AzTrials
AzTrials

TriagesuPARNCT02643459

Risk Stratification in Acute Care: The Meaning of suPAR Measurement in Triage

A study testing suPAR measurement in people with Triage and Risk Stratification With Biomarker, run by Herlev Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Will clinical outcome for patients be improved if triage in Acute wards and Emergency rooms is supplemented with a prognostic biomarker? Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Triage, Risk Stratification With Biomarker
What is being tested?
suPAR measurement
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20,000 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Jan 2016to 6 Apr 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients presenting acutely to the Acute ward/Emergency department and have blood samples done which include both Hemoglobin, C reactive protein and Creatinine within 6 hours of registration within the study period. The study is carried out in 2 Hospitals in the Capital of Denmark.

Who cannot join

  • Patients presenting in Pediatric, Gynecological or Obstetric units. Patients not being examined with blood samples.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Herlev Hospital, Department of Cardiology

    Herlev, 2730

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Introduction of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activating Receptor in Acute Care as a Prognostic Biomarker to Strengthen Risk Stratification of Acutely Admitted Patients

Will clinical outcome for patients be improved if triage in Acute wards and Emergency rooms is supplemented with a prognostic biomarker?

Read the detailed description

In a health care system where the general population is growing, more patients are living with chronic conditions and the hospitals are reducing beds and length of stay, it is crucial to perform safe and fast risk stratification of patients presenting in the Emergency departments. Risk stratification is currently performed with a combination of measurement of the vital signs and assessment of the primary complaint. The aim of the current study is to assess whether the supplement of biomarkers can improve the risk stratification in regard to mortality, readmissions and improve overall patient flow in the Emergency departments. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activating receptor (suPAR) is the soluble form of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR). uPAR is present on various immunological active cells, as well as endothelia and smooth muscle cells. It is believed that suPAR mirrors the inflammatory response in patients. Previous studies have shown a strong association with mortality and severity of disease in a broad variety of conditions (infection, hepatic-, renal-, cardiac- and lung disease) as well as a possible marker of disease development in the general population. These abilities indicate that suPAR although unspecific would be ideal to identify patients at high- and at low-risk. The aim is to target interventions and limited clinical focus where it is most beneficial. In unselected patients suPAR is one of the strongest prognostic biomarker available to date.

It is not known whether information on prognosis in the Emergency department can be used to prevent death, serious complications or reduce admissions and readmissions.

The purpose of the current study is to examine if introduction of the biomarker suPAR and education of doctors in the meaning of suPAR levels and association to disease, can reduce mortality, admissions and readmission in patients referred to the emergency rooms.

Being tested
suPAR measurement
Keywords
Triage, Risk stratification, Acute care, suPAR

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • suPAR measurementBehavioural

    The biomarker suPAR will be measured on all patients included in the study. Before the study period the doctors will receive information on suPAR. We want to study if the information provided by suPAR is useful in emergency medicine. Interventions depends on the clinical issue, as suPAR is an unspecific marker of disease. Usually a elevated suPAR level could result in more investigation e.g. diagnostic procedures or follow up, while a low suPAR could result in faster discharge.

Study groups in NCT02643459
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ConventionalNo interventionno suPAR measurement. Standard care.
suPARExperimentalsuPAR measurement and education of doctors working in the Emergency department in the meaning of low or elevated levels of suPAR. Since suPAR is measured on all patients regardless of disease the investigators cannot define a single intervention. A possible intervention depends on the clinical situation.
Receives: Behavioral: suPAR measurement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. All Cause Mortality

    Time frame starts at the beginning of the index admission, defined as first admission in the study period. Patients will be followed using central registers.

    Measured: 10 months after the inclusions period ends mortality data will be assessed

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. All Cause Mortality

    Mortality within 30 days

    Measured: 1 months after index admission mortality data will assessed

  2. Number of Discharges From the Emergency Room Within 24 Hours

    How many patients are discharged directly from the ED

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Number of Admissions to the Medical Ward

    Number of Participants with Admissions to the Medical War

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Number of Patients With an Admission to the Intensive Care Unit

    Number of Participants with transfer to the ICU

    Measured: 30 days

  5. Number of Patients With New Cancer Diagnosis in Control vs Intervention Groups

    Measured: 10 months after inclusion period ends

  6. Length of Stay During Admission.

    Length of stay in days during the admission

    Measured: 30 days

  7. Number of Readmissions

    Patients will be followed using central registers. All new admissions within 90 days of the same patient is defined as readmissions.

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completion6 Apr 2017
  4. Study completion6 Apr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02643459
Sponsor's protocol ID
HerlevH01
Acronym
suPAR
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
13 Nov 2015
Last updated
9 Mar 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Schultz M, Rasmussen LJH, Hoi-Hansen T, Kjoller E, Jensen BN, Lind MN, Ravn L, Kallemose T, Lange T, Kober L, Rasmussen LS, Eugen-Olsen J, Iversen KK. Early Discharge from the Emergency Department Based on Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Levels: A TRIAGE III Substudy. Dis Markers. 2019 May 19;2019:3403549. doi: 10.1155/2019/3403549. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31236143
  • Schultz M, Rasmussen LJH, Kallemose T, Kjoller E, Lind MN, Ravn L, Lange T, Kober L, Rasmussen LS, Eugen-Olsen J, Iversen K. Availability of suPAR in emergency departments may improve risk stratification: a secondary analysis of the TRIAGE III trial. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 11;27(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0621-7.

    PubMed 30975178
  • Schultz M, Rasmussen LJH, Andersen MH, Stefansson JS, Falkentoft AC, Alstrup M, Sando A, Holle SLK, Meyer J, Tornkvist PBS, Hoi-Hansen T, Kjoller E, Jensen BN, Lind M, Ravn L, Kallemose T, Lange T, Kober L, Rasmussen LS, Eugen-Olsen J, Iversen KK. Use of the prognostic biomarker suPAR in the emergency department improves risk stratification but has no effect on mortality: a cluster-randomized clinical trial (TRIAGE III). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 28;26(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0539-5.

    PubMed 30153859
  • Sando A, Schultz M, Eugen-Olsen J, Rasmussen LS, Kober L, Kjoller E, Jensen BN, Ravn L, Lange T, Iversen K. Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Aug 5;24:100. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0290-8.

    PubMed 27491822

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing suPAR measurement in people with Triage and Risk Stratification With Biomarker, run by Herlev Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Mar 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

All Cause Mortality (time frame: 10 months after the inclusions period ends mortality data will be assessed). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02643459, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in