AzTrials
AzTrials

Flexible FlatfootNCT02633566

Clinical Trial of the Effect of Functional Orthoses in Children With Flat Feet

A study testing Plantar orthoses in people with Flexible Flatfoot, run by Fresno, Raquel Lopez, M.D..

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficay of functional plantar orthoses on flatfoot in children. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 4 years
Conditions the study is for
Flexible Flatfoot
What is being tested?
Plantar orthoses
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
61 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2013to May 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 4 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Flexible flatfoot

Who cannot join

  • Congenital Vertical talus
  • Tarsal coalition
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Ligamentous laxity
  • Previous history of surgery on lower limb
  • Previous orthotic treatment

About this study

Official title: Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effect of Functional Orthoses on the Joint Position of the Hindfoot in Children With Flat Feet After a Year of Follow-up

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficay of functional plantar orthoses on flatfoot in children.

Read the detailed description

There's a considerable controversy regarding the effectiveness of plantar orthoses in the treatment of flexible flat foot, despite being the most widely used treatment. Several studies tried to investigate the correction of the deformity using plantar orthoses, but there are few studies with a control group of people, not enough to compare the effectiveness of the treatment.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel design clinical trial was conducted with two study groups. The sample consisted of 61 children, aged 3 and 4 years old, who were randomly assigned to each study group. One group (intervention group) received treatment with functional plantar orthotics, and the other group (control group) received treatment with placebo-type plantar orthotics, to use as a reference or comparison. Both groups were followed for a one-year period. Before delivering the treatment, all subjects underwent dorsoplantar radiography, repeated at the end of the treatment (after one year). Differences in the talus-calcaneus, tibionavicular and talus-first metatarsal angles were compared, pre and post-treatment of both study groups. Test analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed as a statistical test.

Being tested
Plantar orthoses
Keywords
Flatfoot, orthoses, children
Medical subject headings
Flatfoot

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Plantar orthosesDevice

Study groups in NCT02633566
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Functional plantar orthosesActive comparatorFunctional plantar orthoses in polypropylene with Medial Heel Skive technique
Receives: Device: Plantar orthoses
Placebo plantar orthosesPlacebo comparatorPlantar orthoses made in Ethil Vinyl Acetate (22º Shore) without correction of the pronation
Receives: Device: Plantar orthoses

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. X-ray measurements of the angles: talus-calcaneus, talus-navicular and talus-first metatarsal angle.

    Before delivering the treatment, all subjects underwent dorsoplantar radiography, repeated at the end of the treatment (after one year). Differences in the talus-calcaneus, tibionavicular and talus-first metatarsal angles were compared, pre and post-treatment of both study groups. Test analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed as a sataistical test.

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionApr 2013
  4. Study completionMay 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
61 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02633566
Sponsor's protocol ID
1
Status last verified
Dec 2015
First submitted
10 Dec 2015
Last updated
17 Dec 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Evans AM, Rome K, Carroll M, Hawke F. Foot orthoses for treating paediatric flat feet. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 26;1(1):CD006311. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006311.pub4.

    PubMed 35080267
  • Evans AM, Rome K, Carroll M, Hawke F. Foot orthoses for treating paediatric flat feet. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 14;1(1):CD006311. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006311.pub3.

    PubMed 35029841

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Plantar orthoses in people with Flexible Flatfoot, run by Fresno, Raquel Lopez, M.D..

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

X-ray measurements of the angles: talus-calcaneus, talus-navicular and talus-first metatarsal angle. (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02633566, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in