AzTrials
AzTrials

DepressionNCT02667366

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Telephone-delivered Psychotherapy for Depression in Primary Care

A study testing Tel-PT and TAU and text messages in people with Depression, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is the examination of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telephone-based psychotherapy (Tel-PT) for depression compared to treatment as usual in primary care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Depression
What is being tested?
Tel-PT and TAU and text messages
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
56 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
Jan 2016to Mar 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • PHQ-9 score of > 5 and ≤15.
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
  • Minimum age of 18 years
  • Diagnosis of mild to moderate depression according to ICD-10 (F32.0, F32.1, F33.0, F33.1)

Who cannot join

  • Patients currently being in psychotherapeutic treatment or treatment in past three months
  • Suicidal tendencies or suicidality
  • Insufficient knowledge of German language
  • Health condition that does not allow questionnaire completion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • University of Zurich

    Zurich, 8050

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Improving Access to Evidence-based Treatment for Depression: Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Telephone-delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) in Primary Care

The aim of the study is the examination of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telephone-based psychotherapy (Tel-PT) for depression compared to treatment as usual in primary care.

Read the detailed description

The overall purpose of the study is to examine the effectiveness of telephone psychotherapy (Tel-PT) for the treatment of mild to moderate depression on different outcome-levels and under clinically representative conditions in Swiss primary health care. The randomized-controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the primary hypothesis that Tel-PT is more effective than routine primary care (i.e. treatment as usual, TAU), more specifically, that it leads to significant higher reduction in depression severity than TAU at follow-up.

The intervention group (IG) receives a manualized short-term cognitive behavioral treatment, which is the adapted German version of the program "Creating a balance" developed in the USA. The therapy consists of one face-to-face and 8-12 telephone contacts and is carried out by a licensed psychotherapist.

More concrete, recruitment and inclusion of the patients will be carried out by the participating general practitioners (GPs). GPs will be instructed to screen patients at risk for depression, especially those revealing diffuse somatic symptoms and suffering from chronic diseases. If positively screened, patient's depressive symptoms are assessed with Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and diagnosed according to ICD-10.

All GPs will receive an initial training prior to their participation, providing them with study information and procedures as well as training in screening procedure, psychodiagnostics and study enrolment.

Eligible patients are provided with detailed study information and asked to participate. Subsequently, patients will give informed consent. Patients will then be included into the study and fill out the baseline questionnaires (t0). After that, randomization will be carried out at the University of Zurich, based on an appropriately created computer algorithm. Both GPs and patients are informed about the results by the study team within two days. Subsequently, patients in control group (CG) will receive regular text messages and patients in the intervention group (IG) will be called by the study therapist to schedule an initial appointment.

In case of positive results, the overarching objective is the optimization of mental health services for depressed patients by implementing an evidence-based, accessible and cost-effective treatment option into primary care.

Conditions
Depression
Being tested
Tel-PT, TAU and text messages
Keywords
mild and moderate depression
Medical subject headings
Depression, Lymphoma, Follicular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tel-PTBehavioural

  • TAU and text messagesBehavioural

Study groups in NCT02667366
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tel-PTExperimentalTel-PT receives a manualized short-term CBT. Treatment consists of one initial face-to-face appointment and 8-12 subsequent telephone sessions between patient and licensed therapist. Each telephone contact lasts between 20 and 30 minutes and take place on a weekly and later biweekly basis.
Receives: Behavioral: Tel-PT
TAU and text messagesActive comparatorControl Group receives treatment as usual and additionally weekly text messages containing general information about depression.
Receives: Behavioral: TAU and text messages

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in depressive symptoms

    The change in depressive symptoms will be assessed with the German version of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Löwe, Spitzer, Zipfel, \& Herzog 2002).

    Measured: t0 (baseline) and t2 (12 months after baseline)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change in depressive symptoms

    The change in depressive symptoms will be assessed with the German version of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Löwe, Spitzer, Zipfel, \& Herzog 2002).

    Measured: t0 (baseline) and t1 (four months after baseline)

  2. Response

    Response defined as 50% reduction in the PHQ-9.

    Measured: t0 (baseline), t1 (four months after baseline), t2 (12 months after baseline)

  3. Change in health-related quality of life

    Change in health-related quality of life is measured with the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12; Bullinger \& Kirchberger, 1998).

    Measured: t0 (baseline), t1 (four months after baseline), t2 (12 months after baseline)

  4. Self-efficacy for management and relapse prevention in depression

    Depression self-efficacy scale for management and relapse prevention (Bush et al., 2001).

    Measured: t0 (baseline), t1 (four months after baseline), t2 (12 months after baseline)

  5. Cost-effectiveness

    Health care utilization and productivity loss will be measured with an adapted version of the Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory (CSSRI; Chisholm et al., 2000). For Switzerland, country-specific unit costs will be employed to calculate direct and indirect costs.

    Measured: t0 (baseline), t1 (four months after baseline), t2 (12 months after baseline)

  6. Cost-effectiveness

    Health-related quality of life for the economic analyses will be measured using the EQ-5D-5L (The EuroQuol Group, 1990), Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) based on the EQ-5D index will be determined and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) will be computed.

    Measured: t0 (baseline), t1 (four months after baseline), t2 (12 months after baseline)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02667366
Sponsor's protocol ID
BW-0417
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
3 Dec 2015
Last updated
16 Oct 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Löwe, B, Spitzer, RL, Zipfel, S, & Herzog, W. Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D): Manual und Testunterlagen. Pfizer. Karlsruhe: 2002.

  • Watzke B, Heddaeus D, Steinmann M, Konig HH, Wegscheider K, Schulz H, Harter M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guideline-based stepped care model for patients with depression: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in routine care. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 20;14:230. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0230-y.

    PubMed 25182269
  • Simon GE, Ludman EJ, Tutty S, Operskalski B, Von Korff M. Telephone psychotherapy and telephone care management for primary care patients starting antidepressant treatment: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Aug 25;292(8):935-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.935.

    PubMed 15328325
  • Bush, T, Russo, J, Ludman, E, Lin, E, Von Korff, M, Simon, G, Walker, E. Perceived self-efficacy for depression self-management. A reliable and valid self-report measure with predictive validity: Poster presentation at the American Psychological Society Meeting, June 2001. Toronto, Canada.

  • Bullinger, M, & Kirchberger, I. Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Hogrefe. Göttingen: 1998.

  • Haller E, Besson N, Watzke B. "Unrigging the support wheels" - A qualitative study on patients' experiences with and perspectives on low-intensity CBT. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 9;19(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4495-1.

    PubMed 31597555
  • Watzke B, Haller E, Steinmann M, Heddaeus D, Harter M, Konig HH, Wegscheider K, Rosemann T. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based cognitive-behavioural therapy in primary care: study protocol of TIDe - telephone intervention for depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 19;17(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1429-5.

    PubMed 28724423

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tel-PT and TAU and text messages in people with Depression, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in depressive symptoms (time frame: t0 (baseline) and t2 (12 months after baseline)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02667366, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in