Alzheimer's DiseasePhase 3CREADNCT02670083
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Crenezumab Versus Placebo in Participants With Prodromal to Mild Alzheimer's Disease (AD).
A Phase 3 study testing Crenezumab in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 196 sites in 30 countries.
Trial summary
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of crenezumab versus placebo in participants with prodromal to mild AD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alzheimer's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Crenezumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 813 participants
- Where
- 196 sitesin 30 countries
- Study dates
- 22 Mar 2016to 31 May 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Weight between 40 and 120 kilograms (Kg) inclusive
- Availability of a person (referred to as the "caregiver") who in the investigator's judgment:
- Has frequent and sufficient contact with the participant to be able to provide accurate information regarding the participant's cognitive and functional abilities, agrees to provide information at clinic visits (which require partner input for scale completion), signs the necessary consent form, and has sufficient cognitive capacity to accurately report upon the participant's behavior and cognitive and functional abilities
- Fluency in the language of the tests used at the study site
- Adequate visual and auditory acuity, in the investigator's judgment, sufficient to perform the neuropsychological testing (eye glasses and hearing aids are permitted)
- Evidence of the AD pathological process, by a positive amyloid assessment either on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta 1-42 levels as measured on the Elecsys beta-amyloid(1-42) test system or amyloid PET scan by qualitative read by the core/central PET laboratory
Show all 11Show fewer
- Demonstrated abnormal memory function at screening (up to 4 weeks before screening begins) or screening (FCSRT cueing index =<0.67 AND free recall =<27)
- Screening mini mental state examination (MMSE) score of greater than or equal to (>=) 22 points and Clinical Dementia Rating-Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5 or 1.0
- Meets National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer's Association (NIAAA) core clinical criteria for probable AD dementia or prodromal AD (consistent with the NIAAA diagnostic criteria and guidelines for mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
- If receiving symptomatic AD medications, the dosing regimen must have been stable for 3 months prior to screening
- Participant must have completed at least 6 years of formal education after the age of 5 years
Who cannot join
- Any evidence of a condition other than AD that may affect cognition such as other dementias, stroke, brain damage, autoimmune disorders (e.g. multiple sclerosis) or infections with neurological sequelae.
- History of major psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia or major depression (if not considered in remission)
- At risk of suicide in the opinion of the investigator
- Any abnormal MRI findings, such as presence of cerebral vascular pathology, cortical stroke, etc or inability to tolerate MRI procedures or contraindication to MRI
- Unstable or clinically significant cardiovascular (e.g., myocardial infarction), kidney or liver disease
- Uncontrolled hypertension
Show all 11Show fewer
- Screening hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) >8%
- Poor peripheral venous access
- History of cancer except:
- If considered to be cured or If not being actively treated with anti-cancer therapy or radiotherapy
- Known history of severe allergic, anaphylactic, or other hypersensitivity reactions to chimeric, human, or humanized antibodies or fusion proteins
Trial locations and contacts
196 sites in 30 countries.
196 sites in 30 countries
United States66 sites
Albany Medical Faculty Physicians COmmunity Division. The Neurology Group
Albany, New York, 12206
Neurological Associates of Albany, PC
Albany, New York, 12208
Dent Neurological Institute
Amherst, New York, 14226
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329
Maine Research Associates
Auburn, Maine, 04210
Senior Adults Specialty Research
Austin, Texas, 78757
Bradenton Research Center
Bradenton, Florida, 34205
Valley Medical Primary Care
Centerville, Ohio, 45459
Behavioral Health Research
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28211
Kerwin Research Center, LLC
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Associated Neurologists PC - Danbury
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810
NeuroStudies.net, LLC
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Quantum Laboratories
Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33064
Brain Matters Research, Inc.
Delray Beach, Florida, 33445
Alexian Brothers Neurosci Inst
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007
Pharmacology Research Inst
Encino, California, 91316
Precise Research Centers
Flowood, Mississippi, 39232
University of North Texas Health Science Center; Fort Worth Patient Care Center
Fort Worth, Texas, 76107
Guilford Neurologic Associates
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401
Galiz Research, LLC
Hialeah, Florida, 33016
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Jacksonville Center For Clinical Research
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Alzheimer's Research and Treatment Center
Lake Worth, Florida, 33414
Collaborative Neuroscience Network Inc.
Long Beach, California, 90502
Alliance for Wellness, dba Alliance for Research
Long Beach, California, 90807
Pharmacology Research Institute
Los Alamitos, California, 90720
USC Keck School Of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90033
UCLA Medical Center, Department of Neurology
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Merritt - Island Medical Research
Merritt Island, Florida, 32952
Miami Jewish Health Systems
Miami, Florida, 33137
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Yale University School Of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Pharmacology Research Inst
Newport Beach, California, 92660
Shankle Clinic
Newport Beach, California, 92663
Sentara Medical Group
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Research Center for Clinical Studies, Inc.
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06851
Renstar Medical Research
Ocala, Florida, 34470
Oklahoma Clinical Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Cutting Edge Research Group
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73116
Bioclinica Research
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Stanford Univ Medical Center
Palo Alto, California, 94304
South Shore Neurologic Associates P.C.
Patchogue, New York, 11772
Drexel Univ College of Med; Clinical Research Group
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
Banner Alzheimer's Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Progressive Medical Research
Port Orange, Florida, 32127
Summit Research Network Inc.
Portland, Oregon, 97210
MidAmerica Neuroscience Institute
Prairie Village, Kansas, 66206
Anderson Clinical Research, Inc.
Redlands, California, 92374
National Clinical Research Inc.-Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, 23294
University of California, Davis; Alzheimers Disease Center, Department of Neurology
Sacramento, California, 95817
UCSF - Memory and Aging Center
San Francisco, California, 94158
Neurological Research Inst
Santa Monica, California, 90404
MMP Neurology
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
North Bay Neuro Science Institute
Sebastopol, California, 95472
Insight Clinical Trials LLC
Shaker Heights, Ohio, 44122
Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine
Springfield, Illinois, 62702
Springfield Neurology Associates
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01104
The Cognitive and Research Center of New Jersey
Springfield, New Jersey, 07081
Johnnie B. Byrd Sr. Alzheimer's Center & Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Stedman Clinical Trials, LLC
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Compass Research
The Villages, Florida, 32162
Advanced Memory Research Institute of NJ
Toms River, New Jersey, 08755
Central States Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Abington Neurological Associates
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090
Spain19 sites
Hospital General Universitario de Albacete; Servicio de Neurología
Albacete
Fundació ACE
BArcelon, Barcelona, 08034
Hospital Vall d'Hebron; Servicio de Neurología
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital Universitario de Burgos. Servicio de Neurología
Burgos, 09006
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge; Servicio de Neurologia
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Clinica Ruber, 4 planta; Servicio de Neurologia
Madrid, 28006
Universitario de La Princesa; Servicio de Neurología
Madrid, 28006
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; Servicio de Neurologia
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya; Servicio de Neurologia
Málaga, 29010
Hospital Sant Joan de Deu; Servicio de Neurología
Manresa, Barcelona
Hospital Universitario Virgen de Arrixaca; Servicio de Neurología
Murcia
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra; Servicio de Neurología
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Hospital Virgen del Puerto. Servicio de Neurología
Plasencia, Caceres, 10600
Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio de Psiquiatría
Salamaca, Salamanca, 37007
Hospital General De Catalunya; Servicio de Neurologia
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, 8195
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla; Servicio de Neurología
Santander, Cantabria
Hospital Mutua De Terrasa; Servicio de Neurologia
Terrassa, Barcelona, 08222
Hospital Universitario la Fe; Servicio de Neurologia
Valencia, 46026
Servicio de Neurología Hospital Viamed Montecanal.
Zaragoza, 50012
Japan10 sites
Miyoshi Clinic of Neurology, Hananosato
Hiroshima, 728-0013
National Hospital Organization Hiroshima-Nishi Medical Center
Hiroshima, 739-0696
Rakuwakai Otowarehabilitation Hospital
Kyoto, 607-8113
Mie University Hospital
Mie, 514-8507
National Hospital Organization Matsumoto Medical Center
Nagano, 399-8701
Saigata Medical Center
Niigata, 949-3193
Katayama Medical Clinic
Okayama, 710-0813
Tokyo Medical University Hospital
Tokyo, 160-0023
Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital
Tokyo, 173-0015
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry
Tokyo, 187-8551
Canada9 sites
Parkwood Hospital; Geriatric Medicine
London, Ontario, N6C 5J1
Bruyere Continuing Care
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 5C8
Kawartha Centre - Redefining Healthy Aging
Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 2P4
CHA Hopital de I enfant-Jesus
Québec, Quebec, G1J 1Z4
The Centre for Memory and Aging
Toronto, Ontario, M4G 3E8
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8
Vancouver Hospital - UBC Hospital Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
Vancouver Island Health Authority
Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 1J8
Devonshire Clinical Research Inc.
Woodstock, Ontario, N4S 5P5
Germany8 sites
Neurologische Praxis Dr. Andrej Pauls
München, 80331
Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München; Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
München, 81675
Universitätsklinikum Münster; Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie
Münster, 48149
Steinwachs Klaus; Arztpraxis fur Neurologie u. Psychiatrie
Nuremberg, 90402
Universitätsklinikum Rostock Zentrum für Nervenheilkunde
Rostock, 18147
Universitätsklinikum Ulm; Klinik für Neurologie
Ulm, 89081
Studienzentrum Nordwest, Dr. med. Joachim Springub / Herr Wolfgang Schwarz
Westerstede, 26655
Forschungszentrum Ruhr
Witten, 58455
United Kingdom8 sites
Royal Preston Hospital
Blackburn, PR2 9HT
Surrey and Borders NHS Foundation Trust; Brain Science Research Unit
Chertsey, KT16 0AE
Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust
Coventry, CV6 6NY
St George's Hospital
London, SW17 0QT
Charing Cross Hospital
London, W6 8RF
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Manchester, M13 9WL
Campus for Ageing and Vitality
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 6BE
John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, OX3 9DU
France7 sites
Hopital Avicenne; Neurologie
Bobigny, 93009
Hopital neurologique Pierre Wertheimer - CHU Lyon; Neurologie
Bron, 69677
Hopital Gui de Chauliac; Neurologie
Montpellier, 34295
Hopital Lariboisiere
Paris, 75475
CHU Poitiers - Hopital La Miletrie
Poitiers, 86000
Hopital Hautepierre; Centre dInvestigation Clinique
Strasbourg, 67098
CHU Toulouse - La Grave
Toulouse, 31059
Italy7 sites
Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera; Ambulatorio di Neurologia
Genoa, Liguria, 16128
Casa di Cura Policlinico; Dipartimento di Scienze Neuroriabilitative
Milan, Lombardy, 20144
Ospedale S. Maria Nascente; Fondazione Don Gnocchi; Dip. Neurologia Riabilitativa
Milan, Lombardy, 20148
Ospedale Casati Passirana di Rho; Centro Regionale Alzheimer
Passirana, Lombardy, 20017
Azienda Ospedaliera Di Perugia Ospedale s. Maria Della Misericordia; S.C. Geriatria
Perugia, Umbria, 06129
Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS; Neurologia e Riabilitazione Neurologica
Rome, Lazio, 00179
Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratell;Neurologia
Rome, Lazio, 00186
Russia7 sites
State Autonomous Healthcare Institution "Republican Clinical Neurological Center
Kazan', 420021
State autonomous institution of healthcare Inter-regional clinical and diagnostic center
Kazan', 420101
Institution of RAMS (Mental Health Research Center of RAMS)
Moscow, 115522
SBEI of HPI The 1st Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov of MOH of RF
Moscow, 119021
SHI City Psychoneurological Dispensary #7
Saint Petersburg, 190005
Russian Medical Military Academy n.a. S.M.Kirov; Neurology Department
Saint Petersburg, 194044
City Clinical Hospital # 2 n.a. V.I. Razumovsky
Saratov, 410028
Poland6 sites
Podlaskie Centrum Psychogeriatrii
Bialystok, 15-756
NZOZ NEURO-KARD Ilkowski i Partnerzy Sp. Partn. Lek
Poznan, 61-853
NEURO-CARE Sp. z o.o. Sp. Komandytowa
Siemianowice Śląskie, 41-100
Przychodnia Specjalistyczna PROSEN
Warsaw, 01-231
Centrum Medyczne NeuroProtect
Warsaw, 01-684
Optimum
Warsaw, 01-785
South Korea6 sites
Chonnam National University Hospital
Gwangju, 61469
Inha University Hospital
Incheon, 22332
Konkuk University Medical Center
Seoul, 05030
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505
KyungHee Medical Center
Seoul, 130-702
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital; Dept of Neurology
Seoul, 158-710
Hungary5 sites
Semmelweis University; Department of Neurology
Budapest, 1083
Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Kórházak - Jósa András Oktatókórház; Pszichiátria
Nyíregyháza, 4400
University of Szeged; Department of Psychiatry
Szeged, 6725
Szent Borbala Korhaz; Neurologiai es Stroke Osztaly
Tatabánya, 2800
Jávorszky Ödön Kórház, Neurológia és stroke osztály
Vác, 2600
Australia4 sites
Caulfield Hospital; Aged Psychiatry Research Unit
Caulfield, Victoria, 3162
Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital; Medical and Cognitive Research Centre
Heidelberg West, Victoria, 3081
Neurodegenerative Disorders Research; Neurology
West Perth, Western Australia, 6005
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Neurology
Woodville, South Australia, 5011
Mexico4 sites
Hospital Angeles de Culiacán, Neurociencias Estudios Clínicos SC
Culiacán, 80020
Hospital Uni; Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez
Monterrey, 64460
AVIX Investigación Clínica S.C
Monterrey, 64710
Hospital Universitario de Saltillo
Saltillo, 25000
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Hacettepe University School of Medicine; Neurology
Ankara, 06100
Osmangazi University School of Medicine,Neurology Department
Eskişehir, 26480
Istanbul University Istanbul School of Medicine; Neurology
Istanbul, 34093
Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine; Neurology
Samsun, 55139
Sweden3 sites
Skånes Universitetssjukhus Malmö, Minneskliniken
Malmö, 211 46
Sahlgrenska Academy University,Neuroscience and Physiology;Departmt of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry
Mölndal, 431 41
Karolinska Uni Hospital, Huddinge; Dept. of Geriatric Med
Stockholm, 14186
Ukraine3 sites
National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education named after P.L.Shupik; Neurology Department #1
Kiev, 04112
D.F.Chebotarev Institute of Gerontology NAMS;Depart of Age Physiology&Pathology of Nervous System
Kiev, 04114
Regional mental hospital; Department of psychiatry, psychology and sexology
Lviv, KIEV Governorate, 79021
Bulgaria2 sites
ACIBADEM CITY CLINIC TOKUDA HOSPITAL EAD; Clinic of Neurology and Sleep Medicine
Sofia, 1407
Alexandrovska hospital; Neurology Department
Sofia, 1431
Costa Rica2 sites
Hospital Clínica Biblica
San José, 10101
ICIMED Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Médicas
San José, 10108
Czechia2 sites
Charles University, Medical faculty, Hradec Kralove ;Department of Neurology
Hradec Králové, 500 05
General Teaching Hospital, Departmetn of Neurology
Prague, 110 00
Denmark2 sites
Aarhus Universitetshospital, Neurologisk Afdeling F, Demensklinikken
Aarhus N, 8200
Rigshospitalet, Hukommelsesklinikken
København Ø, 2100
Hong Kong2 sites
Prince of Wales Hospital; Dept. of Medicine & Therapeutics
Hong Kong
Queen Mary Hospital, Division of Geriatric Medicine
Hong Kong
Portugal2 sites
Hospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca; Servico de Neurologia
Amadora, 2720-276
Hospital Beatriz Angelo; Servico de Neurologia
Loures, 2674-514
Croatia1 site
Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb;Clinic for Neurology
Zagreb, 10000
Lithuania1 site
Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinic
Vilnius, 08661
Switzerland1 site
Universitäres Zentrum für Altersmedizin und Rehabilitation
Basel, 4002
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Efficacy And Safety Study of Crenezumab in Patients With Prodromal to Mild Alzheimer's Disease.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of crenezumab versus placebo in participants with prodromal to mild AD. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous (IV) infusion of crenezumab or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 100 weeks. The final efficacy and safety assessment will be performed 52 weeks after the last crenezumab dose. Participants will then have the option to enter the Open Label Extension (OLE) study if eligible. Participants who do not enter the OLE study will have additional follow-up visits at 16 and 52 weeks after the last dose, primarily for safety and also for limited efficacy assessments.
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Being tested
- Crenezumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Alzheimer Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CrenezumabDrug
Crenezumab was administered by intravenous (IV) infusion at 60mg/kg as per the dosing schedule described above.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo was administered by intravenous (IV) infusion at 60mg/kg as per the dosing schedule described above.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of Placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 100 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Crenezumab | Experimental | Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of Crenezumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 100 weeks. Receives: Drug: Crenezumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 105 in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score
The CDR-SB rates impairment in 6 categories (memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies and personal care) on a 5-point scale in which no impairment = 0, questionable impairment = 0.5 and mild, moderate and severe impairment = 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The score range is from 0 to 18 with a high score indicating a high disease severity. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline for this primary endpoint. Data after 29 January 2019 are censored for the primary and secondary efficacy analyses to avoid potential biases due to investigators, participants, raters, etc. being potentially influenced by early closure of the study due to lack of efficacy.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Secondary outcomes (20)
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Cognition, as Assessed by Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition (ADAS-Cog) (Subscale) 13 (ADAS-Cog-13)
The ADAS-Cog-13 assesses multiple cognitive domains including memory, comprehension, praxis, orientation, and spontaneous speech. Most of these are assessed by tests although some are rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale. The ADAS-Cog-13 is the ADAS-Cog-11 with 2 further items: delayed word recall and total digit cancellation. The score range for ADAS-Cog-13 is from 0 to 85 with high scores representing severe dysfunction. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Cognition, as Assessed by Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition (ADAS-Cog) (Subscale) 11 (ADAS-Cog-11)
The ADAS-Cog-11 assesses multiple cognitive domains including memory, comprehension, praxis, orientation, and spontaneous speech. Most of these are assessed by tests although some are rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale. The score range for ADAS-Cog-11 is from 0 to 70 with high scores representing severe dysfunction. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Severity of Dementia, Assessed Using the CDR-Global Score (CDR-GS)
The CDR-GS represents a semi-structured interview which rates impairment in 6 categories (memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care) on a 5-point scale in which CDR 0 = no dementia and CDR 0.5, 1, 2 or 3 = questionable, mild, moderate or severe dementia respectively. The range in scores for the CDR-GS is from 0 to 3 and a high score on the CDR-GS would indicate a high disease severity. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Severity of Dementia, Assessed Using the Mini Mental State Evaluation (MMSE)
The MMSE is a set of standardized questions used to evaluate possible cognitive impairment and help stage the severity level of this impairment. The questions target 6 areas: orientation, registration, attention, short-term recall, language and constructional praxis/visuospatial abilities. The scores on the MMSE range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better function. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Function as Assessed by the ADCS-ADL Total Score
The ADCS-ADL (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living) is the scale most widely used to assess functional outcomes in participants with AD. The ADCS-ADL covers both basic ADL (e.g., eating and toileting) and more complex 'instrumental' ADL or iADL (e.g., using the telephone, managing finances and preparing a meal). The ADCS-ADL consists of 23 questions with a score range of 0 to 78 where a higher score represents better function. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Function as Assessed by the ADCS-instrumental (ADCS-iADL) Subscore
The ADCS-iADL (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living) measures activities such as using the telephone, managing finances and preparing a meal. The ADCS-iADL consists of 16 questions with a score range of 0 to 56 where a higher score represents better function. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on a Measure of Dependence Derived From the ADCS-ADL Score
The ADCS-ADL (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living) is the scale most widely used to assess functional outcomes in participants with AD. The ADCS-ADL covers both basic ADL (e.g., eating and toileting) and more complex 'instrumental' ADL or iADL (e.g., using the telephone, managing finances and preparing a meal). The ADCS-ADL consists of 23 questions with a score range of 0 to 78 where a higher score represents better function. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 Assessed Using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q)
The NPI-Q is an informant-based instrument that evaluates 12 neuropsychiatric disturbances common in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation, dysphoria, anxiety, apathy, irritability, euphoria, disinhibition, aberrant motor behavior, night-time behavioral disturbances and appetite and eating abnormalities. The severity of each neuropsychiatric symptom is rated on a 3-point scale (mild, moderate and marked). The total severity score range is from 0 to 36 with higher scores representing higher severity. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) Scale Score
The QoL-AD (Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease) scale assesses QoL in participants who have dementia. The QoL-AD consists of 13 items covering aspects of participants' relationships with friends and family, physical condition, mood, concerns about finances and overall assessment of QoL. Items are rated on 4-point Likert-type scales ranging from 1 [poor] to 4 [excellent]. The score range is from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating a better QoL. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 105
Zarit Caregiver Interview for Alzheimer's Disease (ZCI-AD) Scale Score
The ZCI-AD is a modified version of the Zarit Burden Interview, which was originally designed to reflect the stresses experienced by caregivers of people with dementia. This modified version includes slight modifications in item and title wording (e.g., removal of "your relative" to refer directly to the patient, removal of "burden" from title) and the use of 11-point numerical rating scales. The ZCI-AD scale consists of a total of 30 items. Total scores will be calculated with a total score range from 0 to 300 (higher scores indicate a higher burden on the caregiver). The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 105
EQ-5D Questionnaire Domain Score for Participants
The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status designed to provide a simple generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. It is broadly applicable across a wide range of health conditions and treatment. The EQ-5D assesses five domains to provide a health state index. These are anxiety/depression, pain/discomfort, usual activities, mobility, and self-care. The scores on the EQ-5D ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 105
EQ-5D Questionnaire Domain Score for Caregivers
The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status designed to provide a simple generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. It is broadly applicable across a wide range of health conditions and treatment. The EQ-5D assesses five domains to provide a health state index. These are anxiety/depression, pain/discomfort, usual activities, mobility, and self-care. The scores on the EQ-5D ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 105
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Event (AEs) and Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)
An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Measured: Baseline up until 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 117 weeks).
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Crenezumab Antibodies
Participants were considered positive or negative for ADA based on their baseline and post-baseline sample results. The number and percentage of participants with confirmed positive ADA levels were determined for Crenezumab and Placebo groups. The prevalence of ADA at baseline was calculated as the proportion of participants with confirmed positive ADA levels at baseline relative to the total number of participants with a sample available at baseline. The incidence of treatment-emergent ADAs was determined as the proportion of participants with confirmed post-baseline positive ADAs relative to the total number of participants that had at least one post-baseline sample available for ADA analysis.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 105
Serum Concentration of Crenezumab
Serum concentration data for Crenezumab will be tabulated and summarized. Descriptive summary statistics will include the arithmetic mean and SD. Since a sparse PK sampling design is being used, population (non-linear mixed-effects) modeling will be used to analyze the dose concentration-time data of crenezumab. Information from other clinical studies may be incorporated to establish the PK model. Please note that Post-dose samples were not collected at Weeks 37 and 105.
Measured: Pre-infusion (0 hour), 60-90 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 Week 1 and on Week 25; Weeks 13, 37 (Pre-dose), 53, 77 and 105 (infusion length = as per the Pharmacy Manual)
Plasma Amyloid Beta (Abeta) 40 Concentrations
Plasma Abeta 40 concentrations will be measured over time and descriptive summary statistics will include the arithmetic mean and SD. Please note that a Post-dose sample was only collected at Week 13.
Measured: Week 1 Day 1; Weeks 13, 25, 53, 77 and 105
Plasma Amyloid Beta (Abeta) 42 Concentrations
Plasma Abeta 42 concentrations will be measured over time and descriptive summary statistics will include the arithmetic mean and SD. Please note that a Post-dose sample was only collected at Week 13.
Measured: Week 1 Day 1; Weeks 13, 25, 53, 77 and 105
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 105 in Whole Brain Volume as Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Percentage Change in Whole Brain Volume will be measured over time and descriptive summary statistics will include the arithmetic mean, median, range, SD, and coefficient of variation, as appropriate. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 105 in Ventricle Volume as Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Percentage Change in Ventricle Volume will be measured over time and descriptive summary statistics will include the arithmetic mean, median, range, SD, and coefficient of variation, as appropriate. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 105 in Hippocampal Volume as Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Percentage Change in Hippocampal Volume will be measured over time and descriptive summary statistics will include the arithmetic mean, median, range, SD, and coefficient of variation, as appropriate. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region, and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 105
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start22 Mar 2016
- Primary completion31 May 2019
- Study completion31 May 2019
Why it stopped: This study was discontinued due to an interim analysis in this study, which indicated that Crenezumab was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alzheimer's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 813 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02670083
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BN29552
- Other IDs
- 2015-003034-27, 2015
- Acronym
- CREAD
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Hibar DP, Bauer A, Rabe C, Borlinghaus N, Jethwa A, Kollmorgen G, Di Domenico A, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Masters CL, Sperling RA, Bittner T. Elecsys pTau217 plasma immunoassay detection of amyloid pathology in clinical cohorts. Alzheimers Dement. 2026 Jan;22(1):e71009. doi: 10.1002/alz.71009.
PubMed 41537338Chandler JM, Lansdall CJ, Ye W, McDougall F, Belger M, Toth B, Mi X, Sink KM, Atkins AS. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living dependence score: revision and validation of an algorithm evaluating patient dependence across the spectrum of AD severity. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Sep;12(8):100261. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100261. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
PubMed 40603145Teng E, Manser PT, Shah M, Pickthorn K, Hu N, Djakovic S, Swendsen H, Blendstrup M, Faccin G, Ostrowitzki S, Sink KM. The Use of Episodic Memory Tests for Screening in Clinical Trials for Early Alzheimer's Disease: A Comparison of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(1):41-49. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2022.101.
PubMed 36641609Ostrowitzki S, Bittner T, Sink KM, Mackey H, Rabe C, Honig LS, Cassetta E, Woodward M, Boada M, van Dyck CH, Grimmer T, Selkoe DJ, Schneider A, Blondeau K, Hu N, Quartino A, Clayton D, Dolton M, Dang Y, Ostaszewski B, Sanabria-Bohorquez SM, Rabbia M, Toth B, Eichenlaub U, Smith J, Honigberg LA, Doody RS. Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Crenezumab vs Placebo in Adults With Early Alzheimer Disease: Two Phase 3 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. JAMA Neurol. 2022 Nov 1;79(11):1113-1121. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2909.
PubMed 36121669
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Efficacy And Safety Study of Crenezumab in Patients With Prodromal to Mild Alzheimer's Disease.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02670083
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CREAD / BN29552
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: This study was discontinued due to an interim analysis in this study, which indicated that Crenezumab was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint.
- Enrolment
- 813 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Jul 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of crenezumab versus placebo in participants with prodromal to mild AD. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous (IV) infusion of crenezumab or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 100 weeks. The final efficacy and safety assessment will be performed 52 weeks after the last crenezumab dose. Participants will then have the option to enter the Open Label Extension (OLE) study if eligible. Participants who do not enter the OLE study will have additional follow-up visits at 16 and 52 weeks after the last dose, primarily for safety and also for limited efficacy assessments.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received intravenous (IV) infusion of Placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 100 weeks. |
| Crenezumab | Experimental | Drug: CrenezumabParticipants received intravenous (IV) infusion of Crenezumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 100 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Weight between 40 and 120 kilograms (Kg) inclusive
- Availability of a person (referred to as the "caregiver") who in the investigator's judgment:
- Has frequent and sufficient contact with the participant to be able to provide accurate information regarding the participant's cognitive and functional abilities, agrees to provide information at clinic visits (which require partner input for scale completion), signs the necessary consent form, and has sufficient cognitive capacity to accurately report upon the participant's behavior and cognitive and functional abilities
- Fluency in the language of the tests used at the study site
- Adequate visual and auditory acuity, in the investigator's judgment, sufficient to perform the neuropsychological testing (eye glasses and hearing aids are permitted)
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Any evidence of a condition other than AD that may affect cognition such as other dementias, stroke, brain damage, autoimmune disorders (e.g. multiple sclerosis) or infections with neurological sequelae.
- History of major psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia or major depression (if not considered in remission)
- At risk of suicide in the opinion of the investigator
- Any abnormal MRI findings, such as presence of cerebral vascular pathology, cortical stroke, etc or inability to tolerate MRI procedures or contraindication to MRI
- Unstable or clinically significant cardiovascular (e.g., myocardial infarction), kidney or liver disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CrenezumabCrenezumab was administered by intravenous (IV) infusion at 60mg/kg as per the dosing schedule described above. | Drug | Crenezumab |
| PlaceboPlacebo was administered by intravenous (IV) infusion at 60mg/kg as per the dosing schedule described above. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 105 in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
The CDR-SB rates impairment in 6 categories (memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies and personal care) on a 5-point scale in which no impairment = 0, questionable impairment = 0.5 and mild, moderate and severe impairment = 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The score range is from 0 to 18 with a high score indicating a high disease severity. The difference in mean change from Baseline to Week 105 between Crenezumab and Placebo treated participants was estimated. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) adjusting for disease severity, APOEe4 status, geographic region and the use or non-use of anti-dementia medications at baseline were used to estimate the mean change from baseline for this primary endpoint. Data after 29 January 2019 are censored for the primary and secondary efficacy analyses to avoid potential biases due to investigators, participants, raters, etc. being potentially influenced by early closure of the study due to lack of efficacy.
20 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Cognition, as Assessed by Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition (ADAS-Cog) (Subscale) 13 (ADAS-Cog-13)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Cognition, as Assessed by Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition (ADAS-Cog) (Subscale) 11 (ADAS-Cog-11)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Severity of Dementia, Assessed Using the CDR-Global Score (CDR-GS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Severity of Dementia, Assessed Using the Mini Mental State Evaluation (MMSE)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Function as Assessed by the ADCS-ADL Total Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on Function as Assessed by the ADCS-instrumental (ADCS-iADL) Subscore
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 on a Measure of Dependence Derived From the ADCS-ADL Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Change From Baseline to Week 105 Assessed Using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) Scale Score
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 105
Zarit Caregiver Interview for Alzheimer's Disease (ZCI-AD) Scale Score
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 105
EQ-5D Questionnaire Domain Score for Participants
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 105
EQ-5D Questionnaire Domain Score for Caregivers
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 105
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Event (AEs) and Serious Adverse Event (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up until 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 117 weeks).
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Crenezumab Antibodies
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 105
Serum Concentration of Crenezumab
Time frame: Pre-infusion (0 hour), 60-90 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 Week 1 and on Week 25; Weeks 13, 37 (Pre-dose), 53, 77 and 105 (infusion length = as per the Pharmacy Manual)
Plasma Amyloid Beta (Abeta) 40 Concentrations
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1; Weeks 13, 25, 53, 77 and 105
Plasma Amyloid Beta (Abeta) 42 Concentrations
Time frame: Week 1 Day 1; Weeks 13, 25, 53, 77 and 105
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 105 in Whole Brain Volume as Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 105 in Ventricle Volume as Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 105 in Hippocampal Volume as Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 105
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41537338Hibar DP, Bauer A, Rabe C, Borlinghaus N, Jethwa A, Kollmorgen G, Di Domenico A, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Masters CL, Sperling RA, Bittner T. Elecsys pTau217 plasma immunoassay detection of amyloid pathology in clinical cohorts. Alzheimers Dement. 2026 Jan;22(1):e71009. doi: 10.1002/alz.71009.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40603145Chandler JM, Lansdall CJ, Ye W, McDougall F, Belger M, Toth B, Mi X, Sink KM, Atkins AS. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living dependence score: revision and validation of an algorithm evaluating patient dependence across the spectrum of AD severity. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Sep;12(8):100261. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100261. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36641609Teng E, Manser PT, Shah M, Pickthorn K, Hu N, Djakovic S, Swendsen H, Blendstrup M, Faccin G, Ostrowitzki S, Sink KM. The Use of Episodic Memory Tests for Screening in Clinical Trials for Early Alzheimer's Disease: A Comparison of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(1):41-49. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2022.101.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36121669Ostrowitzki S, Bittner T, Sink KM, Mackey H, Rabe C, Honig LS, Cassetta E, Woodward M, Boada M, van Dyck CH, Grimmer T, Selkoe DJ, Schneider A, Blondeau K, Hu N, Quartino A, Clayton D, Dolton M, Dang Y, Ostaszewski B, Sanabria-Bohorquez SM, Rabbia M, Toth B, Eichenlaub U, Smith J, Honigberg LA, Doody RS. Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Crenezumab vs Placebo in Adults With Early Alzheimer Disease: Two Phase 3 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. JAMA Neurol. 2022 Nov 1;79(11):1113-1121. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2909.
Related trials for Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Trontinemab in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals at Risk for Progression to Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
196 sites in 30 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Crenezumab in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 196 sites in 30 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 196 sites in United States, Spain, Japan, Canada, Germany and 25 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jul 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 105 in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score (time frame: Baseline, Week 105). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02670083, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2020.