Cervical CancerNCT02642471
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Early-stage Cervical Cancer (PHENIX/CSEM 010)
A study testing no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in people with Cervical Cancer and Surgery, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer has been well studied. However, there were no randomized controlled study on comparing the long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy and conventional procedure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer, Surgery, Quality of Life
- What is being tested?
- no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,080 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 31 Dec 2015to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with newly histologically confirmed cervical carcinoma
- Histopathology squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adeno-squamous carcinoma
- Original clinical stage must be FIGO (2018) stage IA1 (lymphovascular space involvement), IA2, IB1, IB2 and IIA1
- No suspected node should be found on imaging examination (RESIST 1.1)
- Age between 18-65
- Patients must give signed informed consent
Show all 9Show fewer
- P.S status: 0-1
- Estimated survival time > 3 months
- Tumor diameter ≤ 3 cm
Who cannot join
- The presence of uncontrolled life-threatening illness
- Receiving other ways of anti-cancer therapy
- Investigator consider the patients can't finish the whole study
- With normal liver function test (ALT、AST>2.5×ULN)
- With normal renal function test (Creatinine>1.5×ULN)
- WBC<4,000/mm3 or PLT<100,000/mm
Show all 10Show fewer
- The whole cervix has been occupied by tumor and there is no normal surface left for tracer injection
- History of severe heart disease or deep venous thrombosis; 4) Presence or history of other malignant disease
- Gestation or perinatal period
- Intention to fertility preservation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060
About this study
The diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer has been well studied. However, there were no randomized controlled study on comparing the long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy and conventional procedure. The investigators perform a phase III, randomized controlled trial to determine whether pelvic lymphadenectomy can be replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy in surgical treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Read the detailed description
This study comprises two parts: PHENIX-I: To compare the outcomes of managements with and without pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with negative sentinel lymph node; PHENIX-II: To compare the outcomes of managements with and without pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with positive sentinel lymph node. Patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA1 (lymphovascular space involvement), IA2, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer are eligible for our study. The tumor diameter should be less than 3cm. Sentinel lymph node biopsy will be performed at the beginning of operations. After pathological examination of frozen section, patients will be assigned to PHENIX-I or PHENIX-II study according to their status of sentinel nodes. In both parts of this trail, patients have equal chance to be randomly assigned to experimental arms (radical hysterectomy only) and reference arms (radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy).Adjuvant treatments will be planned according to postoperative pathological factors. The primary objective is disease-free survival at 3 years for PHENIX-I and 2 years for PHENIX-II. The secondary end points are overall survival, long-term outcome of sentinel lymph node biopsy and the quality of life.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer, Surgery, Quality of Life
- Being tested
- no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy
- Keywords
- sentinel lymph node, pelvic lymphadenectomy, cervical carcinoma, surgery, radiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomyProcedure or surgery
systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy is omitted in surgical treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | patients with negative sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 1 or Arm 2 Arm 1: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 2: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection Receives: Procedure: no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy |
| Arm 2 | No intervention | patients with negative sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 1 or Arm 2 Arm 1: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 2: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | patients with positive sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 3 or Arm 4 Arm 3: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 4: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection Receives: Procedure: no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy |
| Arm 4 | No intervention | patients with positive sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 3 or Arm 4 Arm 3: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 4: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease free survival in PHENIX-I
Measured: 3 years
Disease free survival in PHENIX-II
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (7)
Surgical morbidity
Measured: 3 years
Rate of retroperitoneal node recurrence
Measured: 3 years
Overall survival
Measured: 5 years
Patients' quality of life
Measured: 5 years
Performance of SLN detection
Measured: 3 years
Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section examination
Measured: 3 years
Anatomic distribution of SLNs
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study start31 Dec 2015
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,080 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jihong Liu, Sun Yat-sen University
- Investigators
- Jihong Liu, Ph. D, Principal investigator, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02642471
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2015-FXY-073
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 24 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tu H, Huang H, Li Y, Chen X, Wang C, Zheng M, Zhang Y, Zhao W, Feng Y, Wan T, Huang Y, Yu A, Lu W, Xiao J, Shan W, Zhang P, Zhu C, Wang D, Zhou H, Li J, Kong B, Feng W, Wang X, Luo R, Huang X, Li J, Lin Z, Yao S, Liu J; PHENIX Investigators. Sentinel-Lymph-Node Biopsy Alone or with Lymphadenectomy in Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2025 Oct 16;393(15):1463-1474. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2506267.
PubMed 41092328Tu H, Huang H, Xian B, Li J, Wang P, Zhao W, Chen X, Xie X, Wang C, Kong B, Xiao J, Zhang P, Liu J; PHENIX Investigators and the CSEM group. Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a multi-center randomized trial (PHENIX/CSEM 010). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1829-1833. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001857. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
PubMed 32973117
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Early-stage Cervical Cancer (PHENIX/CSEM 010)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02642471
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2015-FXY-073
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer, Surgery, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- sentinel lymph node, pelvic lymphadenectomy, cervical carcinoma, surgery, radiotherapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,080 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer has been well studied. However, there were no randomized controlled study on comparing the long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy and conventional procedure. The investigators perform a phase III, randomized controlled trial to determine whether pelvic lymphadenectomy can be replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy in surgical treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Detailed description
This study comprises two parts: PHENIX-I: To compare the outcomes of managements with and without pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with negative sentinel lymph node; PHENIX-II: To compare the outcomes of managements with and without pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with positive sentinel lymph node. Patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA1 (lymphovascular space involvement), IA2, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer are eligible for our study. The tumor diameter should be less than 3cm. Sentinel lymph node biopsy will be performed at the beginning of operations. After pathological examination of frozen section, patients will be assigned to PHENIX-I or PHENIX-II study according to their status of sentinel nodes. In both parts of this trail, patients have equal chance to be randomly assigned to experimental arms (radical hysterectomy only) and reference arms (radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy).Adjuvant treatments will be planned according to postoperative pathological factors. The primary objective is disease-free survival at 3 years for PHENIX-I and 2 years for PHENIX-II. The secondary end points are overall survival, long-term outcome of sentinel lymph node biopsy and the quality of life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Procedure: no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomypatients with negative sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 1 or Arm 2 Arm 1: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 2: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection |
| Arm 2 | No intervention | –patients with negative sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 1 or Arm 2 Arm 1: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 2: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | Procedure: no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomypatients with positive sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 3 or Arm 4 Arm 3: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 4: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection |
| Arm 4 | No intervention | –patients with positive sentinel nodes confirmed by pathological examination of frozen section will be randomly assigned to Arm 3 or Arm 4 Arm 3: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy (no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy) Arm 4: patients undergo radical hysterectomy±salpingo-oophorectomy+pelvic lymph node dissection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with newly histologically confirmed cervical carcinoma
- Histopathology squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adeno-squamous carcinoma
- Original clinical stage must be FIGO (2018) stage IA1 (lymphovascular space involvement), IA2, IB1, IB2 and IIA1
- No suspected node should be found on imaging examination (RESIST 1.1)
- Age between 18-65
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- The presence of uncontrolled life-threatening illness
- Receiving other ways of anti-cancer therapy
- Investigator consider the patients can't finish the whole study
- With normal liver function test (ALT、AST>2.5×ULN)
- With normal renal function test (Creatinine>1.5×ULN)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomysystematic pelvic lymphadenectomy is omitted in surgical treatment | Procedure or surgery | Arm 1, Arm 3 |
Primary outcome
Disease free survival in PHENIX-I
Time frame: 3 years
Disease free survival in PHENIX-II
Time frame: 2 years
7 secondary outcomes
Surgical morbidity
Time frame: 3 years
Rate of retroperitoneal node recurrence
Time frame: 3 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Patients' quality of life
Time frame: 5 years
Performance of SLN detection
Time frame: 3 years
Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section examination
Time frame: 3 years
Anatomic distribution of SLNs
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41092328Tu H, Huang H, Li Y, Chen X, Wang C, Zheng M, Zhang Y, Zhao W, Feng Y, Wan T, Huang Y, Yu A, Lu W, Xiao J, Shan W, Zhang P, Zhu C, Wang D, Zhou H, Li J, Kong B, Feng W, Wang X, Luo R, Huang X, Li J, Lin Z, Yao S, Liu J; PHENIX Investigators. Sentinel-Lymph-Node Biopsy Alone or with Lymphadenectomy in Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2025 Oct 16;393(15):1463-1474. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2506267.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32973117Tu H, Huang H, Xian B, Li J, Wang P, Zhao W, Chen X, Xie X, Wang C, Kong B, Xiao J, Zhang P, Liu J; PHENIX Investigators and the CSEM group. Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a multi-center randomized trial (PHENIX/CSEM 010). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1829-1833. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001857. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jihong Liu, Ph. D principal investigator
Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing no systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in people with Cervical Cancer and Surgery, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease free survival in PHENIX-I (time frame: 3 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02642471, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2024.