AzTrials
AzTrials

Accidental FallsProfexsNCT02634736

Cluster RCT of Falls Prevention Exergames for Older Adults

A study testing Exergame plus usual treatment in people with Accidental Falls, run by University of Manchester at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cluster RCT study will investigate the effectiveness of strength/balance Exergames (exercise and computer games that use body movements as controls) developed to improve balance, function, prevent falls and increase exercise adherence for older people in the home setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Accidental Falls
What is being tested?
Exergame plus usual treatment
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
106 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Feb 2016to Sep 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • able to use gaming technology safely as assessed by the therapist, with access to television and a 2m space in the home to exercise safely (Note: Kinect-based Exergame system does not require the use of any hand-held consoles; and the exercises will be customised/tailored to each participant's needs, including those having difficulty standing a long time);
  • participants will be home-dwelling participants aged 60 years and above;
  • participants should be able to watch TV with or without glasses from a 2m distance;
  • participants should be English-speaking, and registered with primary care general practices; and
  • participants must have the mental capacity to give informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • currently using gaming technologies to exercise;
  • inability to comprehend the study procedures;
  • acute illness, severe congestive cardiac failure, uncontrolled hypertension, recent fracture or surgery;
  • Myocardial Infarction or Stroke in past 6 months;
  • severe cognitive impairment;
  • orthopaedic surgery in last 6 months, or on waiting list to have orthopaedic surgery;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • wheelchair users;
  • severe auditory or visual impairment; and
  • peripheral neuropathy or other uncontrolled medical conditions likely to compromise the ability to exercise.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Dr Emma Stanmore

    Manchester, Lancashire, M13 9PL

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Multi-centre, Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Falls Prevention Exergames With Remote Monitoring Against Standard Falls Prevention Programmes for Community Dwelling Older Adults at Risk of Falls.

This cluster RCT study will investigate the effectiveness of strength/balance Exergames (exercise and computer games that use body movements as controls) developed to improve balance, function, prevent falls and increase exercise adherence for older people in the home setting. The proposal incorporates postural stability Exergames that have been developed with users based on best evidence strength and balance exercise (OTAGO and Postural Stability) currently used by therapists, safe for older people and can be used in the home setting

Read the detailed description

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Primary Question:

To determine the effect of using MIRA falls prevention Exergames to improve balance in older adults.

Secondary Question/Objectives:

  1. What features of usual falls prevention teams routines/activities need consideration for successful implementation of the strength and balance Exergame intervention?
  2. How can the Exergames be tailored for home use for older adults?
  3. What are the most effective outcome measurements to detect meaningful changes resulting from the MIRA Exergame programme?
  4. What are the current challenges and solutions to accessing robust data depicting costs of current therapy treatment compared to home-based MIRA Exergame treatment?
  5. Is it possible to retain participants in the intervention during the 12-week MIRA Exergame intervention with respect to outcomes including motivation, enjoyment and usability?
  6. What training and support needs are required to maximise the use of the MIRA Exergame technology?
  7. What are the costs of the MIRA Exergame intervention and how cost-effectiveness is the MIRA Exergame intervention compared with usual care.
  8. What are the effects on falls and fall-related use of health services during a 6-month follow up? STUDY DESIGN \& PROTOCOL Participants This project is a cluster RCT study to test the effectiveness of undertaking MIRA Exergames in the sheltered home setting in addition to usual activities. A maximum of 12 sheltered housing units, with 108 participants will be recruited to participate in the study. These will be split into the experimental group (6 sheltered housing units with n=54) and the control group (6 sheltered housing units with n=54). These 2 groups will be based in 2 falls prevention teams in Manchester and a second site in Glasgow.

Falls prevention team staff and other professionals will also be recruited into the study (n=20) to either give their professional insights and feedback on the usability of the exergames and/or help supervise the participants.

Study Intervention Sheltered Housing facilities will be recruited via the Manchester and Glasgow Housing Associations to enable facilities of similar size and deprivation status to be identified. The sheltered housing facilities will be randomised into two groups: the Exergame/experimental group (n=6 sheltered housing units with 9 participants recruited in each); and the control group (n=6 sheltered housing units with 9 participants recruited in each). The participants in the control groups will be offered the Exergame intervention after the final 12-week measurements for ethical reasons. A pre-enrolment examination will be carried out by a trained research physiotherapist to assess each person's suitability to participate in the Kinect exergame programme, and also evaluate potential impact of the Exergames on various aspects of their physical health. Their GPs will also be notified.

The eligible participants will be given a tailored, individualised [i.e. frequency and duration will be set according to each participant's baseline levels] Exergame programme incorporated into their normal routines plus usual falls prevention treatment (prescribed by the physiotherapists). The control group will be given usual falls prevention assessment, treatment and home exercises without the Exergames. The Exergame intervention will run for 12 weeks to test the efficacy of the intervention. Outcome measures to be used during these 12 weeks will include a series of standardised tests and questionnaires. Each participant will be aided in completing these measures. These assessments will take place 3 times: at baseline, 6 weeks, and at the end of the 12-week period.

The intervention participants will be offered the use the Exergame intervention in a group setting and/or home setting according to their preferences (previously piloted in a small feasibility study). The physiotherapists and physiotherapist assistants will supervise and monitor their progress and will also have the ability to see the results of the Exergame programme (anonymised data on points gained, time used, range of motion) at the Falls Prevention Clinic for participants that consent to the sharing of this anonymised data.

At the end of the 12 weeks, focus groups and interviews will be conducted to assess the therapists and participants' perspectives regarding the effectiveness of the remote MIRA Exergame programmes and their usability.

Being tested
Exergame plus usual treatment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Exergame plus usual treatmentDevice

    An individualised [i.e. frequency and duration will be set according to each participant's baseline levels] Exergame programme incorporated into participant's normal routines plus usual falls prevention treatment (prescribed by the physiotherapists).

Study groups in NCT02634736
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Exergame plus usual treatmentExperimentalExergame programme plus usual falls prevention treatment including assessment and exercises (prescribed by the physiotherapists).
Receives: Device: Exergame plus usual treatment
Usual treatmentNo interventionNo exergame programme, just usual falls prevention treatment including assessment and exercises (prescribed by the physiotherapists).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Balance

    The Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Adherence

    Duration in minutes of use of the Exergames

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Physical activity levels

    The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly to assess user's physical activity levels

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Lower limb strength

    Timed up and go measurement of lower limb strength

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Fear of falling

    The Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) The FES-I is a validated and reliable 7-item tool that measures confidence in performing a range of activities of daily living without falling

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. Cognition

    The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACEIII) to measure cognition levels in older adults

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. Mood

    The 5-item Geriatric Depression Scale screening tool for depression in older adults

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2016
  3. Primary completionFeb 2017
  4. Study completionSep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
106 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02634736
Sponsor's protocol ID
R119047/195378
Acronym
Profexs
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
9 Dec 2015
Last updated
26 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Stanmore EK, Mavroeidi A, de Jong LD, Skelton DA, Sutton CJ, Benedetto V, Munford LA, Meekes W, Bell V, Todd C. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of strength and balance Exergames to reduce falls risk for people aged 55 years and older in UK assisted living facilities: a multi-centre, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Med. 2019 Feb 28;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1278-9.

    PubMed 30813926

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exergame plus usual treatment in people with Accidental Falls, run by University of Manchester at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Balance (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02634736, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in