AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokePhase 2NCT02690493

The Efficacy of an Acupuncture Protocol and Use of Taping in the Treatment of Spastic Upper Limb After Stroke

A Phase 2 study testing Acupuncture, Functional Taping and Acupuncture and Functional Taping in people with Stroke and Cerebrovascular Stroke, run by Fernanda Cechetti at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether acupuncture and taping are effective in the treatment of spastic upper limb after stroke. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Cerebrovascular Stroke
What is being tested?
Acupuncture, Functional Taping and Acupuncture and Functional Taping
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Jan 2015to Dec 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with stroke diagnosis for at least six (06) months, who present hemiparesis in upper limb;
  • To accept participate in the study by signing theTerms of Consent;
  • Do not have any cognitive impairment.

Who cannot join

  • Do not follow the inclusion criteria;
  • To present shoulder subluxation or dislocation, shoulder pain syndrome or amputations (with or without the use of aids);
  • To present any allergic reaction due to use of bandage and/or do not adapt to treatment with needles.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90050170

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine whether acupuncture and taping are effective in the treatment of spastic upper limb after stroke.

Read the detailed description

Acupuncture and taping have emerged as treatment alternatives for many diseases with positive and satisfactory results.

Thus, acupuncture seeks to balance all physiological systems, using specific points on the body where needles are inserted.

In turn, the use of taping is associated to various benefits such as improved blood and lymphatic function. In addition, it assists in the correction of muscle function and in the decrease of pain for neurological suppression. The constant afferent mechanical and somatosensory stimuli are perceived in cortical level and may produce motor unit recruitment and contribute to neuroplasticity of the nervous system.

Thus, this research aims to analyze the effects of Acupuncture associated with Functional Taping on patients' upper limb with chronic hemiparesis after Stroke through a prospective, randomized intervention. Seventy-five patients will be evaluated before and after intervention with Acupuncture and / or Function Taping, divided into three groups (Acupuncture, Functional Taping and Acupuncture plus Functional Taping). The evaluation will consist of Isokinetic, Mini-Mental State Examination, Modified Ashworth Scale, Motor Activity Log, Wolf Motor Function Test and Visual Analog Scale of Pain. The results will be analyzed and presented descriptively, as of statistical comparisons of pre- and post-treatment and the relationship between the groups.

Being tested
Acupuncture, Functional Taping, Acupuncture and Functional Taping
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AcupunctureProcedure or surgery

    Acupuncture needles are inserted in specific acupuncture points on the boby (three points on both forearms and five points on the top of the head) for twenty minutes, three times a week, during twelve sessions.

  • Functional TapingOther

    Elastic taping is positioned directly on the skin (on the back of the fingers, hand, forearm and arm - paretic upper limb), three times a week, during twelve sessions. The patient should keep the taping on the skin for two days.

  • Acupuncture and Functional TapingOther

    Acupuncture needles are inserted in specific acupuncture points on the boby (three points on both forearms and five points on the top of the head) for twenty minutes, then elastic taping is positioned directly on skin (on the back of the fingers, hand, forearm and arm - paretic upper limb). Both procedures are performed three times a week, during twelve sessions.

Study groups in NCT02690493
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Acupuncture OnlyActive comparatorPatients will be treated with acupuncture only.
Receives: Procedure: Acupuncture
Functional Taping OnlyActive comparatorPatients will be treated with taping only.
Receives: Other: Functional Taping
Acupuncture and Functional TapingExperimentalPatients will be treated with both acupuncture and taping at the same session.
Receives: Other: Acupuncture and Functional Taping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The change of level of spasticity of upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention, assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale

    Modified Ashworth Scale

    Measured: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The change of functionality of upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention, assessed using the Wolf Motor Function Test

    Wolf Motor Function Test

    Measured: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.

  2. The change of frequency of movement of upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention

    Motor Activity Log

    Measured: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.

  3. The change of quality of movement of upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention

    Motor Activity Log

    Measured: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.

  4. The change of amplitude of movement after 12 sessions of intervention, assessed using Manual Goniometer

    Manual Goniometry

    Measured: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.

  5. The change of level of pain in upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention, assessed using Visual Analogue Scale

    Visual Analogue Scale of Pain

    Measured: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02690493
Sponsor's protocol ID
935.288
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
14 Feb 2016
Last updated
29 Feb 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Andrade FA, Pereira LV, Sousa FA. [Pain measurement in the elderly: a review]. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2006 Mar-Apr;14(2):271-6. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692006000200018. Epub 2006 May 8. Portuguese.

    PubMed 16699703
  • ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA FÍSICA E REABILITAÇÃO. Espasticidade: Avaliação Clínica. Projeto Diretrizes. 2006.

  • ASSUMPÇAO, María Sebra de, et al. Coativação, Espasticidade, Desempenho Motor e Funcional na Paralisia Cerebral. Revista Motriz, v. 17, n. 4, out./dez. 2011, p. 650-659.

  • Belagaje SR, Lindsell C, Moomaw CJ, Alwell K, Flaherty ML, Woo D, Dunning K, Khatri P, Adeoye O, Kleindorfer D, Broderick J, Kissela B. The adverse effect of spasticity on 3-month poststroke outcome using a population-based model. Stroke Res Treat. 2014;2014:696089. doi: 10.1155/2014/696089. Epub 2014 Jul 24.

    PubMed 25147752
  • Bodhankar S, Chen Y, Lapato A, Vandenbark AA, Murphy SJ, Offner H. Targeting immune co-stimulatory effects of PD-L1 and PD-L2 might represent an effective therapeutic strategy in stroke. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014 Aug 11;8:228. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00228. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 25157219
  • BRANDÃO, Aline D.; LASKOVSKI, Larissa; GARANHANI, Márcia R. Estratégias de Fisioterapia com Enfoque na Prevenção da Dor no Ombro de Pacientes Hemiplégicos: Revisão Narrativa da Literatura. Fisioterapia em Movimento, v. 21, n. 4, p. 71-78, out./dez. 2008.

  • BROL, Angela M.; BORTOLOTO, Flavia; MAGAGNIN, Nedi M.S. Tratamento de Restrição e Indução do Movimento na Reabilitação Funcional de Pacientes Pós Acidente Vascular Encefálico: Uma Revisão Bibliográfica. Fisioterapia em Movimento, v. 22, n. 4, p. 497-509, out./dez. 2009.

  • Cabral DL, Damascena CG, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Laurentino GE. [Reliability of the Nottingham Health Profile after suffering a stroke]. Cien Saude Colet. 2012 May;17(5):1313-22. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232012000500025. Portuguese.

    PubMed 22634824
  • CANCELA, Diana M. G. O Acidente Vascular Cerebral - Classificação, Principais Conseqüências e Reabilitação. Universidade Lusíada do Porto, 2008.

  • CORREIA, Andreza C. S. et al. Crioterapia e Cinesioterapia no Membro Superior Espástico no Acidente Vascular Cerebral. Fisioterapia em Movimento, v. 23, n. 4, p. 555-563, out./dez. 2010.

  • DUARTE, Alcino et al., Efeito da Crioterapia na Noção de Posição Articular Activa do Ombro: Um Estudo Comparativo Entre o Género Masculino e Feminino. Revista Portuguesa de Fisioterapia no Desporto, [2007].

  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.

    PubMed 1202204
  • Fu TC, Wong AM, Pei YC, Wu KP, Chou SW, Lin YC. Effect of Kinesio taping on muscle strength in athletes-a pilot study. J Sci Med Sport. 2008 Apr;11(2):198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.02.011. Epub 2007 Jun 27.

    PubMed 17588814
  • GOMES, A. C. Acidente Vascular Cerebral Isquêmico Direito e suas Repercussões em Idosos. São Paulo: Pontífica Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2005.

  • GOMES, Bruna Moreira et al. O Efeito da Técnica de Reeducação Postural Global de um Paciente com Hemiparesia após Acidente Vascular Encefálico. Revista Acta Fisiátrica, v. 13, n. 2, 2006, p. 103-108.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Acupuncture, Functional Taping and Acupuncture and Functional Taping in people with Stroke and Cerebrovascular Stroke, run by Fernanda Cechetti at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The change of level of spasticity of upper limb after 12 sessions of intervention, assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (time frame: Immediately before the first session of intervention and 2 days after the last (12th) session of intervention.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02690493, which also lists 56 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in