AzTrials
AzTrials

Retraction of the Pars Tensa of the Tympanic MembraneBETNCT02631187

Feasibility Study of Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty (BET)

A study testing Bielefeld balloon in people with Retraction of the Pars Tensa of the Tympanic Membrane and Eustachian Tube Dysfunction, run by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study that aims to evaluate the feasibility of undertaking a United Kingdom (UK) multi-centre randomised controlled trial of BET for the treatment of moderate (grade 2 or 3) retraction pockets (RPs). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Bielefeld balloon
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Mar 2016to Mar 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients over 18 years old with grade 2-3 retraction pocket of the tympanic membrane as assessed by study clinician.

Who cannot join

  • Craniofacial abnormalities (assessed by history and examination)
  • Cholesteatoma (assessed by history, otoscopy, tympanogram, PTA)
  • Nasopharyngeal tumours (assessed by flexible nasendoscopy)
  • Adenoid hypertrophy (assessed by flexible nasendoscopy)
  • Patulous ET (assessed by history, otoscopy and tympanogram)
  • Previous middle ear surgery (assessed by history and otoscopy)
  • Concurrent use of anticoagulant medication

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

    Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8DH

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Feasibility Study of Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty (BET) for Grade 2 and 3 Pars Tensa Retractions

This is a study that aims to evaluate the feasibility of undertaking a United Kingdom (UK) multi-centre randomised controlled trial of BET for the treatment of moderate (grade 2 or 3) retraction pockets (RPs). This future study will aim to address the question: Does BET improve symptoms scores, audiometry and otoscopic appearance of Grade 2-3 pars tensa RPs in adult patients?

Currently conservative treatments for this condition has been shown to be ineffective; there is a significant risk of progression to hearing loss or more serious complications in untreated retraction pockets; and the surgical treatments available to us in the UK not only have a number of risks and drawbacks, but also do not aim to treat the underlying cause (Eustachian Tube dysfunction (ETD)).

Being tested
Bielefeld balloon
Keywords
Grade 2 retraction of the pars tensa of the tympanic membrane, Grade 3 retraction of the pars tensa of the tympanic membrane

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bielefeld balloonDevice

    Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty = dilatation of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube with a balloon catheter device performed with endoscopic control under general anaesthetic

Study groups in NCT02631187
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Balloon Eustachian TuboplastyExperimentalBalloon Eustachian tuboplasty = dilatation of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube with a balloon catheter device performed with endoscopic control under general anaesthetic
Receives: Device: Bielefeld balloon

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Acceptability

    Acceptability of the procedure, which will be assessed with pre- and post-procedure using the the seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7).

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Patient Focus Group

    Thematic analysis of Patient Focus Group discussions. Standardised questions and focus group discussion with patients with (i) un-operated asymptomatic Retraction Pockets (RPs), (ii) un-operated symptomatic RPs, (iii) RPs treated with cartilage tympanoplasty, and (iv) RPs treated with BET. These will qualitatively assess (as appropriate) positive and negative aspects of patient experience, such as living with the RP, the procedure itself, their recovery, any after effects, and participating in the study. Focus groups will consist of 6 patients in each group.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Complications

    An assessment of the number of complications in the 20 participants undergoing BET will also be performed as a marker of safety of the procedure.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Demand

    Demand assessed by recruitment rate

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Cost analysis of treatment

    Cost analysis of BET vs. cartilage tympanoplasty

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Comparison of otoendoscopy images

    Comparison of otoendoscopy images by two experienced observers and computer software (ImageJ). Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.

    Measured: Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.

  4. Ability to perform Valsalva

    Ability to perform Valsalva measured as always, sometimes or never. Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6.

    Measured: Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.

  5. Tympanometry

    Tympanometry (peak middle ear pressure and compliance, and Jerger grade (Improved, unchanged, worse)). Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.

    Measured: Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.

  6. pure-tone average (PTA) hearing loss

    PTA (air conduction at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8kHz; bone conduction at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 kHz) with calculation of air bone gap at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4kHz. Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months

    Measured: Assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention at 2 weeks and 6 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2017
  4. Study completionMar 2017

Why it stopped: Inability to recruit any trial partcipants

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02631187
Sponsor's protocol ID
15/P/164
Acronym
BET
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
1 Dec 2015
Last updated
17 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Swords C, Smith ME, Patel A, Norman G, Llewellyn A, Tysome JR. Balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube for obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 26;2(2):CD013429. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013429.pub2.

    PubMed 40008607

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bielefeld balloon in people with Retraction of the Pars Tensa of the Tympanic Membrane and Eustachian Tube Dysfunction, run by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Acceptability (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02631187, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in