Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor SitesNCT02712164
Molecular, Histologic, and Clinical Analysis of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) for Split-thickness Skin Graft (STSG) Donor Sites
A study testing Modified NPWT dressing and Tegaderm in people with Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites and Burns, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Trial summary
The purpose of this single-center, randomized, prospective cohort study is to evaluate the clinical outcome and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) mediated modulation of the biologic milieu of a modified NPWT dressing on split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites, Burns
- What is being tested?
- Modified NPWT dressing and Tegaderm
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2017to Jul 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-60
- Both genders are eligible for study
- Written consent obtained from the subject or agent
- Donor site wounds must not exceed 5% total body surface area (TBSA)
- Subject must be receiving a split-thickness skin graft (STSG)
- Donor site is amenable to either NPWT or standard of care (occlusive dressing)
- Ability to comply with necessary wound care/follow up
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- Subject has been diagnosed with Diabetes
- Subject is a smoker
- Subject takes steroids
- Subject takes immunosuppressive medications
- Subject with immunosuppressive disorders
Show all 9Show fewer
- Donor site wounds that exceed 5% total body surface area (TBSA)
- Subject has sensitivity to silver or acrylic adhesives
- Inability to comply with necessary wound care/follow up.
About this study
The purpose of this single-center, randomized, prospective cohort study is to evaluate the clinical outcome and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) mediated modulation of the biologic milieu of a modified NPWT dressing on split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites.
Read the detailed description
The investigators have designed a prospective randomized trial in which subjects will be assigned to a modified negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressing or standard moist dressing. The investigators will measure the percentage of re-epithelization at set postoperative time intervals using digital photography, pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), and healing quality using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). The investigators hypothesize that the NPWT will lead to less pain and increased re-epithelization in a shorter postoperative time course. This specific aim seeks to prove/disprove that patients who receive a modified NPWT dressing perceive the advantage with improved healing, pain, shorter length of stay, and other wound symptoms related to delayed donor site wound healing.
The donor site for STSGs provides a consistent model of superficial wounds that offers the opportunity to study both mechanisms of wound healing and potential mechanisms of action of NPWT. In patients undergoing both standard dressings and NPWT, the investigators will sample the wound exudate and perform microbiopsies of the healing wound at fixed intervals and perform histologic and molecular analysis in order to quantify the degree of re-epithelization and the trophic and inflammatory profile of the healing wound.
- Conditions
- Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites, Burns
- Being tested
- Modified NPWT dressing, Tegaderm
- Keywords
- Split-thickness skin graft, STSG, donor site, negative-pressure wound therapy, NPWT, dressing
- Medical subject headings
- Burns
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Modified NPWT dressingDevice
Use of negative pressure wound therapy on split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites
TegadermDevice
Standard of care for STSG donor sites.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Modified NPWT dressing | Experimental | In the experimental group, a microporous silver-impregnated foam with a thin silicone contact layer (Mepilex Ag) will be applied. A macroporous foam layer (V.A.C. GranuFoam) and an occlusive dressing (V.A.C. Drape) will then be applied to cover the foam, plus 3-5cm border of intact skin. The occlusive dressing will then be pinched and a 2cm hole will be cut to apply the SensaT.R.A.C. Pad that supplies pressure from the NPWT unit. NPWT will be applied at 125mmHg throughout treatment using KCI's InfoV.A.C. Therapy Unit. The donor site dressing will be replaced on postoperative day 5-7 and a new occlusive dressing (Tegaderm) will be applied. Receives: Device: Modified NPWT dressing; Device: Tegaderm |
| Control: Tegaderm | Active comparator | In the control group, the donor sites will be dressed with an occlusive dressing only (Tegaderm). The donor site dressings will be replaced on postoperative day 5-7 and a new occlusive dressing (Tegaderm) will be applied. Receives: Device: Tegaderm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain as measured by visual analog scale (VAS).
Measured: Assessed up to 14 days
Wound healing rate (re-epithelialization)
Evaluated by the investigator and by a blinded expert using photographs.
Measured: Assessed up to 1 month
Wound exudate: mRNA expression
Wound exudate and tissue lysate will be subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for semi-quantitative analysis of mRNA expression.
Measured: Assessed up to 14 days
Wound exudate: protein content
Quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) will allow analysis of target protein content.
Measured: Assessed up to 14 days
Tissue sample: re-epithelialization and granulation percentage
Tissue samples will be fixed and processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) staining and analyzed microscopically for re-epithelialization percentage.
Measured: Assessed up to 14 days
Tissue sample: epidermal thickness
Tissue samples will be fixed and processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) staining and analyzed microscopically for epidermal thickness.
Measured: Assessed up to 14 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Wound Healing Quality
As measured by the Vancouver scar scale (VAS)
Measured: Assessed up to 1 month postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2018 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Lack of resources.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor SitesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Brigham and Women's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Indranil Sinha, Brigham and Women's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02712164
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016P000030
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 29 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Genecov DG, Schneider AM, Morykwas MJ, Parker D, White WL, Argenta LC. A controlled subatmospheric pressure dressing increases the rate of skin graft donor site reepithelialization. Ann Plast Surg. 1998 Mar;40(3):219-25. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199803000-00004.
PubMed 9523602Orgill DP, Bayer LR. Negative pressure wound therapy: past, present and future. Int Wound J. 2013 Dec;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):15-9. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12170.
PubMed 24251839Glass GE, Murphy GF, Esmaeili A, Lai LM, Nanchahal J. Systematic review of molecular mechanism of action of negative-pressure wound therapy. Br J Surg. 2014 Dec;101(13):1627-36. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9636. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
PubMed 25294112Fischer S, Wall J, Pomahac B, Riviello R, Halvorson EG. Extra-large negative pressure wound therapy dressings for burns - Initial experience with technique, fluid management, and outcomes. Burns. 2016 Mar;42(2):457-65. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.034. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
PubMed 26774601Nuutila K, Siltanen A, Peura M, Harjula A, Nieminen T, Vuola J, Kankuri E, Aarnio P. Gene expression profiling of negative-pressure-treated skin graft donor site wounds. Burns. 2013 Jun;39(4):687-93. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
PubMed 23141686
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Molecular, Histologic, and Clinical Analysis of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) for Split-thickness Skin Graft (STSG) Donor Sites
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02712164
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016P000030
- Conditions
- Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites, Burns
- Keywords
- Split-thickness skin graft, STSG, donor site, negative-pressure wound therapy, NPWT, dressing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Lack of resources.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this single-center, randomized, prospective cohort study is to evaluate the clinical outcome and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) mediated modulation of the biologic milieu of a modified NPWT dressing on split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites.
Detailed description
The investigators have designed a prospective randomized trial in which subjects will be assigned to a modified negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressing or standard moist dressing. The investigators will measure the percentage of re-epithelization at set postoperative time intervals using digital photography, pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), and healing quality using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). The investigators hypothesize that the NPWT will lead to less pain and increased re-epithelization in a shorter postoperative time course. This specific aim seeks to prove/disprove that patients who receive a modified NPWT dressing perceive the advantage with improved healing, pain, shorter length of stay, and other wound symptoms related to delayed donor site wound healing.
The donor site for STSGs provides a consistent model of superficial wounds that offers the opportunity to study both mechanisms of wound healing and potential mechanisms of action of NPWT. In patients undergoing both standard dressings and NPWT, the investigators will sample the wound exudate and perform microbiopsies of the healing wound at fixed intervals and perform histologic and molecular analysis in order to quantify the degree of re-epithelization and the trophic and inflammatory profile of the healing wound.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Modified NPWT dressing | Experimental | Device: Modified NPWT dressing, Device: TegadermIn the experimental group, a microporous silver-impregnated foam with a thin silicone contact layer (Mepilex Ag) will be applied. A macroporous foam layer (V.A.C. GranuFoam) and an occlusive dressing (V.A.C. Drape) will then be applied to cover the foam, plus 3-5cm border of intact skin. The occlusive dressing will then be pinched and a 2cm hole will be cut to apply the SensaT.R.A.C. Pad that supplies pressure from the NPWT unit. NPWT will be applied at 125mmHg throughout treatment using KCI's InfoV.A.C. Therapy Unit. The donor site dressing will be replaced on postoperative day 5-7 and a new occlusive dressing (Tegaderm) will be applied. |
| Control: Tegaderm | Active comparator | Device: TegadermIn the control group, the donor sites will be dressed with an occlusive dressing only (Tegaderm). The donor site dressings will be replaced on postoperative day 5-7 and a new occlusive dressing (Tegaderm) will be applied. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age 18-60
- Both genders are eligible for study
- Written consent obtained from the subject or agent
- Donor site wounds must not exceed 5% total body surface area (TBSA)
- Subject must be receiving a split-thickness skin graft (STSG)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age <18 years
- Subject has been diagnosed with Diabetes
- Subject is a smoker
- Subject takes steroids
- Subject takes immunosuppressive medications
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Modified NPWT dressingUse of negative pressure wound therapy on split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites | Device | Experimental: Modified NPWT dressing |
| TegadermStandard of care for STSG donor sites. | Device | Control: Tegaderm, Experimental: Modified NPWT dressing |
Primary outcome
Pain as measured by visual analog scale (VAS).
Time frame: Assessed up to 14 days
Wound healing rate (re-epithelialization)
Time frame: Assessed up to 1 month
Evaluated by the investigator and by a blinded expert using photographs.
Wound exudate: mRNA expression
Time frame: Assessed up to 14 days
Wound exudate and tissue lysate will be subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for semi-quantitative analysis of mRNA expression.
Wound exudate: protein content
Time frame: Assessed up to 14 days
Quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) will allow analysis of target protein content.
Tissue sample: re-epithelialization and granulation percentage
Time frame: Assessed up to 14 days
Tissue samples will be fixed and processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) staining and analyzed microscopically for re-epithelialization percentage.
Tissue sample: epidermal thickness
Time frame: Assessed up to 14 days
Tissue samples will be fixed and processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) staining and analyzed microscopically for epidermal thickness.
1 secondary outcome
Wound Healing Quality
Time frame: Assessed up to 1 month postoperatively
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2017.
- Background: PubMed 9523602Genecov DG, Schneider AM, Morykwas MJ, Parker D, White WL, Argenta LC. A controlled subatmospheric pressure dressing increases the rate of skin graft donor site reepithelialization. Ann Plast Surg. 1998 Mar;40(3):219-25. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199803000-00004.
- Background: PubMed 24251839Orgill DP, Bayer LR. Negative pressure wound therapy: past, present and future. Int Wound J. 2013 Dec;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):15-9. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12170.
- Background: PubMed 25294112Glass GE, Murphy GF, Esmaeili A, Lai LM, Nanchahal J. Systematic review of molecular mechanism of action of negative-pressure wound therapy. Br J Surg. 2014 Dec;101(13):1627-36. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9636. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
- Background: PubMed 26774601Fischer S, Wall J, Pomahac B, Riviello R, Halvorson EG. Extra-large negative pressure wound therapy dressings for burns - Initial experience with technique, fluid management, and outcomes. Burns. 2016 Mar;42(2):457-65. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.034. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
- Background: PubMed 23141686Nuutila K, Siltanen A, Peura M, Harjula A, Nieminen T, Vuola J, Kankuri E, Aarnio P. Gene expression profiling of negative-pressure-treated skin graft donor site wounds. Burns. 2013 Jun;39(4):687-93. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
Related trials for Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites
Not yet recruiting
Safety Study of Microlyte DualGuard
Wound Closure, Wound Care
Not yet recruiting
Autologous Skin Cell Suspension (RECELL®) for Accelerated Healing of Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Randomized, Intra-Patient (Split-Site) Controlled Trial
Skin Graft Donor Site, Wound Healing
Active, not recruiting
Allogeneic Adipose Tissue Extract in Wound Treatment and Scar Maturation
Wound Healing
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Dressing Materials of Donor Site of Split-thickness Skin Graft; Paraffin Mesh Gauze vs Povidone-Iodine Foam at SMBB Institute of Trauma Karachi
Skin Graft Wounds
Recruiting
Aloe Vera vs Paraffin Tulle Dressings for Pain Management in Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites
Skin Graft Wounds, Donor Site Complication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Modified NPWT dressing and Tegaderm in people with Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites and Burns, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain as measured by visual analog scale (VAS). (time frame: Assessed up to 14 days). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02712164, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2017.