tumor can been utilized to elicit both prophylactic and therapeutic immunity against the specific cancer from which the preparations have been isolated. Overexpression of heat shock protein-chaperone complexes (HSPPC) in brain tumor cells suggests that HSPPC are a meaningful target antigen for a brain tumor vaccine. Moreover, in addition to generating tumor-specific immunity, vaccination with heat shock protein peptide complexes in animal models generates therapeutic responses. Since an immune response has not been widely evaluated for pediatric brain tumors, this study will test the safety and feasibility of producing and administering a vaccine capable of generating an autologous, anti-tumor immune response.
HSPPC-96:
Heat shock proteins are up-regulated along with tissue-specific chaperone peptides in the setting of cellular stress to prevent damage and aggregation of the proteome. Therefore, heat shock protein peptide complexes (HSPPC) provide a cytoprotective effect. Overexpression of heat shock proteins has been described in malignant glioma and medulloblastoma cells. HSPPC-96 is an autologous tumor-derived vaccine that has been under clinical investigation for the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including adult high-grade glioma (HGG). It is composed of the 96-kilodalton (KDa) heat shock protein, glycoprotein 96 (gp96), attached to autologous tumor-derived peptides. The gp96 glycoprotein in HSPPC-96 is a highly conserved, abundant, non-polymorphic stress protein found in every cell type of the body. Gp96 isolated from normal or tumor tissues is found in complex with peptides that are specific to the original tissue. Mouse models have shown that HSPPC-96 confers protective immunity only to the tumor from which it is derived and not to genetically distinct tumors or normal tissue.
When injected into the host, HSPPC-96 interacts with antigen presenting cells (APCs) via specific receptors. Once internalized by the APCs, the peptides chaperoned by the HSP are transferred to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II molecules in intracellular compartments and eventually expressed at the cell surface. T-cells then recognize the MHC-peptide complexes and are stimulated. HSP-peptide complexes are unique in their ability to elicit an antigen-specific cytotoxic T-cell response. Additionally, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+) T cells and natural killer (NK) cells are also recruited adding to the tumor-associated immunity.
Some advantages of heat shock protein-peptide vaccines for immunotherapy are that it elicits a cluster of differentiation (CD8+) T cell response in spite of exogenous administration, it circumvents the need for identification of T-cell epitopes of individual cancers, and it minimizes the possibility of generating epitope variants. Furthermore, heat shock protein-peptide complexes have elicited tumor rejection and CD8+ T cell response without adjuvant therapies. Heat shock protein-peptide complexes, such as HSPPC-96, can be isolated from human tumors, and when injected back into the patient from whom they were isolated, may present a unique opportunity to deliver a vaccine specific to that patient.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma (HGG) | Experimental | Biological: Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96), Procedure: Tumor Resection, Radiation: RadiationHeat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96) therapy will be given between 0-28 days after the completion of radiation therapy (XRT) AND no more than 60 days from completion of XRT. Vaccine will be given once weekly for 4 weeks. The 4 weeks (28 days) of vaccine administration will be followed by an observation visit. In patients with sufficient vaccine (on both Arms A and B), a maintenance therapy will be instituted. It will be administered at the same dose the patient was enrolled at and given every 2 weeks until vaccine is exhausted or there is evidence of tumor progression. The first dose of maintenance vaccine should be administered 7 days after completion of the observation visit. |
| Recurrent HGG and Ependymoma | Experimental | Biological: Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96), Procedure: Tumor ResectionOn Arm B, Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96) will be given as soon as possible after tumor resection post-operative recovery and sufficient time for vaccine preparation (typically 0-28 days post-operatively) AND no more than 60 days post-operatively. Vaccine will be given once weekly for 4 weeks. These 4 weeks (28 days) of vaccines will be followed by an observation visit. In patients with sufficient vaccine, a maintenance therapy will be given. It will be given at the same dose the patient was enrolled at and given every 2 weeks until vaccine is exhausted or there is evidence of tumor progression. The first dose of maintenance vaccine should be given 7 days after completion of the observation visit. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Arm A: Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma Tumor
- Arm B: Recurrent, resectable High Grade Glioma or Ependymoma
- Stable Neurologic Status
- Lanksy/Karnofsky score greater than or equal to 50.
- Adequate Bone Marrow Function (ANC≥ 1000/μL, platelets≥ 100,000/μL transfusion independent, Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 gm/dL with or without transfusion support)
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with unresectable disease are not eligible.
- Patients with primary spinal cord tumors are not eligible.
- Patients with metastatic disease are not eligible for Arm A (this does NOT apply to Arm B).
- Patients with a known allergy to any component of the vaccine or any compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition of the vaccine are not eligible.
- Patients with known auto-immune disease are excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96)The vaccine is patient specific, created from the patient's own brain tumor resected at a clinically necessary surgery. The vaccine is administered intradermally on a weekly basis. | Biological | Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma (HGG), Recurrent HGG and Ependymoma |
| Tumor ResectionClinically-indicated removal of the tumor | Procedure or surgery | Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma (HGG), Recurrent HGG and Ependymoma |
| RadiationFocal Radiation Therapy | Radiation | Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma (HGG) |
Primary outcome
The rolling 6 statistical design will be utilized to establish the MTD and RP2D of HSPCC autologous vaccine in children with newly diagnosed high grade glioma (HGG) following focal radiation therapy and in recurrent HGG and ependymoma given alone.
Time frame: 36 months
3 secondary outcomes
To estimate the progression-free survival distribution in children with recurrent and resectable HGG treated with HSPPC-96 vaccine therapy alone (Arm B).
Time frame: 60 months
To estimate the progression-free survival distribution in children with recurrent and resectable ependymoma treated with HSPPC-96 vaccine therapy alone (Arm B).
Time frame: 60 months
To evaluate patient immune responses as measured by immune correlates in the above patient groups.
Time frame: 60 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Lack of substantial evidence for immune responses in response to vaccination.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Glioblastoma Multiforme
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
EF-41/KEYNOTE D58: Phase 3 Study of Optune Concomitant With Temozolomide Plus Pembrolizumab in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Beginning Radiation Immediately With GammaTile at GBM Excision Versus Standard of Care
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Testing the Addition of an Anti-cancer Drug, Selinexor, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Temozolomide) for Brain Tumors That Have Returned After Previous Treatment
Recurrent Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype, Recurrent MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Oral Gallium Maltolate for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
PLX038 in Primary Central Nervous System Tumors Containing MYC or MYCN Amplifications
Glioma, Medulloblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stewart Goldman, MD principal investigator
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Heat Shock Protein Peptide Complex-96 (HSPPC-96), Tumor Resection and Radiation in people with Glioblastoma Multiforme and Astrocytoma, Grade III, run by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Lack of substantial evidence for immune responses in response to vaccination.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The rolling 6 statistical design will be utilized to establish the MTD and RP2D of HSPCC autologous vaccine in children with newly diagnosed high grade glioma (HGG) following focal radiation therapy and in recurrent HGG and ependymoma given alone. (time frame: 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2025.