AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)COMPASS-XTNCT02700984

A Study to Assess Long-Term Safety of the CyPass Micro-Stent in Patients Completing the COMPASS Trial

A study testing CyPass Micro-Stent and Cataract Surgery in people with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG), run by Alcon Research at 22 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety of the CyPass Micro-Stent in subjects who completed Study Protocol TMI-09-01, COMPASS Trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)
What is being tested?
CyPass Micro-Stent and Cataract Surgery
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
282 participants
Where
22 sitesUnited States
Study dates
30 Mar 2016to 18 Apr 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Completed the COMPASS Trial
  • Understands study requirements and is willing to follow study instructions and return for study visits

Who cannot join

  • Systemic disease that would put subject health at risk and/or prevent completion of required study visits.
  • Early termination from the COMPASS Trial.

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 1 country.

22 sites in 1 country

United States22 sites
  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Cape Coral, Florida, 33904

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72704

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Fort Collins, Colorado, 80525

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76102

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Garden City, Kansas, 67846

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Glendale, Arizona, 85306

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Kingston, Pennsylvania, 18704

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Maryville, Tennessee, 37803

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Parker, Colorado, 80134

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Sioux City, Iowa, 51104

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63131

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    Vineland, New Jersey, 08361

  • Alcon Investigative Site

    West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, 15122

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Observational Multicenter Clinical Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety of the CyPass Micro-Stent in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Who Have Completed Participation in the COMPASS Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety of the CyPass Micro-Stent in subjects who completed Study Protocol TMI-09-01, COMPASS Trial.

Read the detailed description

The COMPASS Trial (TMI-09-01) was a prospective, randomized, comparative multicenter study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the CyPass Micro-Stent in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma who were undergoing cataract surgery. In the study, 505 subjects were randomized to either the CyPass group, who underwent cataract surgery and received the CyPass Micro-Stent, or the Control group, who underwent cataract surgery alone. All subjects randomized were to be followed for 2 years postoperatively. Four hundred eighty (480) subjects completed this study.

The COMPASS-XT (TMI-09-01-E) Trial is designed to collect safety data beyond 24 months postoperatively for subjects who completed the COMPASS Trial. In COMPASS-XT, clinical data will be collected at 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months postoperatively for a total of 5 year follow-up across the 2 studies.

Being tested
CyPass Micro-Stent, Cataract Surgery
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma, Open-Angle

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CyPass Micro-StentDevice

    The CyPass Micro-Stent is a small tube with a through-lumen designed to redirect aqueous fluid from the front into the back of the eye. The device is implanted after completion of cataract surgery.

  • Cataract SurgeryProcedure or surgery

    Cataract surgery involves the removal of the natural lens, which has become clouded (called a cataract), and insertion of an artificial lens (called an intraocular lens). This procedure is done through a small surgical incision in the eye.

Study groups in NCT02700984
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cataract Surgery + CyPassExperimentalCyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial)
Receives: Device: CyPass Micro-Stent; Procedure: Cataract Surgery
Cataract Surgery OnlyActive comparatorCataract Surgery (COMPASS trial) with no CyPass Micro-Stent implantation
Receives: Procedure: Cataract Surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 5-year Annualized Rate (Percentage) of Sight-threatening Adverse Events, by Treatment Group

    Sight-threatening adverse events occurring in the study eye included, but were not limited to: BCVA loss of ≥ 3 lines, endophthalmitis, corneal decompensation, severe retinal detachment, severe choroidal hemorrhage, severe choroidal detachment and aqueous misdirection. The number of events at the end of Year 5 was divided by the number of eyes at risk at the beginning of Year 1 for a 5-year annualized rate. The 5-year annualized rate is reported as a percentage, with the last annual non-censored rate divided by 5. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Up to Month 60 postoperative

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Number of Subjects According to Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit

    Best corrected (with spectacles or other visual corrective devices) VA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at 1 or 4 meters and determined by total number of letters read correctly. 20/20 Snellen is considered 'normal' vision. A larger denominator indicates a lower visual acuity. Baseline, Month 12, and Month 24 data derived from previous COMPASS trial. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  2. Number of Subjects Who Reported at Least One Protocol-specified Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye

    Ocular adverse events in the study eye could include, but were not limited to, BCVA loss of 2 lines (10 letters) or more on the ETDRS chart in comparison with the best BCVA reported in Study Protocol TMI-09-01, endophthalmitis, corneal edema, and corneal decompensation. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Up to Month 60 postoperative

  3. Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Corneal Edema

    Corneal Edema (swelling of the cornea) was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 4-point scale: None (transparent and clear or less than mild), Mild (dull glassy appearance), Moderate (Dull glassy appearance of epithelium with large number of vacuoles), and Severe (epithelial bullae and/or stromal edema, localized or diffuse, with or without stromal striae). Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  4. Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Corneal Staining/Erosion

    Corneal Staining (appearance of tissue disruption and other pathophysiological changes) and erosion (abrasion) were assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 4-point scale: None (no fluorescein staining of epithelium, OR less than mild), Mild (slight fluorescein staining confined to a small focus), Moderate (regionally dense fluorescein staining (1 mm or greater in diameter) with underlying structure moderately visible), and Severe (marked fluorescein staining or epithelial loss). Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  5. Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Anterior Chamber Cells

    Inflammatory anterior chamber cells (cells in the front portion of the eye) were assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and reported in one of 6 categories according to cells per 1x1 mm slit: 0-<1 cell, 1-5 cells, 6-15 cells, 16-25 cells, and 26-50 cells, and >50 cells. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  6. Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Anterior Chamber Flare

    Anterior Chamber Flare (protein escaping from dilated vessels) was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 5-point scale: None, Faint, Moderate (iris and lens details clear), Marked (iris and lens details hazy), and Intense (fibrin or plastic aqueous). The presence of flare is a sign of intraocular inflammation. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  7. Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Iris Atrophy/Erosion

    Iris Atrophy/Erosion (deterioration) was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 4-point scale: None, Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  8. Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Iris Peaking

    Iris Peaking (one part of the iris pulled to a peak resulting in an irregular pupil) was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 4-point scale: None, Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  9. Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Iris Rubeosis

    Iris Rubeosis (abnormal blood vessels (formed by neovascularization) found on the surface of the iris) was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 4-point scale: None, Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  10. Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) Severity

    PCO (cloudy layer of scar tissue behind the lens implant) Severity was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 6-point scale: None, Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Severe, and Unspecified. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  11. Gonioscopy at Visits 36, 48, and 60, CyPass Subjects Only

    For subjects in the CyPass group, gonioscopic examination was performed to assess the position of the CyPass Micro-Stent in the angle and with respect to the iris and the corneal endothelium. A visible CyPass Micro-Stent indicated a lack of adhesions (favorable). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  12. Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Findings Noted During Fundus Examinations

    The dilated fundus examination was performed by the investigator to evaluate the health of the vitreous, retina, macula, choroid, and optic nerve. Clinically significant findings are reported categorically. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  13. Change From Month 24 in Visual Field Mean Deviation

    Visual field (how much one can see to each side while focusing the eyes on a central point (peripheral vision)) deviations were obtained with a Humphrey automated perimeter using the 24-2 SITA standard testing method. Normal deviation values are typically within 0 to -2 decibels (dB) and become more negative as the overall field worsens. Month 24 data derived from COMPASS trial. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  14. Change From Month 24 in Central Corneal Thickness

    Central corneal thickness was evaluated by Pachymetry and measured in micrometers (μm). A negative number indicates a decrease in corneal thickness (unfavorable). Month 24 data derived from COMPASS trial. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  15. Central Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Visit

    The endothelium maintains corneal hydration and reduced cell density can disrupt vision. Central endothelial cell counts were assessed using non-contact specular microscopy. Specular images were taken of the corneal endothelium and submitted to a reading center in order to standardize readings across all sites and optimize reading reliability. Baseline through Month 24 data were derived from COMPASS trial. A higher cell density indicates improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  16. Number of Subjects With CyPass Device Malposition, Dislodgement or Movement

    Device position was a qualitative and subjective assessment by the investigator and evaluated based on visible number of rings of the device under the gonioscopic exam. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint. This outcome measure was prespecified for Cataract Surgery + CyPass arm only.

    Measured: Up to 60 months postoperatively

  17. Mean Reduction From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A higher reduction from baseline (ie, a greater postitive number) indicates greater improvement. Baseline was derived from COMPASS trial. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  18. Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 20% Reduction in IOP From Baseline (COMPASS Trial) Without the Use of Ocular Hypotensive Medications

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

  19. Percentage of Subjects Not Using Ocular Hypotensive Medication With IOP ≥ 6 mmHg and ≤ 18 mmHg

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.

    Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start30 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion18 Apr 2018
  4. Study completion18 Apr 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
282 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02700984
Sponsor's protocol ID
TMI-09-01-E
Other IDs
GLD122b-C001
Acronym
COMPASS-XT
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
28 Feb 2016
Last updated
24 Jan 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CyPass Micro-Stent and Cataract Surgery in people with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG), run by Alcon Research at 22 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

5-year Annualized Rate (Percentage) of Sight-threatening Adverse Events, by Treatment Group (time frame: Up to Month 60 postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in