AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical PrecancerNCT02693379

Cervical Cancer Screening in Madagascar Using Smartphone Photos and Mobile Telemedicine

A study testing D-VIA in people with Cervical Precancer, run by Prof. Patrick Petignat at 1 site in Madagascar.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether smartphone photos may assist health-care worker (on-site) and to evaluate the diagnostic reliability and accuracy of cervical examination with smartphone photos of VIA (D-VIA), on-site and off-site, compared with conventional VIA, for human papillomavirus (HPV)… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 49 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Precancer
What is being tested?
D-VIA
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,041 participants
Where
1 siteMadagascar
Study dates
Feb 2015to Nov 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 49 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 30-49 years
  • HPV-positive
  • Attending the cervical cancer screening program conducted by the Saint-Damien Health-Care Centre
  • Understands study procedures and accepts voluntarily to participate by signing the informed consent form (ICF)

Who cannot join

  • Previous Hysterectomy
  • Conditions that can interfere with visualization of the cervix
  • Pregnancy > 20 weeks
  • Not able to comply with protocol study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Madagascar1 site
  • Saint-Damien Health-Care Centre

    Ambanja, Antsiranana

Other trials in Madagascar

About this study

Official title: Cervical Cancer Screening in Madagascar: Usability of Mobile Telemedicine for Detection of Precancerous Lesions From Smartphone Photos

The purpose of this study is to determine whether smartphone photos may assist health-care worker (on-site) and to evaluate the diagnostic reliability and accuracy of cervical examination with smartphone photos of VIA (D-VIA), on-site and off-site, compared with conventional VIA, for human papillomavirus (HPV) positive women.

Read the detailed description

Background: Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in females in Madagascar. In this country, a large-scale screening of precancerous lesions with cytology is hardly possible, because of the lack of specialists and infrastructures. Visual inspection of the cervix with application of 5% acetic acid (VIA) is an inexpensive alternative but very subjective since it depends on the examiner's experience. Mobile telemedicine is a very promising tool in order to assist non-expert health-care workers in rural area for cervical cancer screening.

Objective: To assess if Smartphone may assist health-care worker (on-site) and to evaluate the diagnostic reliability and accuracy of cervical examination with smartphone photos of VIA (D-VIA) compared with conventional VIA, for women testing positive for human papillomavirus (HPV).

Material and method: On-site health care workers will be trained in VIA. Prescreened HPV-positive women will be referred to VIA evaluation, during which digital images with a smartphone (D-VIA) will be taken for later evaluation by a VIA specialist in Geneva linked by telemedicine. Women with positive VIA results will be treated with cold coagulation if eligible. Histological results will be considered as gold standard. The results will be analyzed with Cohen's kappa coefficient, Mcnemar's test and Bonferroni's adjustment for multiple comparisons to assess the performance of D-VIA.

Expected results: Based on the results of this project, the investigators will develop an educational training and quality assurance program for health providers for VIA and so contribute to a scaling-up of cervical cancer control. An appropriate triage by VIA will reduce not only an excessive referral rate but also an excessive treatment delay, giving the possibility of a "screen (HPV), see (VIA/D-VIA), and treat" program in a single or two visits.

Being tested
D-VIA
Keywords
cervical cancer, HPV, VIA, screening, smartphone, telemedicine
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • D-VIADevice

    D-VIA images were captured during the cervical examination with a smartphone. Biopsies and cytological samples were taken on all patients and analyzed for gold standard results. Images were shown to off site experts. D-VIA and VIA diagnoses were then compared.

    Women who were diagnosed on-site as pathological underwent appropriate treatment at the same consultation. Women who were diagnosed as pathological later by histopathological analyses were asked to return to the clinic for treatment.

Study groups in NCT02693379
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
D-VIAExperimentalHPV high risk-positive (16, 18, 45, 31, 33, 35, 39, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68) women had a cervical examination using acetic acid (VIA) application and visual inspection.
Receives: Device: D-VIA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Differences in sensitivity and specificity of VIA examination (control) and digital VIA to detect cervical cancer and pre-cancer

    Sensitivity and specificity will be calculated using histological results as gold-standard. All lesion Cin2 and worse will be considered as pathological.

    Measured: up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Overall agreement between diagnoses based on VIA examination (control) and diagnoses for the same patient based on digital VIA.

    Measured: up to 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2015
  3. Primary completionSep 2015
  4. Study completionNov 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,041 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02693379
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-071
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
8 Jul 2015
Last updated
26 Feb 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data will be used for scientific publications and congress presentations.

Publications

  • Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2893-917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516.

    PubMed 21351269
  • Marquardt K. [Correlation of cervical cytology and histology]. Pathologe. 2011 Nov;32(6):491-6. doi: 10.1007/s00292-011-1479-2. German.

    PubMed 21822676

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing D-VIA in people with Cervical Precancer, run by Prof. Patrick Petignat at 1 site in Madagascar.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Madagascar. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Differences in sensitivity and specificity of VIA examination (control) and digital VIA to detect cervical cancer and pre-cancer (time frame: up to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02693379, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in