AzTrials
AzTrials

Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisNCT02632123

Validation of the Risk Stratification Score in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

An observational study of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by a poor prognosis, with a progressive decline in lung function and a considerable variability in the disease's natural history. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
How many people
260 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Dec 2015to 30 Jun 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients newly diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Who may be able to join

  • A new diagnosis of IPF based on the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria (Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;198:e44-e68) and confirmed by a panel of expert chest radiologists and lung pathologists in the context of multi-disciplinary discussion.

Who cannot join

  • Interstitial lung disease other than IPF
  • Not a new diagnosis of IPF

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Canada1 site
  • London Health Science Centre

    London, Ontario, N6A 5W9

Other trials in Canada

Italy1 site
  • Policlinico Tor Vergata

    Rome, Lazio, 00133

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by a poor prognosis, with a progressive decline in lung function and a considerable variability in the disease's natural history. Besides lung transplantation (LTx), the only available treatments are anti-fibrosing drugs, which have shown to slower the disease course. Therefore, predicting the prognosis is of pivotal importance to avoid treatment delays, which may be fatal for patients with a high risk of progression. Previous studies showed that a multi-dimensional approach is practical and effective to create a reliable prognostic score for IPF. In the RIsk Stratification scorE (RISE), physiological parameters, an objective measure of patient-reported dyspnea and exercise capacity are combined to capture different domains of the complex pathophysiology of IPF.

This is an observational, multi-centre, prospective cohort study. A development cohort and a validation cohort will be included. Patients newly diagnosed with IPF based on the ATS/ERS criteria and multi-disciplinary discussion will be included in the study. A panel of chest radiologists and lung pathologists will further assess eligibility. At the first visit (time of diagnosis), and every 4-months, MRCDS, pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC and DLCO), and 6MWD will be recorded and patients will be prospectively followed for 3 years. Comorbidities will be considered. The radiographic extent of fibrosis on HRCT will be recalculated at a 2-year interval. RISE, Gender-Age-Physiology, CPI and Mortality Risk Scoring System will be calculated at 4-month intervals. Longitudinal changes of each variable considered will be assessed. The primary endpoint is 3-year LTx-free survival from the time of diagnosis. Secondary endpoints include several, clinically-relevant information to ensure reproducibility of results across a wide range of disease severity and in concomitance of associated pulmonary hypertension, emphysema.

The present study aims at validating RISE as a simple, straightforward, inexpensive and reproducible tool to guide clinical decision making in IPF and potentially as an endpoint for future clinical trials.

Read the detailed description

This is an observational, international, prospective cohort study including 2 large tertiary referral centres for interstitial lung disease (ILD)(London, Canada and Rome, Italy). Only patients newly diagnosed with IPF based on the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria and local multi-disciplinary discussion will be included in the study.

As a further inclusion step, for all patients who did not undergo a surgical lung biopsy (SLB), a panel of 3 chest radiologists with ILD expertise will examine each HRCT and patients will be included, if at least 2 out of 3 agree on a pattern of probable/definite UIP. For patients who underwent a SLB, a panel of 3 lung pathologists with ILD expertise will examine each biopsy and patients will be included, if at least 2 out of 3 agree on a pattern of probable/definite UIP.

All known causes of ILD (occupational, environmental, domestic exposures; drug-induced lung toxicity; connective tissue disease) will carefully excluded for the patient to be included in the study. Only patients newly diagnosed with IPF at participating centres will be included in the study. Comorbidities considered will include (associated pulmonary hypertension [APH], only if right heart catheterization[RHC]-proven), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary artery disease (CAD), left heart dysfunction (LHD), and sleep apnea (SA).

A development cohort and a validation cohort will be included in the study. In both cohorts. at the first visit (time of diagnosis) and at each subsequent visit at 4-month intervals, for a period of 3 years, Medical Research Council Dyspnea Score (MRCDS), pulmonary function tests (PFTs)(forced expiratory volume during the first second [FEV1], FVC and diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide [DLCO]), and 6MWD will be recorded. 6MWD % predicted will be calculated, as previously described.

The following events will be recorded in the study: death; lung transplant (LTx) referral; LTx; acute exacerbation (AEs); hospitalization for respiratory causes; start, stop and switch of anti-fibrotic therapy; start of supplemental home oxygen therapy; start and stop of physiotherapy program enrolments; progression of disease (see secondary endpoints).

The RISE will be first calculated, as previously described, on a scale from 1 to 3. However, a modified and improved version of the RISE will also be considered, both using the CALIPER-revised Composite Physiologic index (CPI) instead of the original version of CPI, and with a new 1 to 4 scale, which may allow for better stratification for mortality risk. If superior to the previous version of RISE, the modified version will be tested for validation.

Patients will be prospectively followed for a period of 3 years from the time of diagnosis and enrolment. PFTs and 6MWD will be obtained at 4 months intervals, at each visit at participating centres. All multi-dimensional scores will be calculated at 4-months intervals corresponding to each visit. A 2nd HRCT will be obtained at the 2-year visit, or sooner if clinically indicated, and as per clinicians' discretion. The HRCT fibrosis score will be then recalculated on the 2nd scan. Deaths, LTx, AEs and hospitalizations due to respiratory causes will be recorded. All protocol violations (missing visits, delayed visits, data not obtained at individual visits) will be systematically recorded. Every interruption or change in course of therapy, as well as initiation of supplemental home oxygen therapy will be recorded. When available, hemodynamic data from RHCs will be considered. Since 2D echocardiograms alone are unreliable in predicting the presence of APH in IPF, they will not be considered.

At the end of the study period, both baseline RISE and longitudinal changes of RISE will be tested as predictors of mortality. Other individual variables will also be tested as predictors of mortality, including age at the time of diagnosis, time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis (months), gender, body mass index, smoking history (pack-years), FVC, DLCO, 6MWD (meters and % predicted), HRCT visual fibrosis score at the time of diagnosis, and other multi-dimensional scores (Gender-Age-Physiology [GAP], CPI, Mortality Risk Scoring System [MRSS]). In the validation cohort, we will seek to confirm and validate results obtained in the development cohort.

PATIENT SELECTION Inclusion criteria A new diagnosis of IPF based on ATS/ERS criteria, confirmed by local multi-disciplinary discussion (MDD). A panel of 3 chest radiologists with ILD expertise will review each HRCT and patients will be included, if at least 2 out of 3 agree on a pattern of probable/definite UIP. A panel of 3 lung pathologists with ILD expertise will review each SLB and patients will be included, if at least 2 out of 3 agree on a pattern of probable/definite UIP.

Exclusion criteria ILD other than IPF Previous (rather than new) diagnosis of IPF Exclusion determined by the chest radiologists' or lung pathologists' panel Age <18 years Patient not able to provide informed consent

MRC dyspnea score, pulmonary function tests and 6-minute walk test Dyspnea, defined as "the unpleasant sensation of labored or difficult breathing" was rated by using the MRCDS, which specifically measures perceived respiratory disability24. This scale grades the effect of breathlessness on daily activities. PFTs and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) will be performed according to ERS/ATS guidelines and the ATS guidelines, respectively. A reference equation was used to calculate 6MWD percent predicted (% pred). The distance-saturation product will be considered.

High resolution chest CT scans A quantitative fibrosis score on HRCT will be obtained at the time of diagnosis and on the repeat HRCT. The score will be calculated as previously described12 by each of the chest radiologists, and the average of the scores will then be calculated. Interobserver variability will be evaluated. The presence and severity of coronary calcifications will be evaluated as absent, mild, moderate or severe.

Longitudinal follow-up After diagnosis, patients are seen at 4-month intervals, for a period of 3 years in both the development and validation cohort. At each visit, MRCDS, PFTs and 6MWT will be obtained. Patients may be seen more often at the clinician's discretion. After completion of the 3 years follow-up period, patients who are still alive without a LTx will continue to be followed regularly until required recruitment is completed, as long-term follow-up is part of secondary endpoints.

Statistical Analysis and sample size calculation Values will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used for distribution analysis. Interobserver variability among chest radiologists and lung pathologists will be assessed with Weighted kappa coefficients29. Comparisons between survivors and non-survivors will be made with unpaired t-test or with the Mann-Whitney U-test, where appropriate. Variance inflation factors of the predicting variables included in RISE will be calculated to rule out the possibility of multicollinearity and demonstrate that the variables are truly independent30. The optimal cut-off value for different variables to endpoints will be assessed using receiver operating characteristics analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis will used to identify significant variables predicting survival status. Results will be summarized as hazard ratios, representing the relative risk of dying as a result of a specific characteristic during the observation period. Variables selected via univariate analysis (p<0.05) will be evaluated in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. Once patients are listed for LTx, death and LTx become competing events. In order to account for the competing risks of LTx and death in a population of patients undergoing LTx assessment, the Fine-Gray competing risk regression analysis will also be used to identify significant variables predicting independent survival status. Results will be summarized as subdistribution hazard ratios, representing the relative risk of dying prior to LTx. Survival will be further evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.

Keywords
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, outcome, prognosis, survival, staging
Medical subject headings
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02632123
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Development cohortPatients newly diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Validation cohortPatients newly diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Survival

    Primary outcome is lung-transplant-free 3-year survival since the time of diagnosis

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Subgroup analysis

    Comparative analysis of RISE as predictor of LTx-free survival in subgroups stratified by age; gender; baseline lung function; baseline 6MWD; baseline extent of fibrosis on HRCT; time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis; presence of APH; presence of concomitant emphysema; presence of comorbidities (COPD, CAD, LHD, SA); participating site

    Measured: 3 years

  2. Clinical progression

    Clinical progression as a predictor of mortality, defined as either: absolute decline of FVC >10% pred; decline of 6-min walk distance >50 m; hospitalization for respiratory causes; LTx assessment; or death

    Measured: 3 years

  3. Incidence of acute exacerbations

    Incidence of acute exacerbations (AEs) of IPF and its predictors, if any.

    Measured: 3 years

  4. Incidence of hospitalizations

    Incidence of hospitalizations due to respiratory causes and its predictors, if any.

    Measured: 3 years

  5. Results stratification by HRT pattern

    LTx-free survival, incidence of AEs, incidence of hospitalizations, and time to progression of patients with HRCT pattern definite/probable for UIP vs. patients with indeterminate/inconsistent pattern. In this subanalysis, 2 groups of patients matched for age, gender, BMI, and extent of fibrosis at the time of diagnosis will be considered.

    Measured: 3 years

  6. Results stratification by autoimmune markers

    LTx-free survival, incidence of AEs, incidence of hospitalizations, and time to progression of patients with autoimmune markers (although not meeting criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features vs. those without. In this subanalysis, 2 groups of patients matched for age, gender, BMI and extent of fibrosis at the time of diagnosis will be considered

    Measured: 3 years

  7. Results stratification by concomitant emphysema

    LTx-free survival, incidence of AEs, incidence of hospitalizations and time to progression of patients with concomitant emphysema vs. those without. In this subanalysis, 2 groups of patients matched for age, gender, BMI and extent of fibrosis at the time of diagnosis will be considered.

    Measured: 3 years

  8. Results stratification by anti-fibrotic treatment

    LTx-free survival, incidence of AEs, incidence of hospitalizations and time to progression of patients treated with pirfenidone vs. patients treated with nintedanib. In this subanalysis, 2 groups of patients matched for age, gender, BMI and extent of fibrosis at the time of diagnosis will be considered.

    Measured: 3 years

  9. Results stratification by anti-fibrotic treatment switch

    LTx-free survival, incidence of AEs, incidence of hospitalizations and time to progression of patients whose therapy was switched (from pirfenidone to nintedanib and viceversa). In this subanalysis, 2 groups of patients matched for age, gender, BMI and extent of fibrosis at the time of diagnosis will be considered.

    Measured: 3 years

  10. 6MWD m vs. % pred as predictors of mortality

    6-min walk distance in meters vs. percent predicted as predictors of mortality.

    Measured: 3 years

  11. Results on patient listed for lung transplant

    Survival, incidence of AEs and time to progression on the LTx list of listed patients.

    Measured: 3 years

  12. Time to progression in patients with initially non-clinically significant disease.

    Time to clinical progression in patients who initially had non-clinically significant disease

    Measured: 3 year

  13. Long-term follow-up

    Long-term follow-up (beyond 3 years) of patients who are still alive without a LTx, until required recruitment is completed. This will include LTx-free survival, incidence of AEs, incidence of hospitalizations and time to progression.

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
260 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02632123
Sponsor's protocol ID
10010803
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
13 Dec 2015
Last updated
10 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Martinez FJ, Collard HR, Pardo A, Raghu G, Richeldi L, Selman M, Swigris JJ, Taniguchi H, Wells AU. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Oct 20;3:17074. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.74.

    PubMed 29052582
  • Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Myers JL, Richeldi L, Ryerson CJ, Lederer DJ, Behr J, Cottin V, Danoff SK, Morell F, Flaherty KR, Wells A, Martinez FJ, Azuma A, Bice TJ, Bouros D, Brown KK, Collard HR, Duggal A, Galvin L, Inoue Y, Jenkins RG, Johkoh T, Kazerooni EA, Kitaichi M, Knight SL, Mansour G, Nicholson AG, Pipavath SNJ, Buendia-Roldan I, Selman M, Travis WD, Walsh S, Wilson KC; American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society. Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep 1;198(5):e44-e68. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST.

    PubMed 30168753
  • Mura M, Porretta MA, Bargagli E, Sergiacomi G, Zompatori M, Sverzellati N, Taglieri A, Mezzasalma F, Rottoli P, Saltini C, Rogliani P. Predicting survival in newly diagnosed idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a 3-year prospective study. Eur Respir J. 2012 Jul;40(1):101-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00106011. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

    PubMed 22241745
  • Ley B, Collard HR, King TE Jr. Clinical course and prediction of survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 15;183(4):431-40. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201006-0894CI. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

    PubMed 20935110
  • Farrand E, Iribarren C, Vittinghoff E, Levine-Hall T, Ley B, Minowada G, Collard HR. Impact of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Longitudinal Health-care Utilization in a Community-Based Cohort of Patients. Chest. 2021 Jan;159(1):219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.07.035. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

    PubMed 32717266
  • Nathan SD, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, du Bois RM, Fagan EA, Fishman RS, Glaspole I, Glassberg MK, Glasscock KF, King TE Jr, Lancaster L, Lederer DJ, Lin Z, Pereira CA, Swigris JJ, Valeyre D, Noble PW, Wells AU. Effect of continued treatment with pirfenidone following clinically meaningful declines in forced vital capacity: analysis of data from three phase 3 trials in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax. 2016 May;71(5):429-35. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207011. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

    PubMed 26968970
  • Collard HR, Ryerson CJ, Corte TJ, Jenkins G, Kondoh Y, Lederer DJ, Lee JS, Maher TM, Wells AU, Antoniou KM, Behr J, Brown KK, Cottin V, Flaherty KR, Fukuoka J, Hansell DM, Johkoh T, Kaminski N, Kim DS, Kolb M, Lynch DA, Myers JL, Raghu G, Richeldi L, Taniguchi H, Martinez FJ. Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An International Working Group Report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug 1;194(3):265-75. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0801CI.

    PubMed 27299520
  • Serajeddini H, Rogliani P, Mura M. Multi-dimensional Assessment of IPF Across a Wide Range of Disease Severity. Lung. 2018 Dec;196(6):707-713. doi: 10.1007/s00408-018-0152-4. Epub 2018 Aug 27.

    PubMed 30151723
  • Fisher JH, Al-Hejaili F, Kandel S, Hirji A, Shapera S, Mura M. Multi-dimensional scores to predict mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis undergoing lung transplantation assessment. Respir Med. 2017 Apr;125:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

    PubMed 28340864
  • Rozanski C, Mura M. Multi-dimensional indices to stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2014 Apr 18;31(1):8-18.

    PubMed 24751449
  • Hosein K, Le J, Mura M. Assessing the Therapeutic Response to Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Can We Do Better than with Forced Vital Capacity Alone? Lung. 2017 Feb;195(1):101-105. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9963-3. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

    PubMed 27858160
  • Taha N, D'Amato D, Hosein K, Ranalli T, Sergiacomi G, Zompatori M, Mura M. Longitudinal functional changes with clinically significant radiographic progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: are we following the right parameters? Respir Res. 2020 May 19;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01371-7.

    PubMed 32429952
  • Hosein KS, Sergiacomi G, Zompatori M, Mura M. The CALIPER-Revised Version of the Composite Physiologic Index is a Better Predictor of Survival in IPF than the Original Version. Lung. 2020 Feb;198(1):169-172. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00295-4. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

    PubMed 31792602
  • Ley B, Ryerson CJ, Vittinghoff E, Ryu JH, Tomassetti S, Lee JS, Poletti V, Buccioli M, Elicker BM, Jones KD, King TE Jr, Collard HR. A multidimensional index and staging system for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):684-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00004.

    PubMed 22586007
  • Wells AU, Desai SR, Rubens MB, Goh NS, Cramer D, Nicholson AG, Colby TV, du Bois RM, Hansell DM. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a composite physiologic index derived from disease extent observed by computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr 1;167(7):962-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2111053.

    PubMed 12663338

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Survival (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02632123, which also lists 50 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in