Acute DiarrhoeaPhase 4ADIASENCT02704091
Efficacy of Diosmectite (Smecta®) in the Symptomatic Treatment of Acute Diarrhoea in Adults
A Phase 4 study testing Smecta in people with Acute Diarrhoea, run by Ipsen at 71 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that diosmectite efficacy is superior to placebo regarding time to recovery of an acute diarrhoea episode presumed of infectious origin in adult subjects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Diarrhoea
- What is being tested?
- Smecta
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 858 participants
- Where
- 71 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 17 Mar 2016to 8 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provision of written informed consent prior to any study related procedures
- Male or female subject (outpatient) legally considered as an adult (age of majority). In Czech Republic, the upper limit of age will be 70 years inclusive. In Egypt, the upper limit of age will be 60 years inclusive.
- Subject has a diagnosis of acute diarrhoea presumed of infectious origin, defined as the passage of 3 or more unformed loose or watery stools (rated according to the Bristol scale) per day within the last 48 hours without associated alarm symptoms
- Subject has, usually, normal bowel habits (Rome III criteria), i.e. at least 3 stools per week and no more than 3 stools per day
- Subject must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions and willing to return to the clinic for the follow up evaluation(s) as specified in the protocol.
Who cannot join
- At least one of the following alarm symptoms
- Bloody diarrhoea*,
- pus in the stools*,
- fever ≥38°C*,
- moderate or severe dehydration according to World Health Organisation (WHO) definition, requiring intravenous (IV) rehydration*,
- repeated vomiting*,
Show all 37Show fewer
- persistent abdominal pain* *These symptoms are considered as alarm symptoms
- other episode of acute watery diarrhoea within the previous 30 days,
- persistent diarrhoea, defined as acutely starting episode of diarrhoea lasting more than 14 days,
- history of chronic diarrhoea (Rome III criteria); i.e. 3 or more loose or watery stools per day for at least 12 weeks, consecutive or not, in the preceding 12 months,
- traveller's diarrhoea defined as a diarrhoeal episode due to contamination experienced by subjects having travelled in at risk countries, or coming from abroad and experiencing locally an acute diarrhoea episode, occurring usually within the first 2 weeks of the stay in a foreign environment.
- Diarrhoea suspected to be induced by drug for example:
- antibiotic therapy, including Clostridium difficile-induced diarrhoea, within 1 week before entry in the study,
- laxative agent
- thyroid hormone (at a nonstabilised dosing),
- intake of other prohibited drugs (as specified in the protocol)
- anti-diarrhoeal agent intake during the last month,
- any subject requiring repeated intake of a drug with a narrow therapeutic margin (as specified in the protocol),
- history of hypersensitivity to diosmectite or its excipients or placebo components,
- subject likely to require treatment during the study with drugs that are not permitted by the study protocol (for example, antibiotic agent, anti-diarrhoeal agent, antiemetic drug, antispasmodic drug),
- use of any investigational medication within the last 30 days before entering this study,
- subject who previously entered in a clinical study within the past 30 days.
- Other digestive exclusion criteria:
- History of gastric or intestinal resection, vagotomy,
- known digestive malabsorption disease, including coeliac disease
- known lactose intolerance,
- any suspicion of abdominal surgery need,
- known inflammatory bowel disease.
- Other exclusion criteria:
- Known Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive status,
- known or suspected immunosuppression,
- known severe renal insufficiency (including e-GFR not less than 45 mL/min) or hepatic insufficiency,
- known endocrine disease or Type II Diabetes Mellitus with HBA1c more than 8,5% or insulin-dependent diabetes,
- history of, or known current, problems with alcohol abuse and/or known drug addiction (cocaine, heroin, hashish…),
- previous enrolment in this study,
- any mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude.
- Pregnant or lactating women
Trial locations and contacts
71 sites in 6 countries.
71 sites in 6 countries
Tunisia19 sites
CSB Zouhour
Ben Arous, 41200
Hôpital Régional de Ben Arous
Ben Arous
Centre intermédiaire de Santé de Base
La Marsa, 2078
Hôpital des Forces de Sécurité Intérieure
La Marsa, 2078
CSB Hedi Chaker
Sousse, 4000
Hôpital Universitaire Salhoul
Sousse, 4011
CSB Akouda
Sousse, 4022
CSB Sidi Bou Ali
Sousse, 4022
CSB Zouhour
Sousse, 4031
CSB Nager
Sousse, 4041
CSB Riadh
Sousse, 4041
CSB Oued Blibène
Sousse, 4051
CSB Kalaa Kébira
Sousse, 4060
CSB Zaouia
Sousse, 4081
Centre de santé de base Bab Laasal
Tunis, 1006
Hopital Militaire Principal d'instructions de Tunis
Tunis, 1008
Centre de santé de base Ras Tabia
Tunis, 2000
Centre de santé de base Ksar Said
Tunis, 2009
Centre de santé de base Ibn Khaldoun
Tunis, 2062
Czechia15 sites
Ordinace PL pro dospělé
Čáslav, 286 01
OPL, spol. s r.o.
Hrochův Týnec, 53862
Ordinace PL pro dospělé
Kladno, 27201
Ordinace PL pro dospělé, Poliklinika přízemí, Nerudova
Kralupy nad Vltavou, 278 01
AK Medipraktik, s.r.o
Orlová, 73514
MUDr. Alena Břeňová - PL pro dospělé
Pardubice, 53009
Ordinace PL pro dospělé
Prague, Karlín, 186 00
Ordinace PL pro dospělé
Prague, Nusle, 140 000
Ordinace PL pro dospělé
Prague, Vysočany, 190 00
Ordinace Bělehradská s.r.o
Prague, 12000
Ordinace PL pro dospělé
Prague, 164 00
Ordinace PL pro dospělé
Prague, 182 00
Ordinace PL pro dospělé
Praha 6, 2.patro, 160 00
Praktický lékař Radotín, s.r.o.
Radotín, 15300
Ordinace PL pro dospělé
Vrchlabí, 54301
Poland15 sites
Komisji Edukacji Narodowej 3B lok. 1
Bialystok, 15-687
Cermed
Bialystok, 15270
KLIMED
Bychawa, 23100
Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Roman Spyra
Katowice, 40-018
MEKMED S.C. Przychodnia Lekarska NZOZ
Katowice, 40-709
Lekarska Spółka Partnerska Familia T S A Gugała
Kozienice, 26900
Praktyka Lekarzy Rodzinnych NZOZ
Krakow, 30-664
Niepubliczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej Ugorek sp. z o.o.
Krakow, 31455
Niepubliczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej Centrum Zdrowia i Profilaktyki "Dąbie" spółka z o.o.
Krakow, 31567
KLIMED
Łomża, 18404
Niepubliczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej Praktyka Lekarza Rodzinnego "Eskulap" spółka z o.o.
Lublin, 20-044
NZOZ Primed
Malbork, 82-200
Solumed Research Site
Poznan, 60529
Centrum Medyczne Pratia S.A
Warsaw, 01868
PrzychodniaLekarska ORLIK Sp. z o.o
Warsaw, 04-041
Algeria14 sites
Cabinet privé, Coopératives El MOSTAKBAL, BIRKHADEM
Algiers, 16000
CHU Beni Messous
Algiers, 16000
CHU Mustapha
Algiers, 16000
Polyclinique d'el Achour
Algiers, 16000
Polyclinique de Baba Hassen
Algiers, 16000
Cabinet privé, 29 avenue amara Youcef
Blida, 09000
EPH Blida
Blida, 09000
EPH EL Afroun
Blida, 09000
EPH Bologhine
Bologhine, 16000
Cabinet privé, cité des 408 lgmts Bt3
Boumerdas, 35000
CHU BEN BADIS Constantine
Constantine, 25000
Polyclinique de Dély Brahim
Deli Ibrahim, 16000
Polyclinique DRARIA
Draria, 16000
CHU Oran
Oran, 31000
Egypt7 sites
Clinical Research Center
Alexandria
Ain Shams University Hospitals
Cairo
Air Force Specialized Hospital
Cairo
Al Hussein University Hospital
Cairo
Badr University Hospital
Cairo
Cairo University
Cairo
Tanta University
Tanta
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Diosmectite (Smecta®) in the Symptomatic Treatment of Acute Diarrhoea in Adults. A Multicentre, Randomized, Double Blind Placebo Controlled, Parallel, Groups Study
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that diosmectite efficacy is superior to placebo regarding time to recovery of an acute diarrhoea episode presumed of infectious origin in adult subjects.
- Conditions
- Acute Diarrhoea
- Being tested
- Smecta, Smecta placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SmectaDrug
Also called Diosmectite Beaufour
Smecta placeboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Smecta | Active comparator | 2 sachets, three times a day (TID), during 5 to 9 days Receives: Drug: Smecta |
| Smecta placebo | Placebo comparator | 2 sachets of placebo, TID, during 5 to 9 days Receives: Drug: Smecta placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Recovery
Time to recovery was defined as the time from the first study treatment intake recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF) to the first formed stool followed by a non-watery stool, recorded in the DEB. Results are presented as median time to recovery, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Participants prematurely withdrawn without recovery or ending the study without recovery were censored (not responders) at the date/time of their last stool as recorded in the DEB. Participants who had not filled in the DEB (i.e. no post-baseline evaluation of stools) were censored at the date/time of their first study treatment intake (or the randomisation date/time if not administered).
Measured: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Secondary outcomes (7)
Time From Diarrhoea Onset to Recovery
The event of diarrhoea onset (i.e. loose or watery stool) was recorded in the eCRF and the event of recovery (i.e. first formed stool followed by a non-watery stool) was recorded in the DEB. Results are presented as median time from diarrhoea onset to recovery, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Participants prematurely withdrawn without recovery or ending the study without recovery were censored (not responders) at the date/time of their last stool as recorded in the DEB. Participants who had not filled in the DEB (i.e. no post-baseline evaluation of stools) were censored at the date/time of their first study treatment intake (or the randomisation date/time if not administered).
Measured: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Time From Diarrhoea Onset to First Formed Stool
The event of diarrhoea onset (i.e. loose or watery stool) was recorded in the eCRF and the event of first formed stool was recorded in the DEB. Results are presented as median time from diarrhoea onset to first formed stool, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Participants prematurely withdrawn with no formed stool or ending the study with no formed stool were censored at the date/time of their last stool as recorded in the DEB. Participants who had not filled in the DEB (i.e. no post-baseline evaluation of stools) were censored at the date/time of their first study treatment intake (or the randomisation date/time if not administered).
Measured: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Time From the First Study Treatment Intake to the Last Watery Stool
The event of first study treatment intake was recorded in the eCRF and the event of last watery stool was recorded in the DEB. Results are presented as median time from first study treatment intake to last watery stool, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Participants prematurely withdrawn with no watery stool or ending the study with no watery stool were censored at the date/time of their last stool as recorded in the DEB. Participants who had not filled in the DEB (i.e. no post-baseline evaluation of stools) were censored at the date/time of their first study treatment intake (or the randomisation date/time if not administered).
Measured: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Number of Stools, Per 12-Hour Period
Number of stools, per 12-hour period, was recorded in the DEB.
Measured: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Number of Watery Stools, Per 12-Hour Period
Number of watery stools, per 12-hour period, was recorded in the DEB.
Measured: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Percentage of Participants With Associated Symptoms, Per 12-Hour Period
Percentage of participants with associated symptoms (at least 1 symptom of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain or anal irritation) per 12-hour period is presented. Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and anal irritation were recorded in the DEB.
Measured: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Abdominal Pain Intensity Scores, Per 12-Hour Period
Abdominal pain intensity per 12-hour period was recorded in the DEB. Abdominal pain intensity was rated with a 5-point ordinal scale: 0 = absent, 1= mild, 2 =moderate, 3 = severe, 4= very severe. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The median abdominal pain intensity score for each 12-hour period is presented.
Measured: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start17 Mar 2016
- Primary completion8 Apr 2019
- Study completion8 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Acute DiarrhoeaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IpsenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 858 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ipsen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ipsen Medical Director, Study director, Ipsen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02704091
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- F-FR-00250-105
- Other IDs
- 2015-001138-10, 2015
- Acronym
- ADIASE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Diosmectite (Smecta®) in the Symptomatic Treatment of Acute Diarrhoea in Adults. A Multicentre, Randomized, Double Blind Placebo Controlled, Parallel, Groups Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02704091
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ADIASE / F-FR-00250-105
- Conditions
- Acute Diarrhoea
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 858 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IpsenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 17 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Apr 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that diosmectite efficacy is superior to placebo regarding time to recovery of an acute diarrhoea episode presumed of infectious origin in adult subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Smecta | Active comparator | Drug: Smecta2 sachets, three times a day (TID), during 5 to 9 days |
| Smecta placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Smecta placebo2 sachets of placebo, TID, during 5 to 9 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Provision of written informed consent prior to any study related procedures
- Male or female subject (outpatient) legally considered as an adult (age of majority). In Czech Republic, the upper limit of age will be 70 years inclusive. In Egypt, the upper limit of age will be 60 years inclusive.
- Subject has a diagnosis of acute diarrhoea presumed of infectious origin, defined as the passage of 3 or more unformed loose or watery stools (rated according to the Bristol scale) per day within the last 48 hours without associated alarm symptoms
- Subject has, usually, normal bowel habits (Rome III criteria), i.e. at least 3 stools per week and no more than 3 stools per day
- Subject must be willing and able to comply with study restrictions and willing to return to the clinic for the follow up evaluation(s) as specified in the protocol.
Key exclusion criteria (37 listed)
- At least one of the following alarm symptoms
- other episode of acute watery diarrhoea within the previous 30 days,
- persistent diarrhoea, defined as acutely starting episode of diarrhoea lasting more than 14 days,
- history of chronic diarrhoea (Rome III criteria); i.e. 3 or more loose or watery stools per day for at least 12 weeks, consecutive or not, in the preceding 12 months,
- traveller's diarrhoea defined as a diarrhoeal episode due to contamination experienced by subjects having travelled in at risk countries, or coming from abroad and experiencing locally an acute diarrhoea episode, occurring usually within the first 2 weeks of the stay in a foreign environment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SmectaAlso: Diosmectite Beaufour | Drug | Smecta |
| Smecta placebo | Drug | Smecta placebo |
Primary outcome
Time to Recovery
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Time to recovery was defined as the time from the first study treatment intake recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF) to the first formed stool followed by a non-watery stool, recorded in the DEB. Results are presented as median time to recovery, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Participants prematurely withdrawn without recovery or ending the study without recovery were censored (not responders) at the date/time of their last stool as recorded in the DEB. Participants who had not filled in the DEB (i.e. no post-baseline evaluation of stools) were censored at the date/time of their first study treatment intake (or the randomisation date/time if not administered).
7 secondary outcomes
Time From Diarrhoea Onset to Recovery
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Time From Diarrhoea Onset to First Formed Stool
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Time From the First Study Treatment Intake to the Last Watery Stool
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Number of Stools, Per 12-Hour Period
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Number of Watery Stools, Per 12-Hour Period
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Percentage of Participants With Associated Symptoms, Per 12-Hour Period
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Abdominal Pain Intensity Scores, Per 12-Hour Period
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Acute Diarrhoea
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Two Probiotics for Reducing Diarrhea Frequency in Children Aged 6-24 Months
Acute Watery Diarrhea, Acute Watery Diarrhoea
Enrolling by invitation
Hypernatremia Fluid Therapy in Childhood Diarrhoea
Hypernatremia, Acute Watery Diarrhea
Recruiting
Bacillus Clausii Versus Multistrain Probiotics for Acute Watery Diarrhea in Children
Acute Watery Diarrhea
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Bacillus Clausii and Saccharomyces Boulardii for Acute Diarrhea at Day 3
Acute Watery Diarrhea
Not yet recruiting
Rural Water Filtration and Health Study
Diarrhea, Enteric Pathogens
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ipsen Medical Director study director
Ipsen
71 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Smecta in people with Acute Diarrhoea, run by Ipsen at 71 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 37 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 71 sites in Tunisia, Czechia, Poland, Algeria, Egypt and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Recovery (time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2020.