AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Traumatic Cervical Central Cord Syndrom InjuryDS3CSNCT02673320

Prospective Study for Delay in Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Central Cord Injury in Canal Stenosis

A study testing Early surgery within 48 hours and Delayed surgery at 15 days in people with Acute Traumatic Cervical Central Cord Syndrom Injury, run by Nantes University Hospital at 5 sites in France.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The studied pathology concerns post traumatic cervical spinal cord contusion on narrow spinal canal. The pathophysiology remains controversial. This pathology does not enjoy consensus support. Many questions remain regarding the surgical care and its delay. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Early surgery within 48 hours and Delayed surgery at 15 days
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
5 sitesFrance
Study dates
Jul 2016to Jul 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Man or woman,
  • Aged from 18 years old or over,
  • Initial glasgow score ≥ 13,
  • Initial ASIA score grade A-D,
  • Scan of the cervical spine in bone windows
  • Posttraumatic cervical spinal cord contusion on narrow cervical canal confirmed by MRI,
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Complete or incomplete tetraplegia on whiplash on narrow cervical canal,
  • Patient's consent form (or, if appropriate, by an third party independent of the sponsor and the investigator in the case of physical disability to sign)
  • Location of the stepped spinal cord injury C2 to t1,
  • Affiliation to a social security system.

Who cannot join

  • Nontraumatic narrow cervical canal,
  • Nontraumatic not acute cervical myelopathy,
  • Cervico brachial neuralgia,
  • Contraindication to one of the methods studied, of a functional exploration, subject on exclusion period,
  • Penetrating cervical-spinal wounds,
  • Lesions threatening the vital prognosis and preventing the emergency decompression,
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Contraindications to MRI : Pacemaker or implantable defibrillator or pacemaker neurosensory, cochlear implants, ocular or cerebral ferromagnetic foreign body close to the nerve structures, metal prostheses, agitation of the patient : not cooperating or agitated patients, claustrophobic subjects, valves of neurosurgical ventriculoperitoneal shunt, dental braces,
  • Pregnant women,
  • Unconscious patients whose score ASIA is not feasible,
  • Adults under a legal protection regime (guardianship, trusteeship, safeguard justice).

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

France5 sites
  • CHU d'Angers

    Angers, 49933

  • CHU de Brest

    Brest

  • Hospital LA TIMONE

    Marseille

  • CHU de Nantes

    Nantes, 44000

  • CHU de Rennes

    Rennes, 35033

Other trials in France

About this study

The studied pathology concerns post traumatic cervical spinal cord contusion on narrow spinal canal.

The pathophysiology remains controversial. This pathology does not enjoy consensus support. Many questions remain regarding the surgical care and its delay.

Read more

The purpose of the study was to demonstrate non-inferiority of early surgical treatment compared to the same surgery performed with a delay among patients identified as having a cervical spinal cord contusion on posttraumatic narrowed cervical canal.

In the current state of knowledge and practices, the treatment of post traumatic spinal cord contusions on narrow spinal canal spinal decompression is performed remote diagnosis. The generally accepted delay is 15 days.

The surgical technique is a conventional cervical spinal decompression surgery. The type of decompression (anterior or posterior) is dependent on the compression and therefore the clinical radiological analysis. The choice of the technique and the surgical approach are therefore left to the discretion of the surgeon.

After completion of the clinical and radiological diagnosis of post-traumatic spinal cord contusion on narrow spinal canal, the patient was hospitalized in intensive care or in the Neurosurgery Service of the University Hospital concerned.

After anesthetic consultation determining the feasibility or not of surgery and in the absence of other vital injury or involving life-threatening, early surgery within 48 hours of diagnosis is then considered (according to the assigned group).

The surgical technique is a conventional cervical spinal decompression surgery. Way posterior surgery, laminectomy for spinal stenosis significant if greater than or equal to 3 floors will be preferred. In other cases, the type of surgery will be at the discretion of the surgeon and the opinion of the Staff Neurosurgery.

The surgical procedure is identical in the two groups. Alone, the delay of the surgery varies : less than 48 hours for the first group and 15 days for the second.

During the different monitoring visits (D0 (surgery), D7, M3, Y1 and Y2), the following criteria will be assessed : the quality and quickness of the motor and sensory recovery, the early post-operative evolution and the long and medium term evolution but also disability and functional sequelaes.

Being tested
Early surgery within 48 hours, Delayed surgery at 15 days
Keywords
Acute Traumatic Cervical Central Cord Syndrom Injury, Delay of Surgery, Decompressive Surgery, Canal Stenosis, Schneider Syndrom, Quality of life, Functional Outcome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Early surgery within 48 hoursProcedure or surgery

    After completion of the clinical and radiological diagnosis of post-traumatic spinal cord contusion on narrow spinal canal, the patient was hospitalized. After obtaining the signed consent form, the patient was included in the protocol. After anesthetic consultation determining the feasibility or not of surgery and in the absence of other vital injury or involving life-threatening, early surgery is then realised within 48 hours. The surgical technique is a conventional cervical spinal decompression surgery. Surgery by way posterior surgery, by laminectomy in case of significant spinal stenosis greater than or equal to 3 floors will be preferred. In other cases, the type of surgery will be at the discretion of the surgeon. Then, the follow-up visits are D7, M3, Y1 and Y2.

  • Delayed surgery at 15 daysProcedure or surgery

    After completion of the clinical and radiological diagnosis of post-traumatic spinal cord contusion on narrow spinal canal, the patient was hospitalized. After obtaining the signed consent form, the patient was included in the protocol. After anesthetic consultation determining the feasibility or not of surgery and in the absence of other vital injury or involving life-threatening, delayed surgery is then realised at 15 days. The surgical technique is a conventional cervical spinal decompression surgery. Surgery by way posterior surgery, by laminectomy in case of significant spinal stenosis greater than or equal to 3 floors will be preferred. In other cases, the type of surgery will be at the discretion of the surgeon. Then, the follow-up visits are D7, M3, Y1 and Y2.

Study groups in NCT02673320
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early surgeryExperimentalEarly surgery within 48 hours
Receives: Procedure: Early surgery within 48 hours
Delayed surgeryOtherDelayed surgery at 15 days
Receives: Procedure: Delayed surgery at 15 days

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Score ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association)

    Assessment of the motor skills of upper and lower limbs using the score ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association). The primary outcome measure is the Total Motor Score (Score ASIA) at 2 years : difference between the initial score ASIA at the inclusion visit and the score ASIA at 2 years. This is a functional scale divided into four assessment parameters (motor assessment, perineal assessment, functional assessment - neurological level and sensory evaluation.

    The realization of the ASIA score evaluates functional disability of a patient.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Score ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association)

    Assessment of the motor skills of upper and lower limbs using the score ASIA. Differences between the score ASIA at the different follow-up visits (D0, D7, M3, Y1 and Y2).

    Measured: Day 0, Day 7, Month 3, Year 1 and Year 2

  2. Score WISCI II (Walking Index of Spinal Cord Injury)

    Assessment of the walking index of spinal cord injury using the WISCI II. Differences between the score WISCI II at the different follow-up visits (D0, D7, M3, Y1 and Y2).

    Measured: Day 0, Day 7, Month 3, Year 1 and Year 2

  3. Score SCIM III (Spinal Cord Independence Measure)

    Assessment of the overall functional abilities of Spinal Cord Injury using the score SCIM III (Spinal Cord Independence Measure). Differences between the score SCIM III at the different follow-up visits (D0, D7, M3, Y1 and Y2).

    Measured: Day 0, Day 7, Month 3, Year 1 and Year 2

  4. Score SF-36

    Assessment of the quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire. Differences between the score SF-36 at the different follow-up visits (D0, D7, M3, Y1 and Y2).

    Measured: Day 0, Day 7, Month 3, Year 1 and Year 2

  5. Score EVA (visual analog scale)

    Assessment of cervical pains using a visual analog scale. Differences between the score EVA at the different follow-up visits (D0, D7, M3, Y1 and Y2).

    Measured: Day 0, Day 7, Month 3, Year 1 and Year 2

  6. Score DN4

    Assessment of neuropathic pains using the score DN4. Differences between the score DN4 at the different follow-up visits (D0, D7, M3, Y1 and Y2). It is a questionnaire with ten items (seven of them are issued from the patient interview and three are established by clinical examination). The DN4 questionnaire is based on the analysis of the words proposed by patients to describe their pain.

    Measured: Day 0, Day 7, Month 3, Year 1 and Year 2

  7. Urinary status

    This assessment characterizes the patient's urinary status under 4 generic items (Spontaneous micturition, reflex micturition, intermittent poll and other).

    Measured: Day 0, Day 7, Month 3, Year 1 and Year 2

  8. Defecation status

    This assessment characterizes the patient's defecation status under 4 generic items (Spontaneous defecation, reflex defecation, rectal touch and other).

    Measured: Day 0, Day 7, Month 3, Year 1 and Year 2

  9. Cervical spinal cord injury

    The data collected for each patient will be as follows : Decrease of the lesions (yes / no), disappearance of the lesions (yes / no), presence of radiological spinal cord lesion sequelae (yes / no), size of the lesion and other. The reference imaging will be the cervical spinal MRI.

    Measured: Day 0, Year 1

  10. Resuscitation complications

    Adverse events occurring during resuscitation

    Measured: Day 0, Day 7, Month 3, Year 1 and Year 2

  11. Decubitus complications

    Adverse events related to the extended position and immobility

    Measured: Day 0, Day 7, Month 3, Year 1 and Year 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completionJul 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
72 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02673320
Sponsor's protocol ID
RC15_0040
Acronym
DS3CS
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
1 Feb 2016
Last updated
16 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Early surgery within 48 hours and Delayed surgery at 15 days in people with Acute Traumatic Cervical Central Cord Syndrom Injury, run by Nantes University Hospital at 5 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Score ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in