Sjogren's SyndromeNCT02661243
Implantology and Sjögren's Syndrome
A study testing Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants in people with Sjogren's Syndrome, run by Derk Jan Jager at 5 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Until now it has not been investigated whether placement of implants in SS patients is less successful than compared to non-SS patients. The risk factors and the efficacy of dental implants in dry mouth patients are not known because of the lack of scientific evidence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sjogren's Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- May 2015to Feb 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient is at least 18 years and younger than 70;
- A diagnosed (by the AECG guidelines; see attachment; Vitali et al., 2002) primary or secondary Syndrome of Sjögren;
- The missing or lost tooth/teeth are premolars and/or molars in the upper or lower jaw.
- Sufficient healthy and vital bone to insert a dental implant with a minimum length of 8 mm and at least 3.8 mm in diameter. In case of insufficient bone volume, a bone augmentation procedure will be performed with autologue bone. If necessary the autologue bone can be mixed with artificial bone (artificial bone graft substitutes in combination with a membrane).
- The implant site must be free from infection;
- Adequate oral hygiene (modified plaque index and modified sulcus bleeding index ≤ 1) (Mombelli et al., 1987; Loe and Silness, 1963)
Show all 17Show fewer
- Sufficient mesio-distal, bucco-lingual, and interocclusal space for placement of an anatomic restoration;
- The patient is capable of understanding and giving informed consent.
- The patient is at least 18 years and younger than 70;
- A diagnosed (by the AECG guidelines; Vitali et al., 2002) primary or secondary Syndrome of Sjögren
- The patient is edentulous. Before final inclusion in the study the patient has to be edentulous for 1 year.
- Problems with conventional denture retention, stability and/or adaptation, which could be solved by an implant, supported denture (lower or/and upper jaw).
- Sufficient healthy and vital bone to insert dental implants with a minimum length of 8 mm and at least 3.8 mm in diameter. In case of insufficient bone volume, a bone augmentation procedure will be performed with autologue bone. If necessary the autologue bone can be mixed with artificial bone (artificial bone graft substitutes in combination with a membrane).
- The implant site must be free from infection;
- Capable of performing adequate oral hygiene;
- The patient is capable of understanding and giving informed consent.
- The inclusion criteria for the healthy control groups are similar as for the Sjögren groups without the Sjögren criterion.
Who cannot join
- Criteria used for excluding patients from this study are as follows:
- Medical and general contraindications for the surgical procedures;
- Presence of an active and uncontrolled periodontal disease as expressed by probing pockets depths > 4mm with bleeding upon probing;
- Smoking (patients who stop smoking six weeks before the operation can be included);
- A history of radiotherapy to the head and neck region;
- Use of intravenous bisphosphonates or the use of oral bisphosphonates for more than 5 years.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Netherlands5 sites
VU Medical Center department of Maxillofacial surgery
Amsterdam
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, 9700 RB
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, 3508 GA
Tandartspraktijk Bocht Oosterdiep
Veendam, 9641 JH
Vogellanden Center for Special Care Dentistry/Isala
Zwolle, 8001 BB
About this study
Official title: Implantology and Sjögren's Syndrome: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
Until now it has not been investigated whether placement of implants in SS patients is less successful than compared to non-SS patients. The risk factors and the efficacy of dental implants in dry mouth patients are not known because of the lack of scientific evidence. The aim of this study is to investigate changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss and the clinical performance of dental implants in SS patients compared to implants in healthy patients.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: Until now it has not been investigated whether placement of implants in SS patients is less successful than compared to non-SS patients. The risk factors and the efficacy of dental implants in dry mouth patients are not known because of the lack of scientific evidence.
Objective: to investigate changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss and the clinical performance of dental implants in SS patients compared to implants in healthy patients.
Study design: A prospective multicenter clinical trial.
Study population: N = 120
Intervention: All patients receive Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel implants to replace the missing (pre)molars or to support a full denture in the upper and lower jaw .
This study is comprised of four study groups:
- 30 human adults affected by SS with the need of replacement of missing premolars or molars in the upper or lower jaw.
- 30 healthy human adults with the need of replacement of missing premolars or molars in the upper or lower jaw.
- 30 human edentulous adults affected by SS with the need of stabilization of the dentures.
- 30 healthy human edentulous adults with the need of stabilization of the dentures.
Main study parameters/endpoints: changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss of dental implants between the healthy and SS groups and differences in clinical performance 1.5 years after finalization.
- Conditions
- Sjogren's Syndrome
- Being tested
- Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants
- Keywords
- Sjogren's Syndrome, Dental Implants
- Medical subject headings
- Sjogren's Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implantsDevice
Insertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants to replace missing (pre)molars or to stabilize a denture
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dentate Sjogren's syndrome arm | Other | 30 human adults affected by SS with the need of replacement of missing premolars or molars in the upper or lower jaw. Intervention: insertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants Receives: Device: Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants |
| Dentate healthy controls arm | Other | 30 healthy human adults with the need of replacement of missing premolars or molars in the upper or lower jaw. Intervention: insertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants Receives: Device: Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants |
| Edentulous Sjogren's syndrome arm | Other | 30 human edentulous adults affected by SS with the need of stabilization of the dentures. Intervention: insertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants Receives: Device: Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants |
| Edentulous healthy controls arm | Other | 30 healthy human edentulous adults with the need of stabilization of the dentures. Intervention: insertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants Receives: Device: Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in marginal peri-implant bone loss of dental implants
changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss of dental implants between the healthy and SS groups and differences in clinical performance 1.5 years after finalization.
Measured: 1.5 years
Secondary outcomes (8)
Implant survival
The survival rate of the fixture is assessed 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 1.5 years after placement of the definitive restoration. Implant survival is defined as presence of the implant at time of the follow-up examinations.
Measured: 1.5 years
Overdenture/crown survival
The survival (i.e. fully intact) rate of the denture or crown is assessed 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 1.5 years after placement of the definitive restoration.
Measured: 1.5 years
Modified Plaque-index and Modified Bleeding-Index
These parameters are evaluated pre-operative, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 1.5 years after placement of the definitive restoration. The adjacent teeth are counted as well in the assessments (dentate groups only).
Measured: 1.5 years
Probing depth
Probing of the implant and the adjacent teeth (dentate groups only) is performed at three sites, buccodistal, buccomedial, buccomesial. The probing depth is measured 1 month, 6 months, one year and 1.5 years after placement of the definitive restoration.
Measured: 1.5 years
Width of keratinized epithelium
The width in millimetres of keratinized epithelium is measured pre-operative, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 1.5 years after the definitive restoration has been placed. For this a periodontal probe is used.
Measured: 1.5 years
Patient satisfaction and impact of oral health on the quality of life
- All patients: OHIP-NL14. Oral Health Impact Profile. An instrument for measuring the impact of oral health on the quality of life. A validated Dutch-language version of the OHIP-14, a questionnaire by means of which the impact of oral health on the quality of life of patients can be determined is completed by every participant at every examination
Measured: 1.5 years
Denture function and satisfaction
- Edentulous groups: the following validated questionnaires are used for the edentulous groups only (see attachment; Vervoorn et al., 1988):
- A. General experience with the denture, including a grade from 1 tot 10
- B. Complaints form with regard to aesthetics and function of the denture
- C. Chewing list (which food can be chewed well and which food is difficult to chew).
The participant at every time point completes these questionnaires
Measured: 1.5 years
Disease symptoms (SS groups only)
patients in the SS groups are asked to complete the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index and the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSPRI \& ESSDAI; see attachment) questionnaire with regard to disease symptoms
Measured: 1.5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2015
- Primary completionFeb 2019
- Study completionFeb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sjogren's SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Derk Jan Jager
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UMC Utrecht, University Medical Center Groningen, Tandartspraktijk Bocht Oosterdiep, Isala, BioHorizons, Inc., Fonds NutsOhra
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Derk Jan Jager, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
- Investigators
- Derk Jan Jager, DMD, PhD, Principal investigator, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02661243
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL47808.029.14
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
den Hartog L, Slater JJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Dec;35(12):1073-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01330.x.
PubMed 19040585Pecora GE, Ceccarelli R, Bonelli M, Alexander H, Ricci JL. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants. Implant Dent. 2009 Feb;18(1):57-66. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31818c5a6d.
PubMed 19212238Fox RI. Sjogren's syndrome. Lancet. 2005 Jul 23-29;366(9482):321-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66990-5.
PubMed 16039337Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexander EL, Carsons SE, Daniels TE, Fox PC, Fox RI, Kassan SS, Pillemer SR, Talal N, Weisman MH; European Study Group on Classification Criteria for Sjogren's Syndrome. Classification criteria for Sjogren's syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Jun;61(6):554-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.6.554.
PubMed 12006334Meijndert L, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. A technique for standardized evaluation of soft and hard peri-implant tissues in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol. 2004 May;75(5):646-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.5.646.
PubMed 15212345
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Implantology and Sjögren's Syndrome: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02661243
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NL47808.029.14
- Conditions
- Sjogren's Syndrome
- Keywords
- Sjogren's Syndrome, Dental Implants
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Derk Jan JagerUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- UMC Utrecht, University Medical Center Groningen, Tandartspraktijk Bocht Oosterdiep, Isala, BioHorizons, Inc., Fonds NutsOhra
- Study start
- May 2015
- Primary completion
- Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Until now it has not been investigated whether placement of implants in SS patients is less successful than compared to non-SS patients. The risk factors and the efficacy of dental implants in dry mouth patients are not known because of the lack of scientific evidence. The aim of this study is to investigate changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss and the clinical performance of dental implants in SS patients compared to implants in healthy patients.
Detailed description
Rationale: Until now it has not been investigated whether placement of implants in SS patients is less successful than compared to non-SS patients. The risk factors and the efficacy of dental implants in dry mouth patients are not known because of the lack of scientific evidence.
Objective: to investigate changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss and the clinical performance of dental implants in SS patients compared to implants in healthy patients.
Study design: A prospective multicenter clinical trial.
Study population: N = 120
Intervention: All patients receive Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel implants to replace the missing (pre)molars or to support a full denture in the upper and lower jaw .
This study is comprised of four study groups:
- 30 human adults affected by SS with the need of replacement of missing premolars or molars in the upper or lower jaw.
- 30 healthy human adults with the need of replacement of missing premolars or molars in the upper or lower jaw.
- 30 human edentulous adults affected by SS with the need of stabilization of the dentures.
- 30 healthy human edentulous adults with the need of stabilization of the dentures.
Main study parameters/endpoints: changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss of dental implants between the healthy and SS groups and differences in clinical performance 1.5 years after finalization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dentate Sjogren's syndrome arm | Other | Device: Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants30 human adults affected by SS with the need of replacement of missing premolars or molars in the upper or lower jaw. Intervention: insertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants |
| Dentate healthy controls arm | Other | Device: Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants30 healthy human adults with the need of replacement of missing premolars or molars in the upper or lower jaw. Intervention: insertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants |
| Edentulous Sjogren's syndrome arm | Other | Device: Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants30 human edentulous adults affected by SS with the need of stabilization of the dentures. Intervention: insertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants |
| Edentulous healthy controls arm | Other | Device: Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants30 healthy human edentulous adults with the need of stabilization of the dentures. Intervention: insertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- The patient is at least 18 years and younger than 70;
- A diagnosed (by the AECG guidelines; see attachment; Vitali et al., 2002) primary or secondary Syndrome of Sjögren;
- The missing or lost tooth/teeth are premolars and/or molars in the upper or lower jaw.
- Sufficient healthy and vital bone to insert a dental implant with a minimum length of 8 mm and at least 3.8 mm in diameter. In case of insufficient bone volume, a bone augmentation procedure will be performed with autologue bone. If necessary the autologue bone can be mixed with artificial bone (artificial bone graft substitutes in combination with a membrane).
- The implant site must be free from infection;
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Medical and general contraindications for the surgical procedures;
- Presence of an active and uncontrolled periodontal disease as expressed by probing pockets depths > 4mm with bleeding upon probing;
- Smoking (patients who stop smoking six weeks before the operation can be included);
- A history of radiotherapy to the head and neck region;
- Use of intravenous bisphosphonates or the use of oral bisphosphonates for more than 5 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implantsInsertion of Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants to replace missing (pre)molars or to stabilize a denture | Device | Dentate Sjogren's syndrome arm, Dentate healthy controls arm, Edentulous Sjogren's syndrome arm, Edentulous healthy controls arm |
Primary outcome
Change in marginal peri-implant bone loss of dental implants
Time frame: 1.5 years
changes in marginal peri-implant bone loss of dental implants between the healthy and SS groups and differences in clinical performance 1.5 years after finalization.
8 secondary outcomes
Implant survival
Time frame: 1.5 years
Overdenture/crown survival
Time frame: 1.5 years
Modified Plaque-index and Modified Bleeding-Index
Time frame: 1.5 years
Probing depth
Time frame: 1.5 years
Width of keratinized epithelium
Time frame: 1.5 years
Patient satisfaction and impact of oral health on the quality of life
Time frame: 1.5 years
Denture function and satisfaction
Time frame: 1.5 years
Disease symptoms (SS groups only)
Time frame: 1.5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2019.
- Background: PubMed 19040585den Hartog L, Slater JJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Dec;35(12):1073-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01330.x.
- Background: PubMed 19212238Pecora GE, Ceccarelli R, Bonelli M, Alexander H, Ricci JL. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants. Implant Dent. 2009 Feb;18(1):57-66. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31818c5a6d.
- Background: PubMed 16039337Fox RI. Sjogren's syndrome. Lancet. 2005 Jul 23-29;366(9482):321-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66990-5.
- Background: PubMed 12006334Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexander EL, Carsons SE, Daniels TE, Fox PC, Fox RI, Kassan SS, Pillemer SR, Talal N, Weisman MH; European Study Group on Classification Criteria for Sjogren's Syndrome. Classification criteria for Sjogren's syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Jun;61(6):554-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.6.554.
- Background: PubMed 15212345Meijndert L, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. A technique for standardized evaluation of soft and hard peri-implant tissues in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol. 2004 May;75(5):646-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.5.646.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sjogren's Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Prevalence, and Immunological Characteristics of Small Fiber Neuropathy in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
Sjögren's Syndrome, Small Fiber Neuropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Derk Jan Jager, DMD, PhD principal investigator
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Biohorizons Laser-lok bonelevel dental implants in people with Sjogren's Syndrome, run by Derk Jan Jager at 5 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in marginal peri-implant bone loss of dental implants (time frame: 1.5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02661243, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2019.