Myocardial IschemiaSEPPRMACI-ARMNCT02694185
Secondary Event Prevention Using Population Risk Management After PCI and for Anti-Rheumatic Medications
A study testing Caplan IVR in people with Myocardial Ischemia and Rheumatic Diseases, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 5 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) and its treatment carry profound public health and economic implications. Among Veterans, IHD represents one of the most common causes of death and disability, with over 500,000 affected individuals' annually. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myocardial Ischemia, Rheumatic Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Caplan IVR
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5,269 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2016to 28 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients will qualify for inclusion if they:
- Undergo PCI or are prescribed a DMARD.
- Are prescribed any of the following medications:
- [for the IHD intervention]
- Statin
- Beta-blocker
Show all 15Show fewer
- Thienopyridines (dual platelet inhibitors)
- [for the DMARD intervention]
- Oral methotrexate
- Sulfasalazine
- Azathioprine
- Leflunomide
- Tofacitinib
- Hydroxychloroquine [Note: as a study focused on adherence, the investigators will NOT address the appropriateness of prescribed medications, which is an important, but separate issue]
- Receive their care from the VA. This is defined by the presence of a VA-assigned-PCP in the year prior to PCI or in the year following PCI (IHD intervention) or in the year prior to or following index DMARD prescription (rheumatic disease intervention).
Who cannot join
- Patients will be excluded under the following circumstances:
- Undergoing only diagnostic (non-interventional) catheterization
- Receive their index medicines (listed in item above) from a non-VA source
- Discharge to nursing home or skilled nursing facility
- Individuals with impaired decision making capacity
- Prisoners
- Pregnant women
- The terminally ill
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 2 countries.
5 sites in 2 countries
United States4 sites
Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
Aurora, Colorado, 80045-7211
Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, California, 94121
Puerto Rico1 site
VA Caribbean Healthcare System, San Juan, PR
San Juan, 00921
About this study
Official title: Secondary Event Prevention Using Population Risk Management After PCI
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) and its treatment carry profound public health and economic implications. Among Veterans, IHD represents one of the most common causes of death and disability, with over 500,000 affected individuals' annually. Rheumatic disease, though far less common than IHD can affect multiple organ systems and requires therapies costing in excess of $50,000 a year. Optimal treatment of Veterans with IHD and rheumatic disease requires a number of medications to maintain or improve health. Not taking medications as prescribed, however, is common and increases the risk of subsequent adverse events (cardiac death and myocardial infarction [MI]).
To improve medication adherence rates and the cardiac health of Veterans with IHD, the investigators propose to test a medication adherence intervention. Known as VA SEPPRMACI-ARM (Secondary Event Prevention using Population Risk Management After PCI and for Anti-Rheumatic Medications), this intervention will consist of: proactive real-time adherence monitoring of patients and targeting of individuals if they have not refilled their medication a given number of days after it was due for refill. The intervention will employ a tailored, escalating-intensity approach which begins with some combination of personalized short messaging service (SMS) text messages and interactive voice response (IVR) telephone technology, depending on patient preference. Patients not completing SMS and then IVR by not refilling their medication (or declining SMS and not completing IVR) escalate to a trained research interventionalist. The interventionalist will contact the patient and address adherence barriers based on the dimensions outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) that are specific to each patient. The investigators will test the intervention on IHD patients who have recently undergone PCI-a cardiac procedure commonly used among IHD patients to improve the heart's blood flow and in patients starting anti-rheumatic medication. The investigators will test the intervention at four VA Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories (CCLs) and have 12 sites serving as usual care controls.
Read the detailed description
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) and rheumatic diseases are both pervasive, expensive, and results in grave health consequences. IHD affects an estimated 15.4 million Americans 20 years of age-representing 6.4% of the adult population. The direct and indirect cost of IHD has been estimated at $195.2 billion, with a doubling of cost projected by 2030.5 Similarly, the direct cost to the U.S. workforce for rheumatoid arthritis alone approaches $5.8 billion yearly.
Widely-accepted national evidence-based guidelines support the use of cardio-protective medications to reduce the risk of adverse consequences resulting from IHD and disease modifying anti-rheumatic medications (DMARDs) to reduce the risk of adverse consequence in rheumatic diseases. For example, numerous rigorously conducted randomized trials show that statins improve outcomes and reduce mortality in patients with established cardiovascular disease (i.e., secondary prevention), including those undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The use of statins and beta-blockers have been repeatedly demonstrated to be cost-effective in lowering cardiovascular event (CVE) rates, in part by their effects on cholesterol, and blood pressure, respectively. Accordingly, the most recent VA performance measures and American Heart Association guidelines encourage the use of statins in patients with atherosclerotic disease; beta-blockers in subjects with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction less than 40%), prior MI, or blood pressure of 140/90 or greater; and clopidogrel following any acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or PCI with stent. The rheumatology literature provides similar evidence for the benefit of DMARDs in rheumatic diseases, and guidelines strongly endorse their use.
Unfortunately, non-adherence to medications is common, and increases the risk of poor outcomes. The investigators' 2011 national preliminary data from VA cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCLs) demonstrate that over 6300 patients experienced at least one refill gap of >= 7 days for statins in the year following PCI. The mean proportion of days covered (PDC) for these patients was only 75%-below the PDC threshold of 80% that typical defines adherent patients, based on the empiric evidence for effectiveness of medications at this cut-point. Non-adherent patients were present at all CCLs without substantial variation in mean PDC by center, suggesting a global problem.
Systematic problems underlie and contribute to non-adherence to medications. Usual care of IHD and rheumatic disease patients is encumbered by systematic deficiencies including: passive monitoring (contact with patients only when initiated by the patient) and inefficiency (time-consuming patient-by-patient approach, rather than through population management). The proposed intervention addresses both the complex patient-specific factors (emphasizing forgetfulness and carelessness) and the systematic inadequacies using a multi-modal, escalating approach.
Objectives
- To assess the effectiveness of a multi-faceted patient-centered intervention versus usual care in improving medication adherence as measured by proportion of days covered (PDC, primary outcome). This will be tested among IHD patients for statins, beta-blockers and clopidogrel in the year after PCI and among rheumatology clinic patients chronically prescribed DMARDs. Hypothesis: The PDC for patients in the intervention arm will exceed the PDC for the usual care arm by a 10% absolute difference.
- (Secondary outcome): To determine the effectiveness of a multi-faceted patient-centered intervention versus usual care in reducing secondary CVEs (myocardial infarction [MI], repeat revascularization [PCI or coronary bypass graft], and all-cause mortality) among IHD patients at 18 months post-PCI and progressive erosive disease demonstrated on plain film radiographs in patients with rheumatic diseases (i.e. "radiographic progression"). Hypothesis: The rate of CVEs and radiographic progression will be 5% relatively lower for patients in the intervention arm compared with usual care.
- (Secondary outcome): To establish the cost to implement and maintain the intervention, above the cost of usual care, as well as the incremental cost effectiveness (ICE; e.g. cost to achieve at 10% improvement in PDC; cost per CVE prevented). Hypothesis: This aim does not posit a hypothesis as the objective is descriptive. The available funding for this project limits this outcome to IHD patients (no rheumatic disease patients will be analyzed according to cost).
- Conditions
- Myocardial Ischemia, Rheumatic Diseases
- Being tested
- Caplan IVR
- Keywords
- Medication Adherence, Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterans
- Medical subject headings
- Myocardial Ischemia, Rheumatic Diseases, Medication Adherence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Caplan IVROther
This intervention will consist of: proactive real-time adherence monitoring of patients and targeting of individuals only when they have exhibited non-adherence behavior (i.e., if patients have not refilled their medication more than 4 or 7 days after it was due to be refilled). The intervention will employ a tailored, escalating-intensity approach which begins with some combination of personalized short messaging service (SMS) text messages and interactive voice response (IVR) telephone technology, depending on patient preference. Patients failing SMS and then IVR by not refilling their medication (or declining SMS and failing IVR) escalate to a trained research interventionalist (typically, a clinical pharmacist). The interventionalist will contact the patient and address adherence barriers based on the dimensions outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) that are specific to each patient.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | This group will undergo the intervention as described in the protocol Receives: Other: Caplan IVR |
| Control Group | No intervention | This group will not receive the intervention, they will receive usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) is measured by looking at the number of doses of medication a patient has versus days in the month (if a patient has 20 days of medication for a 30 day period their PDC is 20/30, 2/3, or 66.7%). Used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention, PDC will be tested among IHD patients in the year after PCI and among rheumatology clinic patients chronically prescribed DMARDs.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Cardiovascular Events (CVE)
Cardiovascular Events (CVEs) such as mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization among IHD patients at 12 months post-PCI and progressive erosive disease demonstrated in patients with rheumatic disease will be monitored. CVEs will be monitored to determine if there is a reduction in the occurrence of those events as a result of the intervention.
Measured: 1 year
Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE)
To establish the cost to implement and maintain the intervention, above the cost of usual care. Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE) is the cost to achieve a 10% improvement in PDC, and the cost of CVE prevented.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Oct 2016
- Primary completion31 Dec 2019
- Study completion28 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myocardial IschemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5,269 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Liron Caplan, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02694185
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IIR 14-048
- Other IDs
- 16-1419, 1I01HX001604-01A2
- Acronym
- SEPPRMACI-ARM
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 27 May 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Raghavan S, Liu WG, Michael Ho P, Plomondon ME, Baron AE, Caplan L, Joynt Maddox KE, Magid D, Saxon DR, Voils CI, Bradley SM, Maddox TM. Coronary artery disease severity modifies associations between glycemic control and both mortality and myocardial infarction. J Diabetes Complications. 2018 May;32(5):480-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PubMed 29483016Baker JF, Sauer B, Teng CC, George M, Cannon GW, Ibrahim S, Cannella A, England BR, Michaud K, Caplan L, Davis LA, O'Dell J, Mikuls TR. Initiation of Disease-Modifying Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Associated With Changes in Blood Pressure. J Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Jun;24(4):203-209. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000736.
PubMed 29664818Yazdany J, Caplan L, Fitzgerald J, Schmajuk G. Editorial: The Evolving Art and Science of American College of Rheumatology Guidelines. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;71(1):2-4. doi: 10.1002/art.40725. Epub 2018 Nov 30. No abstract available.
PubMed 30499229McCulley CB, Barton JL, Cannon GW, Sauer BC, Teng CC, George MD, Caplan L, England BR, Mikuls TR, Baker JF. Body mass index and persistence of conventional DMARDs and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 May-Jun;37(3):422-428. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
PubMed 30418120Hirsh J, Wood P, Keniston A, Boyle D, Quinzanos I, Caplan L, Davis L. Universal Health Literacy Precautions Are Associated With a Significant Increase in Medication Adherence in Vulnerable Rheumatology Patients. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;2(2):110-118. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11108. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
PubMed 31957348Raghavan S, Liu WG, Berkowitz SA, Baron AE, Plomondon ME, Maddox TM, Reusch JEB, Ho PM, Caplan L. Association of Glycemic Control Trajectory with Short-Term Mortality in Diabetes Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk: a Joint Latent Class Modeling Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2266-2273. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05848-5. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
PubMed 32333313Daniel CM, Davila L, Makris UE, Mayo H, Caplan L, Davis L, Solow EB. Ethnic Disparities in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Prevalence Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in the United States: a Systematic Review. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;2(9):525-532. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11170. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
PubMed 32869533
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Secondary Event Prevention Using Population Risk Management After PCI
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02694185
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SEPPRMACI-ARM / IIR 14-048
- Conditions
- Myocardial Ischemia, Rheumatic Diseases
- Keywords
- Medication Adherence, Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterans
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5,269 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jun 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) and its treatment carry profound public health and economic implications. Among Veterans, IHD represents one of the most common causes of death and disability, with over 500,000 affected individuals' annually. Rheumatic disease, though far less common than IHD can affect multiple organ systems and requires therapies costing in excess of $50,000 a year. Optimal treatment of Veterans with IHD and rheumatic disease requires a number of medications to maintain or improve health. Not taking medications as prescribed, however, is common and increases the risk of subsequent adverse events (cardiac death and myocardial infarction [MI]).
To improve medication adherence rates and the cardiac health of Veterans with IHD, the investigators propose to test a medication adherence intervention. Known as VA SEPPRMACI-ARM (Secondary Event Prevention using Population Risk Management After PCI and for Anti-Rheumatic Medications), this intervention will consist of: proactive real-time adherence monitoring of patients and targeting of individuals if they have not refilled their medication a given number of days after it was due for refill. The intervention will employ a tailored, escalating-intensity approach which begins with some combination of personalized short messaging service (SMS) text messages and interactive voice response (IVR) telephone technology, depending on patient preference. Patients not completing SMS and then IVR by not refilling their medication (or declining SMS and not completing IVR) escalate to a trained research interventionalist. The interventionalist will contact the patient and address adherence barriers based on the dimensions outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) that are specific to each patient. The investigators will test the intervention on IHD patients who have recently undergone PCI-a cardiac procedure commonly used among IHD patients to improve the heart's blood flow and in patients starting anti-rheumatic medication. The investigators will test the intervention at four VA Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories (CCLs) and have 12 sites serving as usual care controls.
Detailed description
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) and rheumatic diseases are both pervasive, expensive, and results in grave health consequences. IHD affects an estimated 15.4 million Americans 20 years of age-representing 6.4% of the adult population. The direct and indirect cost of IHD has been estimated at $195.2 billion, with a doubling of cost projected by 2030.5 Similarly, the direct cost to the U.S. workforce for rheumatoid arthritis alone approaches $5.8 billion yearly.
Widely-accepted national evidence-based guidelines support the use of cardio-protective medications to reduce the risk of adverse consequences resulting from IHD and disease modifying anti-rheumatic medications (DMARDs) to reduce the risk of adverse consequence in rheumatic diseases. For example, numerous rigorously conducted randomized trials show that statins improve outcomes and reduce mortality in patients with established cardiovascular disease (i.e., secondary prevention), including those undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The use of statins and beta-blockers have been repeatedly demonstrated to be cost-effective in lowering cardiovascular event (CVE) rates, in part by their effects on cholesterol, and blood pressure, respectively. Accordingly, the most recent VA performance measures and American Heart Association guidelines encourage the use of statins in patients with atherosclerotic disease; beta-blockers in subjects with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction less than 40%), prior MI, or blood pressure of 140/90 or greater; and clopidogrel following any acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or PCI with stent. The rheumatology literature provides similar evidence for the benefit of DMARDs in rheumatic diseases, and guidelines strongly endorse their use.
Unfortunately, non-adherence to medications is common, and increases the risk of poor outcomes. The investigators' 2011 national preliminary data from VA cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCLs) demonstrate that over 6300 patients experienced at least one refill gap of >= 7 days for statins in the year following PCI. The mean proportion of days covered (PDC) for these patients was only 75%-below the PDC threshold of 80% that typical defines adherent patients, based on the empiric evidence for effectiveness of medications at this cut-point. Non-adherent patients were present at all CCLs without substantial variation in mean PDC by center, suggesting a global problem.
Systematic problems underlie and contribute to non-adherence to medications. Usual care of IHD and rheumatic disease patients is encumbered by systematic deficiencies including: passive monitoring (contact with patients only when initiated by the patient) and inefficiency (time-consuming patient-by-patient approach, rather than through population management). The proposed intervention addresses both the complex patient-specific factors (emphasizing forgetfulness and carelessness) and the systematic inadequacies using a multi-modal, escalating approach.
Objectives
- To assess the effectiveness of a multi-faceted patient-centered intervention versus usual care in improving medication adherence as measured by proportion of days covered (PDC, primary outcome). This will be tested among IHD patients for statins, beta-blockers and clopidogrel in the year after PCI and among rheumatology clinic patients chronically prescribed DMARDs. Hypothesis: The PDC for patients in the intervention arm will exceed the PDC for the usual care arm by a 10% absolute difference.
- (Secondary outcome): To determine the effectiveness of a multi-faceted patient-centered intervention versus usual care in reducing secondary CVEs (myocardial infarction [MI], repeat revascularization [PCI or coronary bypass graft], and all-cause mortality) among IHD patients at 18 months post-PCI and progressive erosive disease demonstrated on plain film radiographs in patients with rheumatic diseases (i.e. "radiographic progression"). Hypothesis: The rate of CVEs and radiographic progression will be 5% relatively lower for patients in the intervention arm compared with usual care.
- (Secondary outcome): To establish the cost to implement and maintain the intervention, above the cost of usual care, as well as the incremental cost effectiveness (ICE; e.g. cost to achieve at 10% improvement in PDC; cost per CVE prevented). Hypothesis: This aim does not posit a hypothesis as the objective is descriptive. The available funding for this project limits this outcome to IHD patients (no rheumatic disease patients will be analyzed according to cost).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Other: Caplan IVRThis group will undergo the intervention as described in the protocol |
| Control Group | No intervention | –This group will not receive the intervention, they will receive usual care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 95 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Undergo PCI or are prescribed a DMARD.
- Are prescribed any of the following medications:
- [for the IHD intervention]
- [for the DMARD intervention]
- Receive their care from the VA. This is defined by the presence of a VA-assigned-PCP in the year prior to PCI or in the year following PCI (IHD intervention) or in the year prior to or following index DMARD prescription (rheumatic disease intervention).
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Undergoing only diagnostic (non-interventional) catheterization
- Receive their index medicines (listed in item above) from a non-VA source
- Discharge to nursing home or skilled nursing facility
- Individuals with impaired decision making capacity
- Prisoners
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Caplan IVRThis intervention will consist of: proactive real-time adherence monitoring of patients and targeting of individuals only when they have exhibited non-adherence behavior (i.e., if patients have not refilled their medication more than 4 or 7 days after it was due to be refilled). The intervention will employ a tailored, escalating-intensity approach which begins with some combination of personalized short messaging service (SMS) text messages and interactive voice response (IVR) telephone technology, depending on patient preference. Patients failing SMS and then IVR by not refilling their medication (or declining SMS and failing IVR) escalate to a trained research interventionalist (typically, a clinical pharmacist). The interventionalist will contact the patient and address adherence barriers based on the dimensions outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) that are specific to each patient. | Other | Experimental Group |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)
Time frame: 1 year
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) is measured by looking at the number of doses of medication a patient has versus days in the month (if a patient has 20 days of medication for a 30 day period their PDC is 20/30, 2/3, or 66.7%). Used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention, PDC will be tested among IHD patients in the year after PCI and among rheumatology clinic patients chronically prescribed DMARDs.
2 secondary outcomes
Cardiovascular Events (CVE)
Time frame: 1 year
Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 29483016Raghavan S, Liu WG, Michael Ho P, Plomondon ME, Baron AE, Caplan L, Joynt Maddox KE, Magid D, Saxon DR, Voils CI, Bradley SM, Maddox TM. Coronary artery disease severity modifies associations between glycemic control and both mortality and myocardial infarction. J Diabetes Complications. 2018 May;32(5):480-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 29664818Baker JF, Sauer B, Teng CC, George M, Cannon GW, Ibrahim S, Cannella A, England BR, Michaud K, Caplan L, Davis LA, O'Dell J, Mikuls TR. Initiation of Disease-Modifying Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Associated With Changes in Blood Pressure. J Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Jun;24(4):203-209. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000736.
- Background: PubMed 30499229Yazdany J, Caplan L, Fitzgerald J, Schmajuk G. Editorial: The Evolving Art and Science of American College of Rheumatology Guidelines. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;71(1):2-4. doi: 10.1002/art.40725. Epub 2018 Nov 30. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30418120McCulley CB, Barton JL, Cannon GW, Sauer BC, Teng CC, George MD, Caplan L, England BR, Mikuls TR, Baker JF. Body mass index and persistence of conventional DMARDs and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 May-Jun;37(3):422-428. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
- Background: PubMed 31957348Hirsh J, Wood P, Keniston A, Boyle D, Quinzanos I, Caplan L, Davis L. Universal Health Literacy Precautions Are Associated With a Significant Increase in Medication Adherence in Vulnerable Rheumatology Patients. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;2(2):110-118. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11108. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
- Background: PubMed 32333313Raghavan S, Liu WG, Berkowitz SA, Baron AE, Plomondon ME, Maddox TM, Reusch JEB, Ho PM, Caplan L. Association of Glycemic Control Trajectory with Short-Term Mortality in Diabetes Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk: a Joint Latent Class Modeling Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2266-2273. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05848-5. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 32869533Daniel CM, Davila L, Makris UE, Mayo H, Caplan L, Davis L, Solow EB. Ethnic Disparities in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Prevalence Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in the United States: a Systematic Review. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;2(9):525-532. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11170. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Myocardial Ischemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Thiamine Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Coronary Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Liron Caplan, MD PhD principal investigator
Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
5 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Caplan IVR in people with Myocardial Ischemia and Rheumatic Diseases, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 5 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02694185, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2026.