SurgeryBETTER pilotNCT02679859
B-type Natriuretic Peptide Guided Therapy to Improve Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery
A study testing BNP guided medical therapy optimisation in people with Surgery and Cardiovascular Complications, run by University of KwaZulu.
Trial summary
The primary hypothesis of the BETTER pilot trial is that B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) directed medical therapy prior to noncardiac surgery will be associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes, when compared to standard of care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgery, Cardiovascular Complications, Risk Assessment
- What is being tested?
- BNP guided medical therapy optimisation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2016to Jul 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- High risk elective preoperative noncardiac surgical patients who are referred to a preanaesthetic clinic for preoperative risk stratification.
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal to participate
- Where clinical opinion suggests that surgery cannot be postponed for at least 3 to 4 weeks to allow for clinical response to a change in medical therapy
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Bruce Biccard, MD, PhD contact
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multi-centre, Randomised Trial of B-type Natriuretic Peptide Guided Therapy to Improve Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery: the BETTER Surgery Pilot Trial
The primary hypothesis of the BETTER pilot trial is that B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) directed medical therapy prior to noncardiac surgery will be associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes, when compared to standard of care.
Read the detailed description
Study hypothesis and aim. The primary hypothesis of the BETTER Surgery Pilot Trial is that BNP directed medical therapy prior to noncardiac surgery will be associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes, when compared to standard of care. The aim of this pilot trial is to test the feasibility of a preoperative BNP directed medical therapy trial, with the intention of then going onto a large international multicentred RCT.
Primary outcome measure. A composite of 30 day mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, congestive cardiac failure and re-operation.
Secondary outcome measures.
Difference in BNP levels at the time of surgery An analysis of outcomes as a measure of achieved value i.e. the value measured immediately prior to surgery.
Duration of hospital stay Admission to critical care Time to surgery Reoperation
Trial design. A prospective, multi-centre, randomised trial of BNP guided therapy to improve clinical outcomes for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
Inclusion criteria. High risk elective preoperative noncardiac surgical patients who are referred to a preanaesthetic clinic for preoperative risk stratification.
Exclusion criteria.
Patient refusal to participate Where clinical opinion suggests that surgery cannot be postponed for at least 3 to 4 weeks to allow for clinical response to a change in medical therapy Randomisation. Patients will only be randomized during the outpatient clinic visit once a decision has been taken that surgery is necessary. This will follow informed consent. Patients would be randomized to standard of care or BNP directed care. Following randomization, BNP will be measured in all patients.
- Standard-of-care arm. These patients will be managed as per standard preoperative stratification strategies at the participating units. All personnel will be blinded to the BNP results. Optimisation of medical therapies will be encouraged.
- BNP guided therapy patients. Based on an individual patient data meta-analysis of noncardiac surgical patients, the thresholds associated with BNP and MACE are known.
Based on these BNP thresholds, the following recommendations are made;
High risk: Additional medical therapy and/or uptitration of current therapies is strongly recommended. It is strongly recommended that surgery is deferred until the BNP falls below the high risk threshold if possible to allow for therapy response.
Intemediate risk: Additional therapy and/or uptitration of current therapies is recommended. It is recommended that surgery is deferred if possible to allow for therapy response.
Low risk: Surgery is recommended as soon as any other perioperative considerations have been addressed. Ideally, surgery is recommended at the earliest convenience.
Additional visits may also be scheduled at the discretion of the investigator for further BNP risk stratification prior to surgery at the discretion of the treating physician. Neither the attending physicians, nor the patient will be blinded to the BNP result in the BNP guided therapy arm.
BNP levels will be repeated in all patients before scheduled surgery. These preoperative BNP results will be blinded.
Irrespective of the treatment group to which the noncardiac patient has been randomized, it is recommended that all these surgical patients receive statin therapy during the perioperative period and if on aspirin, that it is stopped 72 hours before surgery, and re-instituted at 7 days postoperatively. Intraoperative and postoperative management will be at the discretion of the local physicians.
Drug therapies. Drug therapies used in the BETTER trial will be compliant with practice guidelines for heart failure therapy, up to the point of ensuring ACE-inhibition, beta-blockade and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism. Uptitration of drugs known to decrease mortality associated with cardiac failure and secondary prevention for myocardial infarction will be considered. The minimum and maximum doses advocated in the PROTECT study have been adopted for the BETTER Surgery Pilot Trial. Uptitration will only considered where uptitration of therapy has been associated with improved survival in heart failure studies.
End point adjudication. All end points will be adjudicated by physicians blinded to treatment allocation.
Withdrawal rules. Subjects are free to voluntarily withdraw from the BETTER Surgery Trial at any time. However, events experienced by any withdrawn patient will be analyzed at the end of the trial as a function of treatment allocation under intent-to-treat considerations.
Ethics approval. Ethics approval will be obtained from each university centre. Steering committee members will ensure ethics approval is obtained from their respective centres prior to trial participation.
Data collection and collation. Access to the electronic data entry system will be protected by username and password. Username and password will be delivered during the registration process for individual local investigators. All electronic data transfer between participating centres and the co-ordinating centre will be username and password protected. Each centre will maintain a trial file including a protocol, local investigator delegation log, ethics approval documentation etc. Pseudo-anonymised (coded) data may also be sent by mail to the coordinating centre if necessary for event adjudication.
Statistical analysis. Categorical variables will be described as proportions and will be compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variable will be described as mean and standard deviation if normally distributed or median and inter-quartile range if not normally distributed. Comparisons of continuous variables will be performed using one-way ANOVA or Mann-Whitney test as appropriate.
Primary clinical end point. Kaplan-Meier curves will be constructed to evaluate time to first event and compared using the log-rank test. Lastly, univariable followed by multivariable analyses will identify independent predictors of outcomes, with subsequent regression analysis performed to compare event rates, adjusting for differences between baseline variables.
It is expected that patients in the BNP guided therapy arm may end up with more repeat visits compared to the standard of care arm of the trial. To understand whether such increased contact itself is associated with better outcomes rather than a lowering of BNP, a covariate analysis controlled for total visits versus visits triggered by BNP evaluation for further therapeutic intervention, will be performed to determine the potential effect of increased visits on patient outcomes.
Trial management. Participating centres need to routinely provide preoperative risk stratification services for high risk noncardiac surgical patients. The pilot trial will be led by Bruce Biccard. Site leaders, have been identified as co-participants in this application.
Sample size calculation. For the proposed composite outcome we expect at least a 10% event rate. In a large international multicentre trial, assuming a 25% relative risk reduction in the primary outcome in the BNP directed therapy group with an event rate of 10%, we estimated a sample size of 2075 patients per group would provide a 80% power (α =0.05).
For the pilot trial we will recruit 100 patients.
How this trial will lead to a larger study.
A review of all the literature on preoperative BNP risk stratification suggests that integrating preoperative BNP into risk stratification models has reached the 4th stage integrating a biomarker into clinical practice (clinical utility). This surpasses the current Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) clinical standard in preoperative risk stratification in the process. There is good individual patient data meta-analyses which have been used to establish the BNP thresholds associated with adverse outcomes. This stresses the importance (yet lack) of randomised controlled trials which address the utility of biomarker risk stratification to improve patient outcomes through biomarker directed therapy, management and monitoring in noncardiac surgical patients. The fifth stage of integration of a biomarker into clinical practice demands demonstration that biomarker directed therapy improves clinical outcomes. A single study has been conducted in the non-surgical population, which showed a more aggressive heart failure therapy regimen driven by targetting BNP was generally well tolerated in the elderly and associated with significantly fewer cardiovascular events.
This pilot trial will assess the feasibility of such an important preoperative surgical clinical RCT. These data will be used to plan and conduct a large, multicentre RCT to address this question.
References.
- Hlatky MA, et al. Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009;119:2408-16.
- Biccard BM, Devereaux PJ and Rodseth RN. Cardiac biomarkers in the prediction of risk in the non-cardiac surgery setting. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:484-93.
- Gaggin HK, et al. Heart failure outcomes and benefits of NT-proBNP-guided management in the elderly: results from the prospective, randomized ProBNP outpatient tailored chronic heart failure therapy (PROTECT) study. J Card Fail 2012;18(8):626-34.
- Conditions
- Surgery, Cardiovascular Complications, Risk Assessment
- Being tested
- BNP guided medical therapy optimisation
- Keywords
- Natriuretic Peptide, Brain, Surgery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BNP guided medical therapy optimisationOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| B-type natriuretic guided medical therapy optimisation | Experimental | B-type natriuretic guided medical therapy optimisation Receives: Other: BNP guided medical therapy optimisation |
| Normal medical management | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A composite of 30 day mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, congestive cardiac failure and re-operation.
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2016
- Primary completionJun 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of KwaZulu
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Stellenbosch
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bruce Biccard, University of Cape Town
- Investigators
- Bruce Biccard, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Cape Town
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02679859
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- No Unique ID yet
- Acronym
- BETTER pilot
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multi-centre, Randomised Trial of B-type Natriuretic Peptide Guided Therapy to Improve Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery: the BETTER Surgery Pilot Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02679859
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BETTER pilot / No Unique ID yet
- Conditions
- Surgery, Cardiovascular Complications, Risk Assessment
- Keywords
- Natriuretic Peptide, Brain, Surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of KwaZuluUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Stellenbosch
- Study start
- Jul 2016
- Primary completion
- Jun 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary hypothesis of the BETTER pilot trial is that B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) directed medical therapy prior to noncardiac surgery will be associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes, when compared to standard of care.
Detailed description
Study hypothesis and aim. The primary hypothesis of the BETTER Surgery Pilot Trial is that BNP directed medical therapy prior to noncardiac surgery will be associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes, when compared to standard of care. The aim of this pilot trial is to test the feasibility of a preoperative BNP directed medical therapy trial, with the intention of then going onto a large international multicentred RCT.
Primary outcome measure. A composite of 30 day mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, congestive cardiac failure and re-operation.
Secondary outcome measures.
Difference in BNP levels at the time of surgery An analysis of outcomes as a measure of achieved value i.e. the value measured immediately prior to surgery.
Duration of hospital stay Admission to critical care Time to surgery Reoperation
Trial design. A prospective, multi-centre, randomised trial of BNP guided therapy to improve clinical outcomes for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
Inclusion criteria. High risk elective preoperative noncardiac surgical patients who are referred to a preanaesthetic clinic for preoperative risk stratification.
Exclusion criteria.
Patient refusal to participate Where clinical opinion suggests that surgery cannot be postponed for at least 3 to 4 weeks to allow for clinical response to a change in medical therapy Randomisation. Patients will only be randomized during the outpatient clinic visit once a decision has been taken that surgery is necessary. This will follow informed consent. Patients would be randomized to standard of care or BNP directed care. Following randomization, BNP will be measured in all patients.
- Standard-of-care arm. These patients will be managed as per standard preoperative stratification strategies at the participating units. All personnel will be blinded to the BNP results. Optimisation of medical therapies will be encouraged.
- BNP guided therapy patients. Based on an individual patient data meta-analysis of noncardiac surgical patients, the thresholds associated with BNP and MACE are known.
Based on these BNP thresholds, the following recommendations are made;
High risk: Additional medical therapy and/or uptitration of current therapies is strongly recommended. It is strongly recommended that surgery is deferred until the BNP falls below the high risk threshold if possible to allow for therapy response.
Intemediate risk: Additional therapy and/or uptitration of current therapies is recommended. It is recommended that surgery is deferred if possible to allow for therapy response.
Low risk: Surgery is recommended as soon as any other perioperative considerations have been addressed. Ideally, surgery is recommended at the earliest convenience.
Additional visits may also be scheduled at the discretion of the investigator for further BNP risk stratification prior to surgery at the discretion of the treating physician. Neither the attending physicians, nor the patient will be blinded to the BNP result in the BNP guided therapy arm.
BNP levels will be repeated in all patients before scheduled surgery. These preoperative BNP results will be blinded.
Irrespective of the treatment group to which the noncardiac patient has been randomized, it is recommended that all these surgical patients receive statin therapy during the perioperative period and if on aspirin, that it is stopped 72 hours before surgery, and re-instituted at 7 days postoperatively. Intraoperative and postoperative management will be at the discretion of the local physicians.
Drug therapies. Drug therapies used in the BETTER trial will be compliant with practice guidelines for heart failure therapy, up to the point of ensuring ACE-inhibition, beta-blockade and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism. Uptitration of drugs known to decrease mortality associated with cardiac failure and secondary prevention for myocardial infarction will be considered. The minimum and maximum doses advocated in the PROTECT study have been adopted for the BETTER Surgery Pilot Trial. Uptitration will only considered where uptitration of therapy has been associated with improved survival in heart failure studies.
End point adjudication. All end points will be adjudicated by physicians blinded to treatment allocation.
Withdrawal rules. Subjects are free to voluntarily withdraw from the BETTER Surgery Trial at any time. However, events experienced by any withdrawn patient will be analyzed at the end of the trial as a function of treatment allocation under intent-to-treat considerations.
Ethics approval. Ethics approval will be obtained from each university centre. Steering committee members will ensure ethics approval is obtained from their respective centres prior to trial participation.
Data collection and collation. Access to the electronic data entry system will be protected by username and password. Username and password will be delivered during the registration process for individual local investigators. All electronic data transfer between participating centres and the co-ordinating centre will be username and password protected. Each centre will maintain a trial file including a protocol, local investigator delegation log, ethics approval documentation etc. Pseudo-anonymised (coded) data may also be sent by mail to the coordinating centre if necessary for event adjudication.
Statistical analysis. Categorical variables will be described as proportions and will be compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variable will be described as mean and standard deviation if normally distributed or median and inter-quartile range if not normally distributed. Comparisons of continuous variables will be performed using one-way ANOVA or Mann-Whitney test as appropriate.
Primary clinical end point. Kaplan-Meier curves will be constructed to evaluate time to first event and compared using the log-rank test. Lastly, univariable followed by multivariable analyses will identify independent predictors of outcomes, with subsequent regression analysis performed to compare event rates, adjusting for differences between baseline variables.
It is expected that patients in the BNP guided therapy arm may end up with more repeat visits compared to the standard of care arm of the trial. To understand whether such increased contact itself is associated with better outcomes rather than a lowering of BNP, a covariate analysis controlled for total visits versus visits triggered by BNP evaluation for further therapeutic intervention, will be performed to determine the potential effect of increased visits on patient outcomes.
Trial management. Participating centres need to routinely provide preoperative risk stratification services for high risk noncardiac surgical patients. The pilot trial will be led by Bruce Biccard. Site leaders, have been identified as co-participants in this application.
Sample size calculation. For the proposed composite outcome we expect at least a 10% event rate. In a large international multicentre trial, assuming a 25% relative risk reduction in the primary outcome in the BNP directed therapy group with an event rate of 10%, we estimated a sample size of 2075 patients per group would provide a 80% power (α =0.05).
For the pilot trial we will recruit 100 patients.
How this trial will lead to a larger study.
A review of all the literature on preoperative BNP risk stratification suggests that integrating preoperative BNP into risk stratification models has reached the 4th stage integrating a biomarker into clinical practice (clinical utility). This surpasses the current Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) clinical standard in preoperative risk stratification in the process. There is good individual patient data meta-analyses which have been used to establish the BNP thresholds associated with adverse outcomes. This stresses the importance (yet lack) of randomised controlled trials which address the utility of biomarker risk stratification to improve patient outcomes through biomarker directed therapy, management and monitoring in noncardiac surgical patients. The fifth stage of integration of a biomarker into clinical practice demands demonstration that biomarker directed therapy improves clinical outcomes. A single study has been conducted in the non-surgical population, which showed a more aggressive heart failure therapy regimen driven by targetting BNP was generally well tolerated in the elderly and associated with significantly fewer cardiovascular events.
This pilot trial will assess the feasibility of such an important preoperative surgical clinical RCT. These data will be used to plan and conduct a large, multicentre RCT to address this question.
References.
- Hlatky MA, et al. Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009;119:2408-16.
- Biccard BM, Devereaux PJ and Rodseth RN. Cardiac biomarkers in the prediction of risk in the non-cardiac surgery setting. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:484-93.
- Gaggin HK, et al. Heart failure outcomes and benefits of NT-proBNP-guided management in the elderly: results from the prospective, randomized ProBNP outpatient tailored chronic heart failure therapy (PROTECT) study. J Card Fail 2012;18(8):626-34.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| B-type natriuretic guided medical therapy optimisation | Experimental | Other: BNP guided medical therapy optimisationB-type natriuretic guided medical therapy optimisation |
| Normal medical management | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- High risk elective preoperative noncardiac surgical patients who are referred to a preanaesthetic clinic for preoperative risk stratification.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient refusal to participate
- Where clinical opinion suggests that surgery cannot be postponed for at least 3 to 4 weeks to allow for clinical response to a change in medical therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BNP guided medical therapy optimisation | Other | B-type natriuretic guided medical therapy optimisation |
Primary outcome
A composite of 30 day mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, congestive cardiac failure and re-operation.
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 1
Serial Amnioinfusions as Regenerative Therapy for Pulmonary Hypoplasia
Renal Failure Congenital, Congenital Renal Anomaly Nos
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bruce Biccard, MD, PhD contact
Bruce Biccard, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Cape Town
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BNP guided medical therapy optimisation in people with Surgery and Cardiovascular Complications, run by University of KwaZulu.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bruce Biccard, MD, PhD (bruce.biccard@uct.ac.za), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A composite of 30 day mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, congestive cardiac failure and re-operation. (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2016.