Cervical Spinal Cord InjuryPhase 2/3NCT02669849
Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of VX-210 in Subjects With Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
A Phase 2/3 study testing VX-210 in people with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury, run by Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated at 39 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of VX-210 in subjects with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Secondary objectives include the specific evaluation of the effects of VX-210 on neurological recovery and daily function after spinal cord injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
- What is being tested?
- VX-210
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2016to Nov 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Acute traumatic cervical SCI, motor level of C4, C5, C6, or C7 on each side:
- Screening UEMS score must be ≤16 points on each side.
- AIS A subjects with a C4 motor level on both sides must have at least 1 point of motor activity between C5 and T1 on at least 1 side.
- AIS B subjects with a C4 motor level on both sides must have at least 1 point of motor activity between C5 and C7 on at least 1 side.
- American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A or AIS grade B.
- Scheduled and planned to undergo a spinal decompression/stabilization surgery that commences within 72 hours after the initial injury.
- Computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is consistent with the subject's neurological deficit.
Who cannot join
- Participation in any other clinical study for acute SCI without approval by the sponsor.
- Inability to undergo decompression/stabilization surgery that commences within 72 hours after injury.
- One or more upper extremity muscle groups untestable during screening ISNCSCI examination.
- Acute SCI from gunshot or penetrating/stab wound; non-traumatic SCI (e.g., transverse myelitis, acute disc herniation); brachial plexus injury; complete spinal cord transection; or multifocal SCI.
- Females who are breastfeeding or have a positive serum pregnancy test.
- Body mass index (BMI) of ≥40 kg/m^2 at screening.
Show all 11Show fewer
- History of an adverse reaction to a fibrin sealant or its components.
- Unconsciousness or other mental impairment that precludes reliable International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination.
- Known immunodeficiency, including human immunodeficiency virus, or use of immunosuppressive or cancer chemotherapeutic drugs.
- Any significant medical or psychiatric comorbidities that would significantly increase the risk of study enrollment and/or significantly interfere with study outcomes or assessments, in the judgment of the investigator.
- Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 2 countries.
39 sites in 2 countries
United States33 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Study site
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Columbus, Ohio
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Falls Church, Virginia
Study site
Fresno, California
Study site
Hershey, Pennsylvania
Study site
Iowa City, Iowa
Study site
Jackson, Mississippi
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky
Study site
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Study site
Orange, California
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Study site
Providence, Rhode Island
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Roanoke, Virginia
Study site
Sacramento, California
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
Savannah, Georgia
Study site
Seattle, Washington
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Toledo, Ohio
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Canada6 sites
Study site
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Study site
Montreal, Quebec
Study site
Québec, Quebec
Study site
Saskatoon
Study site
Toronto, Ontario
Study site
Vancouver, British Colombia
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2b/3, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of VX-210 in Subjects With Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of VX-210 in subjects with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Secondary objectives include the specific evaluation of the effects of VX-210 on neurological recovery and daily function after spinal cord injury.
- Conditions
- Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
- Being tested
- VX-210, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VX-210Drug
PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| VX-210 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: VX-210 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)
UEMS focuses selectively on the hand and arm control most relevant to individuals with a cervical spinal cord injury. UEMS ranges from 0 to 50, where a higher score indicates a better movement of hand and arm.
Measured: From baseline at 6 months post-treatment
Secondary outcomes (8)
Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III Self-Care Subscore
SCIM self-care subscore measures self-care abilities (feeding, dressing, grooming, bathing), respiration and sphincter management and mobility. The score ranges from 0-20, where a higher score represents a better outcome.
Measured: At 6 months post-treatment
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) Score
CUE-T measures a participant's ability to perform specific functional movements/tasks with the arms and hands (for example: grasping a pencil, pushing or lifting a weight). CUE-T score ranges from 0-128, where a higher score indicates an improvement in participant's ability.
Measured: At 6 months post-treatment
Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) Quantitative Prehension Score
GRASSP measures participant's ability to perform specific functional tasks with the arms, hands, and fingers. GRASSP quantitative prehension score ranges from 0-60, where a higher score indicates a better performance.
Measured: At 6 months post-treatment
Percentage of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) Grade Responders
AIS ranks impairment according to body-wide motor/sensory results: Grade A: Complete (no sensory or motor function is preserved in the sacral segments S4 to 5); Grade B: Sensory Incomplete (sensory but not motor function is preserved below the neurological level and includes the sacral segments S4 to 5); Grade C: Motor Incomplete (motor function is preserved at the most caudal sacral segments); Grade D: Motor Incomplete (motor incomplete status as defined above, with at least half or more of key muscle functions below the single neurological level of injury having a muscle grade >=3; Grade E: Normal (sensation and motor function as tested are graded as normal in all segments). An AIS responder was defined as a subject with improvement by ≥2 AIS grades (i.e., baseline AIS Grade A changed to Grade C, D, or E; baseline AIS Grade B changed to D or E at 6 months after treatment).
Measured: At 6 months post-treatment
Percentage of Motor Level Responders
The motor level score for the right or left side assesses contraction strength of 10 key muscles in the upper and lower extremities on each side of the body; each muscle receives a score from 0 (total paralysis) to 5 ([normal] active movement). A motor level responder was defined as a subject with improvement by ≥2 motor levels on either side of the body (i.e., baseline level C4 changed to C6, C7, C8 on the left; or baseline level C5 changed to C7, C8 on the right).
Measured: At 6 months post-treatment
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of VX-210
Measured: up to 53 hours post-treatment
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of VX-210
Measured: up to 53 hours post-treatment
Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) of VX-210
Measured: up to 53 hours post-treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2016
- Primary completionNov 2018
- Study completionNov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Cervical Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02669849
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VX15-210-101
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2b/3, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of VX-210 in Subjects With Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02669849
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VX15-210-101
- Conditions
- Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Jan 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of VX-210 in subjects with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Secondary objectives include the specific evaluation of the effects of VX-210 on neurological recovery and daily function after spinal cord injury.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
| VX-210 | Experimental | Drug: VX-210 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Acute traumatic cervical SCI, motor level of C4, C5, C6, or C7 on each side:
- American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A or AIS grade B.
- Scheduled and planned to undergo a spinal decompression/stabilization surgery that commences within 72 hours after the initial injury.
- Computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is consistent with the subject's neurological deficit.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Participation in any other clinical study for acute SCI without approval by the sponsor.
- Inability to undergo decompression/stabilization surgery that commences within 72 hours after injury.
- One or more upper extremity muscle groups untestable during screening ISNCSCI examination.
- Acute SCI from gunshot or penetrating/stab wound; non-traumatic SCI (e.g., transverse myelitis, acute disc herniation); brachial plexus injury; complete spinal cord transection; or multifocal SCI.
- Females who are breastfeeding or have a positive serum pregnancy test.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VX-210 | Drug | VX-210 |
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)
Time frame: From baseline at 6 months post-treatment
UEMS focuses selectively on the hand and arm control most relevant to individuals with a cervical spinal cord injury. UEMS ranges from 0 to 50, where a higher score indicates a better movement of hand and arm.
8 secondary outcomes
Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III Self-Care Subscore
Time frame: At 6 months post-treatment
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) Score
Time frame: At 6 months post-treatment
Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) Quantitative Prehension Score
Time frame: At 6 months post-treatment
Percentage of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) Grade Responders
Time frame: At 6 months post-treatment
Percentage of Motor Level Responders
Time frame: At 6 months post-treatment
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of VX-210
Time frame: up to 53 hours post-treatment
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of VX-210
Time frame: up to 53 hours post-treatment
Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) of VX-210
Time frame: up to 53 hours post-treatment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Not yet recruiting
Influence of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Arm and Hand Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Functional Electrical Stimulation vs Transcutaneous Stimulation in Patients With Subacute Spinal Cord Injury
Non Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury, Sub-Acute Rehabilitation
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
Enrolling by invitation
NeuroSuitUp: Neurorehabilitation Through Synergistic Man-machine Interfaces
Spinal Cord Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
39 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing VX-210 in people with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury, run by Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated at 39 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Jan 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) (time frame: From baseline at 6 months post-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2020.