AzTrials
AzTrials

Legg-Calvé-Perthes DiseaseNCT02676271

The Long Term Outcome of Varus Derotational Osteotomy for Legg-Calvé-Perthes' Disease

An observational study of Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease, run by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Varus derotation osteotomy (VDRO) is one of the most popular surgical treatments for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease yet its long term results have not been assessed. Our purpose was to determine the long term clinical and radiographic outcomes of these patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease
What is being tested?
Proximal varus derotational osteotomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
35 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
Mar 2015to Oct 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Forty patients (43 hips) who had undergone VDRO for LCPD who participated in a long term follow-up study a decade ago. All patients were treated in our institution during 1959 to 1983 with proximal VDRO.

Who may be able to join

  • All patients were treated in our institution during 1959 to 1983 with proximal VDRO and were examined a decade ago

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site
  • Assaf Haroffeh Medical center

    Tsrifin, 70300

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Background: Varus derotation osteotomy (VDRO) is one of the most popular surgical treatments for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease yet its long term results have not been assessed. Our purpose was to determine the long term clinical and radiographic outcomes of these patients.

Methods: Forty patients (43 hips) who had undergone VDRO for LCPD who participated in a long term follow-up study a decade ago were approached for the present study.

Read more

All patients were treated in our institution during 1959 to 1983 with proximal VDRO.

The patients were invited to for a medical interview and a physical examination. They were also asked to fill out questionnaires and to provide or undergo a standing anteroposterior (AP) pelvic and a lateral hip radiographs during the visit.

Patients were asked to self-grade their hip pain as none, mild, moderate or severe and to grade their back pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) between 0-10. Details regarding daily function, physical activity, work status and family history were obtained. All participants completed the Harris Hip Score (HHS) with a maximum score of 100 and the Short Form-36 which is composed of 8 sections and has a maximum score of 100.

The physical examination included an assessment of the hip range of motion, leg length discrepancy and the presence of a Trendelenburg sign.

Radiographic parameters evaluated were the Tonnis grade (with a score between 0-3), head size ratio, and the center-edge (CE) angle.

Being tested
Proximal varus derotational osteotomy
Medical subject headings
Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Proximal varus derotational osteotomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Femoral plate

    The purpose of surgery was to relocate the protruded, deformed femoral head from its lateral position back to the acetabulum to achieve containment. Surgery was preceded by a hip arthrography with dynamic examination to find the suitable containment position and plan the correct osteotomy angles accordingly. A sub trochanteric osteotomy was performed then after in an open or closed wedge form, with fixation in an angle that gave best coverage.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical outcomes

    The hip status was assessed by the Harris Hip Score (HHS)

    Measured: a follow-up 42.5 years from surgery

  2. Clinical outcomes

    The Short Form-36 (SF-36) was used to asses the general well being

    Measured: a follow-up 42.5 years from surgery

  3. Radiographic outcomes

    The degenerative changes were assessed by The Tonnis grade.

    Measured: a follow-up 42.5 years from surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2015
  3. Primary completionJul 2015
  4. Study completionOct 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
35 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02676271
Sponsor's protocol ID
0063-15
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
24 Nov 2015
Last updated
8 Feb 2016
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease, run by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical outcomes (time frame: a follow-up 42.5 years from surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in