Prostate CancerPhase 3PRONOUNCENCT02663908
A Trial Comparing Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease
A Phase 3 study testing Degarelix and Leuprolide in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 133 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this trial is to test if a marketed drug for advanced prostate cancer (FIRMAGON) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications as compared to another marketed drug for advanced prostate cancer (LUPRON DEPOT) in subjects with prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Degarelix and Leuprolide
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 545 participants
- Where
- 133 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- 19 Apr 2016to 29 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Advanced prostate cancer
- Indication to initiate androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
- Predefined cardiovascular disease
Who cannot join
- Previous or current hormonal management of prostate cancer (unless terminated at least 12 months prior to trial)
- Acute cardiovascular disease in the previous 30 days
Trial locations and contacts
133 sites in 12 countries.
133 sites in 12 countries
United States48 sites
Urology Group of New Mexico PC
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109
Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc.
Anaheim, California, 92801
Urologic Consultants of Southeaster PA LLP
Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004
Urology Center of Alabama PC
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Seattle Urology Research Center
Burien, Washington, 98166
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center
Charleston, South Carolina, 29401
Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Erlanger Health System
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403
Signal Point Clinical Research Center
Dayton, Ohio, 45409
Urology Center of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, 80211
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Advanced Urology Centers of New York Elmont Division
Elmont, New York, 11003
Urology of Indiana LLC
Greenwood, Indiana, 46032
First Urology PSC
Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130
University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute, Inc.
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
San Diego Clinical Trials
La Mesa, California, 91942
Comprehensive Urologic Care
Lake Barrington, Illinois, 60010
Lancaster Urology
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604
Kansas City Urology Care
Lenexa, Kansas, 66214
Clinical Trials Research
Lincoln, California, 95648
Urology Associates, PA
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
Los Angeles, California, 90073
San Marcus Research Clinic Inc
Miami, Florida, 33014
Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Clinical Research Solutions PC
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Delaware Valley Urology LLC Westhampton
Mount Laurel, New Jersey, 08054
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519
Urology of Virginia
Norfolk, Virginia, 23462
University of California, Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Clinical Research Center of Florida
Pompano Beach, Florida, 33060
Veterans Affairs Medical Center-Salisbury, NC
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
University of Washington School of Medicine
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Regional Urology, LLC
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71106
Springfield Clinic LLP
Springfield, Illinois, 62703
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Florida Urology Partners
Tampa, Florida, 33615
Holy Name Medical Center
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
Montefiore Medical Center PRIME
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Skyline Urology
Torrance, California, 90505
Chesapeake Urology Associates, P.A.
Towson, Maryland, 21204
Arizona Institute of Urology
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Urological Associates of Southern Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85715
University of Arizona College of Medicine
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
Urologic Surgeons of Washington
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20036
Iowa Clinic
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266
Innovative Clinical Research Institute
Whittier, California, 90603
Slovakia15 sites
CUIMED s.r.o.
Bratislava
Urocentrum Bratislava s.r.o.
Bratislava
Nemocnica Kosice-Saca, a.s.
Košice
Vychodoslovensky onkologicky ustav, a.s.
Košice
Zeleznicna nemocnica Kosice
Košice
UROCENTRUM LEVICE s.r.o.
Levice
UROAMB s.r.o.
Liptovský Mikuláš
Univerzitna nemocnica Martin
Martin
Fakultna nemocnica Nitra
Nitra
UROEXAM, spol. s r.o.
Nitra
MILAB s.r.o.
Prešov
MIRAMED s.r.o
Rimavská Sobota
UROCENTRUM SALA s.r.o.
Šaľa
Privatna Urologicka ambulancia
Trenčín
Fakultna nemocnica s poliklinikou Zilina
Žilina
Germany12 sites
Gynaekologisches Zentrum Bonn-Friedensplatz
Bonn
Staedtisches Klinikum Braunschweig GmbH - Standort Salzdahlumer
Braunschweig, Lower Saxony
Staedtisches Klinikum Dresden Standort Dresden-Friedrichstadt
Dresden, Saxony
Facharztpraxis für Urologie
Eisleben Lutherstadt, Saxony-Anhalt
Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg
Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Doelau
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt
Urologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
Herzogenaurach, Bavaria
Urologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
Kirchheim unter Teck, Baden-Wurttemberg
Urologie am Nordplatz
Leipzig, Saxony
Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH
Mönchengladbach, North Rhine-Westphalia
Praxisklinik Urologie Rhein Ruhr
Mülheim, North Rhine-Westphalia
Klinikum Oldenburg gGmbH
Oldenburg, Lower Saxony
Canada10 sites
The Male Health Centre Euroscope Inc
Barrie, Ontario
J. Giddens Medicine Professional Corporation
Brampton, Ontario
G. Kenneth Jansz Medicine Professional Corporation
Burlington, Ontario
Urology Associates Urologic Medical Research
Kitchener, Ontario
Uro Laval
Laval, Quebec
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario
Jewish General Hospital / McGill University
Montreal, Quebec
Femalemale Health Centres
Oakville, Ontario
CHU de Québec -Hôtel-Dieu de Québec
Québec
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario
France10 sites
Institut Sainte Catherine
Avignon
Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin Tripode
Bordeaux
Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil
CHU de Grenoble - Hôpital Albert Michallon
Grenoble
CH de Libourne- Hopital Robert Boulin
Libourne
Hopital Claude Huriez - CHU Lille
Lille
Hopital Edouard Herriot - CHU Lyon
Lyon
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours
Nantes
Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard
Paris
Clinique Saint Jean Languedoc
Toulouse
Russia9 sites
City Clinical Hospital n.a. Botkin
Moscow
FSBI "Moscow scientific research oncology institute"
Moscow
FSBSI "Russian Oncological Scientific Center n.a. N.N. Blokhin"
Moscow
SBEI HPE "Moscow State Medical and Dentistry University n.a. A. I. Evdokimov"
Moscow
FBHI Privolzhskiy District Medical Centre FMBA of Russia
Nizhny Novgorod
Medical Center Avitsenna
Novosibirsk
BHI of Omsk region "Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Omsk
FFSBI "The Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine"
Saint Petersburg
SBHI of Sverdiovsk Region "Sverdiovsk Regional Clinical Hospital #1
Yekaterinburg
Czechia8 sites
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc
Olomouc
Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava
Ostrava
Multiscan s.r.o.
Pardubice
Urocentrum Plzen
Pilsen
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
Prague
Proton Therapy Center Czech s.r.o.
Prague
Oblastni nemocnice Pribram a.s.
Příbram
Krajska zdravotni a.s. - Masarykova nemocnice v Usti nad Labem o.z.
Ústí nad Labem
United Kingdom8 sites
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge
St Peter's Hospital
Chertsey, Surrey
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (Wonford)
Exeter
Prince Philip Hospital
Llanelli, Carmarthenshire
Charing Cross Hospital
London, Greater London
Salford Royal
Salford
Scunthorpe General Hospital
Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, West Midlands
Greece6 sites
Central Clinic of Athens
Athens
General Hospital of Athens "Alexandra"
Athens
T.Y.P.E.T. Hygeias Melathron Hospital
Athens
University General Hospital of Heraklion
Heraklion
University of Patras Medical School
Pátrai
General Hospital Papageorgiou
Thessaloniki
Poland4 sites
Swietokrzyskie Centrum Onkologii
Kielce
DERMED Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o.
Lodz
Provita Profamilia
Piotrkow Trybunalski
WroMedica
Wroclaw
Finland2 sites
Keski-Suomen keskussairaala
Jyväskylä
Tampereen yliopistollinen
Tampere
South Africa1 site
Groote Schuur Hospital Department of Urology
Cape Town, Western Cape
About this study
Official title: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Assessor-Blind, Controlled Trial Comparing the Occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs) in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Receiving Degarelix (Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor Antagonist) or Leuprolide (GnRH Receptor Agonist)
The purpose of this trial is to test if a marketed drug for advanced prostate cancer (FIRMAGON) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications as compared to another marketed drug for advanced prostate cancer (LUPRON DEPOT) in subjects with prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Degarelix, Leuprolide
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DegarelixDrug
Also called FIRMAGON
LeuprolideDrug
Also called LUPRON DEPOT
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Degarelix |
| Leuprolide | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Leuprolide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Occurrence of the Composite Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Endpoint; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Composite MACE endpoint was defined as: death due to any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke.
Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) occurrence of composite MACE over time. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.
Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Measured: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Occurrence of Cardiovascular (CV)-Related Death, Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction or Non-fatal Stroke; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict confirmed (adjudicated) occurrence of CV-related death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.
Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Measured: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to Confirmed (Adjudicated) CV-related Death; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict confirmed (adjudicated) CV-related death. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.
Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Measured: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Myocardial Infarction; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) myocardial infarction. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.
Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Measured: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Stroke; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) stroke. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.
Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Measured: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Unstable Angina Requiring Hospitalization; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) unstable angina requiring hospitalization. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.
Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Measured: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to Death Due to Any Cause; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict death due to any cause. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.
Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
Measured: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Testosterone Levels at Days 28, 168 and 336 in the Degarelix and Leuprolide Treatment Groups
Median levels and interquartile ranges for serum testosterone at Days 28, 168, and 336 are presented.
Measured: Days 28, 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to Failure in Progression-free Survival (PFS); Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Time to failure in PFS was defined as the time, measured in days, from randomization to the first occurrence of either death, radiographic disease progression, introduction of additional prostate cancer therapies for progression, or PSA failure.
Subjects who discontinued treatment with IMP or withdrew from the trial were censored at the time of discontinuation/withdrawal.
Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict failure in PFS. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported.
Measured: From randomization to end-of-trial for each subject (subjects not censored at Day 336)
Changes From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total and Quality of Life (QoL) Scores
Lower urinary tract symptoms were measured with the IPSS Version 1 (IPSS-1). The IPSS is a subject-administered questionnaire containing seven items to evaluate symptoms of urinary obstruction (incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, nocturia) over the preceding week. Each urinary symptom question was assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total IPSS-1 score was then calculated as summation over the responses for all 7 questions. The total IPSS-1 score was transformed to a scale from 0 (lowest score) to 100 (highest score). Higher scores reflect higher severity of symptoms. The IPSS-1 included an additional single question to assess a subject's QoL in relation to his urinary symptoms; response to this question was analyzed separately and was not included in the total IPSS score. The score was similarly scaled from 0 to 100.
Change from baseline in IPSS Total and QoL scores are presented.
Measured: Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)
Total Number of CV-related Hospitalization Events Over the Duration of the Trial
The total number of CV-related hospitalizations over the duration of the trial was defined as the number of hospitalizations due to CV-related adverse events, observed from the first exposure to IMP up until Day 336 for each subject.
Measured: First dose of IMP to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Total Number of Coronary Artery By-pass Grafting (CABG) or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Procedures Over the Duration of the Trial
The total number of CABG or PCI procedures observed for each subject over the duration of the trial
Measured: First dose of IMP to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Total Number of CV-related Emergency Room (ER) Visit Events Over the Duration of the Trial
CV-related ER visit events (that did not lead to hospitalization) was observed from the first exposure to IMP up until Day 336 for each subject.
Measured: First dose of IMP to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Change in Utility, Based on EuroQol Group 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of 2 systems - the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ VAS is an overall estimation of the present health status. The results from the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire were converted into quality adjusted life year (QALY) units.
The QALY is estimated by combining the value of life (utility value) and length of life. Quality adjusted life years are based on a principle assuming that a year of life lived in perfect health is worth 1 QALY and that a year of life lived in a state of less than perfect health is worth less than 1.
Measured: Baseline to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Changes From Baseline in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) Global Score
The DASI is a self-administered instrument developed to measure functional capacity in subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD). It contains 12 items referring to the present time, assessing the ability to perform physical tasks in five domains: personal care (1 item), ambulation (4 items), household tasks (4 items), sexual function (1 item) and recreation (2 items). Each question was answered by one of four options: 'yes with no difficulty' / 'yes, but with some difficulty' / 'no, I can't do this' / 'don't do this for other reasons'. A global score was calculated with a higher score indicating a higher functional capacity. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 58.2 points.
Change from baseline in DASI Global score is presented.
Measured: Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)
Changes From Baseline in Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) Global Score and Score Per Domain
The CAQ is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure heart-focused anxiety in persons with or without heart disease. It contains 18 items referring to the present time assessing cardiac anxiety in three domains: fear (8 items, each item could be scored between 0 "never" to 4 "always", maximum total score 32), avoidance (5 items, each item could be scored between 0 "never" to 4 "always", maximum total score 20) and attention (5 items, each item could be scored between 0 "never" to 4 "always", maximum total score 20). A higher score indicated greater cardiac anxiety and the total score range was between 0 and 72.
Change from baseline in CAQ Global score and score per domain are presented.
Measured: Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs)
Adverse events were recorded from signed informed consent until end-of-trial. Adverse events with onset after start of IMP treatment, and within 3 months after (1 month=28 days) last dosing of IMP, were considered 'treatment-emergent' and are presented for the safety analysis set.
Measured: Start of IMP treatment until 3 months after last dosing of IMP
Intensity of AEs
The intensity of AE was graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (version 4.02) 5-point scale.
AE were categorized as grade 1 Mild (minor; no specific medical intervention; asymptomatic laboratory findings only; marginal clinical relevance), Grade 2 Moderate (minimal intervention: local intervention; non-invasive intervention), Grade 3 Severe (significant symptoms, requiring hospitalization or invasive intervention; transfusion; elective interventional radiological procedure; therapeutic endoscopy or operation), Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling (complicated by acute, life-threatening metabolic or CV complications such as circulatory failure, hemorrhage, sepsis. Life-threatening physiologic consequences; need for intensive care or emergent invasive procedure; emergent interventional radiological procedure, therapeutic endoscopy or operation) and Grade 5 Death. Events with grades 3, 4 and 5 were categorized as severe.
Measured: Start of IMP treatment until 3 months after last dosing of IMP
Changes in Vital Signs
Number of subjects shifting from normal value(s) in vital signs (pulse and blood pressure) at baseline to clinically significant abnormal value(s) at end-of-trial are presented.
Note: Only subjects with appropriate baseline and post-baseline data are included in the evaluation.
Measured: Baseline to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study start19 Apr 2016
- Primary completion29 Mar 2021
- Study completion29 Mar 2021
Why it stopped: Recruitment rate; a lower than anticipated observed cardiovascular event rate. The Sponsor decision to stop the trial was not based on any safety concerns or any knowledge of the results, or influenced by issues imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 545 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Global Clinical Compliance, Study director, Ferring PharmaceuticalsSusan Slovin, MD, Principal investigator, Sidney Kimmel Center for Urologic and Prostate Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterJohn Alexander, MD, MHS, Principal investigator, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02663908
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 000108
- Acronym
- PRONOUNCE
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Lopes RD, Higano CS, Slovin SF, Nelson AJ, Bigelow R, Sorensen PS, Melloni C, Goodman SG, Evans CP, Nilsson J, Bhatt DL, Clarke NW, Olesen TK, Doyle-Olsen BT, Kristensen H, Arney L, Roe MT, Alexander JH; PRONOUNCE Study Investigators. Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Primary Results of the PRONOUNCE Randomized Trial. Circulation. 2021 Oct 19;144(16):1295-1307. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056810. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
PubMed 34459214Melloni C, Slovin SF, Blemings A, Goodman SG, Evans CP, Nilsson J, Bhatt DL, Zubovskiy K, Olesen TK, Dugi K, Clarke NW, Higano CS, Roe MT; PRONOUNCE Investigators. Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide for Advanced Prostate Cancer: The PRONOUNCE Trial Study Design. JACC CardioOncol. 2020 Mar 17;2(1):70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.01.004. eCollection 2020 Mar.
PubMed 34396210Zengerling F, Jakob JJ, Schmidt S, Meerpohl JJ, Blumle A, Schmucker C, Mayer B, Kunath F. Degarelix for treating advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 5;8(8):CD012548. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012548.pub2.
PubMed 34350976
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-Center, Randomized, Assessor-Blind, Controlled Trial Comparing the Occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs) in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Receiving Degarelix (Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor Antagonist) or Leuprolide (GnRH Receptor Agonist)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02663908
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRONOUNCE / 000108
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Recruitment rate; a lower than anticipated observed cardiovascular event rate. The Sponsor decision to stop the trial was not based on any safety concerns or any knowledge of the results, or influenced by issues imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Enrolment
- 545 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ferring PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute
- Study start
- 19 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Jun 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this trial is to test if a marketed drug for advanced prostate cancer (FIRMAGON) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications as compared to another marketed drug for advanced prostate cancer (LUPRON DEPOT) in subjects with prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix | Experimental | Drug: Degarelix |
| Leuprolide | Active comparator | Drug: Leuprolide |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Advanced prostate cancer
- Indication to initiate androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
- Predefined cardiovascular disease
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Previous or current hormonal management of prostate cancer (unless terminated at least 12 months prior to trial)
- Acute cardiovascular disease in the previous 30 days
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DegarelixAlso: FIRMAGON | Drug | Degarelix |
| LeuprolideAlso: LUPRON DEPOT | Drug | Leuprolide |
Primary outcome
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Occurrence of the Composite Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Endpoint; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Time frame: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Composite MACE endpoint was defined as: death due to any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke. Kaplan Meier plots of the cumulative incidence rate by treatment groups were used to depict first confirmed (adjudicated) occurrence of composite MACE over time. Percentage of observed subjects with outcome measure events during the trial are reported. Subjects were censored at the time a subject discontinued the trial, was lost to follow-up, discontinued treatment with IMP, initiated treatment with prohibited medication (including hormonal combination therapy), or at Day 336, whichever occurred first.
18 secondary outcomes
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Occurrence of Cardiovascular (CV)-Related Death, Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction or Non-fatal Stroke; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Time frame: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to Confirmed (Adjudicated) CV-related Death; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Time frame: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Myocardial Infarction; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Time frame: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Stroke; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Time frame: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Unstable Angina Requiring Hospitalization; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Time frame: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to Death Due to Any Cause; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Time frame: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Testosterone Levels at Days 28, 168 and 336 in the Degarelix and Leuprolide Treatment Groups
Time frame: Days 28, 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)
Time From Randomization to Failure in Progression-free Survival (PFS); Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial
Time frame: From randomization to end-of-trial for each subject (subjects not censored at Day 336)
Changes From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total and Quality of Life (QoL) Scores
Time frame: Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)
Total Number of CV-related Hospitalization Events Over the Duration of the Trial
Time frame: First dose of IMP to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Total Number of Coronary Artery By-pass Grafting (CABG) or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Procedures Over the Duration of the Trial
Time frame: First dose of IMP to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Total Number of CV-related Emergency Room (ER) Visit Events Over the Duration of the Trial
Time frame: First dose of IMP to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Change in Utility, Based on EuroQol Group 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: Baseline to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Changes From Baseline in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) Global Score
Time frame: Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)
Changes From Baseline in Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) Global Score and Score Per Domain
Time frame: Baseline to Days 168 and 336 (end-of-trial)
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Start of IMP treatment until 3 months after last dosing of IMP
Intensity of AEs
Time frame: Start of IMP treatment until 3 months after last dosing of IMP
Changes in Vital Signs
Time frame: Baseline to Day 336 (end-of-trial)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34459214Lopes RD, Higano CS, Slovin SF, Nelson AJ, Bigelow R, Sorensen PS, Melloni C, Goodman SG, Evans CP, Nilsson J, Bhatt DL, Clarke NW, Olesen TK, Doyle-Olsen BT, Kristensen H, Arney L, Roe MT, Alexander JH; PRONOUNCE Study Investigators. Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Primary Results of the PRONOUNCE Randomized Trial. Circulation. 2021 Oct 19;144(16):1295-1307. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056810. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34396210Melloni C, Slovin SF, Blemings A, Goodman SG, Evans CP, Nilsson J, Bhatt DL, Zubovskiy K, Olesen TK, Dugi K, Clarke NW, Higano CS, Roe MT; PRONOUNCE Investigators. Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide for Advanced Prostate Cancer: The PRONOUNCE Trial Study Design. JACC CardioOncol. 2020 Mar 17;2(1):70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.01.004. eCollection 2020 Mar.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34350976Zengerling F, Jakob JJ, Schmidt S, Meerpohl JJ, Blumle A, Schmucker C, Mayer B, Kunath F. Degarelix for treating advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 5;8(8):CD012548. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012548.pub2.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Global Clinical Compliance study director
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Susan Slovin, MD principal investigator
Sidney Kimmel Center for Urologic and Prostate Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
John Alexander, MD, MHS principal investigator
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute
133 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Degarelix and Leuprolide in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 133 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 133 sites in United States, Slovakia, Germany, Canada, France and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jun 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time From Randomization to the First Confirmed (Adjudicated) Occurrence of the Composite Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Endpoint; Percentage of Observed Subjects With Outcome Measure Events During the Trial (time frame: Randomization to Day 336 (end-of-trial)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02663908, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2022.