Renal Cell CarcinomaEarly Phase 1NCT02671552
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Treatment Response in Patients With Kidney Cancer Undergoing Cryosurgery
A Early Phase 1 study testing Perflutren Protein-Type A Microspheres and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This pilot clinical trial compares the imaging results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), the current clinical standard, in predicting treatment response in patients with kidney cancer undergoing cryosurgery (a procedure in which an… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Perflutren Protein-Type A Microspheres and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Jan 2013to 4 Dec 2014
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be scheduled for a percutaneous cryoablation of a renal mass
- Be medically stable
- If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test
- Have signed informed consent to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Females who are pregnant or nursing
- Patients who are medically unstable, patients who are seriously or terminally ill, and patients whose clinical course is unpredictable; for example:
- Patients on life support or in a critical care unit
- Patients with unstable occlusive disease (eg, crescendo angina)
- Patients with clinically unstable cardiac arrhythmias, such as recurrent ventricular tachycardia
- Patients with uncontrolled congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class IV)
Show all 16Show fewer
- Patients with recent cerebral hemorrhage
- Patients with known sensitivities to albumin, blood, or blood products
- Patients who have undergone surgery within 24 hours prior to the study sonographic examination
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to perflutren
- Patients who have received any contrast medium (X-ray, MRI, CT, or ultrasound [US]) in the 24 hours prior to the research US exam
- Patients with cardiac shunts
- Patients with congenital heart defects
- Patients with severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, or a history of pulmonary emboli
- Patients with respiratory distress syndrome
- Patients with renal insufficiency such that they can not get intravenous contrast as part of screening or follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
About this study
Official title: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma Cryoablation
This pilot clinical trial compares the imaging results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), the current clinical standard, in predicting treatment response in patients with kidney cancer undergoing cryosurgery (a procedure in which an extremely cold liquid or an instrument called a cryoprobe is used to freeze and destroy abnormal tissue). Using contrast-enhanced ultrasound that does not involve a dye may help patients avoid side effects from a dye that is usually used in MRI or CT and may help doctors measure blood flow and determine whether the cryosurgery procedure treated the kidney tumor.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Evaluate if contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used to successfully evaluate the cryoablation (cryosurgery) of renal cell carcinoma.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Establish whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound provides a reliable tool for the characterization of renal masses prior to cryoablation.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
- Compare harmonic imaging (the current industry standard for contrast imaging) with subharmonic imaging (a novel, improved contrast imaging technique) in the two aims listed above.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive perflutren protein-type A microspheres intravenously (IV) and then undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging the morning prior to cryosurgery and at 3-4 months post treatment during MRI or CT follow up.
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Perflutren Protein-Type A Microspheres, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Perflutren Protein-Type A MicrospheresDrug
Also called Optison, Perflutren Protein-Type A Microspheres
Given IV
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound ImagingProcedure or surgery
Undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) | Experimental | Patients receive perflutren protein-type A microspheres IV and then undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging the morning prior to cryosurgery and at 3-4 months post treatment during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) follow up. Receives: Drug: Perflutren Protein-Type A Microspheres; Procedure: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Sensitivity will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Measured: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Specificity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Specificity will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Measured: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Accuracy - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Accuracy will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Measured: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Positive predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Positive predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Measured: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Negative predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Negative predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Measured: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Secondary outcomes (5)
Sensitivity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Inter- and intra-observer variability will be calculated.
Measured: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Specificity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Inter- and intra-observer variability will be calculated.
Measured: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Positive predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Inter- and intra-observer variability will be calculated.
Measured: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Negative predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Inter- and intra-observer variability will be calculated.
Measured: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Accuracy - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Inter- and intra-observer variability will be calculated.
Measured: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start24 Jan 2013
- Primary completion4 Dec 2014
- Study completion4 Dec 2014
Why it stopped: Terminated by the IRB
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Renal Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Flemming Forsberg, PhD, Principal investigator, Thomas Jefferson University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02671552
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12P.615
- Other IDs
- 2012-84, NCI-2015-01470, JT 3004
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 2 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma Cryoablation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02671552
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12P.615
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Terminated by the IRB
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Jan 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This pilot clinical trial compares the imaging results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), the current clinical standard, in predicting treatment response in patients with kidney cancer undergoing cryosurgery (a procedure in which an extremely cold liquid or an instrument called a cryoprobe is used to freeze and destroy abnormal tissue). Using contrast-enhanced ultrasound that does not involve a dye may help patients avoid side effects from a dye that is usually used in MRI or CT and may help doctors measure blood flow and determine whether the cryosurgery procedure treated the kidney tumor.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Evaluate if contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used to successfully evaluate the cryoablation (cryosurgery) of renal cell carcinoma.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Establish whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound provides a reliable tool for the characterization of renal masses prior to cryoablation.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
- Compare harmonic imaging (the current industry standard for contrast imaging) with subharmonic imaging (a novel, improved contrast imaging technique) in the two aims listed above.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive perflutren protein-type A microspheres intravenously (IV) and then undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging the morning prior to cryosurgery and at 3-4 months post treatment during MRI or CT follow up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) | Experimental | Drug: Perflutren Protein-Type A Microspheres, Procedure: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound ImagingPatients receive perflutren protein-type A microspheres IV and then undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging the morning prior to cryosurgery and at 3-4 months post treatment during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) follow up. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Be scheduled for a percutaneous cryoablation of a renal mass
- Be medically stable
- If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test
- Have signed informed consent to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Females who are pregnant or nursing
- Patients who are medically unstable, patients who are seriously or terminally ill, and patients whose clinical course is unpredictable; for example:
- Patients with recent cerebral hemorrhage
- Patients with known sensitivities to albumin, blood, or blood products
- Patients who have undergone surgery within 24 hours prior to the study sonographic examination
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Perflutren Protein-Type A MicrospheresAlso: Optison, Perflutren Protein-Type A MicrospheresGiven IV | Drug | Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) |
| Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound ImagingUndergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging | Procedure or surgery | Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Sensitivity will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Specificity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Specificity will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Accuracy - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Accuracy will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Positive predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Positive predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
Negative predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Negative predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam using both the standard of care contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, and patient outcome as the reference standard. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI or CT findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test.
5 secondary outcomes
Sensitivity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Specificity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Positive predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Negative predictive value - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Accuracy - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma
Time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 May 2025.
- Thomas Jefferson University HospitalLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab and Lenvatinib With or Without SBRT Before Surgery for Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer
Nonmetastatic Locally Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Pucotenlimab, Lenvatinib, and SBRT Before Surgery for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Flemming Forsberg, PhD principal investigator
Thomas Jefferson University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Perflutren Protein-Type A Microspheres and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity - Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to successfully evaluate the cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma (time frame: Up to 3-4 months after cryosurgery). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2025.