AzTrials
AzTrials

ViolenceNCT02706145

Using Media to Shift Social Norms of Violence Among Youth

A study testing Social norming campaign in people with Violence, run by University of Louisville at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The project will utilize a quasi-experimental design to examine the effectiveness of a community-level, three-year social norming campaign aimed at changing norms of violence among youth 10-24, with West Louisville (WL) as the intervention community and East Nashville, Tennessee as the control community. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 24 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Violence
What is being tested?
Social norming campaign
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8,037 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2016to 31 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 24 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • youth between 10 and 24 years of age who reside in one of the nine neighborhoods of West Louisville or in the comparison site of East Nashville

Who cannot join

  • individuals outside the age range (i.e., younger than 10 or older than 24) or who do not live in the intervention or comparison communities

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of Louisville School of Public Health & Information Sciences

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40203

  • Vanderbilt University

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Changing the Narrative: Using Media to Shift Social Norms of Violence Among Youth in West Louisville

The project will utilize a quasi-experimental design to examine the effectiveness of a community-level, three-year social norming campaign aimed at changing norms of violence among youth 10-24, with West Louisville (WL) as the intervention community and East Nashville, Tennessee as the control community. The project will address the following research questions (RQs):

RQ1: To what extent is a social norming campaign effective in changing the descriptive and injunctive norms of violence among youth in WL?

Read more

RQ2: To what extent are the descriptive and injunctive norms of violence among youth in WL related to violent behavior (by type)?

RQ3: To what extent is a social norming campaign effective in reducing population rates of youth violence in WL?

RQ4: Which forms of media are most effective in reaching youth of different ages with campaign messages?

RQ5: How is community readiness related to implementation of a community-level social norming campaign?

RQ6: How is community capacity related to implementation of a community-level social norming campaign?

RQ7: How does community capacity to address youth violence change over time with the implementation of a community-level social norming campaign?

RQ8: To what extent is a social norming campaign cost-effective in reducing incidents of serious violence among youth?

Read the detailed description

The Center of Excellence in Youth Violence Prevention at the University of Louisville (UofL) School of Public Health \& Information Sciences capitalizes on a specific window of opportunity-where there is currently alignment of a public consciousness of the issue of youth violence, the availability of expertise to implement a feasible intervention, and substantial political will across community sectors to address the issue. This provides an ideal context for the creation of the UofL Center for Youth Violence Prevention, allowing us to partner with residents and organizations in West Louisville (WL) to develop, implement, and evaluate a community-level intervention to reduce youth violence. To this end, we plan to achieve five specific aims:

AIM 1: Strengthen the infrastructure to support youth violence prevention research and practice at the University of Louisville.

AIM 2: Develop, implement and evaluate a community-level social norming campaign to change the norms of violence among youth in West Louisville using mass and social media.

AIM 3: Document the development and implementation of the social norming campaign to improve replication and scalability in other settings or communities.

AIM 4: Evaluate the relationship between community readiness, community capacity, and the implementation of the community-level social norming campaign.

AIM 5: Facilitate knowledge translation and dissemination initiatives to relevant audiences (i.e., community, local organizations and leaders, youth violence prevention researchers and practitioners, academic peers, and policy-makers) that produce actionable community- and policy-level approaches.

Conditions
Violence
Being tested
Social norming campaign
Keywords
social norms, youth violence, media

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Social norming campaignOther

    community-level, three-year social norming campaign, using traditional and emerging media, aimed at changing norms of violence among youth 10-24

Study groups in NCT02706145
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention Group (West Louisville)ExperimentalThis group will be exposed to the social norming campaign via traditional, mass, and social media over the three-year intervention period.
Receives: Other: Social norming campaign
Control Group (East Nashville)No interventionThis group will serve as the control group, and measures of social norms and attitudes toward violence will be compared between this group and the intervention group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of youth who report descriptive norms that promote violence as measured by our school survey

    Survey will assess population level changes in descriptive norms among youth in the intervention group related to violence compared to control group

    Measured: up to 60 months

  2. Proportion of youth who report injunctive norms that promote violence as measured by our school survey

    Survey will assess population level changes in injunctive norms among youth in the intervention group related to violence compared to youth in the control group

    Measured: up to 60 months

  3. Proportion of youth who engaged in violent behavior in the past 12 months as measured by our school survey

    Youth engagement in violent behavior (by type of violence)

    Measured: up to 60 months

  4. Community rates of violence involving youth 10-24 aggregated by police department, emergency department, and school district records

    Community-level rates of youth violence (by type of violence)

    Measured: up to 60 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
8,037 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02706145
Sponsor's protocol ID
15.0910
Other IDs
1U01CE002711
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
23 Feb 2016
Last updated
14 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Will share data, but nothing with identifiers

Publications

  • Castle B, Wendel M, Kerr J, Brooms D, Rollins A. Public Health's Approach to Systemic Racism: a Systematic Literature Review. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Feb;6(1):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-0494-x. Epub 2018 May 4.

    PubMed 29729001
  • Wendel ML, Jones G Jr. Equity for Whom? The Example of Qualified Opportunity Zones. Am J Public Health. 2020 Mar;110(3):280-281. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305532. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32023101
  • Wendel ML. Commentary: Racism is a Public Health Emergency. Fam Community Health. 2020 Oct/Dec;43(4):255-256. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000281. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32826736
  • Castle B, Wendel M, Kelly Pryor BN, Ingram M. Assessing Community Leadership: Understanding Community Capacity for Health Improvement. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Jul/Aug;23 Suppl 4 Suppl, Community Health Status Assessment:S47-S52. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000587.

    PubMed 28542064
  • Golden TL, Wendel ML. Public Health's Next Step in Advancing Equity: Re-evaluating Epistemological Assumptions to Move Social Determinants From Theory to Practice. Front Public Health. 2020 May 7;8:131. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00131. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32457863

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Social norming campaign in people with Violence, run by University of Louisville at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of youth who report descriptive norms that promote violence as measured by our school survey (time frame: up to 60 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02706145, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in