AzTrials
AzTrials

Uterine DiseasesHALONNCT02631837

Hysterectomy by Transabdominal Laparoscopy or NOTES

A study testing vNOTES hysterectomy and LSC hysterectomy in people with Uterine Diseases, run by Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objective: To randomly compare hysterectomy by vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) versus laparoscopy uterus in women with benign gynecological pathology. Study design: Randomized controlled/single center/single-blinded/parallel-group/non-inferiority/efficacy trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Uterine Diseases
What is being tested?
vNOTES hysterectomy and LSC hysterectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Dec 2015to 15 Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All women aged 18 to 70 years regardless of parity, with a non-prolapsed uterus in need of a hysterectomy for benign indication
  • Written informed consent obtained prior to surgery

Who cannot join

  • History of rectal surgery
  • Suspected rectovaginal endometriosis
  • Suspected malignancy
  • History of pelvic inflammatory disease, especially prior tubo-ovarian or pouch of Douglas abscess
  • Active lower genital tract infection e.g. Chlamydia, N. gonorrhoeae
  • Virgo
  • Pregnancy
  • Failure to provide written informed consent prior to surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Imelda Hospital

    Bonheiden, Antwerp, 2820

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Disease by Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery or Laparoscopy

Objective: To randomly compare hysterectomy by vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) versus laparoscopy uterus in women with benign gynecological pathology.

Study design: Randomized controlled/single center/single-blinded/parallel-group/non-inferiority/efficacy trial.

Read more

Study population: All women aged 18 to 70 years regardless of parity with a non-prolapsed uterus and a benign indication for hysterectomy.

Primary study outcome parameters: successful removal of the uterus by the intended technique.

Secondary outcomes: the proportion of women admitted to the in-hospital ward; postoperative pain scores; the total amount of analgesics used; postoperative infection; per- or postoperative complications; hospital readmission rates; duration of the surgical procedure; incidence and intensity of dyspareunia; sexual wellbeing; health-related quality of life; costs.

Read the detailed description

l1.Objectives of the HALON Trial The primary research questions of this IDEAL stage 2b efficacy trial are as follows: is a vNOTES (vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) hysterectomy at least as effective compared to the standard transabdominal laparoscopic approach (LSC) for removing a non-prolapsed uterus without the need for conversion to an alternative approach? (non inferiority design)

Secondary research questions are:

  • Do more women treated by vNOTES prefer to leave the day care unit on the day of surgery compared to LSC?
  • Do women treated by vNOTES suffer from less pain compared to women treated by LSC in the first postoperative week?
  • Is the removal of a uterus by vNOTES faster compared to LSC?
  • Does a vNOTES cause more pelvic infection or other complications compared to LSC?
  • Does a vNOTES result in more hospital readmissions within 6 weeks after surgery compared to LSC?
  • Does a vNOTES approach result in more women reporting dyspareunia, less sexual wellbeing or less health-related quality of life at 3 or 6 months after surgery when compared to women treated by LSC?
  • What are the direct and indirect costs up to 6 weeks after the surgical intervention of a vNOTES compared to LSC? 2. TRIAL DESIGN 2.1. Design A single center, single-blinded, parallel group randomized, non-inferiority efficacy trial.

2.2. Simple pilot randomized trial. 2.3. Time schedule Based upon the mean number of hysterectomies performed annually for benign gynecological disease at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the participating center (168) the investigators estimate that the duration of recruitment will be 12 months. Based upon the follow up (6 months) and the period of analysis/reporting (3 months) the total study period will be 2 years.

2.4. Participating center Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Imeldahospital Imeldalaan 9 2820 Bonheiden Belgium 3. ELIGIBILITY, CONSENT AND RANDOMIZATION 3.1. Screening and consent prior to surgery All women aged 18 to 70 years, regardless of parity, with a non-prolapsed uterus in need of a hysterectomy for benign indication are eligible for inclusion.

3.2. Determining eligibility All women aged 18 to 70 years, regardless of parity, with a non-prolapsed uterus in need of a hysterectomy for benign indication who provide consent to participation are eligible in the HALON trial and will be randomized before the procedure.

3.3. Randomization If the woman is eligible for the HALON trial, the trial secretary will obtain a randomized allocation the day before surgery. This will be done using a randomization list generated by a free computer software program offered by Research Randomizer (https://www.randomizer.org). The random sequence generation will be concealed using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. The envelope will be opened by the nurse assistant the day before surgery for practical logistic reasons.

3.4. Patients with strong preference for treatment A minority of women will express a clear preference for one of both treatments (e.g. strong desire to have no scar) and for this reason will not wish to be randomized between surgical treatments. To investigate how outcomes vary by choice, these women could be followed up in exactly the same way as for those women randomized into the HALON trial. A formal non-randomized follow-up of these women will not be done for logistical reasons.

3.5. Stratification of randomization A blocked randomization procedure will be used to avoid chance imbalances for the parameter 'uterine size'.

  1. TREATMENT ALLOCATIONS 4.1. Surgical procedures The principal investigator, who has training and experience in both laparoscopy and NOTES, will perform all surgical procedures. He is therefore not blinded. All vNOTES participants will be blinded by three superficial non-therapeutic or "mock" skin incisions similar to those done with the laparoscopic technique.

4.1.1 vNOTES hysterectomy This is the surgical procedure done in the intervention arm of the HALON trial. 4.1.2 LSC hysterectomy This is the surgical procedure done in the control arm of the HALON trial. 5. FOLLOW-UP AND OUTCOME MEASURES 5.1. Clinical assessments 5.1.1 Format PROMs (Patient reported outcomes) will be collected using a postal questionnaire, which will include a combination of disease specific (Pain on sexual intercourse measured by VAS scale and SSFS Scale) and generic measurement instruments (EQ-5D).

The postal questionnaires will be sent from the HALON Trial Office with postage paid envelopes two weeks before the due date. Reminders will be sent to patients if the questionnaire is not returned within one week of the due date and attempts will be made to contact the patient by phone if the questionnaire is not returned by two weeks after the due date.

5.1.2 Timing of assessments The primary outcome will be measured clinically at the end of the surgical procedure. In addition PROMs will take place at baseline (pain on sexual intercourse, health-related quality of life and sexual well being), the evening of the surgical intervention (in-hospital admission), during the first postoperative week (pain by VAS scores and analgetic drugs) and at 3 and 6 months (dyspareunia/ sexual well being/health related quality of life). Clinical physician assessment will take place the evening of the surgical intervention (in-hospital admission) and during the first six weeks following surgery (pelvic infection, surgical complications, hospital readmission rate).

5.2. Primary clinical outcome measure The proportion of women successfully treated by removing the uterus by the intended approach without conversion to another approach, using a dichotomous outcome measure, will be used as a measure of efficacy.

5.3. Secondary clinical outcome measures

The following secondary outcomes will be measured:

  • The proportion of women addmitted in-hospital for at least one night observation based on their own preference, as a dichotomous outcome.
  • Postoperative pain scores, as an ordinal outcome, measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) twice daily from day 1 till 7 self-reported by the participating women. The VAS scores range from 0= no pain to 10= worst imaginable pain.
  • Postoperative pain defined by the total amount of analgesics used as described in the standardized pain treatment protocol, as a continuous outcome.
  • Postoperative infection as a dichotomous outcome.
  • Per- or postoperative complications according to the Clavien- Dindo classification detected during the first six weeks of surgery, as a dichotomous outcome.
  • The number of women readmitted to hospital within 6 weeks following surgery.
  • Incidence and intensity of dyspareunia recorded by the participants at baseline, 3 and 6 months by self-reporting using a simple questionnaire and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale, as a dichotomous and ordinal outcome. The VAS scores range from 0= no pain to 10= worst imaginable pain.
  • Sexual wellbeing at baseline, at 3 and 6 months by self-reporting the Short Sexual Functioning Scale (SSFS). The SSFS is a questionnaire with 7 multiple choice open ended questions.
  • Health related quality of life, at baseline, at 3 and 6 months by self-reporting the EQ-5D-3L scale. The EQ-5D-3L scale is a questionnaire on 5 domains with 3 open ended questions and a scale from 0= worst possible health-related quality of life to 100= best possible health-related quality of life.
  • Duration of surgery measured as the time in minutes from the insertion of the bladder catheter to the end of vaginal/abdominal wound closure, as a continuous outcome. 5.4.The direct and indirect costs up to 6 weeks after the hysterectomy of the vNOTES technique compared to LSC.
  1. ACCRUAL AND ANALYSIS 6.1. Sample size The sample size for the primary outcome of this trial has been chosen to give good statistical power to preclude any clinically important inferiority of vNOTES compared to laparoscopy and is based on evidence retrieved from a Dutch prospective cohort study. Based on the power calculations for the primary outcome and assuming a loss-to-follow-up rate of 15% we decided to include 66 study participants in the HALON trial.

6.2. Projected accrual and attrition rates Based upon the mean number of hysterectomies performed annually at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the participating center (168) the investigators anticipate that the duration of recruitment will be 12 months. Based upon the follow up (6 months) and the period of analysis/reporting (3 months) the total study period will be 2 years. First publication will be possible within four years of trial commencement.

The sample size calculations have allowed for a 15% loss to follow up rate. In order to minimize rates of attrition a dedicated research secretary will be employed to optimize recruitment and follow up.

Being tested
vNOTES hysterectomy, LSC hysterectomy
Keywords
NOTES, Laparoscopic surgery
Medical subject headings
Uterine Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • vNOTES hysterectomyProcedure or surgery

    Surgical removal of the uterus by Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery using a colpotomy

  • LSC hysterectomyProcedure or surgery

    Surgical removal of the uterus by transabdominal laparoscopy

Study groups in NCT02631837
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
vNOTES hysterectomyExperimentalvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery
Receives: Procedure: vNOTES hysterectomy
LSC hysterectomyActive comparatorLaparoscopic hysterectomy
Receives: Procedure: LSC hysterectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Successful Removal of the Uterus Without Conversion to Another Technique

    Successful removal of the uterus without conversion to another technique with or without morcellation

    Measured: Intraoperative

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Admission in Hospital for at Least One Night Observation

    The number of women admitted in-hospital for at least one night observation based on their own preference after discharge from the day care unit, as a dichotomous outcome. The decision to discharge or to admit to hospital for the night will be based solely on the choice of the woman to return home the same day or stay overnight.

    Measured: Measured on the day of the surgical intervention

  2. Postoperative Pain Scores

    Postoperative pain scores, as an ordinal outcome, measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) twice daily (morning and evening) from day 1 till 7 selfreported by the participating women. VAS scores from 0 to 10 with 0 = no pain and 10= worst pain ever imaginable.

    Measured: The first seven days after the surgical intervention

  3. The Use of Analgetic Drugs for Postoperative Pain

    Postoperative pain defined by the total amount of analgesics used as described in the standardized pain treatment protocol, as a continuous outcome.

    Measured: The first week after the surgical intervention

  4. Postoperative Infection

    Postoperative infection defined by lower abdominal pain with fever > 38°C and positive clinical signs or laboratory findings, detected during the first six weeks of surgery, as a dichotomous outcome.

    Measured: The first six weeks after the surgical intervention

  5. Intra- Operative Complications

    Intra- operative complications according to the Clavien- Dindo classification detected during the first six weeks of surgery, as a dichotomous outcome

    Measured: At the time of the surgical intervention

  6. Postoperative Complications

    Postoperative complications detected during the first six weeks of surgery, as a dichotomous outcome

    Measured: The first six weeks after the surgical intervention

  7. Hospital Readmission

    The number of women readmitted to hospital within six weeks following surgery, as a dichotomous outcome.

    Measured: The first six weeks after the surgical intervention

  8. Duration of the Surgical Intervention

    Duration of surgery measured as the time in minutes from the insertion of the bladder catheter to the end of vaginal/ abdominal wound closure, as a continuous outcome

    Measured: Intraoperative

  9. Vaginal Pain During Sexual Intercourse at Three Months

    Incidence of vaginal dyspareunia recorded by the participants at 3 months by self-reporting using a simple questionnaire.

    Measured: At 3 months after the surgical intervention

  10. Vaginal Pain During Sexual Intercourse at Six Months

    Incidence of vaginal dyspareunia recorded by the participants at 6 months by self-reporting using a simple questionnaire

    Measured: At 6 months after the surgical intervention

  11. Pelvic Pain During Sexual Intercourse at Three Months

    Incidence of pelvic dyspareunia recorded by the participants at 3 months by self-reporting using a simple questionnaire.

    Measured: At 3 months after the surgical intervention

  12. Pelvic Pain During Sexual Intercourse at Six Months

    Incidence of pelvic dyspareunia recorded by the participants at 6 months by self-reporting using a simple questionnaire.

    Measured: At 6 months after the surgical intervention

  13. Health-related Quality of Life at Three Months

    Health-related quality of life at 3 months by self-reporting the EQ-5D scale.The reported values for the health-related quality of life are self-reported values using the VAS part of the two part EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. The scale ranges from 0 (worst quality) to 100 (best quality).

    Measured: At 3 months after the surgical intervention

  14. Health-related Quality of Life at Six Months

    Health-related quality of life at 6 months by self-reporting the EQ-5D scale. The reported values for the health-related quality of life are self-reported values using the VAS part of the two part EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. The scale ranges from 0 (worst quality) to 100 (best quality).

    Measured: At 6 months after the surgical intervention

  15. Sexual Well Being

    Sexual wellbeing at baseline, at 3 and 6 months by self-reporting using the SSFS (Short Sexual Function Scale). The SSFS is a questionnaire of 7 open ended questions on sexual wellbeing.

    Measured: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months after the surgical intervention

  16. Direct Costs

    Calculating the comparative direct costs in USD of both techniques up to 6 weeks after the surgical intervention

    Measured: Up to 6 weeks postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2015
  3. Primary completion24 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion15 Jul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02631837
Sponsor's protocol ID
B689201526261
Acronym
HALON
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
9 Dec 2015
Last updated
11 Apr 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Interim analyses of major endpoints will be supplied, in strict confidence, to an independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee (DMEC) along with updates on results of other related studies, and any other analyses that the DMEC may request.

Publications

  • Reynders A, Baekelandt J. Adnexectomy by Poor Man's Transvaginal NOTES. Gynecol Surg 2015; 12: 207-11

  • Van Peer S, Baekelandt J. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy: a first series demonstrating how a new surgical technique can be applied in a low-resource setting. Gynecol Surg 2015; 12: 299-302

  • Baekelandt J, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, Weyers S, Mol BW, Bosteels JJ. HALON-hysterectomy by transabdominal laparoscopy or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a randomised controlled trial (study protocol). BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 12;6(8):e011546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011546.

    PubMed 27519922
  • Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, Weyers S, Mol B, Bosteels J. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):105-113. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15504.

    PubMed 30325565
  • Su H, Yen CF, Wu KY, Han CM, Lee CL. Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): feasibility of an innovative approach. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;51(2):217-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.04.009.

    PubMed 22795097
  • Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Wu PJ, Han CM, Yen CF. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):818-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

    PubMed 24681063
  • Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, Schoonyoung H, Quinteros F, Hunter L, Larach S. Vaginal Access Minimally Invasive Surgery (VAMIS): A New Approach to Hysterectomy. Surg Innov. 2015 Aug;22(4):344-7. doi: 10.1177/1553350614560273. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

    PubMed 25432882
  • Yang YS, Kim SY, Hur MH, Oh KY. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case-matched study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):624-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

    PubMed 24462594
  • Wang CJ, Huang HY, Huang CY, Su H. Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for nonprolapsed uteri. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jan;29(1):100-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3639-y. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

    PubMed 25270610
  • Baekelandt J. Total Vaginal NOTES Hysterectomy: A New Approach to Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):1088-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 May 22.

    PubMed 26009278

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing vNOTES hysterectomy and LSC hysterectomy in people with Uterine Diseases, run by Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Jun 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Successful Removal of the Uterus Without Conversion to Another Technique (time frame: Intraoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02631837, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in