Type 1 Diabetes MellitusPhase 4NCT02688933
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Morning Injection of Toujeo Versus Lantus in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
A Phase 4 study testing HOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml), Lantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml) and Mandated back ground therapy in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi at 100 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To demonstrate that morning injection of Toujeo (HOE901-U300) compared to Lantus provides better glycemic control evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in adult participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- HOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml), Lantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml) and Mandated back ground therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 638 participants
- Where
- 100 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 5 May 2016to 19 Jun 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult participants (male and female) with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
- Signed written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years or >70 years.
- Fasting c-peptide ≥0.3 nmol/L as per source document or central lab test at Visit 1.
- Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤ 6.5 % or ≥ 10.0% via central lab test at Visit 1.
- Participants who experienced none of episode of documented symptomatic and/or severe hypoglycemia (as per the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification) during the past month prior to screening.
- Participants who experienced >1 episode of severe hypoglycemia resulting in coma/seizures during the last 12 months before screening.
- Participants received less than 1 year treatment with basal plus mealtime insulin.
Show all 17Show fewer
- Used any basal insulins other than long-acting insulin analogs (ie, Lantus, Toujeo, Levemir, and Tresiba) in the past 3 months before screening.
- Required >80 U/day basal insulin analogs or not on stable dose (±20% total dose) within 30 days prior to screening.
- Used fewer than 2 injections of rapid-acting insulin analog per day within 30 days prior to screening.
- Used human regular insulin as mealtime insulin within 30 days prior to screening.
- Used an insulin pump during the last 6 months before screening.
- History of unstable proliferative diabetic retinopathy or any other rapidly progressive diabetic retinopathy or macular edema likely to required treatment (e.g., laser, surgical treatment, or injectable drugs) during the study period.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women or planned pregnancy during the duration of the study.
- Use of any other investigational drug(s) within 1 month or 5 half-lives, whichever was longer prior to screening.
- Inappropriate CGM use during screening period evidenced by failure to obtain a minimum of 4 days of usable records by the end of screening.
- Noncompliance with self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) performance evidenced by failure to demonstrate at least 5 days of 5 point SMPG records by the end of screening.
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participants's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
100 sites in 2 countries.
100 sites in 2 countries
United States99 sites
Investigational Site Number 840-125
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005
Investigational Site Number 840-001
Atlanta, Georgia, 30318
Investigational Site Number 840-162
Bend, Oregon, 97702
Investigational Site Number 840-143
Bennington, Vermont, 05201
Investigational Site Number 840-067
Billings, Montana, 59101
Investigational Site Number 840-139
Bridgeport, West Virginia, 26330
Investigational Site Number 840-056
Burlington, Vermont, 05405
Investigational Site Number 840-058
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37411
Investigational Site Number 840-011
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Investigational Site Number 840-064
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Investigational Site Number 840-123
Columbus, Ohio, 43203
Investigational Site Number 840-071
Concord, California, 94520-2270
Investigational Site Number 840-072
Coral Gables, Florida, 33124
Investigational Site Number 840-062
Covington, Kentucky, 41011
Investigational Site Number 840-134
Crystal Lake, Illinois, 60012
Investigational Site Number 840-003
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Investigational Site Number 840-019
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Investigational Site Number 840-075
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Investigational Site Number 840-005
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Investigational Site Number 840-013
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Investigational Site Number 840-039
Denver, Colorado, 80209
Investigational Site Number 840-021
Denver, Colorado, 80246
Investigational Site Number 840-070
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Investigational Site Number 840-153
El Paso, Texas, 79925
Investigational Site Number 840-046
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
Investigational Site Number 840-149
Escondido, California, 92025
Investigational Site Number 840-051
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Investigational Site Number 840-037
Flint, Michigan, 48532
Investigational Site Number 840-026
Fort Worth, Texas, 76132
Investigational Site Number 840-157
Framingham, Massachusetts, 01702
Investigational Site Number 840-004
Fresno, California, 93720
Investigational Site Number 840-110
Greenbrae, California, 94904
Investigational Site Number 840-045
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
Investigational Site Number 840-040
Henderson, Nevada, 89052
Investigational Site Number 840-133
Hialeah, Florida, 33016
Investigational Site Number 840-081
Houston, Texas, 77024
Investigational Site Number 840-160
Houston, Texas, 77043
Investigational Site Number 840-156
Houston, Texas, 77079
Investigational Site Number 840-152
Houston, Texas, 77089
Investigational Site Number 840-031
Houston, Texas, 77095
Investigational Site Number 840-054
Hyattsville, Maryland, 20782
Investigational Site Number 840-060
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Investigational Site Number 840-124
La Jolla, California, 92037
Investigational Site Number 840-030
La Mesa, California, 91942
Investigational Site Number 840-017
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
Investigational Site Number 840-012
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30046
Investigational Site Number 840-042
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Investigational Site Number 840-094
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526
Investigational Site Number 840-151
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Investigational Site Number 840-044
Los Angeles, California, 90036
Investigational Site Number 840-022
Los Angeles, California, 90057
Investigational Site Number 840-129
Los Gatos, California, 95032
Investigational Site Number 840-140
Lufkin, Texas, 75904
Investigational Site Number 840-137
Maitland, Florida, 32751
Investigational Site Number 840-104
Mentor, Ohio, 44060
Investigational Site Number 840-029
Mesquite, Texas, 75149
Investigational Site Number 840-009
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Investigational Site Number 840-049
Miami, Florida, 33155
Investigational Site Number 840-076
Miami, Florida, 33176
Investigational Site Number 840-010
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
Investigational Site Number 840-080
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
Investigational Site Number 840-083
Murray, Utah, 84123
Investigational Site Number 840-032
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Investigational Site Number 840-023
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652
Investigational Site Number 840-102
New York, New York, 10001
Investigational Site Number 840-108
New York, New York, 10029
Investigational Site Number 840-079
Norman, Oklahoma, 73069
Investigational Site Number 840-048
North Richland Hills, Texas, 76180
Investigational Site Number 840-024
Northridge, California, 91325
Investigational Site Number 840-053
Ocoee, Florida, 34761
Investigational Site Number 840-101
Ogden, Utah, 84405
Investigational Site Number 840-033
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Investigational Site Number 840-142
Omaha, Nebraska, 68124
Investigational Site Number 840-112
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Investigational Site Number 840-018
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Investigational Site Number 840-150
Pearland, Texas, 77584
Investigational Site Number 840-069
Pomona, California, 91766
Investigational Site Number 840-090
Pomona, California, 91767
Investigational Site Number 840-047
Port Charlotte, Florida, 33952
Investigational Site Number 840-096
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Investigational Site Number 840-015
Renton, Washington, 98055
Investigational Site Number 840-006
Rockville, Maryland, 20852
Investigational Site Number 840-132
Rolling Hills Estates, California, 90274
Investigational Site Number 840-008
Roswell, Georgia, 30076
Investigational Site Number 840-097
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102
Investigational Site Number 840-130
San Jose, California, 95148
Investigational Site Number 840-055
San Ramon, California, 94583
Investigational Site Number 840-028
Santa Barbara, California
Investigational Site Number 840-074
Spokane, Washington, 99207
Investigational Site Number 840-109
Staten Island, New York, 10301-3914
Investigational Site Number 840-014
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281
Investigational Site Number 840-114
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Investigational Site Number 840-063
Tarzana, California, 91356
Investigational Site Number 840-138
Tustin, California, 92780-6953
Investigational Site Number 840-016
Ventura, California, 93003
Investigational Site Number 840-122
Waltham, Massachusetts, 02453
Investigational Site Number 840-002
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265
Investigational Site Number 840-036
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Investigational Site Number 840-073
Wichita, Kansas, 67226
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, 16-Week Open Label Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Morning Injection of Toujeo (Insulin Glargine-U300) Versus Lantus in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate that morning injection of Toujeo (HOE901-U300) compared to Lantus provides better glycemic control evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in adult participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Secondary Objective:
To demonstrate that treatment with HOE901-U300 compared to Lantus provides:
- Lower incidence rate of nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycemia;
- Better glucose control coverage during the last hours of CGM before next basal-insulin dosing;
- Less variability in CGM profile.
Read the detailed description
The maximum study duration per participant was to be of approximately 20 weeks that consisted of an up to a 4-week screening and CGM training period including a 1-2 week baseline (blinded) CGM performance (allowed for re-training), a 14-week open-label, comparative treatment period allowing for dose titration in both basal and meal-time insulin and including a 1-2 week end-of treatment blinded CGM collection with fixed dose of HOE901-U300 and Lantus, and a 2 day post treatment follow-up period.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- HOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml), Lantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml), Mandated back ground therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml)Drug
Also called Toujeo
Self-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in the morning (between waking up and breakfast) using a pre-filled pen.
Lantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml)Drug
Also called HOE901-U100
Self-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in the morning (between waking up and breakfast using a pre-filled pen.
Mandated back ground therapyDrug
Rapid insulin analogs: e.g., insulin glulisine, insulin lispro or insulin aspart, used by participant at least 30 days before screening. Mealtime insulin was to be continued during the study and titrated towards protocol specified postprandial glucose targets (130-180 mg/dL).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HOE901-U300 | Experimental | HOE901-U300 (Insulin glargine, 300 U/mL) once daily for 16 weeks on top of mealtime insulins analogs. Basal insulin doses were individually titrated (until the end of Week 14) to reach fasting self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) levels of 80 to 100 mg/dL, while mitigating hypoglycemia. Receives: Drug: HOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml); Drug: Mandated back ground therapy |
| Lantus | Active comparator | Lantus (Insulin glargine, 100 U/mL) once daily for 16 weeks on top of mealtime insulins analogs. Basal insulin doses were individually titrated (until the end of Week 14) to reach fasting SMPG levels of 80 to 100 mg/dL, while mitigating hypoglycemia. Receives: Drug: Lantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml); Drug: Mandated back ground therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Time of Mean Glucose Concentration Within the Target Range of 70-180 mg/dL as Obtained From CGM
The CGM system combined frequent interstitial glucose measurements (every 5 minutes) with ability to analyze glucose levels in real time. Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard error (SE) were obtained from a generalized linear model with identity link including post baseline CGM assessment during Week 15 (and/or Week 16).
Measured: During Week 15 and/or 16
Secondary outcomes (5)
Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Nocturnal Hypoglycemia
Documented symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycemia was defined as an event with typical symptoms of hypoglycemia accompanied by SMPG <=70 mg/dL that occurred between 00:00 and 05:59 hours as reported on the hypoglycemia electronic case report form (eCRF).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Documented Symptomatic Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Event Rate Per Participant-Year
Documented symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycemia was defined as an event with typical symptoms of hypoglycemia accompanied by SMPG <=70 mg/dL that occurred between 00:00 and 05:59 hours as reported on the hypoglycemia eCRF.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline in Glucose Level During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to the Next Day Basal Insulin Injection During Week 15 and/or Week 16
Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from mixed model including post baseline CGM assessment during the last 4 hours prior to the next day's basal insulin injection during Week 15 (and/or Week 16).
Measured: Baseline, during Week 15 and/or Week 16
Percentage of Time Glucose Concentrations Within the Target Range of 70 to 140 mg/dL During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to Next Day Basal Insulin Injection
Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from mixed model including post baseline CGM assessment during the last 4 hours prior to the next day's basal insulin injection during Week 15 (and/or Week 16).
Measured: During Week 15 and/or Week 16
Coefficient of Variation (CV%) in Mean CGM Glucose
CV% was a measure of spread of variability relative to mean of population. For CGM glucose values over 24 hours, CV% was measure of glycemic variability across 24-hour day and calculated for each period (total, within day and between days) as ratio of standard deviation of glucose values to mean of glucose values.
Measured: During Week 15 and/or Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start5 May 2016
- Primary completion19 Jun 2017
- Study completion19 Jun 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 638 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02688933
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LPS14587
- Other IDs
- U1111-1176-0936
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, 16-Week Open Label Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Morning Injection of Toujeo (Insulin Glargine-U300) Versus Lantus in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02688933
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LPS14587
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 638 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 5 May 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Jun 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Aug 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate that morning injection of Toujeo (HOE901-U300) compared to Lantus provides better glycemic control evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in adult participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Secondary Objective:
To demonstrate that treatment with HOE901-U300 compared to Lantus provides:
- Lower incidence rate of nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycemia;
- Better glucose control coverage during the last hours of CGM before next basal-insulin dosing;
- Less variability in CGM profile.
Detailed description
The maximum study duration per participant was to be of approximately 20 weeks that consisted of an up to a 4-week screening and CGM training period including a 1-2 week baseline (blinded) CGM performance (allowed for re-training), a 14-week open-label, comparative treatment period allowing for dose titration in both basal and meal-time insulin and including a 1-2 week end-of treatment blinded CGM collection with fixed dose of HOE901-U300 and Lantus, and a 2 day post treatment follow-up period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HOE901-U300 | Experimental | Drug: HOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml), Drug: Mandated back ground therapyHOE901-U300 (Insulin glargine, 300 U/mL) once daily for 16 weeks on top of mealtime insulins analogs. Basal insulin doses were individually titrated (until the end of Week 14) to reach fasting self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) levels of 80 to 100 mg/dL, while mitigating hypoglycemia. |
| Lantus | Active comparator | Drug: Lantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml), Drug: Mandated back ground therapyLantus (Insulin glargine, 100 U/mL) once daily for 16 weeks on top of mealtime insulins analogs. Basal insulin doses were individually titrated (until the end of Week 14) to reach fasting SMPG levels of 80 to 100 mg/dL, while mitigating hypoglycemia. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult participants (male and female) with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
- Signed written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Age <18 years or >70 years.
- Fasting c-peptide ≥0.3 nmol/L as per source document or central lab test at Visit 1.
- Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤ 6.5 % or ≥ 10.0% via central lab test at Visit 1.
- Participants who experienced none of episode of documented symptomatic and/or severe hypoglycemia (as per the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification) during the past month prior to screening.
- Participants who experienced >1 episode of severe hypoglycemia resulting in coma/seizures during the last 12 months before screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml)Also: ToujeoSelf-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in the morning (between waking up and breakfast) using a pre-filled pen. | Drug | HOE901-U300 |
| Lantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml)Also: HOE901-U100Self-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in the morning (between waking up and breakfast using a pre-filled pen. | Drug | Lantus |
| Mandated back ground therapyRapid insulin analogs: e.g., insulin glulisine, insulin lispro or insulin aspart, used by participant at least 30 days before screening. Mealtime insulin was to be continued during the study and titrated towards protocol specified postprandial glucose targets (130-180 mg/dL). | Drug | HOE901-U300, Lantus |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Time of Mean Glucose Concentration Within the Target Range of 70-180 mg/dL as Obtained From CGM
Time frame: During Week 15 and/or 16
The CGM system combined frequent interstitial glucose measurements (every 5 minutes) with ability to analyze glucose levels in real time. Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard error (SE) were obtained from a generalized linear model with identity link including post baseline CGM assessment during Week 15 (and/or Week 16).
5 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Nocturnal Hypoglycemia
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Documented Symptomatic Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Event Rate Per Participant-Year
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline in Glucose Level During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to the Next Day Basal Insulin Injection During Week 15 and/or Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, during Week 15 and/or Week 16
Percentage of Time Glucose Concentrations Within the Target Range of 70 to 140 mg/dL During Last 4 Hours of CGM Data Collection Prior to Next Day Basal Insulin Injection
Time frame: During Week 15 and/or Week 16
Coefficient of Variation (CV%) in Mean CGM Glucose
Time frame: During Week 15 and/or Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
100 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing HOE901-U300 (Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml), Lantus (Insulin Glargine 100 U/ml) and Mandated back ground therapy in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi at 100 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 100 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Aug 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Time of Mean Glucose Concentration Within the Target Range of 70-180 mg/dL as Obtained From CGM (time frame: During Week 15 and/or 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2022.